We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information

Results: 3

1.
Figure 2.

Figure 2. From: Is there "Cherry Picking" in the ESRD Program? Perceptions from a Dialysis Provider Survey.

Perceived frequency of cherry picking by provider group. KOLs, key opinion leader.

Amar A. Desai, et al. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 April;4(4):772-777.
2.
Figure 1.

Figure 1. From: Is there "Cherry Picking" in the ESRD Program? Perceptions from a Dialysis Provider Survey.

Perceived frequency of cherry picking across full provider sample.

Amar A. Desai, et al. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 April;4(4):772-777.
3.
Figure 3.

Figure 3. From: Is there "Cherry Picking" in the ESRD Program? Perceptions from a Dialysis Provider Survey.

Perceived effect of cherry picking strategies on dialysis outcomes. The perceived effect of each potential cherry picking strategy was ranked by each respondent using a nine-point modified RAND scale in which 9 = highest impact and 1 = lowest impact. Mean scores exceeding 6.5 (dotted line) denote practices that are generally high impact on patient outcomes, as described in the text. Four of the five strategies were rated as being of generally high impact on dialysis outcomes.

Amar A. Desai, et al. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 April;4(4):772-777.

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Write to the Help Desk