NCBI » Bookshelf » Molecular Cell Biology » Cell Interactions in Development » 23.8 Cell Death and Its Regulation
 
mcb
Molecular Cell Biology
4th
Harvey Lodish,1 Arnold Berk,2 Lawrence Zipursky,2 Paul Matsudaira,3 David Baltimore,4 and James Darnell5
1Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research and Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2Molecular Biology Institute, University of California, Los Angeles
3Howard Hughes Medical Institute, School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
4California Institute of Technology (Caltech)
5Rockefeller University, New York
W. H. Freeman0-7167-3136-32000
cell biologymolecular biology

 23:  23.8 Cell Death and Its Regulation

In the preceding sections, we have described various extracellular signaling molecules, and their intracellular signaling pathways, that play a role in regulating cell division, pattern formation, differentiation, morphogenesis, and motility. In this final section, we consider signaling pathways regulating cell survival. Programmed cell death, a central mechanism controlling multicellular development, leads to deletion of entire structures (e.g., the tail in developing human embryos), sculpts specific tissues by ablating fields of cells (e.g., tissue between developing digits), and regulates the number of neurons in the nervous system. In the mammalian nervous system, for instance, the majority of cells generated during development also die during development.

Cellular interactions regulate cell death in two fundamentally different ways. Most, if not all, cells in multicellular organisms require signals to stay alive. In the absence of such survival signals, frequently referred to as trophic factors, cells activate a “suicide” program. In some developmental contexts, including the immune system, specific signals induce a “murder” program that kills cells. Whether cells commit suicide for lack of survival signals or are murdered by killing signals from other cells, recent studies suggest that death is mediated by a common molecular pathway. In this final section, we first distinguish programmed cell death from death due to tissue injury, then consider the role of trophic factors in neuronal development, and finally describe the evolutionarily conserved effector pathway that leads to cell suicide or murder.

Programmed Cell Death Occurs through Apoptosis

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch23f45a.jpg.
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is permission.jpg.

Figure 23-45

.

   Ultrastructural features of cell death by apoptosis

(a) Schematic drawings illustrating the progression of morphologic changes observed in apoptotic cells. Early in apoptosis, dense chromosome condensation occurs along the nuclear periphery. The cell body also shrinks although most organelles remain intact. Later both the nucleus and cytoplasm fragment, forming apoptotic bodies. These are phagocytosed by surrounding cells. (b) Photomicrographs comparing a normal cell (top) and apoptotic cell (bottom). Clearly visible in the latter are dense spheres of compacted chromatin as the nucleus begins to fragment. [Part (a) adapted from J. Kuby, 1997, Immunology, 3d ed., W. H. Freeman & Co., p. 53. Part (b) from M. J. Arends and A. H. Wyllie, 1991, Inter. Rev. Exp. Pathol. 32:223.]

The demise of cells by programmed cell death is marked by a well-defined sequence of morphological changes, collectively referred to as apoptosis, a Greek word that means “dropping off” or “falling off” as in leaves from a tree. Dying cells shrink and condense and then fragment, releasing small membrane-bound apoptotic bodies, which generally are phagocytosed by other cells (Figure 23-45). Importantly, the intracellular constituents are not released into the extracellular milieu where they might have deleterious effects on neighboring cells. The highly stereotyped changes accompanying apoptosis suggested to early workers that this type of cell death was under the control of a strict cellular program.

In contrast, cells that die in response to tissue damage exhibit very different morphological changes. Typically, cells that undergo this process, called necrosis, swell and burst, releasing their intracellular contents, which can damage surrounding cells and frequently cause inflammation.

Neutrophins Promote Survival of Neurons

The earliest studies demonstrating the importance of trophic factors in cellular development came from analyses of the developing nervous system. In the early 1900s the number of neurons innervating the periphery was shown to depend upon the size of the target field. For instance, removal of limb buds from the developing chick embryo leads to a reduction in the number of sensory neurons and motoneurons innervating it, while grafting of ectopic limb tissue leads to an increase in the number of neurons in corresponding regions of the spinal cord and sensory ganglia. Indeed, incremental increases in target-field size is accompanied by commensurate incremental increases in the number of neurons innervating it. This relation was found to result from the selective survival of neurons rather than changes in their differentiation or proliferation. The observation that neurons die after reaching their target field in several regions of the nervous system suggested that neurons compete for survival factors produced by the target tissue.

Subsequent to the early observations that peripheral tissue promotes survival of sensory and motoneurons, scientists discovered that transplantation of a mouse sarcoma tumor into a chick led to a marked increase in cell number in sympathetic and spinal ganglion neurons. This finding implicated the tumor as a rich source of the presumed trophic factor. To isolate and purify this factor, known simply as nerve growth factor (NGF), scientists used an in vitro assay in which outgrowth of neurites from sensory ganglia was measured. The later discovery that the submaxillary gland in the mouse also produces large quantities of NGF enabled biochemists to purify it to homogeneity and to sequence it. A homodimer of two 118-residue polypeptides, NGF belongs to a family of structurally and functionally related trophic factors, collectively referred to as neutrophins. Brain-derived growth factor (BDNF) and neurotrophin-3 (NT- 3) also are members of this protein family.

Neurotrophin Receptors

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch23f46.jpg.

Figure 23-46

.

   Neurotrophins bind to a family of receptor tyrosine kinases called Trks

Each neurotrophin binds with high affinity to one receptor indicated by the solid arrow from the ligand to the receptor. NT-3 also can bind with lower affinity to both TrkA and TrkB as indicated by the dashed arrow. In addition, neurotrophins bind to a distinct receptor called p75NTR either alone or in combination with Trks. [Adapted from W. D. Snider, 1994, Cell 77:627.]

Neurotrophins bind to and activate a family of receptor tyrosine kinases called Trks (pronounced “tracks”). NGF binds to TrkA; BDNF, to TrkB; and NT-3, to TrkC (Figure 23-46). Binding of these factors to their receptors provides a survival signal for different classes of neurons. A second type of receptor called p75NTR (NTR = neurotrophin receptor) also binds to neurotrophins, but with lower affinity. However, p75NTR forms heteromultimeric complexes with the different Trk receptors; this association increases the affinity of Trks for their ligands. Recent studies indicate that the binding of NGF to p75NTR in the absence of TrkA may promote cell death rather than prevent it.

Knockout of Neurotrophins and Their Receptors

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch23f47.jpg.

Figure 23-47

.

   Experimental demonstration that different classes of sensory neurons in the dorsal root ganglion require different trophic factors for survival

In animals lacking NGF or its receptor TrkA, small nociceptive neurons (blue) that innervate the skin are missing. These neurons express TrkA receptor and innervate NGF-producing targets. In animals lacking either NT-3 or its receptor TrkC, large propioceptive neurons (pink) innervating muscle spindles are missing. Muscle produces NT-3 and the propioceptive neurons express TrkC. Mechanoreceptors (brown), another class of sensory neurons in the dorsal root ganglion, are unaffected in these mutants. [Adapted from W. D. Snider, 1994, Cell 77:627.]

To critically address the role of the neurotrophins in development, scientists produced mice with knockout mutations in each of the neurotrophins and their receptors. These studies revealed that different neurotrophins (and their corresponding receptors) were required for the survival of different classes of sensory neurons (Figure 23-47). For instance, pain-sensitive (nociceptive) neurons, which express TrkA, are selectively lost in the dorsal root ganglion of knockout mice lacking NGF or TrkA, whereas TrkB- and TrkC-expressing neurons are unaffected in such knockouts. In contrast, TrkC-expressing proprioceptive neurons, which detect the position of the limbs, are missing from the dorsal root ganglion in TrkC and NT-3 mutants. That different neurotrophins are required for the survival of different classes of sensory neurons is further supported by the requirement of BDNF and TrkB for the development of sensory neurons in the vestibular ganglia. These neurons innervate organs of the inner ear and are required for sensing motion.

Loss of these different classes of sensory neurons is associated with corresponding defects in behavior. In BDNF mutants, animals show defects in balance associated with the vestibular system. The loss of proprioceptors in NT-3 mutants correlates with postural and movement abnormalities. And finally, although neither NGF nor TrkA mutants survive long enough for behavioral studies, heterozygotes show a decreased sensitivity to pain consistent with a reduction in the number of nociceptive neurons in the dorsal root ganglion.

Three Classes of Proteins Function in the Apoptotic Pathway

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch23f48a.jpg.
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch23f48b.jpg.

Figure 23-48

.

   Mutations in the ced-3 gene block programmed cell death in the nematode C. elegans

During normal development in C. elegans, 131 cells die through apoptosis. The entire apoptotic process from the initiation of cell death to the disappearance of a particular cell takes about 1 hour. (a) Newly hatched larva carrying a mutation in the ced-1 gene. Because mutations in this gene prevent engulfment of dead cells, highly refractile dead cells accumulate (arrows), facilitating their visualization. (b) Newly hatched larva with mutations in both the ced-1 and ced-3 genes. The absence of refractile dead cells in these double mutants indicates that no cell deaths occurred. Thus CED-3 protein is required for programmed cell death. This screen also has identified mutations in other genes required for programmed cell death. [From H. M. Ellis and H. R. Horvitz, 1986, Cell 91:818; courtesy of Hilary Ellis]

Key insights into the molecular mechanisms regulating cell death came from genetic studies in C. elegans. Scientists have traced the lineage of all the somatic cells in C. elegans from the fertilized egg to the mature worm simply by following the development of live worms under Nomarski optics. Of the 1090 somatic cells generated during development, 131 cells undergo programmed cell death. Specific mutations have identified a variety of genes whose encoded proteins play an essential role in controlling this process. For instance, in worms carrying mutations in the ced-3 or the ced-4 genes, programmed cell death does not occur, and all 1090 cells survive (Figure 23-48). In contrast, in ced-9 mutant animals, all 1090 cells die. These genetic studies indicate that the CED-3 and CED-4 proteins are required for cell death, that CED-9 suppresses apoptosis, and that the apoptotic pathway can be activated in all cells. Moreover, the finding that cell death does not occur in ced-9/ced-3 double mutants suggests that CED-9 acts upstream of CED-3 to suppress the apoptotic pathway.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch23f49.jpg.

Figure 23-49

.

   Overview of the apoptotic pathway in C. elegans and vertebrates

Three general types of proteins are critical in this conserved pathway. Regulators either promote or suppress apoptosis; the two regulators shown here, CED-9 and Bcl-2, both function to suppress apoptosis in the presence of trophic factors. Adapters interact with both regulators and effectors; in the absence of trophic factors, they promote activation of effectors. A family of cysteine proteases serve as effector proteins; their activation leads to degradation of various intracellular substrates and eventually cell death. [Adapted from D. L. Vaux and S. J. Korsemeyer, 1999, Cell 96:245.]

That apoptosis involved an evolutionarily conserved pathway was first suggested by the confluence of genetic studies in worms and studies on human cancer cells (Figure 23-49). The first apoptotic gene to be cloned, bcl-2, was isolated as a breakpoint rearrangement in human follicular lymphomas and was shown to act as an oncogene that promoted cell survival rather than cell proliferation. Not only are the Bcl-2 and CED-9 proteins homologous, but a bcl-2 transgene can block the extensive cell death found in ced-9 mutant worms. Thus both proteins act as regulators that suppress the apoptotic pathway. In addition, both proteins contain a single transmembrane domain and are localized to the outer mitochondrial, nuclear, and endoplasmic reticulum membranes.

The effector molecules in the apoptotic pathway are a family of enzymes called caspases, so named because they are cysteine proteases that selectively cleave proteins at sites just C-terminal to aspartate residues. These proteases have specific intracellular targets such as proteins of the nuclear lamina and cytoskeleton. Cleavage of these substrates leads to the demise of a cell. Activation of caspases, discussed below, appears to be a common feature of most, if not all, cell-death programs. The principal effector protease in C. elegans is CED-3. Mammalian cells contain multiple caspases.

Cell-culture studies have yielded important insights into how the various CED proteins in C. elegans and the related mammalian proteins act together to control apoptosis (see Figure 23-49). Expression of C. elegans CED-4 in a human kidney cell line induces rapid apoptosis. This can be blocked by co-expression of CED-9 (or mammalian Bcl-2). CED-9 directly binds to CED-4 and relocalizes it from the cytosol to intracellular membranes. Thus the pro-apoptotic function of CED-4 is directly suppressed by the anti-apoptotic function of CED-9. CED-4 also binds directly to CED-3 (and related mammalian caspases) and promotes activation of its protease activity. Biochemical studies have shown that CED-4 can simultaneously bind both to CED-9 and CED-3.

Pro-Apoptotic Regulators Promote Caspase Activation

Having introduced the major participants in the apoptotic pathway, we now take a closer look at how the effector caspases are activated in mammalian cells. Although CED-9 and Bcl-2 suppress the cell-death pathway, other regulatory proteins act to promote apoptosis. The first pro-apoptotic regulator to be identified, named Bax, was found associated with Bcl-2 in extracts of cells expressing high levels of Bcl-2. Sequence analysis demonstrated that Bax is related in sequence to CED-9 and Bcl-2, but overexpression of Bax induces cell death rather than protecting cells from apoptosis, as CED-9 and Bcl-2 do. Thus this family of homologous regulatory proteins comprises both anti-apoptotic members (e.g., CED-9, Bcl-2) and pro-apoptotic members (e. g., Bax). All members of this family, which we refer to as the Bcl-2 family, are single-pass transmembrane proteins and can participate in oligomeric interactions. Thus the fate of a given cell—survival or death—may reflect the particular spectrum of Bcl-2 family members present in the cell and the intracellular signaling pathways regulating them.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch23f50a.jpg.
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch23f50b.jpg.

Figure 23-50

.

   Current models of the intracellular pathways leading to cell death by apoptosis or to trophic factor–mediated cell survival in mammalian cells

The details of these pathways in any given cell type are not yet known. (a) In the absence of a trophic factor. Bad, a soluble pro-apoptotic protein, binds to the anti-apoptotic proteins Bcl-2 and Bcl-xl, which are inserted into the mitochondrial membrane. Bad binding prevents the anti-apoptotic proteins from interacting with Bax, a membrane-bound pro-apoptotic protein. As a consequence, Bax forms homo-oligomeric channels in the membrane that mediate ion flux. Through an as-yet unknown mechanism, this leads to the release of cytochrome c from the space between the inner and outer mitochondrial membrane. Cytochrome c then binds to the adapter protein Apaf-1, which in turn promotes a caspase cascade leading to cell death. (b) In the presence of a trophic factor such as NGF. In some cells, binding of trophic factors stimulates PI-3 kinase activity, leading to activation of the downstream kinase Akt, which phosphorylates Bad. Phosphorylated Bad then forms a complex with the 14 - 3 - 3 protein. With Bad sequestered in the cytosol, the antiapoptotic Bcl-2/Bcl-xl proteins can inhibit the activity of Bax, thereby preventing the release of cytochrome c and activation of the caspase cascade. [Adapted from B. Pettman and C. E. Henderson, 1998, Neuron 20:633.]

Recent studies suggest that Bcl-2 family members can influence the subcellular distribution of cytochrome c; moreover, biochemical studies have implicated cytochrome c in caspase activation. The current model of caspase activation in mammalian cells, summarized in Figure 23-50a, accounts for the involvement of cytochrome c. In normal healthy cells, cytochrome c is localized between the inner and outer mitochrodrial membrane, but in cells undergoing apoptosis, cytochrome c is released into the cytosol. This release can be blocked by overexpression of Bcl-2; conversely, overexpression of Bax promotes release of cytochrome c into the cytosol and apoptosis. In the cytosol, binding of cytochrome c to the adapter protein Apaf-1 (i.e., mammalian CED-4) promotes activation of a caspase cascade. Bax homodimers, but not Bcl-2 homodimers or Bcl-2/Bax heterodimers, permit influx of ions through the mitochondrial membrane. It remains unclear how this ion influx acts to trigger the release of cytochrome c.

Gene knockout experiments have dramatically confirmed the importance of both pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members in neuronal development. Mice lacking the bcl-xl gene, which encodes another anti-apoptotic protein, show massive defects in nervous system development with widespread cell death in the spinal cord, dorsal root ganglion, and brain of developing embryos. In contrast, bax knockouts exhibit a marked increase in neurons in some regions of the nervous system.

Some Trophic Factors Prevent Apoptosis by Inducing Inactivation of a Pro-Apoptotic Regulator

We saw earlier that neutrophins such as nerve growth factor (NGF) protect neurons from cell death. The intracellular signaling mechanisms linking such survival factors to inactivation of the cell-death machinery are not known in detail, but some intriguing clues are available. The finding that trophic factors appear to work largely independent of protein synthesis suggested that the activity of one or more components of the cell-death pathway is altered post-translationally in response to intracellular signals activated by binding of trophic factors to their receptors. Scientists demonstrated that in the absence of trophic factors, the nonphosphorylated form of Bad is associated with Bcl-2/Bcl-xl at the mitochondrial membrane (see Figure 23-50a). Binding of Bad inhibits the anti-apoptotic function of Bcl-2/Bcl-xl, thereby promoting cell death. Phosphorylated Bad, however, cannot bind to Bcl-2/Bcl-xl and is found in the cytosol complexed to the phosphoserine-binding protein 14-3-3 (Chapter 20). Hence, signaling pathways leading to Bad phosphorylation would be particularly attractive candidates for transmitting survival signals.

A number of trophic factors including NGF have been shown to activate PI-3 kinase, which in turn activates a downstream kinase called Akt (see Chapter 20). This kinase phosphorylates Bad at sites known to inhibit its pro-apoptotic activity. Moreover, a constitutively active form of Akt can rescue cultured neutrophin-deprived neurons, which otherwise would undergo apoptosis and die. These findings support the mechanism for the survival action of trophic factors depicted in Figure 23-50b. In other cell types, different trophic factors may promote cell survival through post-translational modification of other components of the cell-death machinery.

SUMMARY

Help ǀ Contact Bookshelf