Results: 3

1.
Figure 1

Figure 1. From: Is mammary not otherwise specified-type sarcoma with CD10 expression a distinct entity? A rare case report with immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study.

The cut surface was solid gray in fish appearance with haemorrhage and necrosis in the central area.

Guang-Zhi Yang, et al. Diagn Pathol. 2013;8:14-14.
2.
Figure 3

Figure 3. From: Is mammary not otherwise specified-type sarcoma with CD10 expression a distinct entity? A rare case report with immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study.

The tumour cell was spindle and had the striking nucleus with irregular and distorted envelope and one significant nucleolus. Apparatuses in cytoplasm were rare and lysosomes were relatively abundant.

Guang-Zhi Yang, et al. Diagn Pathol. 2013;8:14-14.
3.
Figure 2

Figure 2. From: Is mammary not otherwise specified-type sarcoma with CD10 expression a distinct entity? A rare case report with immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study.

A. The tumour was mainly composed of abundant spindle cells. The tumour was absent of glands except that one elongated and narrow gland was displayed here after widely sectioned. (HE × 50) B. The tumour cells were gathered and abundant, whereas collagen was relatively rare. (HE × 100) C. Collagen bundles among the tumour cells were rather ample. (HE × 100) D. The tumour cells displayed inconspicuous eosinophilic or amphophilic cytoplasm, and striking and vesicular nuclei with coarse chromatin or obvious nucleoli. Mitoses were easily found. (HE × 400) E. CD10 was strongly and diffusely positive. (MaxVision method ×200) F. EGFR was strongly and diffusely positive. (MaxVision method × 200).

Guang-Zhi Yang, et al. Diagn Pathol. 2013;8:14-14.

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Write to the Help Desk