We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information

Results: 4

1.
Fig 1

Fig 1. From: Prevalence of C-Shaped Root Canals in Iranian Population: A Systematic Review.

Classification of C-shaped canal configuration. (From Fan B, J Endod 2004; 30: 899–903)[9]

Mandana Naseri, et al. J Dent (Tehran). 2013 March;10(2):186-196.
2.
Fig 3

Fig 3. From: Prevalence of C-Shaped Root Canals in Iranian Population: A Systematic Review.

Measurement of angles for the C3 canal. Both angle ά and angle β are less than 60°

Mandana Naseri, et al. J Dent (Tehran). 2013 March;10(2):186-196.
3.
Fig 4

Fig 4. From: Prevalence of C-Shaped Root Canals in Iranian Population: A Systematic Review.

Geographic distribution of the selected studies and their related prevalence of C- shaped canals in mandibular second molars

Mandana Naseri, et al. J Dent (Tehran). 2013 March;10(2):186-196.
4.
Fig 2

Fig 2. From: Prevalence of C-Shaped Root Canals in Iranian Population: A Systematic Review.

Measurement of angles for the C2 canal. Angle β is more than 60°. (A and B) Ends of one canal cross-section, (C and D) ends of the other canal cross-section; M, middle point of line AD; ά, angle between line AM and line BM; β, angle between line CM and line DM [8]

Mandana Naseri, et al. J Dent (Tehran). 2013 March;10(2):186-196.

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is temporarily unavailable.

Write to the Help Desk