The impact of pulmonary metastasectomy in patients with previously resected colorectal cancer liver metastases

PLoS One. 2017 Mar 22;12(3):e0173933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173933. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Background: 40-50% of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) will develop liver metastases (CRLM) during the course of the disease. One third of these patients will additionally develop pulmonary metastases.

Methods: 137 consecutive patients with CRLM, were analyzed regarding survival data, clinical, histological data and treatment. Results were stratified according to the occurrence of pulmonary metastases and metastases resection.

Results: 39% of all patients with liver resection due to CRLM developed additional lung metastases. 44% of these patients underwent subsequent pulmonary resection. Patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy showed a significantly better five-year survival compared to patients not qualified for curative resection (5-year survival 71.2% vs. 28.0%; p = 0.001). Interestingly, the 5-year survival of these patients was even superior to all patients with CRLM, who did not develop pulmonary metastases (77.5% vs. 63.5%; p = 0.015). Patients, whose pulmonary metastases were not resected, were more likely to redevelop liver metastases (50.0% vs 78.6%; p = 0.034). However, the rate of distant metastases did not differ between both groups (54.5 vs.53.6; p = 0.945).

Conclusion: The occurrence of colorectal lung metastases after curative liver resection does not impact patient survival if pulmonary metastasectomy is feasible. Those patients clearly benefit from repeated resections of the liver and the lung metastases.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Liver Neoplasms / secondary*
  • Liver Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Lung Neoplasms / secondary*
  • Lung Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Male
  • Metastasectomy*
  • Middle Aged
  • Prognosis
  • Retrospective Studies

Grants and funding

This publication was supported by the Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Wuerzburg given to Dr. Armin Wiegering.