We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information

Results: 5

1.

Figure. From: Impact of C-Reactive Protein on In-Stent Restenosis.

Fig. 5 Funnel plot of the meta-analysis. Comparison: ISR versus no-ISR. Outcome: ISR. ISR = in-stent restenosis; SE = standard error; WMD = weighted mean difference

Jian-Jun Li, et al. Tex Heart Inst J. 2010;37(1):49-57.
2.

Figure. From: Impact of C-Reactive Protein on In-Stent Restenosis.

Fig. 2 Comparison of CRP levels between ISR and no-ISR groups in the 9 included studies. CI = confidence interval; ISR = in-stent restenosis; WMD = weighted mean difference

Jian-Jun Li, et al. Tex Heart Inst J. 2010;37(1):49-57.
3.

Figure. From: Impact of C-Reactive Protein on In-Stent Restenosis.

Fig. 4 Comparison of C-reactive protein levels between ISR and no-ISR groups in the 5 included unstable-angina studies. CI = confidence interval; ISR = in-stent restenosis; WMD = weighted mean difference

Jian-Jun Li, et al. Tex Heart Inst J. 2010;37(1):49-57.
4.

Figure. From: Impact of C-Reactive Protein on In-Stent Restenosis.

Fig. 3 Comparison of C-reactive protein levels between ISR and no-ISR groups in the 4 included stable-angina studies. CI = confidence interval; ISR = in-stent restenosis; WMD = weighted mean difference

Jian-Jun Li, et al. Tex Heart Inst J. 2010;37(1):49-57.
5.

Figure. From: Impact of C-Reactive Protein on In-Stent Restenosis.

Fig. 1 Flow diagram of the trial-selection process. BMSs = bare-metal stents; CRP = C-reactive protein; DESs = drug-eluting stents; ISR = in-stent restenosis; MACE = major adverse coronary event; RCTs = randomized controlled trials

Jian-Jun Li, et al. Tex Heart Inst J. 2010;37(1):49-57.

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Write to the Help Desk