Results: 4

1.
FIG. 2.

FIG. 2. From: High-Volume versus Low-Volume for Esophageal Resections for Cancer: The Essential Role of Case-Mix Adjustments based on Clinical Data.

Overall survival after esophagus resection for cancer: LVHs vs HVH (in-hospital mortality included).

Michael W. Wouters, et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 January;15(1):80-87.
2.
FIG. 3.

FIG. 3. From: High-Volume versus Low-Volume for Esophageal Resections for Cancer: The Essential Role of Case-Mix Adjustments based on Clinical Data.

Overall survival after esophagus resection for cancer: LVHs vs HVH (in-hospital mortality excluded).

Michael W. Wouters, et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 January;15(1):80-87.
3.
FIG. 4.

FIG. 4. From: High-Volume versus Low-Volume for Esophageal Resections for Cancer: The Essential Role of Case-Mix Adjustments based on Clinical Data.

Overall survival after esophagus resection for stage I and II carcinoma: LVHs vs HVH (in-hospital mortality excluded).

Michael W. Wouters, et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 January;15(1):80-87.
4.
FIG. 1.

FIG. 1. From: High-Volume versus Low-Volume for Esophageal Resections for Cancer: The Essential Role of Case-Mix Adjustments based on Clinical Data.

(A) Number of esophageal resections per year in HVH versus LVH group (1990–1999). (B) Total number of esophageal resections per hospital for HVH and LVHs (1990–1999).

Michael W. Wouters, et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 January;15(1):80-87.

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Write to the Help Desk