Results: 5

1.
Fig. 2

Fig. 2. From: Analysis of transcriptome data in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum.

Histogram showing cumulative frequency distribution of BLAST results (E-value) for Tribolium uniESTs. Results are categorized by taxon producing the highest-scoring pair HSP.

Yoonseong Park, et al. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. ;38(4):380-386.
2.
Fig. 1

Fig. 1. From: Analysis of transcriptome data in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum.

Diversity of the clones within each Tribolium cDNA library. The function of exponential association was used for the regression with the equation: y = y0 + A1*(1 − exp(−x/t1)) + A2*(1 − exp(−x/t2)), y0, A1, t1, A2, and t2 are 0.18,2751, 6903, 2736, and 6904, respectively (R2 = 0.916). Note that incremental redundancy increases as more clones are sequenced.

Yoonseong Park, et al. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. ;38(4):380-386.
3.
Fig. 5

Fig. 5. From: Analysis of transcriptome data in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum.

UniESTs mapped onto linkage groups. The unmapped sequence scaffolds are arbitrarily joined and named as chrUn (linkage group unknown). “Rep.” signifies reptigs, i.e. contigs that are highly repetitive and not included in the chromosomal scaffolds.

Yoonseong Park, et al. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. ;38(4):380-386.
4.
Fig. 4

Fig. 4. From: Analysis of transcriptome data in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum.

Gene Ontology (GO) terms of the uniESTs for cellular component, molecular function, and biological process. The levels were arbitrarily chosen for the best visual presentations. For the same reason, the GO terms containing less than 50 uniESTs (in cellular component and molecular function) or 1–9, 10–49, 50–100 uniESTs (in biological process) were combined into the groups in the graph.

Yoonseong Park, et al. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. ;38(4):380-386.
5.
Fig. 3

Fig. 3. From: Analysis of transcriptome data in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum.

Plot showing similarities of uniESTs to the genome and to gene/protein predictions. (A) shows the match of each individual uniEST to GLEAN models, Genome sequence, and the UniProt database, in all three paired combinations. The plot for similarities to GLEAN × Genome is divided into four categories a, b, c, and d in different colors, depending on the E-values in the blast searches. (B) summarizes the interpretations made for each category shown in (A), giving numbers and percentages of uniESTs in each category. Note that E-values for GLEAN and Genome sequences are derived from BLASTN, and those for UniProt are from TBLASTN, thus the critical E-values in (B) were set 1E-40 and 1E-10, respectively.

Yoonseong Park, et al. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. ;38(4):380-386.

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Write to the Help Desk