In the preceding sections, we have described various extracellular signaling
molecules, and their intracellular signaling pathways, that play a role in
regulating cell division, pattern formation, differentiation, morphogenesis, and
motility. In this final section, we consider signaling pathways regulating cell
survival. Programmed cell death, a central mechanism controlling
multicellular development, leads to deletion of entire structures (e.g., the tail in
developing human embryos), sculpts specific tissues by ablating fields of cells
(e.g., tissue between developing digits), and regulates the number of neurons in the
nervous system. In the mammalian nervous system, for instance, the majority of cells
generated during development also die during development.
Cellular interactions regulate cell death in two fundamentally different ways. Most,
if not all, cells in multicellular organisms require signals to stay alive. In the
absence of such survival signals, frequently referred to as trophic
factors, cells activate a “suicide”
program. In some developmental contexts, including the immune system, specific
signals induce a “murder” program that kills cells. Whether
cells commit suicide for lack of survival signals or are murdered by killing signals
from other cells, recent studies suggest that death is mediated by a common
molecular pathway. In this final section, we first distinguish programmed cell death
from death due to tissue injury, then consider the role of trophic factors in
neuronal development, and finally describe the evolutionarily conserved effector
pathway that leads to cell suicide or murder.
Programmed Cell Death Occurs through Apoptosis
Figure 23-45
.
Ultrastructural features of cell death by apoptosis
(a) Schematic drawings illustrating the progression of
morphologic changes observed in apoptotic cells. Early in
apoptosis, dense chromosome condensation occurs along the
nuclear periphery. The cell body also shrinks although most
organelles remain intact. Later both the nucleus and cytoplasm
fragment, forming apoptotic bodies. These are phagocytosed by
surrounding cells. (b) Photomicrographs comparing a normal cell
(top) and apoptotic cell
(bottom). Clearly visible in the latter are
dense spheres of compacted chromatin as the nucleus begins to
fragment. [Part (a) adapted from J. Kuby, 1997,
Immunology, 3d ed., W. H. Freeman &
Co., p. 53. Part (b) from M. J. Arends and A. H. Wyllie, 1991,
Inter. Rev. Exp. Pathol.
32:223.]
The demise of cells by programmed cell death is marked by a well-defined sequence
of morphological changes, collectively referred to as
apoptosis, a Greek word that means “dropping
off” or “falling off” as in leaves from a tree.
Dying cells shrink and condense and then fragment, releasing small
membrane-bound apoptotic bodies, which generally are phagocytosed by other cells
(). Importantly, the
intracellular constituents are not released into the extracellular milieu where
they might have deleterious effects on neighboring cells. The highly stereotyped
changes accompanying
apoptosis suggested to early workers that this type of cell
death was under the control of a strict cellular program.
In contrast, cells that die in response to tissue damage exhibit very different
morphological changes. Typically, cells that undergo this process, called
necrosis, swell and burst, releasing their intracellular
contents, which can damage surrounding cells and frequently cause
inflammation.
Neutrophins Promote Survival of Neurons
The earliest studies demonstrating the importance of trophic factors in cellular
development came from analyses of the developing nervous system. In the early
1900s the number of neurons innervating the periphery was shown to depend upon
the size of the target field. For instance, removal of limb buds from the
developing chick embryo leads to a reduction in the number of sensory neurons
and motoneurons innervating it, while grafting of ectopic limb tissue leads to
an increase in the number of neurons in corresponding regions of the spinal cord
and sensory ganglia. Indeed, incremental increases in target-field size is
accompanied by commensurate incremental increases in the number of neurons
innervating it. This relation was found to result from the selective survival of
neurons rather than changes in their differentiation or proliferation. The
observation that neurons die after reaching their target field in several
regions of the nervous system suggested that neurons compete for survival
factors produced by the target tissue.
Subsequent to the early observations that peripheral tissue promotes survival of
sensory and motoneurons, scientists discovered that transplantation of a mouse
sarcoma tumor into a chick led to a marked increase in cell number in
sympathetic and spinal ganglion neurons. This finding implicated the tumor as a
rich source of the presumed trophic factor. To isolate and purify this factor,
known simply as nerve growth factor (NGF), scientists used an
in vitro assay in which outgrowth of neurites from sensory ganglia was measured.
The later discovery that the submaxillary gland in the mouse also produces large
quantities of NGF enabled biochemists to purify it to homogeneity and to
sequence it. A homodimer of two 118-residue polypeptides, NGF belongs to a
family of structurally and functionally related trophic factors, collectively
referred to as neutrophins. Brain-derived growth factor (BDNF)
and neurotrophin-3 (NT- 3) also are members of this protein family.
Neurotrophin Receptors
Figure 23-46
.
Neurotrophins bind to a family of receptor tyrosine kinases
called Trks
Each neurotrophin binds with high affinity to one receptor
indicated by the solid arrow from the ligand to the receptor.
NT-3 also can bind with lower affinity to both TrkA and TrkB as
indicated by the dashed arrow. In addition, neurotrophins bind
to a distinct receptor called p75NTR either alone or
in combination with Trks. [Adapted from W. D. Snider, 1994,
Cell
77:627.]
Neurotrophins bind to and activate a family of
receptor tyrosine
kinases
called
Trks (pronounced “tracks”). NGF
binds to TrkA; BDNF, to TrkB; and NT-3, to TrkC (). Binding of these factors to their
receptors provides a survival signal for different classes of neurons. A
second type of
receptor called p75
NTR (NTR =
neurotrophin
receptor) also binds to neurotrophins, but with lower affinity.
However, p75
NTR forms heteromultimeric complexes with the
different Trk
receptors; this association increases the affinity of Trks for
their
ligands. Recent studies indicate that the binding of NGF to
p75
NTR in the absence of TrkA may promote cell death rather
than prevent it.
Knockout of Neurotrophins and Their Receptors
Figure 23-47
.
Experimental demonstration that different classes of sensory
neurons in the dorsal root ganglion require different trophic
factors for survival
In animals lacking NGF or its receptor TrkA, small nociceptive
neurons (blue) that innervate the skin are missing. These
neurons express TrkA receptor and innervate NGF-producing
targets. In animals lacking either NT-3 or its receptor TrkC,
large propioceptive neurons (pink) innervating muscle spindles
are missing. Muscle produces NT-3 and the propioceptive neurons
express TrkC. Mechanoreceptors (brown), another class of sensory
neurons in the dorsal root ganglion, are unaffected in these
mutants. [Adapted from W. D. Snider, 1994, Cell
77:627.]
To critically address the role of the neurotrophins in
development,
scientists produced mice with knockout
mutations in each of the
neurotrophins and their
receptors. These studies revealed that different
neurotrophins (and their corresponding
receptors) were required for the
survival of different classes of sensory neurons (). For instance, pain-sensitive
(nociceptive) neurons, which express TrkA, are selectively lost in the
dorsal root ganglion of knockout mice lacking NGF or TrkA, whereas TrkB- and
TrkC-expressing neurons are unaffected in such knockouts. In contrast,
TrkC-expressing proprioceptive neurons, which detect the position of the
limbs, are missing from the
dorsal root ganglion in TrkC and NT-3 mutants.
That different neurotrophins are required for the survival of different
classes of sensory neurons is further supported by the requirement of BDNF
and TrkB for the
development of sensory neurons in the vestibular ganglia.
These neurons innervate organs of the inner ear and are required for sensing
motion.
Loss of these different classes of sensory neurons is associated with
corresponding defects in behavior. In BDNF mutants, animals show defects in
balance associated with the vestibular system. The loss of proprioceptors in
NT-3 mutants correlates with postural and movement abnormalities. And
finally, although neither NGF nor TrkA mutants survive long enough for
behavioral studies, heterozygotes show a decreased sensitivity to pain
consistent with a reduction in the number of nociceptive neurons in the
dorsal root ganglion.
Three Classes of Proteins Function in the Apoptotic Pathway
Figure 23-48
.
Mutations in the ced-3 gene block programmed
cell death in the nematode C. elegans
During normal development in C. elegans, 131 cells
die through apoptosis. The entire apoptotic process from the
initiation of cell death to the disappearance of a particular cell
takes about 1 hour. (a) Newly hatched larva carrying a mutation in
the ced-1 gene. Because mutations in this gene
prevent engulfment of dead cells, highly refractile dead cells
accumulate (arrows), facilitating their visualization. (b) Newly
hatched larva with mutations in both the ced-1 and
ced-3 genes. The absence of refractile dead
cells in these double mutants indicates that no cell deaths
occurred. Thus CED-3 protein is required for programmed cell death.
This screen also has identified mutations in other genes required
for programmed cell death. [From H. M. Ellis and H. R. Horvitz,
1986, Cell
91:818; courtesy of Hilary Ellis]
Key insights into the molecular mechanisms regulating cell death came from
genetic studies in
C. elegans. Scientists have traced the
lineage of all the
somatic cells in
C. elegans from the
fertilized egg to the mature worm simply by following the
development of live
worms under Nomarski optics. Of the 1090
somatic cells generated during
development, 131 cells undergo programmed cell death. Specific
mutations have
identified a variety of
genes whose encoded
proteins play an essential role in
controlling this process. For instance, in worms carrying
mutations in the
ced-3 or the
ced-4 genes, programmed cell
death does not occur, and all 1090 cells survive (). In contrast, in
ced-9
mutant animals, all 1090 cells die. These genetic studies indicate that the
CED-3 and CED-4
proteins are required for cell death, that CED-9 suppresses
apoptosis, and that the apoptotic pathway can be activated in all cells.
Moreover, the finding that cell death does not occur in
ced-9/ced-3 double mutants suggests that CED-9 acts
upstream of CED-3 to suppress the apoptotic pathway.
Figure 23-49
.
Overview of the apoptotic pathway in C. elegans
and vertebrates
Three general types of proteins are critical in this conserved
pathway. Regulators either promote or suppress apoptosis; the two
regulators shown here, CED-9 and Bcl-2, both function to suppress
apoptosis in the presence of trophic factors. Adapters interact with
both regulators and effectors; in the absence of trophic factors,
they promote activation of effectors. A family of cysteine proteases
serve as effector proteins; their activation leads to degradation of
various intracellular substrates and eventually cell death. [Adapted
from D. L. Vaux and S. J. Korsemeyer, 1999, Cell
96:245.]
That
apoptosis involved an evolutionarily conserved pathway was first suggested
by the confluence of genetic studies in worms and studies on human cancer cells
(). The first apoptotic
gene to be cloned,
bcl-2, was isolated as a breakpoint
rearrangement in human follicular lymphomas and was shown to act as an
oncogene
that promoted cell survival rather than cell proliferation. Not only are the
Bcl-2 and CED-9
proteins homologous, but a
bcl-2 transgene can
block the extensive cell death found in
ced-9 mutant worms.
Thus both
proteins act as regulators that suppress the apoptotic pathway. In
addition, both
proteins contain a single transmembrane
domain and are localized
to the outer mitochondrial, nuclear, and endoplasmic reticulum
membranes.
The effector molecules in the apoptotic pathway are a family of enzymes called
caspases, so named because they are cysteine
proteases that selectively cleave proteins at sites just C-terminal to aspartate
residues. These proteases have specific intracellular targets such as proteins
of the nuclear lamina and cytoskeleton. Cleavage of these substrates leads to
the demise of a cell. Activation of caspases, discussed below, appears to be a
common feature of most, if not all, cell-death programs. The principal effector
protease in C. elegans is CED-3. Mammalian cells contain
multiple caspases.
Cell-culture studies have yielded important insights into how the various CED
proteins in
C. elegans and the related mammalian
proteins act
together to control
apoptosis (see ).
Expression of
C. elegans CED-4 in a human
kidney
cell line induces rapid
apoptosis. This can be blocked by co-
expression
of CED-9 (or mammalian Bcl-2). CED-9 directly binds to CED-4 and relocalizes it
from the
cytosol to intracellular
membranes. Thus the pro-apoptotic function of
CED-4 is directly suppressed by the anti-apoptotic function of CED-9. CED-4 also
binds directly to CED-3 (and related mammalian caspases) and promotes activation
of its protease activity. Biochemical studies have shown that CED-4 can
simultaneously bind both to CED-9 and CED-3.
Pro-Apoptotic Regulators Promote Caspase Activation
Having introduced the major participants in the apoptotic pathway, we now take a
closer look at how the effector caspases are activated in mammalian cells.
Although CED-9 and Bcl-2 suppress the cell-death pathway, other regulatory
proteins act to promote apoptosis. The first pro-apoptotic regulator to be
identified, named Bax, was found associated with Bcl-2 in extracts of cells
expressing high levels of Bcl-2. Sequence analysis demonstrated that Bax is
related in sequence to CED-9 and Bcl-2, but overexpression of Bax induces cell
death rather than protecting cells from apoptosis, as CED-9 and Bcl-2 do. Thus
this family of homologous regulatory proteins comprises both anti-apoptotic
members (e.g., CED-9, Bcl-2) and pro-apoptotic members (e. g., Bax). All members
of this family, which we refer to as the Bcl-2
family, are single-pass transmembrane proteins and
can participate in oligomeric interactions. Thus the fate of a given
cell—survival or death—may reflect the particular spectrum
of Bcl-2 family members present in the cell and the intracellular signaling
pathways regulating them.
Figure 23-50
.
Current models of the intracellular pathways leading to cell
death by apoptosis or to trophic factor–mediated cell
survival in mammalian cells
The details of these pathways in any given cell type are not yet
known. (a) In the absence of a trophic factor. Bad, a soluble
pro-apoptotic protein, binds to the anti-apoptotic proteins
Bcl-2 and Bcl-xl, which are inserted into the mitochondrial
membrane. Bad binding prevents the anti-apoptotic proteins from
interacting with Bax, a membrane-bound pro-apoptotic protein. As
a consequence, Bax forms homo-oligomeric channels in the
membrane that mediate ion flux. Through an as-yet unknown
mechanism, this leads to the release of cytochrome
c from the space between the inner and
outer mitochondrial membrane. Cytochrome c then
binds to the adapter protein Apaf-1, which in turn promotes a
caspase cascade leading to cell death. (b) In the presence of a
trophic factor such as NGF. In some cells, binding of trophic
factors stimulates PI-3 kinase activity, leading to activation
of the downstream kinase Akt, which phosphorylates Bad.
Phosphorylated Bad then forms a complex with the
14 - 3 - 3 protein.
With Bad sequestered in the cytosol, the antiapoptotic
Bcl-2/Bcl-xl proteins can inhibit the activity of Bax, thereby
preventing the release of cytochrome c and
activation of the caspase cascade. [Adapted from B. Pettman and
C. E. Henderson, 1998, Neuron
20:633.]
Recent studies suggest that Bcl-2 family members can influence the subcellular
distribution of cytochrome
c; moreover, biochemical studies
have implicated cytochrome
c in caspase activation. The current
model of caspase activation in mammalian cells, summarized in , accounts for the
involvement of cytochrome
c. In normal healthy cells,
cytochrome
c is localized between the inner and outer
mitochrodrial
membrane, but in cells undergoing
apoptosis, cytochrome
c is released into the
cytosol. This release can be blocked
by overexpression of Bcl-2; conversely, overexpression of Bax promotes release
of cytochrome
c into the
cytosol and
apoptosis. In the
cytosol,
binding of cytochrome
c to the adapter
protein Apaf-1 (i.e.,
mammalian CED-4) promotes activation of a caspase cascade. Bax
homodimers, but not Bcl-2 homodimers or Bcl-2/Bax heterodimers, permit influx of
ions through the mitochondrial
membrane. It remains unclear how this ion influx
acts to trigger the release of cytochrome
c.
Gene knockout experiments have dramatically confirmed the importance of both
pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members in neuronal development.
Mice lacking the bcl-xl gene, which encodes another
anti-apoptotic protein, show massive defects in nervous system development with
widespread cell death in the spinal cord, dorsal root ganglion, and brain of
developing embryos. In contrast, bax knockouts exhibit a marked
increase in neurons in some regions of the nervous system.
Some Trophic Factors Prevent Apoptosis by Inducing Inactivation of a
Pro-Apoptotic Regulator
We saw earlier that neutrophins such as nerve
growth factor (NGF) protect neurons
from cell death. The intracellular signaling mechanisms linking such survival
factors to inactivation of the cell-death machinery are not known in detail, but
some intriguing clues are available. The finding that trophic factors appear to
work largely independent of
protein synthesis suggested that the activity of one
or more components of the cell-death pathway is altered post-translationally in
response to intracellular signals activated by binding of trophic factors to
their
receptors. Scientists demonstrated that in the absence of trophic factors,
the nonphosphorylated form of Bad is associated with Bcl-2/Bcl-xl at the
mitochondrial
membrane (see ). Binding of Bad inhibits the anti-apoptotic function of
Bcl-2/Bcl-xl, thereby promoting cell death. Phosphorylated Bad, however, cannot
bind to Bcl-2/Bcl-xl and is found in the
cytosol complexed to the
phosphoserine-binding
protein 14-3-3 (
Chapter 20). Hence, signaling pathways leading to Bad
phosphorylation would be particularly attractive candidates for transmitting
survival signals.
A number of trophic factors including NGF have been shown to activate PI-3
kinase, which in turn activates a
downstream kinase called Akt (see
Chapter 20). This
kinase
phosphorylates Bad at sites known to inhibit its pro-apoptotic activity.
Moreover, a constitutively active form of Akt can rescue cultured
neutrophin-deprived neurons, which otherwise would undergo
apoptosis and die.
These findings support the mechanism for the survival action of trophic factors
depicted in . In other cell
types, different trophic factors may promote cell survival through
post-translational modification of other components of the cell-death
machinery.
SUMMARY
-
Cells die by murder or suicide through
programmed cell death, often referred to as apoptosis.
-
All cells require trophic factors to
prevent apoptosis and thus survive.
-
The best-characterized trophic factors are
the neutrophins, including NGF, BDNF, and NT-3. During development,
neurons compete for a limited supply of these trophic factors in their
target fields. As a result, many cells undergo programmed cell death, so
that the number of surviving neurons matches the target-field size.
-
Genetic studies in C.
elegans defined an evolutionarily conserved cell-death
pathway with three major components (see ). The C. elegans
anti-apoptotic protein, CED-9, is structurally and functionally
homologous to Bcl-2 in vertebrates. -
The effectors of cell death are cysteine
proteases, called caspases. Once activated, these proteases cleave
specific intracellular substrates leading to the demise of a cell.
Pro-apoptotic proteins promote caspase activation, and anti-apoptotic
proteins suppress activation.
-
Direct interactions between pro-apoptotic
and anti-apoptotic proteins lead to cell death in the absence of trophic
factors. Binding of extracellular trophic factors can trigger modulation
of these interactions via phosphorylation or other post-translational
modifications, resulting in cell survival (see ).
ǀ