NCBI » Bookshelf » Health Services/Technology Assessment Text (HSTAT) » U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Evidence Syntheses, formerly Systematic Evidence Reviews » Evaluating Test Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening—Age to Begin, Age to Stop, and Timing of Screening Intervals: A Decision Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Screening for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force from the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET)
 
hsevidsyn
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Evidence Syntheses, formerly Systematic Evidence Reviews
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Evidence Syntheses
public health

 65 Part 2:  Evaluating Test Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening—Age to Begin, Age to Stop, and Timing of Screening Intervals: A Decision Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Screening for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force from the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET)

A58677

Prepared for:

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

540 Gaither Road

Rockville, Maryland 20850

www.ahrq.gov

Prepared by:

Ann G. Zauber, PhD (1)

Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar, MS (2)

Amy B. Knudsen, PhD (3)

Janneke Wilschut, MS (2)

Marjolein van Ballegooijen, MD, PhD (2)

Karen M. Kuntz, ScD (4)

  • (1)

    Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

  • (2)

    Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

  • (3)

    Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

  • (4)

    4Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

AHRQ Publication No. 08-05124-EF-2.

March 2009

This report was funded by the National Cancer Institute (U01-CA-088204, U01-CA-097426, and U01-CA-115953) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HHSP233200700350P, HHSP233200700210P, and HHSP233200700196P).

The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the authors who are responsible for its contents; the finding s and conclusions do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. No statement in this article should be construed as an official position of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

This report may be used, in whole or in part, as the basis for the development of clinical practice guidelines and other quality enhancement tools, or as a basis for reimbursement and coverage policies. AHRQ or U.S. Department of Health and Human Services endorsement of such derivative products may not be stated or implied.

Corresponding Author:

  • Ann G. Zauber, PhD

  • Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics

  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

  • 307 East 63rd Street, New York, NY 10065

  • 646-735-8160 (office)

  • 646-735-0012 (fax)

  • .

Suggested citation: Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Knudsen AB, Wilschut J, van Ballegooijen M, Kuntz KM. Evaluating Test Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening—Age to Begin, Age to Stop, and Timing of Screening Intervals: A Decision Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Screening for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force from the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET). Evidence Synthesis No. 65, Part 2. AHRQ Publication No. 08-05124-EF-2. Rockville, Maryland, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, March 2009.

Prepared for:

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

540 Gaither Road

Rockville, Maryland 20850

www.ahrq.gov

Prepared by:

Ann G. Zauber, PhD (1)

Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar, MS (2)

Amy B. Knudsen, PhD (3)

Janneke Wilschut, MS (2)

Marjolein van Ballegooijen, MD, PhD (2)

Karen M. Kuntz, ScD (4)

  • (1)

    Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

  • (2)

    Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

  • (3)

    Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

  • (4)

    4Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

AHRQ Publication No. 08-05124-EF-2.

March 2009

This report was funded by the National Cancer Institute (U01-CA-088204, U01-CA-097426, and U01-CA-115953) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HHSP233200700350P, HHSP233200700210P, and HHSP233200700196P).

The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the authors who are responsible for its contents; the finding s and conclusions do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. No statement in this article should be construed as an official position of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

This report may be used, in whole or in part, as the basis for the development of clinical practice guidelines and other quality enhancement tools, or as a basis for reimbursement and coverage policies. AHRQ or U.S. Department of Health and Human Services endorsement of such derivative products may not be stated or implied.

Corresponding Author:

  • Ann G. Zauber, PhD

  • Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics

  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

  • 307 East 63rd Street, New York, NY 10065

  • 646-735-8160 (office)

  • 646-735-0012 (fax)

  • .

Suggested citation: Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Knudsen AB, Wilschut J, van Ballegooijen M, Kuntz KM. Evaluating Test Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening—Age to Begin, Age to Stop, and Timing of Screening Intervals: A Decision Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Screening for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force from the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET). Evidence Synthesis No. 65, Part 2. AHRQ Publication No. 08-05124-EF-2. Rockville, Maryland, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, March 2009.

Contents

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Results

Discussion

Acknowledgements

Appendix 1: Model descriptions

Appendix 2. Summary results per 1000 40-year old individuals for all strategies and both models

Appendix 3: Results including starting at age 40 in efficient and near-efficient frontiers

References

Help ǀ Contact Bookshelf
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Evidence Syntheses
(navigation arrows) Go to previous chapter Go to next chapter Go to top of this page Go to bottom of this page Go to Table of Contents