Results: 3

1.
Figure 3

Figure 3. mSFG response to spTMS of the precentral gyrus. From: Probing thalamic integrity in schizophrenia using concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Group averaged spTMS-evoked response in mSFG * P<.05, shaded areas: 95% CI.
Inset: single-subject representation of ROI (yellow); voxels most responsive to condition (red). N=14 in each group.

Yelena Guller, et al. Arch Gen Psychiatry. ;69(7):662-671.
2.
Figure 1

Figure 1. Cortical response to spTMS and button press task. From: Probing thalamic integrity in schizophrenia using concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional magnetic resonance imaging.

(A) Group averaged spTMS-evoked response in the cortical region underlying the TMS coil (precentral gyrus).
(B) Group averaged BP-evoked response in precentral gyrus.
* P<.05, shaded areas: 95% Confidence Intervals (CI). Inset: single-subject representation of ROI (yellow); voxels most responsive to condition (red). N=14 in each group.

Yelena Guller, et al. Arch Gen Psychiatry. ;69(7):662-671.
3.
Figure 2

Figure 2. Thalamic response to spTMS and BP task. From: Probing thalamic integrity in schizophrenia using concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional magnetic resonance imaging.

(A) Group averaged spTMS-evoked response in thalamus
(B) Group averaged BP-evoked response in thalamus
Shaded areas: 95% CI; Red/blue dashed lines: sham TMS response in the same voxels.
(C,D) Dot plots illustrating single-subject peak percent signal change (extracted 3–6.5 seconds following spTMS delivery). The black line indicates the group mean, and the grey box bounding this line indicates SEM. * P<.05, ** P<1.9×10−9; (Note: Because peak latency varied across subjects, the group means shown in C,D necessarily differ from the maxima of the average HRF waveforms depicted in A,B. C,D represent data used for hypothesis testing.)
Inset: single-subject representation of ROI (yellow); voxels most responsive to condition (red). N=14 in each group, N=13 in each group for sham analysis.

Yelena Guller, et al. Arch Gen Psychiatry. ;69(7):662-671.

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Write to the Help Desk