Display Settings:

Items per page
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information

Results: 8

1.
FIG. 6

FIG. 6. From: Structural Determinants of SHP-2 Function and Specificity in Xenopus Mesoderm Induction.

Deletion of the C-terminal prolines has no effect on the ability of SHP-2 to rescue the ΔP block. Representative experimental results show animal cap elongation and protein levels. (A) bFGF-stimulated animal caps from embryos injected with the indicated mRNAs. (B) Immunoblot analysis, as described for Fig. 2B. (C) Quantitation of animal cap elongation, as for Fig. 2D. Percentages are based on a minimum of 37 total animal caps in two or more separate experiments.

Alana M. O’Reilly, et al. Mol Cell Biol. 1998 January;18(1):161-177.
2.
FIG. 5

FIG. 5. From: Structural Determinants of SHP-2 Function and Specificity in Xenopus Mesoderm Induction.

Mutation of tyrosines to phenylalanines does not affect the ability of full-length SHP-2 to rescue the ΔP block. (A) bFGF-stimulated animal caps at stage 10.5 from embryos injected with the indicated mRNA. Shown are caps injected with ΔP alone (ΔP), ΔP plus WT full-length SHP-2 (ΔP + FL), and ΔP plus the indicated single or double tyrosyl phosphorylation site mutants. (B) Immunoblot analysis of SHP-2 expression, as described for Fig. 2B. (C) Quantitation of animal cap elongation, as for Fig. 2D. Percentages are based on a minimum of 70 total animal caps in three or more separate experiments.

Alana M. O’Reilly, et al. Mol Cell Biol. 1998 January;18(1):161-177.
3.

FIG. 4. From: Structural Determinants of SHP-2 Function and Specificity in Xenopus Mesoderm Induction.

Tyrosine-to-phenylalanine mutations do not affect the ability of ΔP to block bFGF signaling. Representative experimental results show animal cap elongation, protein levels, and MAPK activation. (A) bFGF-stimulated animal caps at stage 10.5, prepared from embryos injected with the indicated mRNA. (B) Immunoblot analysis, carried out as described for Fig. 2B. Positions of ΔP proteins and WT full-length SHP-2 (FL) are indicated. In this exposure, endogenous Xenopus SHP-2 levels are too low to be detected. The injected mRNA is indicated beneath each lane. (C) MAPK activation in animal caps assayed as described for Fig. 2C. The injected mRNA is indicated beneath each lane. XMAPK, Xenopus MAPK. (D) Quantitation of animal cap elongation, as for Fig. 2D. The injected mRNA is indicated beneath each lane. Percentages are based on a minimum of 45 total animal caps in three or more separate experiments.

Alana M. O’Reilly, et al. Mol Cell Biol. 1998 January;18(1):161-177.
4.
FIG. 8

FIG. 8. From: Structural Determinants of SHP-2 Function and Specificity in Xenopus Mesoderm Induction.

The ΔP block is partially rescued by coexpression of a chimera containing the PTP domain of SHP-2. Representative experimental results show animal cap elongation, protein levels, muscle actin induction, and MAPK activation. (A) bFGF-stimulated animal caps at stage 10.5 from embryos injected with the indicated mRNAs. Note that ΔP is fully rescued by coexpression of WT full-length SHP-2 (ΔP + FL) and partially rescued upon coexpression of the 12 chimera (ΔP + 12). (B) Immunoblot analysis carried out as for Fig. 2B, except that an antibody directed against the C terminus of SHP-2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was used to allow comparison of the levels of full-length SHP-2, ΔP, and the 12 chimera protein, which share the C terminus of SHP-2 (see Materials and Methods for details). (C) Northern blot analysis of induction of muscle actin mRNA, as for Fig. 3C. (D) MAPK activation in animal caps injected with the indicated constructs, analyzed as for Fig. 2C. XMAPK, Xenopus MAPK. (E) Quantitation of animal cap elongation, as in Fig. 2D. Percentages are based on a minimum of 88 total animal caps in three or more separate experiments.

Alana M. O’Reilly, et al. Mol Cell Biol. 1998 January;18(1):161-177.
5.
FIG. 1

FIG. 1. From: Structural Determinants of SHP-2 Function and Specificity in Xenopus Mesoderm Induction.

Microinjection constructs: schematic representations of human SHP-2 and chimeric cDNA clones showing functional domains that might participate in bFGF signaling, including the two SH2 domains, the SH2-PTP linker, the PTP domain, the C-terminal tyrosine phosphorylation sites, and the proline-rich region. Amino acid numbers corresponding to human SHP-2 (24) are indicated above the diagram. (A) Full-length SHP-2 and ΔP, a mutant with a 31-amino-acid deletion in the PTP domain, which acts as a dominant negative mutant. (B) SH2 domain mutants with point mutations in the essential βb5 arginine of both SH2 domains (R32,138K) or individual N-SH2 (R32K) or C-SH2 (R138K) domains in the context of WT SHP-2 or ΔP, as indicated. (C) C-terminal tail mutants with tyrosine (Y)-to-phenylalanine (F) mutations at position 542 and/or 580 in the context of WT SHP-2 or ΔP, as indicated. Δpro, 10-amino-acid deletion of the proline-rich region between the two tyrosines. (D) Chimeras between SHP-2 and SHP-1. SHP-1 domains (white boxes) and SHP-2 domains (black boxes) are indicated. Shown are SHP-1; the 21 chimera, containing the SH2 domains and linker region of SHP-2 fused to the PTP and C-terminal tail of SHP-1; the 212 chimera, containing the SH2 domains and linker of SHP-2 fused to the PTP domain of SHP-1 and the C-terminal tail of SHP-2; and the 12 chimera, containing the SH2 domains of SHP-1 fused to the linker, PTP domain, and C-terminal tail of SHP-2.

Alana M. O’Reilly, et al. Mol Cell Biol. 1998 January;18(1):161-177.
6.

FIG. 7. From: Structural Determinants of SHP-2 Function and Specificity in Xenopus Mesoderm Induction.

Chimeras containing the PTP domain of SHP-1 act as dominant negative mutants in the animal cap assay. Representative experimental results show animal cap elongation, protein levels, muscle actin induction, and MAPK activation. (A) bFGF-stimulated animal caps at stage 10.5 from embryos injected with either ΔP or the 21 chimera. Note that the two constructs block elongation equivalently. (B) Immunoblot analysis as described for Fig. 2B and MAPK activation in animal caps, assessed as for Fig. 2C. The injected mRNA is indicated beneath each lane. XMAPK, Xenopus MAPK. (C) bFGF-stimulated animal caps at stage 10.5. Shown are caps from embryos injected with ΔP alone (ΔP), ΔP plus WT full-length SHP-2 (ΔP + FL), the 212 chimera alone (212), and the 212 chimera plus WT full-length SHP-2 (212 + FL). (D) Immunoblot analysis as in Fig. 2B. (E) Northern blot analysis of muscle actin mRNA induction, carried out as for Fig. 3C. No muscle actin band is seen in either the ΔP or the 212 lane, even upon longer exposure. (F) MAPK activation in animal caps, as in Fig. 2C. The injected mRNA is indicated beneath each lane. (G) Quantitation of animal cap elongation, as in Fig. 2D. Percentages are based on a minimum of 45 total animal caps in three or more separate experiments.

Alana M. O’Reilly, et al. Mol Cell Biol. 1998 January;18(1):161-177.
7.
FIG. 3

FIG. 3. From: Structural Determinants of SHP-2 Function and Specificity in Xenopus Mesoderm Induction.

Intact SH2 domains are required for SHP-2 to rescue the ΔP-induced block of bFGF signaling. Representative experimental results show elongation, protein levels, muscle actin induction, and MAPK activation in response to bFGF stimulation of animal caps from embryos injected with the indicated RNAs. (A) bFGF-stimulated animal caps at stage 10.5 were analyzed as for Fig. 2A. Shown are caps from embryos injected with ΔP alone (ΔP), with ΔP plus WT SHP-2 (ΔP + FL), or with ΔP plus the indicated increasing amounts of the R32,138K mutant (1×, 5×, and 10×). (B) Immunoblot analysis of the injected animal caps from panel A. (C) Northern blot analysis of induction of the mesoderm-specific marker muscle actin. Caps collected at stage 21 were analyzed for expression of muscle actin (lowest band). The two upper bands represent cytoplasmic actin, which cross-reacts with the probe and acts as a loading control for the experiment. The injected mRNA is indicated beneath each lane. (D) MAPK activation in animal caps injected with the indicated constructs, monitored as described for Fig. 2D. XMAPK, Xenopus MAPK. (E) Quantitation of animal cap elongation, as described for Fig. 2D. The injected mRNA is indicated beneath each lane. Percentages are based on a minimum of 30 total animal caps in three separate experiments.

Alana M. O’Reilly, et al. Mol Cell Biol. 1998 January;18(1):161-177.
8.
FIG. 2

FIG. 2. From: Structural Determinants of SHP-2 Function and Specificity in Xenopus Mesoderm Induction.

SH2 domains are required for ΔP to act as a dominant negative mutant. Representative experimental results show animal cap elongation, protein levels, and MAPK activation following injection of the indicated SHP-2 mutants. (A) bFGF-stimulated animal caps at stage 10.5. The injected mRNA is indicated beneath each panel. C+, uninjected animal caps stimulated for 2 h with bFGF (100 ng/ml). These caps are elongated. In contrast, ΔP-injected caps (ΔP) show no elongation and are scored as blocked. 1× and 5×, concentrations used (see Materials and Methods). (B) Immunoblot analysis of injected animal caps at stage 8. Total lysates of animal caps were probed with anti-PTP1D/SHP-2 monoclonal antibodies (Transduction Laboratories). ΔP proteins are indicated (lower band). This antibody cross-reacts with endogenous Xenopus SHP-2 (XSHP2), which serves as a loading control. The injected mRNA is indicated beneath each lane. (C) MAPK activation in animal caps stimulated with bFGF (100 ng/ml) at 25°C for 5 min. Total lysates of animal caps were probed with anti-Xenopus MAPK (anti-XMAPK antibodies) (see Materials and Methods). The injected mRNA is indicated beneath each lane. The amount of R138/ΔP injected here is equivalent to 5× in panel A. (D) Quantitation of animal cap elongation. Mean percentages of elongated caps are shown. Error bars show the standard error of the mean for each injected mRNA. Injected mRNA is indicated beneath each lane. Percentages are based on a minimum of 45 total animal caps in three or more separate experiments.

Alana M. O’Reilly, et al. Mol Cell Biol. 1998 January;18(1):161-177.

Display Settings:

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Write to the Help Desk