NCBI » Bookshelf » Molecular Biology of the Cell » Internal Organization of the Cell » The Mechanics of Cell Division
 
mboc4
Molecular Biology of the Cell
4th ed.
Bruce Alberts, Alexander Johnson, Julian Lewis, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, and Peter Walter
Garland Science
New York and London
0-8153-4072-92002
cell biologydevelopmental biologymolecular biology

 Chapter 18:  The Mechanics of Cell Division

A3331

Cells reproduce by duplicating their contents and dividing in two. This cycle of duplication and division, called the cell cycle, is discussed in Chapter 17. In this chapter, we consider the mechanical events of the M phase of the cycle, which is the culmination of the cycle and includes the various stages of nuclear division (mitosis) and cytoplasmic division (cytokinesis). In a comparatively brief period, the contents of the parent cell, which were doubled during earlier phases of the cycle, are partitioned into two daughter cells. The period between one M phase and the next is called interphase, and in most rapidly proliferating cells, it is divided into three phases: S phase, in which DNA is replicated (discussed in Chapter 5), and two gap phases, G1 and G2, which provide additional time for the cell to grow (Figure 18-1).

As discussed in detail in Chapter 17, the events of the cell cycle are controlled by the cell-cycle control system. The core of the control system consists of various cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks), which are activated in sequence to trigger various steps of the cycle. The Cdks are activated by the binding of cyclin regulatory proteins, as well as by phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of the kinase. They are inactivated by various Cdk inhibitory proteins (CKIs) and by the degradation of the cyclin subunits at specific stages of the cycle.

The M-phase Cdk (M-Cdk) triggers a cascade of protein phosphorylation that initiates M phase. These phosphorylations are responsible for the many morphological changes that occur during mitosis in animal cells. The chromosomes condense, the nuclear envelope breaks down, the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus reorganize, the cell loosens its adhesions both to other cells and to the extracellular matrix, and the cytoskeleton radically reorganizes to bring about the highly ordered movements that will segregate the replicated chromosomes and divide the cell in two.

Targetted protein degradation by the anaphase-promoting complex (APC) (discussed in Chapter 17) has an equally important regulatory role in mitosis. It initiates the separation and segregation of the replicated chromosomes, and it inactivates M-Cdk at the end of mitosis.

We begin this chapter with an overview of M phase. We then discuss mitosis and cytokinesis in turn, focusing mainly on animal cells. We end by considering how M phase may have evolved. We discuss the special features of meiotic cell division in Chapter 20, where we describe the development of germ cells.

An Overview of M Phase

The central problem for a mitotic cell in M phase is how to accurately separate and distribute (segregate) its chromosomes, which were replicated in the preceding S phase, so that each new daughter cell receives an identical copy of the genome (see Figure 18-1). With minor variations, all eucaryotes solve this problem in a similar way: they assemble specialized cytoskeletal machines—first to pull the duplicated chromosome sets apart and then to split the cytoplasm into two halves. Before the duplicated chromosomes can be separated and distributed equally to the two daughter cells during mitosis, however, they must be appropriately configured, and this process begins in S phase.

Cohesins and Condensins Help Configure Replicated Chromosomes for Segregation

When the chromosomes are duplicated in S phase, the two copies of each replicated chromosome remain tightly bound together as identical sister chromatids. The sister chromatids are glued together by multisubunit protein complexes called cohesins, which are deposited along the length of each sister chromatid as the DNA is replicated. This cohesion between sister chromatids is crucial to the chromosome segregation process and is broken only late in mitosis (at the start of anaphase) to allow the sisters to be pulled apart.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f2.jpg.

Figure 18-2

.

   Human mitotic chromosomes stained to reveal a scaffold-like structure along the chromosome axis

In these confocal fluorescence micrographs, the DNA has been stained with a blue dye, and the axis has been stained red with a fluorescent antibody against a protein in the condensin complex. Only part of the scaffolding is visible in these optical sections. (A) A typical mitotic chromosome, which has a gently coiled scaffold along each of the two chromatids. (B) A metaphase chromosome from a cell artificially blocked in metaphase; in the chromosomes of these cells, the scaffold has condensed by further helical folding. (Courtesy of Ulrich Laemmli and Kazuhiro Maeshima).

The first readily visible sign that a cell is about to enter M phase is the progressive compaction of the replicated chromosomes, which become visible as threadlike structures—a process called chromosome condensation. In humans, for example, each interphase chromosome becomes compacted after replication into a mitotic chromosome that is about 50 times shorter (Figure 18-2). As discussed in Chapter 4, proteins called condensins do the work of chromosome condensation. Activated M-Cdk phosphorylates some of the condensin subunits, triggering the assembly of condensin complexes on DNA and, thereby, the progressive condensation of the chromosomes. The condensins can use the energy of ATP hydrolysis to promote DNA coiling in a test tube, and they are thought to do the same in cells during chromosome condensation. By a mechanism that is still poorly understood, they eventually produce fully condensed mitotic chromosomes, with each of the two sister chromatids organized around a linear central axis, where the condensin complexes are concentrated (see Figure 18-2).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f3.jpg.

Figure 18-3

.

   The related structure and function of cohesins and condensins

(A) Both proteins have two identical DNA- and ATP-binding domains at one end and a hinge region at the other, joined by two, long, coiled-coil regions. This flexible structure is well suited for their role as DNA cross-linkers. (B) Cohesins cross-link two adjacent sister chromatids, gluing them together. (C) Condensins mediate intramolecular cross-linking to coil DNA in the process of chromosome condensation. (Adapted from T. Hirano, Genes and Dev. 13:11–19, 1999.)

The cohesins and condensins are structurally related, and they work together to configure the replicated chromosomes in preparation for mitosis. Genetic studies show that, if chromatid cohesion is not established properly in S phase, full condensation cannot occur in M phase and chromosomes are abnormally segregated at anaphase. A model for how cohesins can glue two DNA molecules together, while the closely related condensins can bind to a single DNA molecule and induce its supercoiling and condensation, is illustrated in Figure 18-3.

In budding yeast, the sudden degradation and release of the cohesin complexes allows sister chromatids to separate at anaphase. In vertebrate cells, by contrast, most of the cohesin is released from the chromosomes at the start of mitosis, when condensins bind to drive condensation. The small amount of cohesin that remains, however, is enough to hold sister chromatids together until anaphase, when the residual cohesins are degraded, allowing the chromatids to separate, as we discuss later.

Cytoskeletal Machines Perform Both Mitosis and Cytokinesis

After the chromosomes have condensed, two distinct cytoskeletal machines are assembled in sequence to perform the mechanical processes of mitosis and cytokinesis. Both machines disassemble rapidly after they have completed their tasks.

To produce two genetically identical daughter cells, the cell has to separate its replicated chromosomes and allocate one copy to each daughter cell. In all eucaryotic cells, this task is performed during mitosis by a bipolar mitotic spindle, which is composed of microtubules and various proteins that interact with them, including microtubule-dependent motor proteins (discussed in Chapter 16).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f4.jpg.

Figure 18-4

.

   Two cytoskeletal machines that operate in M phase

The mitotic spindle assembles first and segregates the chromosomes. The contractile ring assembles later and divides the cell in two. Plant cells use a very different mechanism to divide the cytoplasm, as we discuss later.

Different cytoskeletal structures are responsible for cytokinesis. In animal cells and many unicellular eucaryotes, it is the contractile ring; in most plant cells, it is the phragmoplast. The contractile ring contains both actin and myosin filaments and forms around the equator of the cell, just under the plasma membrane; as the ring contracts, it pulls the membrane inward, thereby dividing the cell in two (Figure 18-4). Plant cells, which have a cell wall to contend with, divide their cytoplasm by a very different mechanism. As we discuss later, instead of using a contractile process that acts on the plasma membrane, the phragmoplast constructs a new cell wall from within the cell, between the two sets of replicated chromosomes.

Two Mechanisms Help Ensure That Mitosis Always Precedes Cytokinesis

In most animal cells, M phase takes only about an hour—a small fraction of the total cell-cycle time, which often lasts 12–24 hours. The rest of the cycle is occupied by interphase. Under the microscope, interphase appears as a deceptively uneventful interlude, in which the cell simply continues to grow in size. Other techniques, however, reveal that interphase is actually a busy time for a proliferating cell, during which elaborate preparations for cell division are occurring in a tightly ordered sequence. Two critical preparatory events that are completed during interphase are DNA replication and duplication of the centrosome.

As discussed in Chapter 17, cyclical oscillations in the activities of the Cdks and of proteolytic complexes drive the cell cycle forward. Cdks trigger various steps of the cycle either by directly phosphorylating structural or regulatory proteins or by activating other protein kinases to do so. The proteolytic complexes activate specific steps in the cycle by degrading key cell-cycle proteins such as cyclins and Cdk inhibitor proteins. Like throwing switches, the activation of Cdks and proteolytic complexes triggers cell-cycle transitions that are normally points of no return. Thus, a green light from M-Cdk to enter M phase results in chromosome condensation, nuclear envelope breakdown, and a dramatic change in microtubule dynamics, all triggered by the phosphorylation of regulatory proteins that control these processes.

It is crucial that the two major events of M phase—nuclear division (mitosis) and cytoplasmic division (cytokinesis)—occur in the correct sequence (see Figure 18-1). It would be catastrophic if cytokinesis occurred before all of the chromosomes had segregated during mitosis. At least two mechanisms seem to prevent this catastrophe. First, the cell-cycle control system that activates proteins required for mitosis is thought to inactivate some of the proteins required for cytokinesis; presumably for this reason, cytokinesis cannot occur until M-Cdk is inactivated at the end of mitosis. Second, after the mitotic spindle has segregated the two sets of chromosomes to opposite poles of the cell, the residual central region of the spindle is required to maintain a functional contractile ring (see Figure 18-4); thus, until the spindle has separated the chromosomes and formed a central spindle, the ring cannot divide the cytoplasm in two.

M Phase in Animal Cells Depends on Centrosome Duplication in the Preceding Interphase

Two critical events must be completed in interphase before M phase begins—replication of the DNA and, in animal cells, duplication of the centrosome. DNA is duplicated so that each new daughter cell inherits an identical copy of the genome, while the centrosome is duplicated to help initiate the formation of the two poles of the mitotic spindle and to supply each daughter cell with its own centrosome. As we discuss later, after the chromosomes have been segregated in late mitosis, the microtubules that emanate from the two centrosomes signal to the cell cortex to help establish the plane of cytoplasmic division. This ensures that the division occurs exactly midway between the two separated groups of chromosomes (see Figure 18-4).

The centrosome is the principal microtubule-organizing center in animal cells (discussed in Chapter 16). It consists of a cloud of amorphous material (called the centrosome matrix or pericentriolar material) that surrounds a pair of centrioles (see Figure 16-24). During interphase, the centrosome matrix nucleates a cytoplasmic array of microtubules, with their fast-growing plus ends projecting outward toward the cell perimeter and their minus ends associated with the centrosome. The matrix contains a great variety of proteins, including microtubule-dependent motor proteins, coiled-coil proteins that are thought to link the motors to the centrosome, structural proteins, and components of the cell-cycle control system. Most important, it contains the γ–tubulin ring complex, which is the component mainly responsible for nucleating microtubules (see Figure 16-22).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f5.jpg.

Figure 18-5

.

   Centrioles

(A) Electron micrograph of an S-phase mammalian cell in culture, showing a duplicated centrosome. Each centrosome contains a pair of centrioles; although the centrioles have duplicated, they remain together in a single complex, as shown in the drawing of the micrograph in (B). One centriole of each centriole pair has been cut in cross-section, while the other is cut in longitudinal section, indicating that the two members of each pair are aligned at right angles to each other. The two halves of the replicated centrosome, each consisting of a centriole pair surrounded by matrix, will split and migrate apart to initiate the formation of the two poles of the mitotic spindle when the cell enters M phase (see Figure 18-7). (C) Electron micrograph of a centriole pair that has been isolated from a cell. The two centrioles have partly separated during the isolation procedure but remain tethered together by fine fibers, which keep the centriole pair together until it is time for them to separate (see Figure 18-6). Both centrioles are cut longitudinally, and it can now be seen that the two have different structures: the mother centriole is larger and more complex than the daughter centriole, and, as shown in Figure 18-6, only the mother centriole is associated with matrix that nucleates microtubules. Each daughter centriole will mature during the next cell cycle, when it will replicate to give rise to its own daughter centriole. (A, from M. McGill, D.P. Highfield, T.M. Monahan, and B.R. Brinkley, J. Ultrastruct. Res. 57:43–53, 1976. © Academic Press; C, from M. Paintrand et al., J. Struct. Biol. 108:107–128, 1992. © Academic Press.)

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f6.jpg.

Figure 18-6

.

   Centriole replication

The centrosome consists of a centriole pair and associated matrix (green). At a certain point in G1, the two centrioles of the pair separate by a few micrometers. During S phase, a daughter centriole begins to grow near the base of each mother centriole and at a right angle to it. The elongation of the daughter centriole is usually completed by G2. The two centriole pairs remain close together in a single centrosomal complex until the beginning of M phase (see Figure 18-7), when the complex splits in two and the two halves begin to separate. Each centrosome now nucleates its own radial array of microtubules called an aster.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f7.jpg.

Figure 18-7

.

   The centrosome cycle

The centrosome in a proliferating animal cell duplicates in interphase in preparation for mitosis. In most animal cells, a centriole pair (shown here as a pair of dark green bars) is associated with the centrosome matrix (light green) that nucleates microtubule outgrowth. (The volume of centrosome matrix is exaggerated in this diagram for clarity; Figure 18-6 gives a more accurate representation.) Centriole duplication begins in G1 and is completed by G2 (see Figure 18-6). Initially the two centriole pairs and associated centrosome matrix remain together as a single complex. In early M phase, this complex separates into two, each of which nucleates its own aster. The two asters, which initially lie side by side and close to the nuclear envelope, move apart. By late prophase, the microtubules that interact between the two asters preferentially elongate as the two asters move apart along the outside of the nucleus. In this way, a bipolar mitotic spindle is rapidly formed. At metaphase, the nuclear envelope breaks down, enabling the spindle microtubules to interact with the chromosomes.

The process of centrosome duplication and separation is known as the centrosome cycle. During interphase of each animal cell cycle, the centrioles and other components of the centrosome are duplicated (by an unknown mechanism) but remain together as a single complex on one side of the nucleus (Figure 18-5). As mitosis begins, this complex splits in two, and each centriole pair becomes part of a separate microtubule organizing center that nucleates a radial array of microtubules called an aster (Figure 18-6). The two asters move to opposite sides of the nucleus to initiate the formation of the two poles of the mitotic spindle. When the nuclear envelope breaks down (at prometaphase), the spindle captures the chromosomes; it will separate them toward the end of mitosis (Figure 18-7). As mitosis ends and the nuclear envelope re-forms around the separated chromosomes, each daughter cell receives a centrosome in association with its chromosomes.

In early embryonic cell cycles, the centrosome cycle can operate even if the nucleus is physically removed or nuclear DNA replication is blocked by a drug that inhibits DNA synthesis. Cycles of centrosome duplication and separation proceed almost normally, first yielding two centrosomes, then four, and then eight, and so on. Egg cell extracts from the frog Xenopus (see Figure 17-9) support multiple rounds of centrosome duplication in a test tube. This system has been used to test the individual protein components of the cell-cycle control system for their ability to stimulate centrosome duplication. Such experiments show that the G1/S-Cdk (a complex of cyclin E and Cdk2) that initiates DNA replication in S phase (discussed in Chapter 17) also stimulates centrosome duplication, presumably explaining why centrosome duplication begins at the start of S phase.

M Phase Is Traditionally Divided into Six Stages

The first five stages of M phase constitute mitosis, which was originally defined as the period in which the chromosomes are visibly condensed. Cytokinesis occurs in the sixth stage, which overlaps with the end of mitosis. These six stages form a dynamic sequence, in which many independent cycles, involving the chromosomes, cytoskeleton, and centrosomes, have to be coordinated in order to produce two genetically identical daughter cells. The stages that occur during M phase are summarized in Panel 18-1. The complexity and beauty of M phase, however, are hard to appreciate from written descriptions or from a set of static pictures.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f8.jpg.

Figure 18-8

.

   The course of mitosis in a typical animal cell

In these micrographs of cultured newt lung cells, the microtubules (green) have been visualized by immunofluorescence, while the chromatin is stained with a blue fluorescent dye. During interphase, the centrosome (not visible) forms the focus for the interphase microtubule array. By early prophase, the single centrosome contains two centriole pairs (not visible). At late prophase, the centrosome divides, and the resulting two asters can be seen to have moved apart. At prometaphase, the nuclear envelope breaks down, allowing the spindle microtubules to interact with the fully condensed chromosomes. At metaphase, the bipolar structure of the spindle is clear, and all the chromosomes are aligned at the equator of the spindle. At early anaphase, the sister chromatids all separate synchronously and, under the influence of the microtubules, the daughter chromosomes begin to move toward the poles. By late anaphase, the spindle poles have moved farther apart, increasing the separation of the two groups of chromosomes. At telophase, the daughter nuclei re-form, and by late telophase, cytokinesis is almost complete, with the midbody (discussed later) persisting between the daughter cells. (Photographs courtesy of C.L. Rieder, J.C. Waters, and R.W. Cole.)

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f9.jpg.

Figure 18-9

.

   The course of mitosis in a plant cell

These light micrographs of a living Haemanthus (lily) cell were taken at the times indicated, using differential-interference-contrast microscopy. The cell has unusually large chromosomes that are easy to see. (A) At prophase, the chromosomes condense and are clearly visible in the cell nucleus. (B and C) At prometaphase, the nuclear envelope breaks down and the chromosomes interact with the microtubules that emanate from the two spindle poles. Plants do not have centrosomes, but their spindle poles contain proteins related to those found in the centrosomal matrix of animal cells. (D) At metaphase, the chromosomes line up at the equator of the spindle. (E) At anaphase, the daughter chromosomes separate and start moving to opposite poles. (F) At telophase, the chromosomes decondense and daughter nuclei re-form (not seen). (G and H) During cytokinesis, a new cell wall (the cell plate, red arrows) forms between the two nuclei (N). (Courtesy of Andrew Bajer.)

The five stages of mitosis—prophase, prometaphase, metaphase, anaphase, and telophase—occur in strict sequential order, while cytokinesis begins in anaphase and continues through telophase. Light micrographs of cell division in a typical animal cell and a typical plant cell are shown in Figures 18-8 and 18-9, respectively. During prophase, the replicated chromosomes condense in step with the reorganization of the cytoskeleton. In metaphase, the chromosomes are aligned at the equator of the mitotic spindle, and in anaphase they are segregated to the two poles of the spindle. Cytoplasmic division is complete by the end of telophase, and the nucleus and cytoplasm of each of the daughter cells then return to interphase, signaling the end of M phase.

Summary

Cell division occurs during M phase, which consists of nuclear division (mitosis) followed by cytoplasmic division (cytokinesis). The DNA is replicated in the preceding S phase; the two copies of each replicated chromosome (called sister chromatids) remain glued together by cohesins. At the start of M phase, cohesin-related proteins called condensins bind to the replicated chromosomes and progressively condense them. A microtubule-based mitotic spindle is responsible for chromosome segregation in all eucaryotic cells. The mitotic spindle in animal cells develops from the microtubule asters that form around each of the two centrosomes produced when the centrosome duplicates, beginning in S phase; at the onset of M phase, the duplicated centrosomes separate and move to opposite sides of the nucleus to initiate the formation of the two poles of the spindle. An actin and myosin-based contractile ring is responsible for cytoplasmic division in animal cells and in many unicellular eucaryotes, but not in plant cells.

Mitosis

The segregation of the replicated chromosomes is brought about by a complex cytoskeletal machine with many moving parts—the mitotic spindle. It is constructed from microtubules and their associated proteins, which both pull the daughter chromosomes toward the poles of the spindle and move the poles apart.

As we have seen, the spindle starts to form outside the nucleus while the chromosomes are condensing during prophase. When the nuclear envelope breaks down at prometaphase, the microtubules of the spindle are able to capture the chromosomes, which eventually become aligned at the spindle equator, forming the metaphase plate (see Panel 18-1). At anaphase, the sister chromatids abruptly separate and are drawn to opposite poles of the spindle; at about the same time, the spindle elongates, increasing the separation between the poles. The spindle continues to elongate during telophase, as the chromosomes arriving at the poles are released from the spindle microtubules and the nuclear envelope re-forms around them.

Both the assembly and the function of the mitotic spindle depend on microtubule-dependent motor proteins. As discussed in Chapter 16, these proteins belong to two families—the kinesin-related proteins, which usually move toward the plus end of microtubules, and the dyneins, which move toward the minus end. In the mitotic spindle, the motor proteins operate at or near the ends of the microtubules. These ends are not only sites of microtubule assembly and disassembly; they are also sites of force production. The assembly and dynamics of the mitotic spindle rely on the shifting balance between opposing plus-end-directed and minus-end-directed motor proteins.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f10.jpg.

Figure 18-10

.

   The three classes of microtubules of the fully formed mitotic spindle in an animal cell

(A) In reality, the chromosomes are proportionally much larger than shown in this drawing, and multiple microtubules are attached to each kinetochore. Note that the plus ends of the microtubules project away from the centrosomes, while the minus ends are anchored at the spindle poles. Although the centrosomes initiate the assembly of the spindle poles, most of the kinetochore and overlap microtubules that they nucleate are released from the centrosomes and are then held and organized at the poles by motor proteins. For simplicity, in the other figures in this chapter, we draw all the spindle microtubules at the poles emanating from the centrosomes. (B) A phase-contrast micrograph of an isolated mitotic spindle at metaphase, with the chromosomes aligned at the spindle equator. (B, from E.D. Salmon and R.R. Segall, J. Cell Biol. 86:355–365, 1980. © The Rockefeller University Press.)

Three classes of spindle microtubules can be distinguished in mitotic animal cells (Figure 18-10). Astral microtubules radiate in all directions from the centrosomes and are thought to contribute to the forces that separate the poles. They also act as “handles” for orienting and positioning the spindle in the cell. Kinetochore microtubules attach end-on to the kinetochore, which forms at the centromere of each duplicated chromosome. They serve to attach the chromosomes to the spindle. Overlap microtubules interdigitate at the equator of the spindle and are responsible for the symmetrical, bipolar shape of the spindle. All three classes of microtubules have their plus ends projecting away from their centrosome. The behavior of each class is thought to be different because of the different protein complexes that are associated with their plus and minus ends.

Microtubule Instability Increases Greatly at M Phase

The mitotic spindle begins to self-assemble in the cytoplasm during prophase. In animal cells, each of the replicated centrosomes nucleates its own array of microtubules, and the two sets of microtubules interact to form the mitotic spindle. We see later that the self-assembly process depends on a balance between opposing forces that originate within the spindle itself and are generated by motor proteins associated with the spindle microtubules.

Many animal cells in interphase contain a cytoplasmic array of microtubules radiating out from the single centrosome. As discussed in Chapter 16, the microtubules of this interphase array are in a state of dynamic instability, in which individual microtubules are either growing or shrinking and stochastically switch between the two states. The switch from growth to shrinkage is called a catastrophe, and the switch from shrinkage to growth is called a rescue (see Figure 16-11). New microtubules are continually being created to balance the loss of those that disappear completely by depolymerization.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f11.jpg.

Figure 18-11

.

   The half-life of microtubules in mitosis

Microtubules in an M-phase cell are much more dynamic, on average, than the microtubules at interphase. Mammalian cells in culture were injected with tubulin that had been covalently linked to a fluorescent dye. After the fluorescent tubulin had become incorporated into the cell's microtubules, an intense laser beam was used to bleach all the fluorescence in a small region. The recovery of fluorescence in the bleached region of microtubules, caused by their replacement by microtubules formed from unbleached fluorescent tubulin from the soluble pool, was then monitored as a function of time. The time for 50% recovery of fluorescence (t1/2) is thought to be equal to the time required for half of the microtubules in the region to depolymerize and re-form. (Data from W.M. Saxton et al., J. Cell Biol. 99:2175–2187, 1984. © The Rockefeller University Press.)

Prophase signals an abrupt change in the cell's microtubules. The relatively few, long microtubules of the interphase array rapidly convert to a larger number of shorter and more dynamic microtubules surrounding each centrosome, which will begin to form the mitotic spindle. During prophase, the half-life of microtubules decreases dramatically. This can be seen by labeling the microtubules in living cells with fluorescent tubulin subunits (Figure 18-11). As the instability of microtubules increases, the number of microtubules radiating from the centrosomes greatly increases as well, apparently because of an alteration in the centrosomes themselves that increases the rate at which they nucleate new microtubules. How does the cell-cycle control system trigger these dramatic changes in the cell's microtubules at the onset of mitosis?

M-Cdk initiates the changes by causing the phosphorylation of two classes of proteins that control microtubule dynamics (discussed in Chapter 16). These include microtubule motor proteins and microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs). The roles of these regulators in controlling microtubule dynamics have been revealed by experiments using Xenopus egg extracts, which reproduce many of the changes that occur in intact cells during M phase. If centrosomes and fluorescent tubulin are mixed with extracts made from either M-phase or interphase cells, fluorescent microtubules nucleate from the centrosomes, permitting the behavior of individual microtubules to be analyzed by time-lapse fluorescence video microscopy. The microtubules in mitotic extracts differ from those in interphase extracts primarily by the increased rate of catastrophes, where they switch abruptly from slow growth to rapid shortening.

Proteins called catastrophins destabilize microtubule arrays by increasing the frequency of catastrophes (see Figure 16-36A). Among the catastrophins is a kinesin-related protein that does not function as a motor. In general, MAPs have the opposite effect of catastrophins, stabilizing microtubules in various ways: they can increase the frequency of rescues, in which microtubules switch from shrinkage to growth, or they can either increase the growth rate or decrease the shrinkage rate of microtubules. Thus, in principle, changes in catastrophins and MAPs can make microtubules much more dynamic in M phase by increasing total microtubule depolymerization rates, decreasing total microtubule polymerization rates, or both.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f12.jpg.

Figure 18-12

.

   Experimental evidence that the balance between catastrophins and MAPs influences the frequency of microtubule catastrophes and microtubule length

(A) Interphase or mitotic Xenopus egg extracts were incubated with centrosomes, and the behavior of individual microtubules nucleated from the centrosomes was followed by fluorescence video microscopy. As expected, the catastrophe rate is higher in mitotic than in interphase extracts. The depletion of a specific MAP (XMAP215) from the mitotic extracts greatly increases the catastrophe rate, indicating that this MAP normally inhibits catastrophes in mitotic extracts. The addition of antibodies that block the function of a specific catastrophin (the kinesin-related protein XKCM1) greatly reduces the catastrophe rate in the XMAP215-depleted mitotic extracts, indicating that this catastrophin is normally responsible for stimulating catastrophes in mitotic extracts and that the catastrophe rate depends on the balance between the MAP and the catastrophin. Fluorescence micrographs of the asters formed in the different experimental conditions are shown in the top panels; note that the higher the catastrophe rates, the shorter the microtubules. (B) Mitotic spindle formation in mitotic extracts when both centrosomes and sperm nuclei are added. Microtubules are shown in red and chromosomes in blue. Whereas normal spindles form in normal mitotic extracts, very abnormal spindles form when XMAP215 is depleted from the extracts, presumably because the microtubules nucleated by the centrosomes are too short. Remarkably, microtubules formed in a test tube from a mixture of purified tubulin, XMAP215, and XKCM1 exhibit normal dynamic instability. (From R. Tournebize et al., Nature Cell Biol. 2:13–19, 2000. © Macmillan Magazines Ltd.)

In Xenopus egg extracts, the balance between a single type of catastrophin and a single type of MAP can be shown to determine the catastrophe rate and the steady-state length of microtubules. This balance, in turn, governs the assembly of the mitotic spindle, as microtubules that are either too long or too short are incapable of assembling into a spindle (Figure 18-12). One way in which M-Cdk may control microtubule length is by phosphorylating this MAP and reducing its ability to stabilize microtubules. Even if the activity of the catastrophin remained constant throughout the cell cycle, the balance between the two opposing activities of the MAP and catastrophin would shift, increasing the dynamic instability of the microtubules.

The cell contains a variety of MAPs, catastrophins, and motor proteins, each with subtly different activities. It is the balance between the opposing activities of these proteins that is responsible for the dynamic behavior of the mitotic spindle. We see later how changes in this balance help the spindle to segregate the chromosomes at anaphase.

Interactions Between Opposing Motor Proteins and Microtubules of Opposite Polarity Drive Spindle Assembly

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f13.jpg.

Figure 18-13

.

   Two functions of multimeric motor proteins that are important for mitotic spindle assembly and function

Microtubule-dependent motor proteins hydrolyze ATP and move along a microtubule toward either its plus or its minus end. If the motor protein is multimeric, as in these examples, it can cross-link two adjacent microtubules and move them relative to one another. (A) Some minus-end-directed multimeric motor proteins rearrange microtubules to form a focus of minus ends, where the motor proteins accumulate. (B) If microtubules are aligned so that they are antiparallel (that is, their plus ends are facing in opposite directions), a cross-linking motor protein can slide the microtubules past each other, as shown here for a plus-end-directed motor protein that could elongate the spindle. (Adapted from A.A. Hyman and E. Karsenti, Cell 84:406–410, 1996.)

While a shift in the balance between MAPs and catastrophins early in M phase creates more dynamic microtubules, a different sort of balance, between minus-end-directed and plus-end-directed motor proteins, helps assemble the mitotic spindle. Because some of these motor proteins form oligomers that can cross-link adjacent microtubules, they can move one microtubule relative to the other, with the direction of movement dependent on the polarity of both the motor protein and the microtubules. In this way, these motor proteins can form foci by bringing together a group of microtubule ends (Figure 18-13A). Alternatively, such motor proteins can slide antiparallel microtubules past each other (Figure 18-13B). These two different motor protein functions play a crucial part in the assembly and function of the spindle: they create the foci of microtubule minus ends that form the two spindle poles, and they slide antiparallel microtubules past each other in the overlap zone of the spindle (see Figure 18-10).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f14.jpg.

Figure 18-14

.

   Separation of the two spindle poles in prophase in an animal cell

In this model, plus-end-directed motor proteins operating on interacting antiparallel microtubules help separate the two poles of a forming mitotic spindle. New microtubules grow out in random directions from two nearby centrosomes. The microtubules are anchored at the centrosome by their minus ends, while their plus ends extend outward. When two microtubules from opposite centrosomes interact in an overlap zone, plus-end-directed, kinesin-related motor proteins cross-link the microtubules together and tend to drive the microtubules in the direction that will push the centrosomes apart (see Figure 18-13B). Minus-end-directed dynein motors associated with the nuclear envelope are also thought to help separate the two centrosomes by pulling on the two sets of astral microtubules (not shown).

During prophase in animal cells, microtubules growing from one centrosome engage with the microtubules of the adjacent centrosome. Because the plus ends of the microtubules are oriented away from the centrosomes, these two sets of microtubules have opposite polarities. Plus-end-directed motor proteins cross-link the two sets of microtubules and help push the centrosomes apart to begin to form the two poles of the mitotic spindle (Figure 18-14). A balance between plus-end-directed motor proteins and minus-end-directed motor proteins is crucial for spindle assembly: whereas plus-end-directed motor proteins operating on overlap microtubules tend to push the two halves of the spindle apart, some minus-end-directed motor proteins tend to pull them together.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f15.jpg.

Figure 18-15

.

   The influence of opposing motor proteins on spindle length in budding yeast

(A) A differential-interference-contrast micrograph of a mitotic yeast cell. The spindle is highlighted in green, and the position of the spindle poles is indicated by red arrows. The nuclear envelope does not break down during mitosis in yeasts, and the spindle forms inside the nucleus (see Figure 18-41). In (B–D), the mitotic spindles have been stained with fluorescent anti-tubulin antibodies. (B) Normal yeast cells. (C) Over-expression of the minus-end-directed motor protein Kar3p leads to abnormally short spindles. (D) Overexpression of the plus-end-directed motor protein Cin8p leads to abnormally long spindles. Thus, it seems that a balance between opposing motor proteins determines spindle length in these cells. (A, courtesy of Kerry Bloom; B–D, from W. Saunders, V. Lengyel, and M.A. Hoyt, Mol. Biol. Cell 8:1025–1033, 1997. © American Society for Cell Biology.)

At least seven families of kinesin-related motor proteins have been localized to the mitotic spindle in vertebrate cells. In the budding yeast S. cerevisiae, five such motor proteins have been shown to work together in the spindle. Increasing the level of one of the plus-end-directed motor proteins produces abnormally long spindles, whereas increasing the level of one of the minus-end-directed motor proteins produces abnormally short spindles (Figure 18-15). Thus, the balance between plus-end-directed and minus-end-directed motor proteins seems to determine spindle length. A similar balance between motor proteins of opposite polarities occurs in human mitotic cells. At least, one of the motor proteins in human cells has to be phosphorylated by M-Cdk to bind to the spindle, suggesting one way in which M-Cdk might control the balance between opposing motor proteins.

Kinetochores Attach Chromosomes to the Mitotic Spindle

Prometaphase in animal cells begins abruptly with the breakdown of the nuclear envelope. The breakdown is triggered when M-Cdk directly phosphorylates the nuclear lamina that underlies the nuclear envelope (see Figure 12-20). The disassembly of the nuclear envelope allows the microtubules access to the condensed chromosomes for the first time. Now, the assembly of a mature mitotic spindle can begin (see Panel 18-1, pp. 1034–1035).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f16.jpg.

Figure 18-16

.

   Kinetochore microtubules

(A) A fluorescence micrograph of a metaphase chromosome stained with a DNA-binding fluorescent dye and with human autoantibodies that react with specific kinetochore proteins. The two kinetochores, one associated with each chromatid, are stained red. (B) A drawing of a metaphase chromosome showing its two sister chromatids attached to kinetochore microtubules, which bind by their plus ends. Each kinetochore forms a plaque on the surface of the centromere. The number of microtubules bound to a metaphase kinetochore varies from 1 in budding yeast to over 40 in some mammalian cells. (A, courtesy of B.R. Brinkley.)

The attachment of the chromosomes to the spindle is a dynamic process. When viewed by video microscopy, it seems to involve a “search and capture” mechanism, in which microtubules nucleated from each of the rapidly separating centrosomes grow outward toward the chromosomes. Microtubules that attach to a chromosome become stabilized, so that they no longer undergo catastrophes. They eventually end up attached end-on at the kinetochore, a complex protein machine that assembles onto the highly condensed DNA at the centromere (discussed in Chapter 4) during late prophase. The end-on attachment to the kinetochore is through the plus end of the microtubule, which is now called a kinetochore microtubule (Figure 18-16).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f17.jpg.

Figure 18-17

.

   The capture of microtubules by kinetochores

The red arrow in (A) indicates the direction of microtubule growth, while the gray arrow in (C) indicates the direction of chromosome sliding.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f18.jpg.

Figure 18-18

.

   Chromosomes at the metaphase plate of a mitotic spindle

In this fluorescence micrograph, kinetochores are labeled in red, microtubules in green, and chromosomes in blue. (From A. Desai, Curr. Biol. 10:R508, 2000. © Elsevier.)

In newt lung cells, where the initial capture event can be readily visualized, the kinetochore is seen first to bind to the side of the microtubule and then to slide rapidly along it toward one of the centrosomes. The lateral attachment to the chromosome is rapidly converted to an end-on attachment. At the same time, microtubules growing from the opposite spindle pole attach to the kinetochore on the opposite side of the chromosome, forming a bipolar attachment (Figure 18-17). Then begins a truly mesmerizing stage of mitosis. First, the chromosomes are tugged back and forth, eventually assuming a position equidistant between the two spindle poles, a position called the metaphase plate (Figure 18-18). In vertebrate cells, the chromosomes then oscillate gently at the metaphase plate, awaiting the signal to separate. The signal is produced after a predictable lag time after the bipolar attachment of the last of the chromosomes (discussed in Chapter 17).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f19.jpg.

Figure 18-19

.

   The kinetochore

Electron micrograph of an anaphase chromatid with microtubules attached to its kinetochore. While most kinetochores have a trilaminar structure, the one shown here (from a green alga) has an unusually complex structure with additional layers. (From J.D. Pickett-Heaps and L.C. Fowke, Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 23:71–92, 1970. Reproduced by permission of CSIRO.)

As we discuss later, kinetochores play a crucial part in moving chromosomes on the spindle. They have a platelike organization when viewed in the electron microscope (Figure 18-19), and they are associated with both plus-end-directed and minus-end-directed microtubule motor proteins. But it remains a mystery how the plus ends of microtubules are attached to the kinetochore, especially because these ends are continuously polymerizing or depolymerizing, depending on the stage of mitosis.

Microtubules Are Highly Dynamic in the Metaphase Spindle

The metaphase spindle is a complex and beautiful assembly, suspended in a state of dynamic equilibrium and tensed for action that will begin in anaphase. All of the spindle microtubules, except the kinetochore microtubules, are in a state of dynamic instability, with their free plus ends shifting stochastically between slow growth and rapid shrinkage. In addition, the kinetochore and overlap microtubules exhibit a behavior called poleward flux, with a net addition of tubulin subunits at their plus end, balancing a net loss at their minus ends, near the spindle poles.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f20.jpg.

Figure 18-20

.

   The dynamic behavior of microtubules in the metaphase spindle studied by photoactivation of fluorescence

A metaphase spindle formed in vitro by adding Xenopus sperm to an extract of Xenopus eggs (see Figure 17-9) has incorporated three fluorescent markers: rhodamine-labeled tubulin (red) to mark all of the microtubules, a blue DNA-binding dye that labels the chromosomes, and caged-fluorescein-labeled tubulin, which is also incorporated into all of the microtubules but is invisible because it is nonfluorescent until activated by ultraviolet light. (A) The distribution of the chromosomes and microtubules in the spindle. (B) A beam of ultraviolet light was used to uncage the caged-fluorescein-labeled tubulin locally, mainly just to the left side of the metaphase plate. Over the next few minutes (after 1.5 minutes in C, after 2.5 minutes in D), the uncaged fluorescein-tubulin signal is seen to move toward the left spindle pole, indicating that tubulin is continuously moving poleward, even though the spindle (visualized by the red rhodamine-tubulin fluorescence) remains largely unchanged. The caged fluorescein signal also diminishes in intensity, indicating that the individual microtubules are continually depolymerizing and being replaced. (From K.E. Sawin and T.J. Mitchison, J. Cell Biol. 112:941–954, 1991. © The Rockefeller University Press.)

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f21.jpg.

Figure 18-21

.

   Visualizing the dynamics of individual microtubules by fluorescence speckle microscopy

(A) The principle of the method. A very low amount of fluorescent tubulin is injected into living cells so that individual microtubules form with a very small proportion of fluorescent tubulin. Such microtubules have a speckled appearance when viewed by fluorescence microscopy. (B) Fluorescence micrographs of a mitotic spindle in a living newt lung epithelial cell. The chromosomes are stained green, and the tubulin speckles are red. (C) The movement of individual speckles can be readily followed by time-lapse video microscopy. Images of the long, thin, rectangular, boxed region (arrow) in (B) were taken at sequential times and pasted side by side to make a montage of the region over time. Individual speckles can be seen to move toward the poles (representing poleward flux) at a rate of about 0.75 μm/min. (From T.J. Mitchison and E.D. Salmon, Nature Cell Biol. 3:E17–21, 2001.)

The poleward flux in kinetochore and overlap microtubules in metaphase spindles has been studied directly by allowing the microtubules to incorporate tubulin that has been covalently coupled to photoactivatable, “caged” fluorescein. When such spindles are marked with a beam of UV light from a laser, the marks move continuously toward the spindle poles (Figure 18-20). The fluorescent marks get dimmer with time, indicating that many of the overlap and kinetochore microtubules depolymerize completely and are replaced. The dynamics of individual spindle microtubules of all classes (astral, kinetochore, and overlap) can be studied by an ingenious method in which very low amounts of fluorescent tubulin are injected into living cells (Figure 18-21). In these studies, a poleward flux is seen in both kinetochore and overlap microtubules, but not in astral microtubules. The function of the poleward flux, which does not occur in simple spindles such as those in yeasts, is unknown, although it might aid chromosome movement in anaphase.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f22.jpg.

Figure 18-22

.

   How opposing forces may drive chromosomes to the metaphase plate

(A) Evidence for an astral ejection force that pushes chromosomes away from the spindle poles toward the spindle equator. In this experiment, a prometaphase chromosome that is temporarily attached to a single pole by kinetochore microtubules is cut in half with a laser beam. The half that is freed from the kinetochore is pushed rapidly away from the pole, whereas the half that remains attached to the kinetochore moves toward the pole, reflecting a decreased repulsion. (B) A model of how two opposing forces may cooperate to move chromosomes to the metaphase plate. Plus-end-directed motor proteins on the chromosome arms are thought to interact with astral microtubules to generate the astral ejection force, which pushes chromosomes toward the spindle equator. Minus-end-directed motor proteins at the kinetochore are thought to interact with kinetochore microtubules to pull chromosomes toward the pole.

One of the most striking aspects of metaphase in vertebrate cells is the continuous oscillatory movement of the chromosomes at the metaphase plate. These movements have been studied by video microscopy in newt lung cells and are seen to switch between two states—a poleward (P) state, which is a minus-end-directed pulling movement, and an away-from-the-pole (AP) state, which is a plus-end-directed movement. Kinetochores are thought to pull the chromosomes toward the poles, while an astral ejection force is thought to push the chromosomes away from the poles, toward the spindle equator (Figure 18-22A). Plus-end-directed motor proteins located on the chromosome arms are believed to interact with the astral microtubules to produce the ejection force (Figure 18-22B). Interestingly, spindles without centrosomes, including those in higher plants and some meiotic spindles, do not display these oscillations, which might reflect the absence of astral microtubules and, consequently, the absence of the astral ejection force.

Functional Bipolar Spindles Can Assemble Around Chromosomes in Cells Without Centrosomes

Chromosomes are not just passive passengers in the process of spindle assembly. By creating a local environment that favors both microtubule nucleation and microtubule stabilization, they play an active part in spindle formation. The influence of the chromosomes can be demonstrated by using a fine glass needle to reposition them after the spindle has formed. For some cells in metaphase, if a single chromosome is tugged out of alignment, a mass of new spindle microtubules rapidly appears around the newly positioned chromosome, while the spindle microtubules at the chromosome's former position depolymerize. This property of the chromosomes seems to depend on a guanine-nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) that is bound to chromatin; it stimulates a small GTPase in the cytosol called Ran, inducing Ran to bind GTP in place of GDP. The activated Ran–GTP, which is also involved in nuclear transport (discussed in Chapter 12), releases microtubule-stabilizing proteins from protein complexes in the cytosol, thereby stimulating the local nucleation of microtubules around chromosomes.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f23.jpg.

Figure 18-23

.

   Bipolar spindle assembly without centrosomes in parthenogenetic embryos of the insect Sciara.

The microtubules are stained green, the chromosomes red. The top fluorescence micrograph shows a normal spindle formed with centrosomes in a normally fertilized Sciara embryo. The bottom micrograph shows a spindle formed without centrosomes in an embryo that initiated development without fertilization. Note that the spindle with centrosomes has an aster at each pole of the spindle, whereas the spindle formed without centrosomes does not. Both types of spindles are able to segregate the replicated chromosomes. (From B. de Saint Phalle and W. Sullivan, J. Cell Biol. 141:1383–1391, 1998. © The Rockefeller University Press.)

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f24.jpg.

Figure 18-24

.

   Bipolar spindle assembly without centrosomes or kinetochores

(A) A fluorescence micrograph of a spindle (green) that self-assembled around beads (red) coated with bacterial DNA in Xenopus egg extracts. (B) The steps in spindle assembly directed by DNA-coated beads. The minus ends of the microtubules are indicated in one part of the figure. (A, from R. Heald et al., Nature 382:420–425, 1996. © Macmillan Magazines Ltd; B, based on C.E. Walczak et al., Curr. Biol. 8:903–913, 1998.)

In cells without centrosomes, the chromosomes direct the assembly of a functional bipolar spindle. This is how spindles form in cells of higher plants, as well as in many meiotic cells. It is also how they assemble in certain insect embryos that have been induced to develop from eggs without fertilization (i.e., parthenogenetically); as the sperm normally provides the centrosome when it fertilizes an egg (discussed in Chapter 20), the mitotic spindles in these parthenogenic embryos develop without centrosomes (Figure 18-23). Remarkably, in artificial systems, spindles can self-assemble without either centrosomes or centromeres. When beads coated with DNA that lack centromere sequences (and therefore lack kinetochore complexes) are added to Xenopus egg extracts in the absence of centrosomes, bipolar spindles assemble around the beads (Figure 18-24A).

The centrosome-independent spindle assembly process is different from the assembly that is directed by centrosomes. In the DNA-coated bead model, for example, the microtubules first nucleate near the surface of the DNA, and then microtubule motor proteins sort the microtubules into bundles of uniform polarity, push the minus ends of the microtubules apart, and focus them into spindle poles (Figure 18-24B).

Even vertebrate cells can use such a centrosome-independent pathway to construct a functional bipolar spindle if the centrosomes are destroyed with a laser beam. Although the resulting acentrosomal spindle can segregate chromosomes normally, it lacks astral microtubules, which are responsible for positioning the spindle in animal cells; as a result, the spindle is often mispositioned, resulting in abnormalities in cytokinesis. If present, however, centrosomes normally direct spindle assembly because they are more efficient at nucleating microtubule polymerization than are chromosomes.

Anaphase Is Delayed Until All Chromosomes Are Positioned at the Metaphase Plate

Mitotic cells usually spend about half of M phase in metaphase, with the chromosomes aligned on the metaphase plate, jostling about, awaiting the signal that induces sister chromatids to separate to begin anaphase. Treatment with drugs that destabilize microtubules, such as colchicine or vinblastine (discussed in Chapter 16), arrests mitosis for hours or even days. This observation led to the identification of a spindle-attachment checkpoint, which is activated by the drug treatment and arrests progress in mitosis. The checkpoint mechanism is used by the cell-cycle control system to ensure that cells do not enter anaphase until all chromosomes are attached to both poles of the spindle (discussed in Chapter 17). If one of the protein components of the checkpoint mechanism is inactivated by mutation or by an intracellular injection of antibodies against the component, the cells initiate anaphase prematurely.

The spindle-attachment checkpoint monitors the attachment of the chromosomes to the mitotic spindle. It is thought to detect either unattached kinetochores or kinetochores that are not under the tension that results from bipolar attachment. In either case, unattached kinetochores emit a signal that delays anaphase until they all are properly attached to the spindle (see Figure 17-27). Drugs that destabilize microtubules prevent such attachment and therefore maintain the signal and delay anaphase. The inhibitory signaling role of the kinetochore can be demonstrated in mammalian cells in culture, where a single unattached kinetochore can block anaphase; destruction of this kinetochore with a laser causes the cell to enter anaphase.

Sister Chromatids Separate Suddenly at Anaphase

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f25.jpg.

Figure 18-25

.

   Chromatid separation at anaphase

In the transition from metaphase (A) to anaphase (B), sister chromatids suddenly separate and move toward opposite poles—as shown in these light micrographs of Haemanthus (lily) endosperm cells that were stained with gold-labeled antibodies against tubulin. (Courtesy of Andrew Bajer.)

Anaphase begins abruptly with the release of the cohesin linkage that holds the sister chromatids together at the metaphase plate. As discussed in Chapter 17, this metaphase-to-anaphase transition is triggered by the activation of the anaphase promoting complex (APC). Once this proteolytic complex is activated, it has at least two crucial functions: (1) it cleaves and inactivates the M-phase cyclin (M-cyclin), thereby inactivating M-Cdk; and (2) it cleaves an inhibitory protein (securin), thereby activating a protease called separase. Separase then cleaves a subunit in the cohesin complex to unglue the sister chromatids (see Figure 17-26). The sisters immediately separate—and are now called daughter chromosomes—and move to opposite poles (Figure 18-25).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f26.jpg.

Figure 18-26

.

   The major forces that separate daughter chromosomes at anaphase in mammalian cells

Anaphase A depends on motor proteins operating at the kinetochores that, together with the depolymerization of the kinetochore microtubules, pull the daughter chromosomes toward the nearest pole. In anaphase B, the two spindle poles move apart. Two separate forces are thought to be responsible for anaphase B. The elongation and sliding of the overlap microtubules past one another in the central spindle push the two poles apart, and outward forces exerted by the astral microtubules at each spindle pole act to pull the poles away from each other, toward the cell surface.

The chromosomes move by two independent and overlapping processes. The first, referred to as anaphase A, is the initial poleward movement of the chromosomes. It is accompanied by shortening of the kinetochore microtubules at their attachment to the chromosome and, to a lesser extent, by the depolymerization of spindle microtubules at the two spindle poles. The second process, referred to as anaphase B, is the separation of the poles themselves, which begins after the sister chromatids have separated and the daughter chromosomes have moved some distance apart. Anaphase A depends on motor proteins at the kinetochore. Anaphase B depends on motor proteins at the poles that pull the poles apart, as well as on motor proteins at the central spindle (the bundles of antiparallel overlap microtubules between the separating chromosomes) that push the poles apart (Figure 18-26). Originally, anaphase A and anaphase B were distinguished by their different sensitivities to drugs. These differences are now thought to reflect differences in the sensitivities of the microtubule motor proteins that mediate the two processes.

Kinetochore Microtubules Disassemble at Both Ends During Anaphase A

As each daughter chromosome moves poleward, its kinetochore microtubules depolymerize, so that they have nearly disappeared at telophase. We can see this process by fluorescence video microscopy, in which labeled tubulin is injected into cells so that the sites of recent tubulin incorporation can be seen. In such experiments, the kinetochore ends of the kinetochore microtubules are observed to be the primary sites of tubulin addition during metaphase. In anaphase A, however, the kinetochore microtubules shorten mainly by the loss of tubulin from their kinetochore ends. It is not known how this switch from polymerization to depolymerization at kinetochores occurs at anaphase, but it may be triggered by the loss of tension that occurs when the cohesion between the sister chromatids is destroyed.

The poleward flux discussed earlier, with the continuous loss of tubulin subunits from both the overlap and kinetochore microtubules at the poles (see Figure 18-21), continues through anaphase. Thus, the kinetochore microtubules disassemble from both ends in anaphase.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f27.jpg.

Figure 18-27

.

   Two alternative models of how the kinetochore may generate a poleward force on its chromosome during anaphase A

(A) Microtubule motor proteins at the kinetochore use the energy of ATP hydrolysis to pull the chromosome along its bound microtubules. Depolymerization of the kinetochore microtubules follows as a consequence. (B) Chromosome movement is driven by kinetochore microtubule disassembly: as tubulin subunits dissociate, the kinetochore is obliged to slide poleward to maintain its binding to the walls of the microtubule. As motor proteins are required for anaphase A, in this model, they would be required mainly for the microtubules to remain attached to the kinetochore.

Although it is clear that both microtubule motor proteins and microtubule depolymerization at the kinetochores contribute to chromosome movement during anaphase A, the exact molecular mechanism that drives the movement is still unknown. It is also unclear how kinetochores can remain attached to a microtubule that is losing tubulin subunits at its kinetochore (plus) end. There are two main ideas about how chromosomes move in anaphase A. One is that motor proteins at the kinetochores use the energy of ATP hydrolysis to pull the chromosomes along the kinetochore microtubules, which depolymerize as a consequence. Another is that the depolymerization itself drives the movement, without using ATP (Figure 18-27). The second possibility might seem implausible at first, but it has been shown that purified kinetochores in a test tube, with no ATP present, can remain attached to depolymerizing microtubules and thereby move. The energy that drives the movement is stored in the microtubule and is released when the microtubule depolymerizes; it ultimately comes from the hydrolysis of GTP that occurs after a tubulin subunit adds to the end of a microtubule (discussed in Chapter 16). How motor proteins and microtubule depolymerization at the kinetochore combine to drive chromosome movement remains one of the fundamental mysteries of mitosis.

Both Pushing and Pulling Forces Contribute to Anaphase B

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f28.jpg.

Figure 18-28

.

   The sliding of overlap microtubules at anaphase

These electron micrographs show the reduction in the degree of microtubule overlap in the central spindle during mitosis in a diatom. (A) Metaphase. (B) Late anaphase. (Courtesy of Jeremy D. Pickett-Heaps.)

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f29.jpg.

Figure 18-29

.

   A model for how motor proteins may act in anaphase B

Plus-end-directed motor proteins cross-link the overlapping, antiparallel, overlap microtubules and slide the microtubules past each other, thereby pushing the spindle poles apart. The red arrows indicate the direction of microtubule sliding. Minus-end-directed motor proteins bind to the cell cortex and to those astral microtubules that point away from the spindle and pull the poles apart. These astral microtubules shorten as the spindle poles are pulled toward the cortex.

In anaphase B, the spindle elongates, pulling the two sets of chromosomes farther apart. In contrast to anaphase A, where the depolymerization of kinetochore microtubules is coupled to chromosome movement toward the poles, in anaphase B, the overlap microtubules actually elongate, helping to push the spindle poles apart. Anaphase B is driven by two distinct forces (see Figure 18-26). The first depends on plus-end-directed microtubule motor proteins in the central spindle that form a bridge between the overlapping microtubules of opposite polarities; the translocation of these motors toward the microtubule plus ends slides the microtubules past one another, pushing the poles apart. As a result, the bundle of overlap microtubules in the central spindle thins out (Figure 18-28). This mechanism is similar to that described earlier, in which motor proteins push the poles apart during spindle assembly in prophase (see Figure 18-14). The second force contributing to anaphase B depends on minus-end-directed motor proteins that interact with both the astral microtubules and the cell cortex and pull the two poles of the spindle apart (Figure 18-29).

The relative contributions of anaphase A and anaphase B to chromosome segregation vary greatly, depending on the cell type. In mammalian cells, anaphase B begins shortly after anaphase A and stops when the spindle is about twice its metaphase length; in contrast, the spindles of yeasts and certain protozoa primarily use anaphase B to separate the chromosomes at anaphase, and their spindles elongate to up to 15 times the metaphase length in the process.

At Telophase, the Nuclear Envelope Re-forms Around Individual Chromosomes

By the end of anaphase, the daughter chromosomes have separated into two equal groups at opposite ends of the cell and have begun to decondense. In telophase, the final stage of mitosis, a nuclear envelope reassembles around each group of chromosomes to form the two daughter interphase nuclei.

The sudden transition from metaphase to anaphase initiates the dephosphorylation of the many proteins that were phosphorylated at prophase. Although the relevant phosphatases are active throughout mitosis, it is not until M-Cdk is switched off that the phosphatases can act unopposed. Shortly thereafter, at telophase, nuclear membrane fragments associate with the surface of individual chromosomes and fuse to re-form the nuclear envelope. Initially, the fused membrane fragments partly enclose clusters of chromosomes; the fragments then coalesce to re-form the complete nuclear envelope (see Figure 12-21). During this process, the nuclear pore complexes are incorporated into the envelope, and the dephosphorylated lamins reassociate to form the nuclear lamina. The nuclear envelope once again becomes continuous with the extensive membrane sheets of the endoplasmic reticulum. Once the nuclear envelope has re-formed, the pore complexes pump in nuclear proteins, the nucleus expands, and the condensed mitotic chromosomes decondense into their interphase state, thereby allowing gene transcription to resume. A new nucleus has been created, and mitosis is complete. All that remains is for the cell to complete its division into two.

Summary

Mitosis begins with prophase, which is marked by an increase in microtubule instability, triggered by M-Cdk. In animal cells, an unusually dynamic microtubule array (an aster) forms around each of the duplicated centrosomes, which separate to initiate the formation of the two spindle poles. Interactions between the asters and a balance between minus-end-directed and plus-end-directed microtubule-dependent motor proteins result in the self-assembly of the bipolar spindle. In higher-plant cells and other cells that lack centrosomes, a functional, bipolar spindle self-assembles instead around the replicated chromosomes. Prometaphase begins with the breakdown of the nuclear envelope, which allows the kinetochores on the condensed chromosomes to capture and stabilize microtubules from each spindle pole. The kinetochore microtubules from opposite spindle poles pull in opposite directions on each duplicated chromosome, creating, together with a polar ejection force, a tension that helps bring the chromosomes to the spindle equator to form the metaphase plate. The spindle microtubules at metaphase are highly dynamic and undergo a continuous poleward flux of tubulin subunits. Anaphase begins with the sudden proteolytic cleavage of the cohesin linkage holding sister chromatids together. The breakage of this linkage allows the chromosomes to be pulled to opposite poles (the anaphase A movement). At about the same time, the two spindle poles move apart (the anaphase B movement). In telophase, the nuclear envelope re-forms on the surface of each group of separated chromosomes as the proteins phosphorylated at the onset of M phase are dephosphorylated.

Cytokinesis

The cell cycle culminates in the division of the cytoplasm by cytokinesis. In a typical cell, cytokinesis accompanies every mitosis, although some cells, such as Drosophila embryos (discussed later) and vertebrate osteoclasts (discussed in Chapter 22), undergo mitosis without cytokinesis and become multinucleate. Cytokinesis begins in anaphase and ends in telophase, reaching completion as the next interphase begins.

The first visible change of cytokinesis in an animal cell is the sudden appearance of a pucker, or cleavage furrow, on the cell surface. The furrow rapidly deepens and spreads around the cell until it completely divides the cell in two. In animal cells and many unicellular eucaryotes, the structure that accomplishes cytokinesis is the contractile ring—a dynamic assembly composed of actin filaments, myosin II filaments, and many structural and regulatory proteins. The ring assembles just beneath the plasma membrane and contracts to constrict the cell into two (see Figure 18-4). At the same time, new membrane is inserted into the plasma membrane adjacent to the contractile ring by the fusion of intracellular vesicles. This addition of membrane is required to compensate for the increase in surface area that accompanies cytoplasmic division. Thus, cytokinesis can be considered to occur in four stages—initiation, contraction, membrane insertion, and completion.

The central problem for a cell undergoing cytokinesis is to ensure that it occurs at the right time and in the right place. Cytokinesis must not occur too early in M-phase, or it will disrupt the path of the separating chromosomes. It must also occur at the right place to separate the two segregating sets of chromosomes properly so that each daughter cell receives a complete set.

The Microtubules of the Mitotic Spindle Determine the Plane of Animal Cell Division

The mitotic spindle in animal cells not only separates the daughter chromosomes, it also specifies the location of the contractile ring, and thereby the plane of cell division. The contractile ring invariably forms in the plane of the metaphase plate, at right angles to the long axis of the mitotic spindle, thereby ensuring that division occurs between the two sets of separated chromosomes. The part of the spindle that specifies the division plane varies depending on the cell type: in some cells, it is the astral microtubules; in others, it is the overlapping antiparallel microtubules in the central spindle.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f30.jpg.

Figure 18-30

.

   Cleavage in a fertilized frog egg

In these scanning electron micrographs, the cleavage furrow is especially obvious and well defined, as the cell is unusually large. The furrowing of the cell membrane is caused by the activity of the contractile ring underneath it. (A) A low-magnification view of the cleaving egg surface. (B) The surface of a furrow at higher magnification. (From H.W. Beams and R.G. Kessel, Am. Sci. 64:279–290, 1976.)

The relationship between the spindle microtubules and the placement of the contractile ring has been studied by manipulating fertilized eggs of marine invertebrates. After fertilization, these embryos undergo a series of rapid cleavage divisions, without intervening periods of growth. In this way, the original egg is progressively divided up into smaller and smaller cells. During cytokinesis, the cleavage furrow appears suddenly on the surface of the cell and deepens rapidly (Figure 18-30). Because the cytoplasm is clear, the spindle can be observed in real time through a microscope. If the spindle is tugged into a new position with a fine glass needle in early anaphase, the incipient cleavage furrow disappears, and a new one develops in accord with the new spindle site.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f31.jpg.

Figure 18-31

.

   An experiment demonstrating the influence of the position of microtubule asters on the subsequent plane of cleavage in a large egg cell

If the mitotic spindle is mechanically pushed to one side of the cell with a glass bead, the membrane furrowing is incomplete, failing to occur on the opposite side of the cell. Subsequent cleavages occur not only in the conventional relation to each of the two subsequent mitotic spindles (yellow arrowheads), but also between the two adjacent asters that are not linked by a mitotic spindle—but in this abnormal cell share the same cytoplasm (red arrowhead). Apparently, the contractile ring that produces the cleavage furrow in these cells always forms in the region midway between two asters, suggesting that the asters somehow alter the adjacent region of cell cortex to induce furrow formation between them.

How does the mitotic spindle control the plane of division? Ingenious experiments in large embryonic cells demonstrate that a cleavage furrow forms midway between the asters originating from the two centrosomes, even when the two centrosomes are not connected to each other by a mitotic spindle (Figure 18-31). Thus, in these cells, the microtubule asters—not the chromosomes or other parts of the spindle—signal to the cell cortex to specify where the contractile ring should assemble. In other cells, the central spindle, rather than the astral microtubules, is apparently responsible for this specification. In either case, it has been speculated that the overlapping microtubules may provide tracks for motor proteins to deliver contractile ring regulators, and perhaps new membrane, to the appropriate region of the dividing cell. But, in fact, the molecular mechanism by which the spindle positions the cleavage furrow remains a mystery.

In some cells, the site of ring assembly is chosen before mitosis, according to a landmark placed in the cortex during a previous cell cycle. In budding yeasts, for example, a ring of proteins called septins assembles before mitosis, adjacent to a bud scar left on the cell surface as the mother and daughter cells separated in the previous division. The septins are thought to form a scaffold onto which other components of the contractile ring, including myosin II, assemble. As we discuss later, in plant cells, an organized band of microtubules and actin filaments assembles just before mitosis and marks the site where the cell wall will assemble and divide the cell in two.

Some Cells Reposition Their Spindle to Divide Asymmetrically

Most cells divide symmetrically. In most animal cells, for example, the contractile ring forms around the equator of the parent cell, so that the two daughter cells produced are of equal size and have similar properties. This symmetry results from the placement of the mitotic spindle, which in most cases tends to center itself in the cytoplasm. The centering process depends both on astral microtubules and on motor proteins that either push or pull on the astral microtubules to center the spindle.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f32.jpg.

Figure 18-32

.

   An asymmetric cell division segregating cytoplasmic components to only one daughter cell

These light micrographs illustrate the controlled asymmetric segregation of specific cytoplasmic components to one daughter cell during the first division of a fertilized egg of the nematode C. elegans. The cells above have been stained with a blue, DNA-binding, fluorescent dye to show the nucleus (and polar bodies—see Figure 20-22); they are viewed by both differential-interference-contrast and fluorescence microscopy. The cells below are the same cells stained with an antibody against P-granules and viewed by fluorescence microscopy. These small granules of unknown function are distributed randomly throughout the cytoplasm of the unfertilized egg (not shown) but become segregated to the posterior pole of the fertilized egg, as shown on the left. The cleavage plane is oriented to ensure that only the posterior daughter cell receives the P-granules when the egg divides, as shown on the right. The same segregation process is repeated in several subsequent cell divisions, so that the P-granules end up only in the cells that give rise to eggs and sperm. (Courtesy of Susan Strome.)

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f33.jpg.

Figure 18-33

.

   Spindle rotation

(A) A possible mechanism underlying the controlled rotation of a mitotic spindle. The red bar represents a specialized region of cell cortex toward which one spindle pole is pulled by its astral microtubules. (B) Fluorescence micrographs showing a precisely programmed rotation of a mitotic spindle in a C. elegans embryo at the two-cell stage in preparation for cleavage to form four cells in a specific pattern. The microtubules are stained with an antibody against tubulin. The spindle in the cell on the right rotates almost 90° clockwise, as diagrammed in (A). (B, courtesy of Tony Hyman and John White.)

There are many instances in development, however, when cells divide asymmetrically to produce two cells that differ in size, in the cytoplasmic contents they inherit, or in both. Usually, the two daughter cells are destined to develop along different pathways. To create daughter cells with different fates, the mother cell must first segregate some components (called fate determinants) to one side of the cell and then position the plane of division so that the appropriate daughter cell inherits these components (Figure 18-32). To position the plane of division asymmetrically, the spindle has to be moved in a controlled manner within the dividing cell. It seems likely that such spindle movements are directed by changes in local regions of the cell cortex and that motor proteins localiazed there pull one of the spindle poles, via its astral microtubules, to the appropriate region (Figure 18-33). Some of the proteins required for such asymmetrical divisions have been identified through genetic analyses in C. elegans and Drosophila (discussed in Chapter 21), and some of these seem to have a similar role in vertebrates.

Asymmetric division is particularly important in plant cells. As these cells cannot move after division, the selection of division planes is crucial for controlling tissue morphology. We discuss later how the plane of division is determined in these cells.

Actin and Myosin II in the Contractile Ring Generate the Force for Cytokinesis

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f34.jpg.

Figure 18-34

.

   The contractile ring

(A) A drawing of the cleavage furrow in a dividing cell. (B) An electron micrograph of the ingrowing edge of a cleavage furrow of a dividing animal cell. (C) Fluorescence micrographs of a dividing slime mold amoeba stained for actin (red) and myosin II (green). Whereas all of the visible myosin II has redistributed to the contractile ring, only some of the actin has done so; the rest remains in the cortex of the nascent daughter cells. (B, from H.W. Beams and R.G. Kessel, Am. Sci. 64:279–290, 1976; C, courtesy of Yoshio Fukui.)

As the astral microtubules in anaphase become longer lived and less dynamic in response to the loss of M-Cdk activity, the contractile ring begins to assemble beneath the plasma membrane. Much of the preparation for cytokinesis, however, happens earlier in mitosis, before the division of the cytoplasm actually begins. In interphase cells, actin and myosin filaments are assembled into a cortical network and, in some cells, also into large cytoplasmic bundles called stress fibers (discussed in Chapter 16). As cells enter mitosis, these arrays disassemble; much of the actin is reorganized, and myosin II filaments are released. As the chromatids separate in anaphase, myosin II begins to accumulate in the rapidly assembling contractile ring (Figure 18-34).

In many cells, cytokinesis requires the activation of one or more members of the polo-like family of protein kinases. These kinases regulate the assembly of both the mitotic spindle and the contractile ring and are therefore thought to help coordinate mitosis and cytokinesis, but it is uncertain how they do so. The fully assembled contractile ring contains many proteins in addition to actin and myosin II. The overlapping arrays of actin filaments and bipolar myosin II filaments, however, generate the force that divides the cytoplasm in two. They are thought to contract by a mechanism that is biochemically similar to that used by smooth muscle cells; in both cases, for example, the contraction begins when Ca2+-calmodulin activates myosin light-chain kinase to phosphorylate myosin II. Once contraction has been stimulated, the ring develops a force large enough to bend a fine glass needle that is inserted in the path of the constricting ring.

How the contractile ring constricts is still a mystery. It seems not to operate by a simple “purse-string” mechanism, with actin and myosin II filaments sliding past each other as in skeletal muscle (see Figure 16-71). As the ring constricts, the ring maintains the same thickness in cross-section, suggesting that its total volume and the number of filaments it contains decrease steadily. Moreover, unlike in muscle, the actin filaments in the ring are highly dynamic, and their arrangement changes extensively during cytokinesis.

In addition to specifying the site of contractile ring assembly in early anaphase, in many cells, microtubules also work continuously during anaphase and telophase to stabilize the advancing cleavage furrow. Drugs that depolymerize microtubules, for example, cause the actin filaments in the contractile ring to become less organized. Moreover, if a needle is used to tear microtubules away from the cell cortex, the contractile ring disassembles and the cleavage furrow regresses. It is not known how the microtubules stabilize the ring, although it has been shown that growing microtubules can activate some members of the Rho family of small GTPases, which in turn stimulate actin polymerization (discussed in Chapter 16). One member of this family, Rho A, is required for cytokinesis.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f35.jpg.

Figure 18-35

.

   The midbody

(A) A scanning electron micrograph of an animal cell in culture in the process of dividing; the midbody still joins the two daughter cells. (B) A conventional electron micrograph of the midbody of a dividing animal cell. Cleavage is almost complete, but the daughter cells remain attached by this thin strand of cytoplasm containing the remains of the central spindle. See also the late telophase panel in Figure 18-8. (A, courtesy of Guenter Albrecht-Buehler; B, courtesy of J.M. Mullins.)

The contractile ring is finally dispensed with altogether when cleavage ends, as the plasma membrane of the cleavage furrow narrows to form the midbody. The midbody persists as a tether between the two daughter cells and contains the remains of the central spindle, which now consists of the two sets of antiparallel overlap microtubules packed tightly together within a dense matrix material (Figure 18-35). Remarkably, in some cells, before cytokinesis has been completed, the mother centriole from one or both daughter cells separates from its daughter centriole (see Figure 18-5c) and migrates into the midbody, where it lingers for minutes, before returning to its daughter cell. Only then do the two daughter cells separate to complete cytokinesis. What the centriole might do in the midbody to trigger the final steps of cytokinesis is not known. After the daughter cells separate completely, some of the components of the residual midbody often remain on the inside of the plasma membrane of each cell, where they may serve as a mark on the cortex that helps to orient the spindle in the subsequent cell division.

Membrane-enclosed Organelles Must Be Distributed to Daughter Cells During Cytokinesis

The process of mitosis ensures that each daughter cell receives a full complement of chromosomes. But when a eucaryotic cell divides, each daughter cell must also inherit all of the other essential cell components, including the membrane-enclosed organelles. As discussed in Chapter 12, organelles like mitochondria and chloroplasts cannot assemble spontaneously from their individual components; they can arise only from the growth and division of the preexisting organelles. Similarly, cells cannot make a new endoplasmic reticulum (ER) unless some part of it is already present.

How, then, are the various membrane-enclosed organelles segregated when a cell divides? Organelles such as mitochondria and chloroplasts are usually present in large enough numbers to be safely inherited if, on average, their numbers roughly double once each cycle. The ER in interphase cells is continuous with the nuclear membrane and is organized by the microtubule cytoskeleton. Upon entry into M phase, the reorganization of the microtubules releases the ER, which fragments as the nuclear envelope breaks down. The Golgi apparatus probably fragments as well, although in some cells it seems to redistribute transiently into the ER, only to re-emerge at telophase. Some of the organelle fragments associate with the spindle microtubules via motor proteins, thereby hitching a ride into the daughter cells as the spindle elongates in anaphase.

Mitosis Can Occur Without Cytokinesis

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f36.jpg.

Figure 18-36

.

   Mitosis without cytokinesis in the Drosophila embryo

(A) The first 13 nuclear divisions occur synchronously and without cytoplasmic division to create a large syncytium. Most of the nuclei then migrate to the cortex, and the plasma membrane extends inward and pinches off to surround each nucleus to form individual cells in a process called cellularization. (B) Fluorescence micrograph of multiple mitotic spindles at metaphase in a Drosophila embryo before cellularization. The microtubules are stained green and the centrosomes red. (B, courtesy of Kristina Yu and William Sullivan.)

Although nuclear division is usually followed by cytoplasmic division, there are exceptions. Some cells undergo multiple rounds of nuclear division without intervening cytoplasmic division. In the early Drosophila embryo, for example, the first 13 rounds of nuclear division occur without cytoplasmic division, resulting in the formation of a single large cell containing 6000 nuclei, arranged in a monolayer near the surface (Figure 18-36). This arrangement greatly speeds up early development, as the cells do not have to take the time to go through all the steps of cytokinesis for each division. After these rapid nuclear divisions, cells are created around each nucleus in one round of coordinated cytokinesis called cellularization. Contractile rings form at the cell surface, and the plasma membrane extends inward and pinches off to enclose each nucleus.

Nuclear division without cytokinesis also occurs in some types of mammalian cells. Osteoclasts, trophoblasts, and some hepatocytes and heart muscle cells, for example, become multinucleated in this way.

The Phragmoplast Guides Cytokinesis in Higher Plants

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f37.jpg.

Figure 18-37

.

   Cytokinesis in a plant cell in telophase

In this light micrograph, the early cell plate (between the two arrowheads) is forming in a plane perpendicular to the plane of the page. The microtubules of the spindle are stained with gold-labeled antibodies against tubulin, while the DNA in the two sets of daughter chromosomes is stained with a fluorescent dye. Note that there are no astral microtubules, because there are no centrosomes in higher-plant cells. (Courtesy of Andrew Bajer.)

Most higher-plant cells are enclosed by a semirigid cell wall, and their mechanism of cytokinesis is different from that just described for animal cells. Rather than a contractile ring dividing the cytoplasm from the outside in, the cytoplasm of the plant cell is partitioned from the inside out by the construction of a new cell wall, called the cell plate, between the two daughter nuclei (Figure 18-37). The orientation of the cell plate determines the positions of the two daughter cells relative to neighboring cells. It follows that altering the planes of cell division, together with enlargement of the cells by expansion or growth, leads to different cell and tissue shapes that help determine the form of the plant.

The mitotic spindle by itself is not sufficient to determine the exact position and orientation of the cell plate. The first visible sign that a higher-plant cell has become committed to divide in a particular plane is seen in G2, when the cortical array of microtubules disappears in preparation for mitosis. At this time, a circumferential band of microtubules and actin filaments forms a ring around the entire cell just beneath the plasma membrane. Because this cytoskeletal array appears before prophase begins, it is called the preprophase band. The band becomes thinner as the cell progresses to prophase, and it disappears completely before metaphase is reached. Yet, the division plane has somehow been established: when the new cell plate forms later during cytokinesis, it grows outward to fuse with the parental wall precisely at the zone formerly occupied by the preprophase band. Even if the cell contents are displaced by centrifugation after the preprophase band has disappeared, the growing cell plate tends to find its way back to the plane defined by the former preprophase band.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f38.jpg.

Figure 18-38

.

   The special features of cytokinesis in a higher plant cell

The division plane is established before M phase by a band of microtubules and actin filaments (the preprophase band) at the cell cortex. At the beginning of telophase, after the chromosomes have segregated, a new cell wall starts to assemble inside the cell at the equator of the old spindle. The overlap microtubules of the mitotic spindle remaining at telophase form the phragmoplast and guide vesicles derived from the Golgi apparatus toward the center of the spindle. The vesicles are filled with cell-wall material and fuse to form the growing new cell wall, which grows outward to reach the plasma membrane and original cell wall at the site determined earlier by the preprophase band. The plasma membrane and the membrane surrounding the new cell wall fuse, completely separating the two daughter cells.

The assembly of the cell plate begins in late anaphase and is guided by a structure called the phragmoplast, which contains the remaining overlap microtubules of the mitotic spindle that interdigitate at their growing plus ends. This region of overlap is similar in structure to the central spindle in animal cells in late anaphase. Small vesicles, largely derived from the Golgi apparatus and filled with polysaccharide and glycoproteins required for the synthesis of the new cell-wall matrix, are transported along the microtubules to the equator of the phragmoplast, apparently by the action of microtubule-dependent motor proteins. Here, the vesicles fuse to form a disclike, membrane-enclosed structure called the early cell plate (see Figure 18-9G). The plate expands outward by further vesicle fusion until it reaches the plasma membrane and the original cell wall and divides the cell in two. Later, cellulose microfibrils are laid down within the matrix of the cell plate to complete the construction of the new cell wall (Figure 18-38).

The Elaborate M Phase of Higher Organisms Evolved Gradually from Procaryotic Fission Mechanisms

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f39.jpg.

Figure 18-39

.

   Cell division in the bacterium E. coli.

The single, circular chromosome contains an origin of replication called oriC. Before division, the chromosome is polarized, so that oriC is at one pole of the bacterium. As soon as the oriC sequence is copied, one of the copies is actively translocated to the other pole, before the rest of the chromosome is replicated. Cell growth occurs continuously, and when the cell reaches an appropriate size, the plasma membrane and cell wall grow inward to divide the cell in two, exactly between the two daughter chromosomes.

Procaryotic cells divide by a process called binary fission. The single, circular DNA molecule replicates and division occurs by the invagination of the plasma membrane and the laying down of new cell wall between the two chromosomes to produce two separate daughter cells. In E. coli, before the chromosome replicates, the single origin of replication (oriC) is located at one pole of the rod-shaped bacterium. As soon as oriC is replicated, one copy of the sequence is immediately translocated to the opposite pole of the cell, after which the rest of the chromosome is replicated. Like the two spindle-pole asters in an animal cell, the bacterial daughter chromosomes at the cell poles somehow determine the location of the plane of cell division, ensuring that fission takes place at the cell equator, so that each daughter cell inherits one chromosome (Figure 18-39). Although a number of genes and proteins involved have been identified, the mechanisms responsible for the active translocation of oriC and the inhibition of fission everywhere but at the equator remain unknown.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f40.jpg.

Figure 18-40

.

   The FtsZ protein

(A) Fluorescence micrographs showing the location of the FtsZ protein during binary fission in E. coli. The protein assembles into a ring at the center of the cell, where it helps orchestrate cell division. The bacteria here have been genetically engineered to produce a fluorescent form of the protein (FtsZ fused to green fluorescent protein). (B) Dividing chloroplasts (red) from a red alga also make use of a FtsZ protein ring (green) for cleavage. (A, from X. Ma, D.W. Ehrhardt, and W. Margolin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:12999-13003, 1996. © National Academy of Sciences; B, from S. Miyagishima et al., Plant Cell 13:2257-2268, 2001. © American Society of Plant Biologists.)

Binary fission in procaryotes depends on filaments made of the FtsZ protein. FtsZ is a cytoskeletal GTPase that is structurally related to tubulin and assembles into a ring at the equator of the cell (Figure 18-40A, and see Figure 16-17). The FtsZ filaments are essential for the recruitment of all the other cell division proteins to the division site. Together, these proteins guide the inward growth of the cell wall and membrane, leading to the formation of a septum that divides the cell into two. Bacteria in which the ftsZ gene is inactivated by mutation cannot divide. A FtsZ-based mechanism is also used in the division of chloroplasts in plant cells (Figure 18-40B) and mitochondria in protists. In fungi and animal cells, another self-assembling GTPase called dynamin (discussed in Chapter 13) has apparently taken over the function of FtsZ in mitochondrial division.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc., usually as some form of binary object. The name of referred object is ch18f41.jpg.

Figure 18-41

.

   The use of different chromosome separation mechanisms by different organisms

Some of these may have been intermediate stages in the evolution of the mitotic spindle of higher organisms. For all examples except bacteria, only the central nuclear region of the cell is shown.

With the evolution of the eucaryotes, the genome increased in complexity, and the chromosomes increased in both number and size. For these organisms, a more elaborate mechanism for dividing the chromosomes between daughter cells was apparently required. Clearly, the mitotic apparatus could not have evolved all at once. In many primitive eucaryotes, such as the dinoflagellate Cryphthecodinium cohnii, mitosis depends on a membrane-attachment mechanism, in which the chromosomes have to bind to the inner nuclear membrane for segregation. The intermediate status of this large, single-celled alga is reflected in the composition of its chromosomes, which, like those of procaryotes, have relatively little associated protein. The nuclear membrane in C. cohnii remains intact throughout mitosis, and the spindle microtubules remain entirely outside the nucleus. Where these spindle microtubules press on the outside of the nuclear envelope, the envelope becomes indented in a series of parallel channels (Figure 18-41). The chromosomes become attached to the inner membrane of the nuclear envelope opposite these channels, and chromosome segregation occurs on the inside of this channeled nuclear membrane. Thus, the extranuclear “spindle” is used to order the nuclear membrane and thereby define the plane of division. Kinetochores in this species seem to be integrated into the nuclear membrane and may therefore have evolved from some membrane component.

Eucaryotic tubulin and procaryotic FtsZ clearly have a common evolutionary history. But, microtubules are important for chromosome segregation in even the most primitive eucaryotes, where they are also present in flagellar axonemes (discussed in Chapter 16). Whether the flagellum or the spindle evolved first is unclear.

A somewhat more advanced, although still extranuclear, spindle is seen in hypermastigotes, in which the nuclear envelope again remains intact throughout mitosis. These large protozoa from the guts of insects provide a particularly clear illustration of the independence of spindle elongation and the chromosome movements that separate the chromatids. The sister kinetochores become separated by the growth of the nuclear membrane (to which they are attached) before becoming attached to the spindle. Only when the kinetochores are near the poles of the spindle do they acquire the kinetochore microtubules needed to attach them to the spindle. Because the spindle microtubules remain separated from the chromosomes by the nuclear envelope, the kinetochore microtubules, which are formed outside the nucleus, must somehow attach to the chromosomes through the nuclear membranes. After this attachment has occurred, the kinetochores are drawn poleward in a conventional manner (see Figure 18-41).

Organisms that form spindles inside an intact nucleus may represent a further stage in the evolution of mitotic mechanisms. In both yeasts and diatoms, the spindle is attached to chromosomes by their kinetochores, and the chromosomes are segregated in a way loosely similar to that described for animal cells—except that the entire process generally occurs within the confines of the nuclear envelope (see Figure 18-41). It is thought that the “open” mitosis of higher organisms and the “closed” mitosis of yeasts and diatoms evolved separately from a common ancestor resembling the modern hypermastigote spindle. At present, there is no convincing explanation for why higher plants and animals have evolved a mitotic apparatus that requires the controlled and reversible dissolution of the nuclear envelope.

Summary

Cell division ends as the cytoplasm divides into two by the process of cytokinesis. Except for plants, cytokinesis in eucaryotic cells is mediated by a contractile ring, which is composed of actin and myosin filaments and a variety of other proteins. By an unknown mechanism, the mitotic spindle determines when and where the contractile ring assembles and, thereby, when and where the cell divides. Most cells divide symmetrically to produce two cells of the same content and size. Some cells, however, specifically position their spindle to divide asymmetrically, producing two daughter cells that differ in size, content, or both. Cytokinesis occurs by a special mechanism in higher-plant cells—in which the cytoplasm is partitioned by the construction of a new cell wall, the cell plate, inside the cell. The position of the cell plate is determined by the position of a preprophase band of microtubules and actin filaments. The organization of mitosis in fungi and some protozoa differs from that in animals and plants, suggesting how the complex process of eucaryotic cell division may have evolved.

References
General
Hyams JS & Brinkely BR (eds) (1989) Mitosis: Molecules and Mechanisms. San Diego: Academic Press.
Wilson EB (1987) The Cell in Development and Heredity, 3rd edn. New York: Garland.
An Overview of M Phase
Hinchcliffe EH, Sluder G. "It takes two to tango": understanding how centrosome duplication is regulated throughout the cell cycle. Genes Dev. (2001); 15: 11671181. [PubMed]
Hirano T. Chromosome cohesion, condensation, and separation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. (2000); 69: 115144. [PubMed]
Hyman AA. Centrosomes: Sic transit gloria centri. Curr Biol. (2000); 10: R276R278. [PubMed]
Losada A, Hirano T. Shaping the metaphase chromosome: coordination of cohesion and condensation. Bioessays. (2001); 23: 924935. [PubMed]
Mitchison TJ, Salmon ED. Mitosis: a history of division. Nat. Cell Biol. (2001); 3: E17E21. [PubMed]
Morgan DO. Cyclin-dependent kinases: engines, clocks, and microprocessors. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. (1997); 13: 261291. [PubMed]
Moritz M, Agard DA. Gamma-tubulin complexes and microtubule nucleation. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. (2001); 11: 174181. [PubMed]
Oakley BR. Gamma-tubulin. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. (2000); 49: 2754. [PubMed]
Pines J, Rieder CL. Re-staging mitosis: a contemporary view of mitotic progression. Nat. Cell Biol. (2001); 3: E3E6. [PubMed]
Raff JW. Centrosomes: Central no more? Curr Biol. (2001); 11: R159R161. [PubMed]
Rieder CL, Faruki S, Khodjakov A. The centrosome in vertebrates: more than a microtubule-organizing center. Trends Cell Biol. (2001); 11: 413419. [PubMed]
Sadler KC, do Carmo Avides M. Orchestrating cell division. Trends Cell Biol. (2000); 10: 447450. [PubMed]
Stearns T. Centrosome duplication: a centriolar pas de deux. Cell. (2001); 105: 417420. [PubMed]
Mitosis
Amon A. The spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. (1999); 9: 6975. [PubMed]
Belmont LD, Hyman AA, Sawin KE, Mitchison TJ. Real-time visualization of cell cycle-dependent changes in microtubule dynamics in cytoplasmic extracts. Cell. (1990); 62: 579589. [PubMed]
Brunet S, Vernos I. Chromosome motors on the move: From motion to spindle checkpoint activity. EMBO Rep. (2001); 2: 669673. [PubMed]
Cande WZ, Hogan CJ. The mechanism of anaphase spindle elongation. Bioessays. (1989); 11: 59. [PubMed]
Compton DA. Spindle assembly in animal cells. Annu. Rev. Biochem. (2000); 69: 95114. [PubMed]
Desai A, Mitchison TJ. Microtubule polymerization dynamics. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. (1997); 13: 83117. [PubMed]
Desai A, Maddox PS, Mitchison TJ, Salmon ED. Anaphase A chromosome movement and poleward spindle microtubule flux occur at similar rates in Xenopus extract spindles. J. Cell Biol. (1998); 141: 703713. [PubMed]
Desai A, Verma S, Mitchison TJ, Walczak CE. KinI kinesins are microtubule-destabilizing enzymes. Cell. (1999); 96: 6978. [PubMed]
Heald R, Tournebize R, Blank T. et al. Self-organization of microtubules into bipolar spindles around artificial chromosomes in Xenopus egg extracts. Nature. (1996); 382: 420425. [PubMed]
Hoyt MA. Exit from mitosis: spindle pole power. Cell. (2000); 102: 267270. [PubMed]
Hunter AW, Wordeman L. How motor proteins influence microtubule polymerization dynamics. J Cell Sci. (2000); 113 Pt 24: 43794389. [PubMed]
Hyman AA, Karsenti E. Morphogenetic properties of microtubules and mitotic spindle assembly. Cell. (1996); 84: 401410. [PubMed]
Mitchison TJ. Polewards microtubule flux in the mitotic spindle: evidence from photoactivation of fluorescence. J. Cell Biol. (1989); 109: 637652. [PubMed]
Mitchison TJ, Kirschner MW. Dynamic instability of microtubule growth. Nature. (1984); 312: 237242. [PubMed]
Mitchison T, Evans L, Schulze E, Kirschner M. Sites of microtubule assembly and disassembly in the mitotic spindle. Cell. (1986); 45: 515527. [PubMed]
Nasmyth K, Peters JM, Uhlmann F. Splitting the chromosome: cutting the ties that bind sister chromatids. Science. (2000); 288: 13791385. [PubMed]
Nislow C, Lombillo VA, Kuriyama R, McIntosh JR. A plus-end-directed motor enzyme that moves antiparallel microtubules in vitro localizes to the interzone of mitotic spindles. Nature. (1992); 359: 543547. [PubMed]
Pines J, Rieder CL. Re-staging mitosis: a contemporary view of mitotic progression. Nat Cell Biol. (2001); 3: E3E6. [PubMed]
Rieder CL, Salmon ED. Motile kinetochores and polar ejection forces dictate chromosome position on the vertebrate mitotic spindle. J. Cell Biol. (1994); 124: 223233. [PubMed]
Rieder CL, Salmon ED. The vertebrate cell kinetochore and its roles during mitosis. Trends Cell Biol. (1998); 8: 310318. [PubMed]
Rudner AD, Murray AW. The spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. (1996); 8: 773780. [PubMed]
Saunders WS, Lengyel B, Hoyt MA. Mitotic spindle function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires a balance between different types of kinesin-related motors. Mol. Biol. Cell. (1997); 8: 10251033. [PubMed] [Free Full Text in PMC icon.Free Full text in PMC]
Sharp DJ, Rogers GC, Scholey JM. Microtubule motors in mitosis. Nature. (2000); 407: 4147. [PubMed]
Tournebize R, Popov A, Kinoshita K, Ashford AJ, Fybina S, Pozniakovsky A, Mayer TU, Walczak CE, Karsenti E, Hyman AA. Control of microtubule dynamics by the antagonistic activities of XMAP215 and XKCM1 in Xenopus egg extracts. Nat. Cell Biol. (2000); 2: 1319. [PubMed]
Walczak CE, Mitchison TJ, Desai A. XKCM1: A Xenopus kinesin-related protein that regulates microtubule dynamics during mitotic spindle assembly. Cell. (1996); 84: 3747. [PubMed]
Waterman-Storer CM, Desai A, Bulinski JG, Salmon ED. Fluorescent speckle microscopy, a method to visualize the dynamics of protein assemblies in living cells. Curr. Biol. (1998); 8: 12271230. [PubMed]
Wittmann T, Hyman A, Desai A. The spindle: a dynamic assembly of microtubules and motors. Nat. Cell Biol. (2001); 3: E28E34. [PubMed]
Zhang D, Nicklas RB. The impact of chromosomes and centrosomes on spindle assembly as observed in living cells. J. Cell Biol. (1995); 129: 12871300. [PubMed]
Cytokinesis
Conrad GW & Schroeder TE (eds) (1990) Cytokinesis: Mechanisms of Furrow Formation During Cell Division. Ann. NY. Acad. Sci., vol. 582. New York: Academy of Sciences.
Field D, Li R, Oegema K. Cytokinesis in eukaryotes: a mechanistic comparison. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. (1999); 11: 6880. [PubMed]
Glotzer M. The mechanism and control of cytokinesis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. (1997); 9: 815823. [PubMed]
Harry EJ. Bacterial cell division: regulating Z-ring formation. Mol. Microbiol. (2001); 40: 795803. [PubMed]
Heese M, Mayer U, Jurgens G. Cytokinesis in flowering plants: cellular process and developmental integration. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. (1998); 1: 486491. [PubMed]
Horvitz HR, Herskowitz I. Mechanisms of asymmetric cell division: two Bs or not two Bs, that is the question. Cell. (1992); 68: 237255. [PubMed]
Jacobs C, Shapiro L. Bacterial cell division: a moveable feast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. (1999); 96: 58915893. [Free Full Text in PMC icon.Free Full text in PMC] [PubMed]
Knoblich JA. Asymmetric cell division during animal development. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. (2001); 2: 1120. [PubMed]
Lecuit T, Wieschaus E. Polarized insertion of new membrane from a cytoplasmic reservoir during cleavage of the Drosophila embryo. J. Cell Biol. (2000); 150: 849860. [PubMed]
Margolin W. Themes and variations in prokaryotic cell division. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. (2000); 24: 531548. [PubMed]
Nanninga N. Cytokinesis in prokaryotes and eukaryotes: common principles and different solutions. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. (2001); 65: 319333. [Free Full Text in PMC icon.Free Full text in PMC] [PubMed]
Rappaport R (1996) Cytokinesis in Animal Cells. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Robinson DN, Spudich JA. Towards a molecular understanding of cytokinesis. Trends Cell Biol. (2000); 10: 228237. [PubMed]
Segal M, Bloom K. Control of spindle polarity and orientation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Trends Cell Biol. (2001); 11: 160166. [PubMed]
Sharpe ME. Upheaval in the bacterial nucleoid: an active chromosome segregation mechanism. Trends Genet. (1999); 15: 7074. [PubMed]
Shima DT, Cabrera-Poch N, Pepperkok R, Warren G. An ordered inheritance strategy for the Golgi apparatus: visualization of mitotic disassembly reveals a role for the mitotic spindle. J. Cell Biol. (1998); 141: 955966. [PubMed]
Smith L. Divide and conquer: cytokinesis in plant cells. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. (1999); 2: 447453. [PubMed]
Sylvester AW. Division decisions and the spatial regulation of cytokinesis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. (2000); 3: 5866. [PubMed]
Wolf WA, Chew TL, Chisholm RL. Regulation of cytokinesis. Cell Mol. Life Sci. (1999); 55: 108120. [PubMed]
Help ǀ Contact Bookshelf