We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information

Results: 3

1.
Fig. 1

Fig. 1. From: Characterization of serous retinal detachments in uveitis patients with optical coherence tomography.

LogMAR visual acuity versus central subfield thickness in patients with SRD. Linear regression curve shows a positive slope and two-tailed Pearson correlation analysis shows r2 = 0.41 (p = 0.0009)

Annamieka Simmons-Rear, et al. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. 2012 December;2(4):191-197.
2.
Fig. 3

Fig. 3. From: Characterization of serous retinal detachments in uveitis patients with optical coherence tomography.

Fundus photograph and OCT of a patient with acute VKH disease. Fundus photograph show vitreous haze, optic disc edema, and multiple exudative detachment involving the posterior pole (a). OCT reveals dome-shaped SRD with intraretinal, focal cystoid edema OD (b)

Annamieka Simmons-Rear, et al. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. 2012 December;2(4):191-197.
3.
Fig. 2

Fig. 2. From: Characterization of serous retinal detachments in uveitis patients with optical coherence tomography.

OCT and macular thickness map of a SRD in an 11-year-old patient with pars planitis. Focal cysts overlying a SRD are seen a with central macular thickening and a central subfield thickness of 492 um (b). Following an oral prednisone taper and methotrexate immunosuppression, the SRD and focal cystoid macular edema have resolved (c) with an improvement in visual acuity, decrease in visual symptoms, and restoration of normal macular thickness on the macular thickness with a central subfield thickness of 184 um (d)

Annamieka Simmons-Rear, et al. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. 2012 December;2(4):191-197.

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Write to the Help Desk