NCBI » Bookshelf » Health Services/Technology Assessment Text (HSTAT) » AHRQ Technical Reviews and Summaries » Consumer-Oriented Strategies for Improving Health Benefit Design: An Overview: Technical Review: Number 15
 
hstechrev
AHRQ Technical Reviews and Summaries
public health

Chapter  15:  Consumer-Oriented Strategies for Improving Health Benefit Design: An Overview: Technical Review: Number 15

A12264

Prepared for:

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

540 Gaither Road

Rockville, MD 20850

www.ahrq.gov

Contract No: 290-02-0017

Prepared by:

Stanford University-UCSF Evidence-based Practice Center, Stanford, CA

Investigators

  • Laurence Baker

  • Kate Bundorf

  • Anne Royalty

Staff

  • Cristina Galvin

  • Kathryn McDonald

AHRQ Publication No. 07-0067

July 2007

This document is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without permission except those copyrighted materials noted for which further reproduction is prohibited without the specific permission of copyright holders.

Suggested Citation:

Baker L, Bundorf K, Royalty A, Galvin C, McDonald K. Consumer-Oriented Strategies for Improving Health Benefit Design: An Overview. Technical Review 15 (Prepared by the Stanford University-UCSF Evidence-based Practice Center, Stanford, CA under Contract No. 290-02-0017.) AHRQ Publication No. 07-0067. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. July 2007

This report is based on research conducted by the Stanford University-UCSF Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC), under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Rockville, MD (Contract No. 290-02-0017). The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the author(s), who are responsible for its content, and do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. No statement in this report should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

The information in this report is intended to help clinicians, employers, policymakers, and others make informed decisions about the provision of health care services. This report is intended as a reference and not as a substitute for clinical judgment.

This report may be used, in whole or in part, as the basis for the development of clinical practice guidelines and other quality enhancement tools, or as a basis for reimbursement and coverage policies. AHRQ or U.S. Department of Health and Human Services endorsement of such derivative products may not be stated or implied.

No investigators have any affiliations or financial involvement (e.g., employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties) that conflict with material presented in this report.

Prepared for:

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

540 Gaither Road

Rockville, MD 20850

www.ahrq.gov

Contract No: 290-02-0017

Prepared by:

Stanford University-UCSF Evidence-based Practice Center, Stanford, CA

Investigators

  • Laurence Baker

  • Kate Bundorf

  • Anne Royalty

Staff

  • Cristina Galvin

  • Kathryn McDonald

AHRQ Publication No. 07-0067

July 2007

This document is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without permission except those copyrighted materials noted for which further reproduction is prohibited without the specific permission of copyright holders.

Suggested Citation:

Baker L, Bundorf K, Royalty A, Galvin C, McDonald K. Consumer-Oriented Strategies for Improving Health Benefit Design: An Overview. Technical Review 15 (Prepared by the Stanford University-UCSF Evidence-based Practice Center, Stanford, CA under Contract No. 290-02-0017.) AHRQ Publication No. 07-0067. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. July 2007

This report is based on research conducted by the Stanford University-UCSF Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC), under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Rockville, MD (Contract No. 290-02-0017). The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the author(s), who are responsible for its content, and do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. No statement in this report should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

The information in this report is intended to help clinicians, employers, policymakers, and others make informed decisions about the provision of health care services. This report is intended as a reference and not as a substitute for clinical judgment.

This report may be used, in whole or in part, as the basis for the development of clinical practice guidelines and other quality enhancement tools, or as a basis for reimbursement and coverage policies. AHRQ or U.S. Department of Health and Human Services endorsement of such derivative products may not be stated or implied.

No investigators have any affiliations or financial involvement (e.g., employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties) that conflict with material presented in this report.

Contents

Preface

Acknowledgments

Structured Abstract

Chapter 1. Introduction

Chapter 2. A Conceptual Model

Chapter 3. Review of the Literature on CDHPs

Chapter 4. Observations on the Size and Content of Literature on Tiering

Chapter 5. Observations on the Literature on Comparative Quality Reporting About Providers

Chapter 6. Concluding Observations and Policy Questions

References

Help ǀ Contact Bookshelf
AHRQ Technical Reviews and Summaries
(navigation arrows) Go to previous chapter Go to next chapter Go to top of this page Go to bottom of this page Go to Table of Contents