NCBI » Bookshelf » Molecular Cell Biology » DNA Replication, Repair, and Recombination » 12.5 Recombination between Homologous DNA Sites
 
mcb
Molecular Cell Biology
4th
Harvey Lodish,1 Arnold Berk,2 Lawrence Zipursky,2 Paul Matsudaira,3 David Baltimore,4 and James Darnell5
1Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research and Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2Molecular Biology Institute, University of California, Los Angeles
3Howard Hughes Medical Institute, School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
4California Institute of Technology (Caltech)
5Rockefeller University, New York
W. H. Freeman0-7167-3136-32000
cell biologymolecular biology

 12:  12.5 Recombination between Homologous DNA Sites

In the previous sections of this chapter, we have discussed how the genome is faithfully reproduced from one generation to another during DNA replication and how the correct sequence is maintained by DNA-repair processes throughout the life of a cell and organism. In this section, we examine the mechanisms by which the genome can change to generate new combinations of genes.

Soon after Mendel’s rules of independent gene segregation were rediscovered and the segregation of linked groups of genes on individual chromosomes was widely recognized, another great genetic discovery was made in D. melanogaster: blocks of genes from homologous chromosomes could be exchanged by the process of crossing over, or homologous recombination (often referred to simply as recombination). Homologous recombination takes place during meiosis in sexually reproducing organisms. Recall that each homologous paternal and maternal chromosome contains a different combination of alleles. By generating new chromosomes that contain part of each homologous paternal and maternal chromosome, recombination results in new combinations of alleles on a given chromosome. Thus recombination provides a mechanism for generating genetic diversity beyond that achieved by the independent segregation of chromosomes (see Figure 8-3). Genetic exchange by recombination occurs not only in animals and plants but also in prokaryotes, viruses, plasmids, and even in the DNA of cell organelles such as mitochondria.

The events in a reciprocal recombination are equivalent to the breakage of two homologous duplex DNA molecules, an exchange of both strands at the break, and a resolution of the two duplexes so that no tangles remain. To a good approximation, recombination occurs randomly between two homologous DNA segments, and thus the frequency of recombination between two sites is proportional to the distance between the sites. (As discussed in Chapter 8, this phenomenon is the basis of genetic mapping of genes defined by mutations.) In the remainder of this chapter, we describe how several types of proteins catalyze steps in recombination.

The Crossed-Strand Holliday Structure Is an Intermediate in Recombination

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch12f29.jpg.

Figure 12-29

.

   Holliday model of genetic recombination

Genetically distinct homologous chromosomes (i.e., double-stranded DNA molecules) are indicated by red and blue; alleles are indicated by capital and lowercase letters (A, a). Complementary DNA strands are distinguished by darker and lighter shades and by the presence or absence of prime signs (A, A; a, a). Resolution of the crossed-strand Holliday structure could occur by two different pathways. Steps 4 and 5a or 6 , 7a , and 8a would yield spliced products that exhibit recombination from AC/ac to Ac/aC, with heteroduplex DNA containing the B locus in between. Although step 5b or steps 7b and 8b also resolve the connected strands of the Holliday structure, the resulting patched products are not recombinants, since all markers surrounding the crossover site, that is, to the left of A and to the right of C, are derived from the same initial chromosome. However, these molecules are heteroduplex for the B segment, and as each of these DNA molecules is duplicated, half the progeny will have the B genetic marker and half will have b. [Steps 1 – 5, see R. Holliday, 1964, Genet. Res. 5:282; steps 6, 7a, 7b, 8a, and 8b see D. Dressler and H. Potter, 1982, Ann. Rev. Biochem. 51:727; also see M. Meselson and C. M. Radding, 1975, Proc. Nat’l Acad. Sci. USA 72:358; and N. Sigal and B. Alberts, 1972, J. Mol. Biol. 71:769.]

In 1964, Robin Holliday proposed the recombination model depicted in Figure 12-29. Except for the initial steps, this model appears to accurately describe the molecular events that lead to genetic recombination. According to the original Holliday model, after two homologous double-stranded DNA molecules (i.e., cellular or viral chromosomes) become aligned, a nick is made in one strand of each of the recombining DNAs (step 1). The two nicked strands then invade each other, a process called strand exchange, at the site of the nicks, and the cut 3′ ends are joined to the 5′ ends of the homologous strand, producing a crossed-strand Holliday structure (step 2). The branch point then migrates, creating a heteroduplex region containing one strand from each parental DNA molecule (step 3).

Two mechanisms have been proposed for separation, or resolution, of the connected duplexes. According to Holliday’s original proposal, all four strands are cut at the crossover site (Figure 12-29, step 4). If the left side of chromosome I joins the right side of chromosome II, and vice versa (step 5a), then both strands in each of the resulting duplexes are recombinant; that is, all markers to the left and right of the crossover site have undergone reciprocal recombination. However, over a short region — the B and b genes in the figure — the chromosomes are termed heteroduplex; they have genetic material from one chromosome on one strand and material from the other chromosome on the opposite strand. As each of these chromosomes duplicates, half the progeny will have the genetic marker B from one initial chromosome, and half will have the b allele. In contrast, if the left sides of chromosomes I and II rejoin with their own respective right sides (step 5 b), then both strands in each of the resulting duplexes are termed nonrecombinant; that is, all markers to the left and right of the crossover site are derived from the same initial chromosome. However, these molecules are also heteroduplex for the B or b segment.

A later proposal simplifies the enzymatic cutting that is necessary to resolve the crossed-strand intermediate. Rotation of the Holliday structure at the crossover site forms a rotational isomer, or isomeric Holliday structure (step 6). (This can be visualized by imagining that the dotted line passing through the crossover point in step 3 serves as an axis around which the bottom duplex spins 180°, untwisting the crossed strands in the process.) Note that no strands are cut or ligated in going from 3 to 6. The two connected duplexes of this structure can be resolved (i.e., disconnected) by cutting and rejoining of only two strands. If this involves the two strands that were not cut to generate the original Holliday intermediate, the resulting “spliced” products are recombinant duplex chromosomes containing a heteroduplex region (steps 7a and 8a). However, if resolution involves cutting of the two strands that were originally cut, the resulting “patched” products are duplex chromosomes that contain a heteroduplex B region but are not termed recombinants (step 7b and 8b), since all the markers to the left of A and to the right of C are derived from the same original chromosome.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is permission.jpg.

Figure 12-30

.

   Electron micrographs of plasmid DNA in the process of recombination

(a) Circular plasmid DNA in crossed-strand Holliday structure. (b) More highly magnified view reveals single-stranded ring in center of isomeric Holliday structure that results from rotation about the crossover point. [See H. Potter and D. Dressler, 1978, Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 43:969; courtesy of D. Dressler.]

Evidence that Holliday intermediates actually exist has come from electron microscopy of viral and plasmid DNA molecules extracted from both bacterial and animal cells. Electron micrographs of such molecules in the act of recombining have revealed structures similar to the crossed-strand and isomeric Holliday structures (Figure 12-30). Thus, regardless of the mechanism initiating recombination, the process seems to involve the kinds of intermediates predicted by the Holliday model.

Double-Strand Breaks in DNA Initiate Recombination

Many variations of the Holliday model have been proposed; these differ in how the DNA strands are cut to initiate strand exchange and whether or not DNA synthesis is involved in the recombination process. Most evidence now favors a model in which homologous recombination is initiated by a double- strand break in one of the DNA duplexes and the homologous, intact chromosome is used as a template to repair the break by DNA synthesis.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch12f31.jpg.

Figure 12-31

.

   Double-strand break model of meiotic recombination developed from studies in the yeast S. cerevisiae

A pair of homologous chromatids (double-stranded DNA molecules) are shown, one in blue and the other red. The darker and lighter shades indicate complementary DNA strands. Alleles are indicated by capital and lowercase letters (D, d). Complementary DNA strands are also indicated by the presence or absence of prime signs (for instance D and D′, and c and c′). In this example, the initial double-strand break and resection of 5′ ends occurs on the a chromatid, removing the d′ marker 1. This is followed by strand invasion 2 and DNA synthesis with the α chromatid D strand as the template 3. Repair synthesis of the other a strand (using its complementary section on the α strand) and ligation result in formation of a Holliday structure with two crossovers 4a and 4b. (Repaired regions are marked by black dashed lines.) Resolution of this crossed-strand intermediate can occur in two ways. Cleavage at sites 2 and 4 (step 5b), or at sites 1 and 3 (not shown here), yields nonrecombinant chromosomes, since all markers surrounding the crossover site (i.e., to the left of c and to the right of E) are derived from the same initial chromosome. One duplex contains a complementary D/D′ region, but the other contains a heteroduplex mismatched d/D′ region (yellow). In contrast, cleavage (step 5a) at sites 2 and 3, or at sites 1 and 4 (not shown here), yields recombinant double-stranded DNA molecules, since all markers to the left and right of the crossover site have undergone reciprocal recombination. Note that one duplex contains a complementary D/D′ region, but the other contains a heteroduplex, mismatched d/D′ region (yellow). Cells can repair such mismatched heteroduplex regions by excising a single-strand segment containing the mismatch and using the other strand as a template for synthesis of a matching strand 6 (see Figure 12-24). In this example, d is removed and D is synthesized (jagged red segment), thus “converting” d to D. The opposite D → d conversion occurs with equal frequency.

If left unrepaired, double-strand breaks lead to broken chromosomes and cell death. The repair mechanism that joins the cut ends of nonhomologous chromosomes reconstitutes double-stranded DNA but deletes several nucleotides (see Figure 12-28). The mechanism outlined in Figure 12-31, however, completely repairs a double-strand break, yielding a molecule of the same length as the original. This model is thought to apply to homologous recombination in prokaryotes and during meiosis in yeast and probably other eukaryotes, as well as to the error-free repair of double-strand breaks in DNA induced by radiation and other agents.

As depicted in Figure 12-31, a double-strand break occurs in one of a pair of aligned homologous double-stranded DNA molecules (the a chromatid); the break is enlarged to gaps by action of 5′ → 3′ exonucleases, resulting in single-stranded 3′ ends (step 1). The 3′ end of one a strand then invades the homologous α chromatid (step 2) and is elongated at its 3′ end by DNA polymerase, using the D complementary strand of the α chromatid as template (step 3). Then the 3′ end of the other cut a strand is elongated using the other strand (D′) of the α chromatid as template, producing an intermediate structure that contains two regions of heteroduplex DNA and two Holliday junctions (step 4). Following rotation at the crossover points, each Holliday junction is resolved by cleavage of two single strands and ligation, yielding two intact double-stranded DNA molecules (step 5a or 5b). Note that the original double-strand cut in the a chromatid has been fully repaired.

This double-strand break model can account for the nonmendelian segregation of certain markers that has been observed during meiotic recombination. This phenomenon is most easily studied in yeast in which all four meiotic products can be scored in the haploid progeny spores. In a cross of multiply-marked yeast strains that undergo recombination, most allelic markers segregate according to the Mendelian 2:2 ratio, but those located near the crossover point exhibit 3:1 or 1:3 segregation. Such a nonreciprocal event is called gene conversion because one allele is apparently “converted” into another. Gene conversion is thought to result from the process for resolving the crossed-strand Holliday intermediate produced in the double-break model of recombination.

To see how gene conversion occurs, consider the example depicted in Figure 12-31 in which the D (or complementary D′) and d markers lie between the two crossovers in the intermediate. Of the two recombinant DNA duplexes that result from cleavage and ligation of the intermediate (i.e., the two products of step 5a), one contains the D marker in one strand and the complementary D′ in the other, whereas the other is a heteroduplex with D′ in one strand and the allelic d in the other. Similarly, of the two nonrecombinant DNAs that would result from cleavage of the intermediate at different sites (step 5b), one is also heteroduplex in the d/D segment. Mispairing of the D′ and d alleles in the heteroduplexes is recognized by the mismatch-repair system. Half of the time, mismatch repair will convert the D/d heteroduplex into D/D (step 6); in this case the d/d marker in the original a chromatid is “converted” into D/D. The other half of the time, the D/d heteroduplex will be converted into d/d, in which case there is no gene conversion. Thus three out of four haploid yeast progeny spores, each carrying one meiotic product, will show the D phenotype, that is, the 3:1 segregation ratio that typifies gene conversion.

The Activities of E. coli Recombination Proteins Have Been Determined

Three different but related enzymatic pathways carry out homologous recombination in E. coli. All three pathways utilize the basic double-strand break mechanism depicted in Figure 12-31 to generate a Holliday-type structure, which undergoes branch migration followed by endonuclease cleavage and then ligation to yield recombinants. In this section, we describe the enzymes that catalyze the primary E. coli recombination pathway and briefly consider homologous eukaryotic enzymes. These enzymes were uncovered through genetic analysis of recombination in E. coli and subsequently purified.

Initiation of Recombination (RecBCD Enzyme)

The most common way that E. coli cells generate a recombinogenic single-stranded region of DNA, equivalent to step 1 in Figure 12-31, probably is by action of the RecBCD enzyme, which has helicase and exonuclease activities. This enzyme complex, composed of proteins encoded by the recB, C, and D genes, specifically recognizes double-strand breaks. Such breaks occur naturally during bacterial conjugation, a process in which chromosomal DNA is transferred from one bacterium to another through direct cell contact, and during bacteriophage-mediated transduction. Double-strand breaks also can be generated by exposure to x-rays and certain chemicals.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch12f32.jpg.

Figure 12-32

.

   Initiation of recombination by E. coli RecBCD enzyme

This multifunction enzyme, which binds to free blunt ends of DNA, acts as a helicase, 3′ → 5′ exonuclease, and 5′ → 3′ exonuclease. When the enzyme encounters a CHI site, its 3′ → 5′ activity is inhibited and its 5′ → 3′ activity enhanced, yielding a single-stranded 3′-hydroxyl end. This recombinogenic 3′ end becomes coated with multiple RecA proteins, which then catalyze strand invasion and formation of a Holliday structure. [See D. G. Anderson and S. C. Kowalczykowski, 1997, Cell 90:77.]

The mechanism of action of RecBCD was worked out in studies with bacteriophage λ. Certain regions of λ phage DNA, termed CHI sites, undergo recombination at higher frequencies than other regions in normal E. coli host cells but not in recBCD mutant host cells. Experiments with purified RecBCD enzyme and λ DNA indicate that the protein complex recognizes and binds to a free blunt end of the λ phage chromosome (equivalent to a double-strand break). The enzyme then moves along the DNA, its helicase activity unwinding the duplex as it goes (Figure 12-32). Initially, RecBCD degrades both single strands one nucleotide at a time using its dual 5′ → 3′ and 3′ → 5′ exonuclease activities. However, when RecBCD encounters a CHI site, its 3′ → 5′ exonuclease activity is inhibited and its 5′ → 3′ exonuclease activity is enhanced. Thus, after passing a CHI site, RecBCD begins to generate a single-stranded 3′-hydroxyl end. After the resulting recombinogenic end becomes coated with multiple RecA proteins, it can participate in the process of strand invasion.

Strand Invasion, Homologous Pairing, and Formation of Holliday-Type Structure (RecA Protein)

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch12f33.jpg.

Figure 12-33

.

   Formation of Holliday-type structure by E. coli RecA

In the presence of ATP, RecA binds single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and promotes insertion of the bound strand at a homologous region of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), yielding a crossed-strand Holliday-type structure. The insertion reaction requires the ATPase activity of RecA. [See S. S. Flory et al., 1984, Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 49:513.]

Biochemical experiments showed that the protein encoded by the recA gene can bind to any single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). In the presence of a homologous target duplex DNA, the RecA-ssDNA complex can carry out two remarkable functions. First, RecA aligns the ssDNA with its homologous target double-stranded DNA region and forms a complex with it. Second, RecA inserts the ssDNA into the target DNA, displacing one of the preexisting strands and forming a heteroduplex Holliday-type structure (Figure 12-33).

In subsequent studies, RecA was shown to bind to the single-stranded recombinogenic ends generated by action of the RecBCD enzyme. In fact, the ability of RecA to load onto single-stranded DNA is stimulated by RecBCD once it is activated by traversing a CHI site in the DNA (see Figure 12-32). E. coli SSB protein stimulates this reaction by binding to the single-stranded region and preventing intrastrand base pairing, which would inhibit binding of RecA. In the presence of ATP, RecA coats the single-stranded region and polymerizes, forming a filament that wraps around the entire length of the recombinogenic end. Because the polymerization of RecA occurs in the 5′ → 3′ direction along the DNA, coating takes place in a discontinuous fashion as a region of the duplex is unwound. X-ray crystallographic analysis of RecA suggests that each molecule has two DNA-binding sites, both of which may lie within the core of the filament.

Branch Migration and Resolution of Holliday Structures (Ruv Proteins)

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch12f34.jpg.

Figure 12-34

.

   Experimental demonstration of branch migration catalyzed by E. coli RuvA and RuvB proteins

Complementary strands are indicated by darker and lighter shades and the presence or absence of prime signs (A, A; B, B); segments with different sequences are indicated by color. (a) A synthetic Holliday structure was produced by annealing four synthetic single-stranded oligonucleotides in which only the center crossover region (green) was homologous and the opposite ends of any given strand are, respectively, complementary to two different strands. (b, c) Treatment of the Holliday structure with RuvA and RuvB in the presence of ATP leads to branch migration followed by unwinding to yield cruciform structures with nonhomologous single-stranded ends. Branch migration in the other direction (towards A and D) yields similar cruciform structures. [Adapted from H. Iwasaki et al., 1992, Genes & Dev. 6:2214.]

Although formation of Holliday structures depends on RecA, their maintenance does not. Removal of RecA leaves stable Holliday structures, which have been used as substrates in studies on branch migration and resolution. Migration of the crossover point, which can be detected in synthetic Holliday structures, is efficiently catalyzed by E. coli RuvA and RuvB proteins (Figure 12-34). Further analysis showed that RuvA specifically recognizes the Holliday junction, whereas RuvB has the helicase activity necessary for promoting the observed branch migration.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch12f35a.jpg.
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch12f35b.jpg.

Figure 12-35

.

   Action of E. coli proteins in branch migration and resolution of Holliday junctions

(a) Model of the association of RuvA and RuvB with a Holliday junction as determined by electron microscopy. For clarity the proteins are drawn behind the DNA; in reality the DNA passes through the central hole of each RuvB hexamer. Powered by ATP hydrolysis, the ringlike RuvB molecules rotate the DNA double helices inside them, much in the way a screw is rotated inside a nut. The two RuvB proteins impart equal and opposite rotational forces to the DNA, as indicated by the black circular arrows. The straight arrows indicate the direction of movement of DNA through the RuvA/RuvB complex. (b) Diagram illustrating migration and resolution of a Holliday junction. (Alleles and complementary strands are indicated as in Figure 12-31.) Movement of a junction through the RuvA/RuvB complex generates heteroduplex regions, exactly as observed in the experiment shown in Figure 12-34. Following branch migration 1, two molecules of the RuvC endonuclease bind to RuvA 2 and cut the intermediate at two points that are 180° apart 3 . Ligation of the cut ends completes resolution 4 . In this example, two recombinant molecules are formed, but if RuvC cleaved at the two other points, nonrecombinant DNAs would be produced (see Figure 12-31). [Adapted from S. C. West, 1996, Cell 86:177; J. Raftery et al., 1996, Science 274:415; and A. Kuzminov, 1996, BioEssays 18:757.]

Recent studies have clarified the action of these two proteins. The active tetrameric form of RuvA binds to the center of a Holliday junction, unfolding the junction into a square planar configuration and keeping the four single-stranded segments apart. This induces binding of two ringlike hexameric RuvB proteins, which surround the double-stranded DNA exiting from opposite sides of the RuvA complex (Figure 12-35a). Powered by ATP hydrolysis, the RuvB rings act as molecular pumps, pulling two double-stranded DNAs into the RuvA complex, separating the strands, and then extruding two double-stranded heteroduplexes out of the RuvA complex. Following branch migration, two RuvC endonuclease proteins bind to the RuvA/ RuvB complex and then cut the DNA intermediate at two sites 180° apart; subsequent ligation generates recombinant (or nonrecombinant) molecules containing a segment of heteroduplex DNA (Figure 12-35b).

Homologous Eukaryotic Recombination Enzymes

Although RecA, RecBCD, and RuvA, B, and C were initially identified in E. coli, all eukaryotic cells, including human cells, produce proteins of similar structure and function. For instance, the human and yeast RAD51 proteins, which are homologous in sequence, catalyze pairing of homologous DNA segments and DNA strand insertion similarly to RecA. A Topo II – like protein encoded by the yeast Spo11 gene generates the double-strand breaks that occur during meiotic recombination, and homologous proteins are found in bacterial and other eukaryotic cells. Thus the molecular mechanism of homologous recombination most likely is similar in all types of cells.

Cre Protein and Other Recombinases Catalyze Site-Specific Recombination

Homologous recombination occurs randomly between two homologous DNA segments, and there is relatively little specificity as to the site at which the actual crossover occurs. In site-specific recombination, a different type of process, relatively short, unique nucleotide sequences in two DNA molecules are recognized by enzymes called recombinases, which then catalyze the joining of the two molecules. Several examples of site-specific recombination have been discovered in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells.

One well-studied example, the integration of bacteriophage λ into a particular site in the E. coli chromosome (see Figure 6-19), is catalyzed by a viral enzyme called integrase. The genome of λ phage contains a 15-bp attachment site whose 7-bp core sequence is identical with the integration (or attachment) site in the host-cell DNA. Integration can be carried out in a cell-free reaction system with only two purified proteins, λ integrase and integration host factor, a cellular protein. Integrase also catalyzes the reverse reaction, excision of the circular λ phage DNA from a bacterial chromosome.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch12f36.jpg.

Figure 12-36

.

   Cre protein, encoded by phage P1, catalyzes site-specific recombination between loxP sites on multimeric circles of P1 DNA, generating a circular monomeric DNA

Repetition of this process eventually converts the entire multimeric DNA into circular P1 monomers.

The site-specific recombination reaction that is best understood at the molecular level is catalyzed by Cre, a protein encoded in the genome of bacteriophage P1. During phage P1 DNA replication, long multimeric DNAs are produced; these are resolved into monomeric P1 DNAs by recombination at loxP sites, which separate the P1 DNA monomers composing a multimeric DNA (Figure 12-36). The Cre protein that catalyzes this reaction is similar in structure and function to λ integrase. Moreover, the excision of monomeric P1 DNAs from a multimeric circle by Cre is mechanistically similar to the excision of λ DNA from the bacterial chromosome by integrase.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch12f37.jpg.

Figure 12-37

.

   Mechanism of Cre-loxP site-specific recombination

Two Cre proteins bind on either side of each of two loxP sites, and then associate together, forming a synapse composed of two DNA molecules and four Cre proteins 1 . A tyrosine (Tyr) residue on opposite Cre proteins cleaves the DNA strand to which the proteins are bound, forming two covalent 3′ phosphotyrosine bonds and two free 5′-hydroxyl ends 2 . The free 5′-hydroxyl ends in this Cre-DNA intermediate then react with the opposite phosphotyrosine bonds, yielding a Holliday-type intermediate and regenerating native Cre proteins 3 . Next, a tyrosine residue on the other two Cre proteins at the synapse cleave the DNA strands to which they are bound, again forming covalent 3′ phosphotyrosine bonds and free 5′-hydroxyl ends to give a second Cre-DNA intermediate 4 . Finally, the free 5′-hydroxyl ends of this intermediate attack the opposite phosphotyrosine bonds, yielding the recombinant DNA products still bound to regenerated native Cre proteins 5 . [Adapted from F. Guo, D. Gopaul, and G. Van Duyne, 1997, Nature 389:40.]

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch12f38.jpg.

Figure 12-38

.

   Ribbon model based on x-ray crystallography of the Cre-DNA intermediate II in site-specific recombination (see Figure 12-37)

Each of the cleaving subunits is covalently linked to a DNA strand by a phosphotyrosine bond. [Courtesy of Dr. G. Van Duyne.]

The mechanism of Cre-catalyzed recombination is depicted in Figure 12-37. This mechanism involves the sequential formation of two transient intermediates in which Cre and DNA are covalently linked by phosphotyrosine bonds, similar to those between DNA and topoisomerase II (see Figure 12-14, inset). Reaction of the first Cre-DNA intermediate generates a Holliday-type structure; reaction of the second one yields the recombinant double-stranded DNA products. By using DNA molecules with mutations or single-strand breaks in the short loxP homologous recognition sites, researchers have been able to stop the Cre-catalyzed reaction at several stages and collect intermediates (Figure 12-38).

The P1 recombinase system has proved useful to mouse geneticists. Because many genes are required at multiple stages of development, “classical” gene-knockout mice, produced by the procedure depicted in Figure 8-34, frequently die as early embryos. However, the P1 loxP-Cre recombinase system has enabled geneticists to generate animals in which a particular gene of interest is deleted only in one specific tissue (see Figure 8-35). Such tissue-specific knockout mice enable researchers to study the function of any gene in just one tissue of the adult animal. Thus, an understanding of how one site-specific recombination system excises a DNA segment out of a specific chromosomal site led to the development of an important tool for mouse geneticists.

SUMMARY

Help ǀ Contact Bookshelf