We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information

Results: 2

1.
Fig. 2

Fig. 2. From: Hormonal and Nutritional Effects on Cardiovascular Risk Markers in Young Women.

Association between hsCRP and IGF-I. IGF-I levels inversely predicted hsCRP levels in HC (triangles) but not in AN (circles.)

Elizabeth A. Lawson, et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. ;92(8):3089-3094.
2.
Fig. 1

Fig. 1. From: Hormonal and Nutritional Effects on Cardiovascular Risk Markers in Young Women.

HsCRP and IL-6. A, Mean hsCRP in AN-E (white; 0.54 ± 0.09 mg/liter), AN+E (black; 2.21 ± 0.47 mg/liter), HC-E (striped; 0.89 ± 0.18 mg/liter), and HC+E (gray; 3.32 ± 0.67). *, P < 0.01 for all intragroup comparisons, except AN+E vs. HC-E. B, Percent with high-risk hsCRP levels (>3.0 mg/liter) in AN-E (white; 2.4%), AN+E (black; 21.4%), HC-E (striped; 3.6%), and HC+E (gray; 38.5%). *, P < 0.05 compared with AN-E and HC-E. C, Mean IL-6 levels in AN+E with hsCRP levels in the high-risk range (black; 0.84 ± 0.12 mg/liter) and not in the high-risk range (white; 0.51 ± 0.05 mg/liter). High-risk hsCRP: 3.0 mg/liter. *, P = 0.005.

Elizabeth A. Lawson, et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. ;92(8):3089-3094.

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...
Write to the Help Desk