• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of jmedgeneJournal of Medical GeneticsCurrent TOCInstructions for authors
J Med Genet. Jun 1998; 35(6): 482–490.
PMCID: PMC1051343

Maternal age specific risk rate estimates for Down syndrome among live births in whites and other races from Ohio and metropolitan Atlanta, 1970-1989.

Abstract

Our primary objective was to estimate, by one year and five year intervals, maternal age specific risk rates for Down syndrome among whites and among other races from two different populations, metropolitan Atlanta and south west Ohio, using live birth and prenatally diagnosed cases ascertained during 1970-1989. The five year estimates were also calculated separately for each of the five four year periods during these 20 years. Additionally, we compared two different methods of estimating these risk rates by using a third population of whites, and compared two different statistical methods of smoothing the risk rates. The results indicate good agreement between the metropolitan Atlanta and south west Ohio estimates within races, but show a statistically significant difference between the two race categories. Because 86% of live births in the "other races" category in the combined population are to blacks, these data may be seen as the first estimates of maternal age specific risk rates for Down syndrome among blacks calculated by one year intervals. We found excellent agreement in the risk rate estimates among the five four year time periods, between the estimates obtained by using the two different methods of estimation, and between the estimates obtained using the two different methods of statistical smoothing. Our estimated risk rates for white women in their 20s strongly reinforce those from previous studies currently being used for genetic counselling purposes. While we did find somewhat higher rates for women under 20, and increasingly higher rates for those over 30 years of age, these differences are not substantial. Thus, this study in general supports the risk rates estimated from data collected mostly during the 1960s and 1970s.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.7M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • COLLMANN RD, STOLLER A. A survey of mongoloid births in Victoria, Australia, 1942-1957. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1962 May;52:813–829. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Trimble BK, Baird PA. Maternal age and Down syndrome: age-specific incidence rates by single-year intervals. Am J Med Genet. 1978;2(1):1–5. [PubMed]
  • Hook EB, Lindsjö A. Down syndrome in live births by single year maternal age interval in a Swedish study: comparison with results from a New York State study. Am J Hum Genet. 1978 Jan;30(1):19–27. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sutherland GR, Clisby SR, Bloor G, Carter RF. Down's syndrome in South Australia. Med J Aust. 1979 Jul 28;2(2):58–61. [PubMed]
  • Young ID, Williams EM, Newcombe RG. Down syndrome and maternal age in South Glamorgan. J Med Genet. 1980 Dec;17(6):433–436. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Koulischer L, Gillerot Y. Down's syndrome in Wallonia (South Belgium), 1971-1978: cytogenetics and incidence. Hum Genet. 1980;54(2):243–250. [PubMed]
  • Staples AJ, Sutherland GR, Haan EA, Clisby S. Epidemiology of Down syndrome in South Australia, 1960-89. Am J Hum Genet. 1991 Nov;49(5):1014–1024. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hook EB, Chambers GM. Estimated rates of Down syndrome in live births by one year maternal age intervals for mothers aged 20-49 in a New York State study-implications of the risk figures for genetic counseling and cost-benefit analysis of prenatal diagnosis programs. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1977;13(3A):123–141. [PubMed]
  • Hook EB, Fabia JJ. Frequency of Down syndrome in livebirths by single-year maternal age interval: results of a Massachusetts study. Teratology. 1978 Jun;17(3):223–228. [PubMed]
  • Huether CA, Gummere GR, Hook EB, Dignan PS, Volodkevich H, Barg M, Ludwig DA, Lamson SH. Down's syndrome: percentage reporting on birth certificates and single year maternal age risk rates for Ohio 1970-79: comparison with upstate New York data. Am J Public Health. 1981 Dec;71(12):1367–1372. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Zarfas DE, Wolf LC. Maternal age patterns and the incidence of Down's syndrome. Am J Ment Defic. 1979 Jan;83(4):353–359. [PubMed]
  • Barsel-Bowers G, Abuelo DN, Pueschel SM. Incidence of Down's syndrome in Rhode Island. JAMA. 1982 Aug 13;248(6):645–645. [PubMed]
  • Edmonds LD, Layde PM, James LM, Flynt JW, Erickson JD, Oakley GP., Jr Congenital malformations surveillance: two American systems. Int J Epidemiol. 1981 Sep;10(3):247–252. [PubMed]
  • Goodwin BA, Huether CA. Revised estimates and projections of Down syndrome births in the United States, and the effects of prenatal diagnosis utilization, 1970-2002. Prenat Diagn. 1987 May;7(4):261–271. [PubMed]
  • Johnson KM, Huether CA, Hook EB, Crowe CA, Reeder BA, Sommer A, McCorquodale MM, Cross PK. False-positive reporting of Down syndrome on Ohio and New York birth certificates. Genet Epidemiol. 1985;2(2):123–131. [PubMed]
  • Hook EB, Topol BB, Cross PK. The natural history of cytogenetically abnormal fetuses detected at midtrimester amniocentesis which are not terminated electively: new data and estimates of the excess and relative risk of late fetal death associated with 47,+21 and some other abnormal karyotypes. Am J Hum Genet. 1989 Dec;45(6):855–861. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lamson SH, Hook EB. A simple function for maternal-age-specific rates of Down syndrome in the 20-to-49-year age range and its biological implications. Am J Hum Genet. 1980 Sep;32(5):743–753. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Cuckle HS, Wald NJ, Thompson SG. Estimating a woman's risk of having a pregnancy associated with Down's syndrome using her age and serum alpha-fetoprotein level. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987 May;94(5):387–402. [PubMed]
  • Hecht CA, Hook EB. The imprecision in rates of Down syndrome by 1-year maternal age intervals: a critical analysis of rates used in biochemical screening. Prenat Diagn. 1994 Aug;14(8):729–738. [PubMed]
  • Lindsjö A. Down's syndrome in Sweden. An epidemiological study of a three-year material. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1974 Jul;63(4):571–576. [PubMed]
  • Krivchenia E, Huether CA, Edmonds LD, May DS, Guckenberger S. Comparative epidemiology of Down syndrome in two United States population, 1970-1989. Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Apr 15;137(8):815–828. [PubMed]
  • Bell JA. The epidemiology of Down's syndrome. Med J Aust. 1991 Jul 15;155(2):115–117. [PubMed]
  • Down syndrome prevalence at birth--United States, 1983-1990. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1994 Aug 26;43(33):617–622. [PubMed]
  • Brett KM, Schoendorf KC, Kiely JL. Differences between black and white women in the use of prenatal care technologies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Jan;170(1 Pt 1):41–46. [PubMed]
  • Kuppermann M, Gates E, Washington AE. Racial-ethnic differences in prenatal diagnostic test use and outcomes: preferences, socioeconomics, or patient knowledge? Obstet Gynecol. 1996 May;87(5 Pt 1):675–682. [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Medical Genetics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links