Display Settings:

Items per page
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information

Results: 6

1.
Fig. 1

Fig. 1. From: Transcriptomic analysis of metabolic function in the giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera, across depth and season.

Isotig Venn diagram showing the distribution of isotigs between the four Macrocystis pyrifera libraries (January surface, January depth, July surface, July depth).

Talina Konotchick, et al. New Phytol. 2013 April;198(2):398-407.
2.
Fig. 2

Fig. 2. From: Transcriptomic analysis of metabolic function in the giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera, across depth and season.

Distribution of clusters of open reading frames (ORFs) for (a) Phaeophyceae expressed sequence tags (ESTs; not including Macrocystis pyrifera), with ORF clusters from Ectocarpus siliculosus, stramenopiles, green algae and red algae, and (b) all EST-derived Macrocystis pyrifera ORF clusters with the ORF clusters from Phaeophyceae ESTs (including Ectocarpus siliculosus), the stramenopiles, green algae and red algae. The genomes and EST libraries used in this analysis are listed in the Supporting Information, Table S2. Annotations (when available) for clusters on the outside of the Venn are listed in Table S3.

Talina Konotchick, et al. New Phytol. 2013 April;198(2):398-407.
3.
Fig. 4

Fig. 4. From: Transcriptomic analysis of metabolic function in the giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera, across depth and season.

Quantitative PCR fold-change expression differences between the surface and at 18 m depth for light-harvesting complexes (LHC) found in Macrocystis pyrifera. LHCs assigned to FCP are shown in brown, to red shown in red and to LI818 shown in yellow (Table S6). The fold-change of the LI818 LHCs (yellow bars) was greater than the other LHCs (brown or red) in both (a) January and (b) July, (note different y-axis scales). Error bars represent standard deviation and asterisks indicate significant differences (two-tailed Welch's t-test, df = 2, P ≤ 0.05).

Talina Konotchick, et al. New Phytol. 2013 April;198(2):398-407.
4.
Fig. 6

Fig. 6. From: Transcriptomic analysis of metabolic function in the giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera, across depth and season.

Quantitative PCR fold-change expression differences between the surface (above 0) and 18 m depth (below 0) for (a) January 2009 and (b) July 2009. Open bars, significant expression in the surface vs depth; closed bars, significant expression at depth vs the surface; tinted bars, non-significant values (two-tailed Welch's t-test, df = 2, P ≤ 0.05). Error bars represent standard deviation. The functional descriptions and primer sets for each transcriptional unit are listed in Table S1.

Talina Konotchick, et al. New Phytol. 2013 April;198(2):398-407.
5.
Fig. 5

Fig. 5. From: Transcriptomic analysis of metabolic function in the giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera, across depth and season.

A schematic illustrating the gradients in light and temperature (and by proxy nutrients) that an individual Macrocystis pyrifera may span. Temperature inset is a boxplot of 10-min sampling interval data for the 2 wk leading up to the day of collection in January 2009 and July 2009 in La Jolla (CA, USA). On the right, is a conceptual model of dominant physiological processes with depth seen in the transcript counts and quantitative PCR validation and the major transport materials found in sieve tube sap.

Talina Konotchick, et al. New Phytol. 2013 April;198(2):398-407.
6.
Fig. 3

Fig. 3. From: Transcriptomic analysis of metabolic function in the giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera, across depth and season.

Log2 fold change comparison based on the library normalized transcriptomic read data between the surface and depth for open reading frames (ORFs) with ribosomal pfam annotations and with total read counts of at least 10 across all libraries and at least one read in each library (n = 115) for (a) January and (b) July. Bars are ordered by summed counts across all libraries (from 713 to 10). Teal bars had higher expression at the surface and blue bars had higher expression at depth. Red indicates values that exceed the axis. Annotations are shown for ribosomal proteins with a fold-change > 10; rp, ribosomal protein.

Talina Konotchick, et al. New Phytol. 2013 April;198(2):398-407.

Display Settings:

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Write to the Help Desk