• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of jepicomhInstructions for authorsCurrent TOCJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health
J Epidemiol Community Health. Jun 1994; 48(3): 297–305.
PMCID: PMC1059963

Antenatal screening: its use in assessing obstetric risk factors in Zimbabwe.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE--To assess the predictive utility of obstetric risk factors for identifying before the onset of labour those women at high risk of obstetric complications in a developing world setting, where home deliveries predominate and emergency transport is scarce. DESIGN--Risk factors derived from two population based, case-control studies (one of cephalopelvic disproportion and one of post partum haemorrhage), carried out in Zimbabwe were used to construct weighted and unweighted scores, a variety of screening algorithms, and sets of probabilities estimated from logistic regression models. These screening tests were evaluated for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and "cost" (the proportion of the population testing positive). Each complication was evaluated separately and the two were then pooled. PARTICIPANTS--All were Harare residents with singleton, vertex deliveries and spontaneous onset of labour. A total of 201 experienced cephalopelvic disproportion, 150 had post partum haemorrhage, and 299 had normal, unassisted deliveries. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS--Largely because of the very low incidence of the two complications studied (1% or less), positive predictive values were low (less than 7%). Holding "cost" constant at 10%, a screening test for cephalopelvic disproportion could predict 42.3% of cases compared with only 35.0% of those with post partum haemorrhage. Weighted scores had little advantage over unweighted ones, and probabilities from the logistic regression models did not differentiate cases from controls very well. CONCLUSIONS--With simple algorithms based on maternal height, parity, and obstetric history, more than one third of women at risk for potentially fatal complications could be identified at relatively small cost to themselves or the health care system.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.6M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Adelstein P, Fedrick J. Antenatal identification of women at increased risk of being delivered of a low birth weight infant at term. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1978 Jan;85(1):8–11. [PubMed]
  • Aubry RH, Nesbitt RE., Jr High risk obstetrics. I. Perinatal outcome in relation to a broadened approach to obstetric care for patients at special risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1969 Sep 15;105(2):241–247. [PubMed]
  • Kaminski M, Goujard J, Rumeau-Rouquette C. Prediction of low birthweight and prematurity by a multiple regression analysis with maternal characteristics known since the beginning of the pregnancy. Int J Epidemiol. 1973 Summer;2(2):195–204. [PubMed]
  • Royston E, Lopez AD. On the assessment of maternal mortality. World Health Stat Q. 1987;40(3):214–224. [PubMed]
  • Tsu VD. Maternal height and age: risk factors for cephalopelvic disproportion in Zimbabwe. Int J Epidemiol. 1992 Oct;21(5):941–946. [PubMed]
  • Everette VJ. The relationship between maternal height and cephalopelvic disproportion in Dar es Salaam. East Afr Med J. 1975 May;52(5):251–256. [PubMed]
  • Fuchs K, Peretz BA, Marcovici R, Paldi E, Timor-Tritsh I. The "grand multipara"--is it a problem? A review of 5785 cases. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1985 Sep;23(4):321–326. [PubMed]
  • Liljestrand J, Bergström S, Westman S. Maternal height and perinatal outcome in Mozambique. J Trop Pediatr. 1985 Dec;31(6):306–310. [PubMed]
  • Mtimavalye LA, van der Does CD, Maathuis JB. The relationship between increasing birthweight and cephalopelvic disproportion in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1974 May;81(5):380–382. [PubMed]
  • Horton T, Chase ES. A STUDY OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SCORE SYSTEM TO THE SANITARY QUALITY OF PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES IN NEW YORK STATE. Am J Public Health (N Y) 1917 Apr;7(4):380–390. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Prendiville W, Elbourne D, Chalmers I. The effects of routine oxytocic administration in the management of the third stage of labour: an overview of the evidence from controlled trials. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988 Jan;95(1):3–16. [PubMed]
  • Begley CM. A comparison of 'active' and 'physiological' management of the third stage of labour. Midwifery. 1990 Mar;6(1):3–17. [PubMed]
  • Bullough CH, Msuku RS, Karonde L. Early suckling and postpartum haemorrhage: controlled trial in deliveries by traditional birth attendants. Lancet. 1989 Sep 2;2(8662):522–525. [PubMed]
  • Aitken IW, Walls B. Maternal height and cephalopelvic disproportion in Sierra Leone. Trop Doct. 1986 Jul;16(3):132–134. [PubMed]
  • Walther FJ. At-risk selection and outcome studied at the Kibara Hospital antenatal clinic in Tanzania. Trop Geogr Med. 1980 Dec;32(4):336–339. [PubMed]
  • Bauer O, Kingu R, Laussen T, Mbwana K. Pelvic assessment and cephalo-pelvic disproportion in Central Tanzania. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1988 Dec;27(3):323–325. [PubMed]
  • Lennox CE. Assessment of obstetric high risk factors in a developing country. Trop Doct. 1984 Jul;14(3):125–129. [PubMed]
  • Essex BJ, Everett VJ. Use of an action-orientated record for antenatal screening. Trop Doct. 1977 Jul;7(3):134–138. [PubMed]
  • Sogbanmu MO. Perinatal mortality and maternal mortality in General Hospital, Ondo, Nigeria use of high-risk pregnancy predictive scoring index. Niger Med J. 1979 Apr;9(4):475–479. [PubMed]
  • Leke RJ, Nasah BT, Mtango FD. Introduction of high risk pregnancy care in rural Cameroon: health service research approach. J Obstet Gynaecol East Cent Africa. 1988 May;7(7):7–10. [PubMed]
  • Watson DS. Use of "at risk" antenatal score card by aboriginal health workers in Arnhem Land. Trop Doct. 1984 Jul;14(3):133–135. [PubMed]
  • Araujo G, Araujo L, Janowitz B, Wallace S, Potts M. Improving obstetric care in northeast Brazil. Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1983;17(3):233–242. [PubMed]
  • Pregnancy risk factor assessment--north area of Santiago, Chile, 1982-1983. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1985 Jun 7;34(22):335–337. [PubMed]
  • Kumar V, Datta N. Home-based mothers' health records. World Health Forum. 1988;9(1):107–110. [PubMed]
  • Herman AA, Irwig LM, Groeneveld HT. Evaluating obstetric risk scores by receiver operating characteristic curves. Am J Epidemiol. 1988 Apr;127(4):831–842. [PubMed]
  • Marshall VA. A comparison of two obstetric risk assessment tools. J Nurse Midwifery. 1989 Jan-Feb;34(1):3–7. [PubMed]
  • Morrison I, Carter L, McNamara S, Cheang M. A simplified intrapartum numerical scoring system. The prediction of high risk in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Sep 15;138(2):175–180. [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...