We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information

Results: 4

Figure 4

Figure 4. Notch signaling rescues cells from the growth inhibitory effects of GSI. From: Inhibition of ?-Secretase Activity Inhibits Tumor Progression in a Mouse Model of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

(A) Retroviral infection has no effect on growth inhibition of NB507 PDAC cells by MRK-003. Cell number was determined 3 days or 6 days following treatment with the GSI (left panel); infection with MigR1 retrovirus did not alter the dose-response curve. (B) Cell number was determined following infection with control (empty) MigR1 virus, or virus encoding a constitutively active form of Notch1 (ICN1) or Notch3 (ICN3). ICN1 and ICN3 expression had minimal effects on NB507 cell number compared to MigR1 when the total population was examined (left panel); when only infected cells were measured, ICN1and ICN3 had a mild inhibitory effect on growth (right panel). (C) ICN1 and ICN3 prevented GSI-induced growth inhibition after 6 days of treatment (only infected cells are shown). These results are representative of two independent experiments.

Ruben Plentz, et al. Gastroenterology. ;136(5):1741-9.e6.
Figure 1

Figure 1. Notch pathway activation accompanies PDAC progression. From: Inhibition of ?-Secretase Activity Inhibits Tumor Progression in a Mouse Model of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

The Notch reporter strain [24] confirms pathway activation in normal pancreatic centroacinar cells A, arrowheads) and PanIN lesions of Pdx1-Cre LSL-KrasG12D p53 L/+ mice (B). Note staining in PanIN epithelium (arrows) but not in adjacent normal ductal epithelium arrowhead). (C) Hes1 is widely expressed in the tumor cells of advanced mouse PDAC. D) Western blot analysis demonstrates a significant increase in Hes1 expression in primary mouse PDAC tumors (T1–T6) and (E) PDAC cell lines (C1–C8) compared to normal pancreatic tissue (N1, N2). (F) Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRTPCR) analysis of Notch pathway components in cultured wildtype duct cells, duct cells derived from PanIN-bearing pancreata, and PDAC cells (mean +/− SEM of 3 independent lines for each group). A,B and C, original magnification 400×.

Ruben Plentz, et al. Gastroenterology. ;136(5):1741-9.e6.
Figure 3

Figure 3. GSI attenuates PDAC development in Kras p53 mice. From: Inhibition of ?-Secretase Activity Inhibits Tumor Progression in a Mouse Model of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

(A) Tumor cells were transplanted as xenografts into SCID mice, and the mice were treated systemically with GSI or vehicle, resulting in a decrease in Hes1 protein levels. (B) PAS staining of small intestine from control and GSI-treated mice, showing an increase in goblet cells in the GSI-treated animal. (C) PDAC incidence in GSI-treated and control mice at ages 11–13 weeks. (D) Macroscopic and histological images of representative pancreas (P), tumor (T), and surrounded duodenum (D) and spleen (S) from vehicle-treated and GSI-treated mice. The boxed region in the middle panels is shown at higher magnification in the lower panels. The vehicle-treated mouse has a PDAC, while the GSI-treated mouse has focal PanIN lesions. (E) The proportion of pancreatic tissue occupied by PanIN lesions was quantified in vehicle- (N=23) and GSI-treated (N=16) pancreata. GSI treatment resulted in a significant (p<0.005; chi squared test) reduction in the abundance of PanINs. (F) Left panel. Ki67 staining of metaplastic ducts. Right panel. Quantitation of Ki67 staining in the neoplastic epithelium, showing significant (p<0.005; Student’s T test) reduction in Ki67+ cells following GSI treatment. C, magnification 100× and 400×, E, magnification 400×.

Ruben Plentz, et al. Gastroenterology. ;136(5):1741-9.e6.
Figure 2

Figure 2. PanIN and PDAC cell lines are sensitive to GSI treatment. From: Inhibition of ?-Secretase Activity Inhibits Tumor Progression in a Mouse Model of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

(A) PanIN cells treated with the indicated concentrations of the GSI exhibit decreased levels of Hes1 protein by Western blot analysis (left) and a dose-dependent shift in the growth curve right). (B) Treatment of the mouse PDAC cell line (N490) with the GSI results in a similar decrease in Hes1 protein levels (left) and growth inhibition (right). Note that most treatment conditions led to a plateau in the growth curves, suggesting that the compound exerts static rather than toxic effects. (C) Soft agar assay of a GSI-treated human PDAC cell line (Panc1), with quantitation on right. Note significant difference between colony numbers in cells treated with ≥1.5µM GSI compared to vehicle-treated cells (p<0.005; Student’s T test). (D) A set of 434 human cancer-derived cell lines comprising 23 different solid tumor types were assessed for growth inhibition following 3 days of exposure to 5 µM MRK-003. The proportion of cell lines from each tumor type that showed >25% decreased growth is plotted on the X-axis (% responders) and the total number of responders is plotted on the y-axis. In addition to pancreatic cancer-derived cell lines (50%; 13/26), only stomach cancer-derived cell lines (37%; 7/19) also showed a response rate of >35%.

Ruben Plentz, et al. Gastroenterology. ;136(5):1741-9.e6.

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Write to the Help Desk