We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information

Results: 3

1.
Fig. 1

Fig. 1. Constitutive versus regulated gene expression. From: Using Gene Expression Noise to Understand Gene Regulation.

A) Schematic of a constitutive gene expression model with transcription rate kR and mRNA degradation rate constant γR. B) Schematic of a two-state (ON, OFF) model with transition rates kON and kOFF.

Brian Munsky, et al. Science. ;336(6078):183-187.
2.
Fig. 3

Fig. 3. Different regulatory motifs yield different steady-state correlations. From: Using Gene Expression Noise to Understand Gene Regulation.

A) Schematics of four possible regulator motifs: X activates Y; X represses Y; W activates both X and Y; and W activates X but represses Y. For each motif, mRNA is produced according the constitutive model; protein is translated from mRNA as a first order reaction; and both mRNA and protein degrade as a first order reaction. Regulation changes to the transcription rate are defined kR(X) = αX4/(M4 + X4) for activation kR(X) = αM4/(M4 + X4) for repression. B) Scatter plots of the populations of protein X and protein Y at steady state. C) Dynamic cross-correlation functions of protein X and protein Y, versus the correlation time delay. The magnitude of RXY (τ) indicates how strongly X(t+τ) is correlated (positive) or anti-correlated (negative) with Y(t). For causal events, where X activates (or represses) Y, peaks (or dips) appear in RXY (τ) at negative values of τ. Blue lines correspond to the motif in (A), and red lines correspond to the same motif in which X and Y have been interchanged. D) Scatter plots for mRNA X and mRNA Y populations. E) Dynamic cross-correlation for mRNA X and mRNA Y. Simulations were conducted using the stochastic simulation algorithm (35).

Brian Munsky, et al. Science. ;336(6078):183-187.
3.
Fig. 2

Fig. 2. Effects of transcriptional control on mRNA distributions. From: Using Gene Expression Noise to Understand Gene Regulation.

A) Heat map of the cell-to-cell variability (Fano factor, σ2/), versus normalized gene activation rate kONR and normalized deactivation rate kOFFR with fixed production and degradation rates (kR = 100, γR = 1). Lines of equal average mRNA expression are shown for 2, 25, and 75 molecules. The parameter space is separated into three classes (I,II,III) that exhibit different types of cell-to-cell variability. B) Representative distributions from each class: Class I corresponds to systems with long OFF and ON periods, giving rise to bimodal distributions with clearly delineated ON/OFF populations. Class II corresponds to populations with short ON and long OFF periods, giving rise to occasional mRNA bursts and long distribution tails. Class III includes systems with short OFF periods, giving rise to continuous production and more graded unimodal distributions. All three distributions have the same average of 25 mRNA and correspond to the squares in (A). Distributions were computed using the Finite State Projection approach (34).

Brian Munsky, et al. Science. ;336(6078):183-187.

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Write to the Help Desk