Results: 4

1.
FIGURE 2

FIGURE 2. From: Prior Elicitation and Bayesian Analysis of the Steroids for Corneal Ulcers Trial.

Comparison of prior probability density functions: pooled graphical response (blue), Steroids for Corneal Ulcers Trial pilot (red), and pooled histogram response (gray).

Craig W. See, et al. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2012 December;19(6):10.3109/09286586.2012.735332.
2.
FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1. From: Prior Elicitation and Bayesian Analysis of the Steroids for Corneal Ulcers Trial.

Comparison of prior probability density functions from graphical and histogram methods from two meetings: North American graphical response (blue), North American histogram response (gold), Indian graphical response (red), and Indian histogram response (green).

Craig W. See, et al. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2012 December;19(6):10.3109/09286586.2012.735332.
3.
FIGURE 3

FIGURE 3. From: Prior Elicitation and Bayesian Analysis of the Steroids for Corneal Ulcers Trial.

Bayesian analysis using questionnaire graphical response as prior: pooled graphical prior (blue), likelihood of Steroids for Corneal Ulcers Trial results (red), and posterior probability distribution (gold).

Craig W. See, et al. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2012 December;19(6):10.3109/09286586.2012.735332.
4.
FIGURE 4

FIGURE 4. From: Prior Elicitation and Bayesian Analysis of the Steroids for Corneal Ulcers Trial.

Comparison Steroids for Corneal Ulcers Trial (SCUT) likelihood of results (blue), and posterior probabilities using SCUT pilot as prior (red), posterior using questionnaire graphical responses as prior (gold), posterior using histogram responses as prior (green), enthusiastic graphical responses as prior (orange), and skeptical graphical responses as prior (magenta).

Craig W. See, et al. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2012 December;19(6):10.3109/09286586.2012.735332.

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Write to the Help Desk