Figure 1. Classical omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acid synthesis pathways and the role of omega-3 fatty acid in regulating health/disease markers
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), through its Evidence-Based Practice Centers (EPCs), sponsors the development of evidence reports and technology assessments to assist public- and private-sector organizations in their efforts to improve the quality of health care in the United States. This report, Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acids on Arrhythmogenic Mechanisms in Animal and Isolated Organ/Cell Culture Studies, was requested and funded by the Office of Dietary Supplements, National Institutes of Health. The reports and assessments provide organizations with comprehensive, science-based information on common, costly medical conditions and new health care technologies. The EPCs systematically review the relevant scientific literature on topics assigned to them by AHRQ and conduct additional analyses when appropriate prior to developing their reports and assessments.
To bring the broadest range of experts into the development of evidence reports and health technology assessments, AHRQ encourages the EPCs to form partnerships and enter into collaborations with other medical and research organizations. The EPCs work with these partner organizations to ensure that the evidence reports and technology assessments they produce will become building blocks for health care quality improvement projects throughout the Nation. The reports undergo peer review prior to their release.
AHRQ expects that the EPC evidence reports and technology assessments will inform individual health plans, providers, and purchasers as well as the health care system as a whole by providing important information to help improve health care quality.
We welcome written comments on this evidence report. They may be sent to: Director, Center for Outcomes and Evidence, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 540 Gaither Road, Rockville, MD 20850.
Carolyn M. Clancy, M.D.
Director
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Paul Coates, Ph.D.
Director, Office of Dietary Supplements
National Institutes of Health
Jean Slutsky, P.A., M.S.P.H.
Acting Director, Center for Outcomes and Evidence
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
The authors of this report are responsible for its content. Statements in the report should not be construed as endorsement by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services of a particular drug, device, test, treatment, or other clinical service.
We gratefully acknowledge the substantial involvement of and assistance from the Technical Expert Panel.
Technical Expert Panel
William S. Harris, PhD
Daniel Lauer/Missouri Professor of Metabolism and Vascular Research
UMKC School of Medicine
Co-Director, Lipid and Diabetes Research Center
Mid America Heart Institute at Saint Luke's Hospital
4320 Wornall Road, Suite 128
Kansas City, MO 64111
Judith Hinchey, MD
Assistant Professor of Neurology,
Tufts University School of Medicine
Department of Clinical Care Research
Tufts-New England Medical Center
750 Washington Street, Box 63
Boston, MA 02111
Howard Knapp, MD, PhD
Executive Director
Deaconess Billings Clinic Research Division
Deaconess Billings Clinic
1500 Poly Drive, Suite 202
Billings, MT 59102
David A. Lathrop, PhD
Assistant Director
Clinical and Molecular Medicine Program
Division of Heart and Vascular Diseases
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
National Institutes of Health
6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 8136
Bethesda, MD 20892-7936
Michael Miller, MD, FACC, FAHA
Associate Professor of Medicine and Epidemiology
Director, Center for Preventive Cardiology
Division of Cardiology
University of Maryland Medical Center
22 South Greene Street, Room S3B06
Baltimore, MD 21201
Eva Obarzanek, PhD, MPH, RD
Research Nutritionist
Prevention Scientific Research Group
Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
National Institutes of Health
6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 8136
Bethesda, MD 20892-7936
Context. Epidemiological studies and clinical trials have reported beneficial effects of fish or fish oil consumption on cardiovascular disease outcomes including sudden death and arrhythmia. The mechanisms of this reported benefit are, however, unclear.
Objectives. As one component of a series of reports on the impact of omega-3 fatty acids on cardiovascular disease, we also performed a systematic review of the literature on whole animal and isolated organ and cell culture studies to assess the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on arrhythmogenic mechanisms and outcomes.
Data Sources. We searched Medline, Embase, Biological Abstracts, and Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau databases for potentially relevant English language studies.
Study Selection. We screened over 1,807 abstracts and retrieved 295 full text articles. Eighty-six studies met our inclusion criteria and provided data to address the key questions in this report. We used comparative studies of whole animal, isolated organ and cells derived from omega-3 fatty acid-fed animals, and isolated organ and cell culture studies, in which the studies quantified the amount of omega-3 fatty acid in the intervention, to assess the effects of the interventions on arrhythmogenic mechanisms and outcomes.
Data Extraction. From each qualifying study, we extracted information about the study design, animal characteristics and model, the amount of omega-3 fatty acid used in the animal diet or in the experiments, the chemical agents used , the conditions under which the experiments were conducted, and outcomes. For whole animal studies, we extracted information about the randomization and blinding techniques to assess methodological quality.
Data Synthesis. Thirteen whole animal studies (rat models) were included in a meta-analysis that compared the anti-arrhythmic effects of ALA or fish oil to omega-6 oils. These meta-analysis results showed that fish oil supplementation showed a significant risk reduction in the number of deaths, ventricular tachycardia (VT), and ventricular fibrillation (VF). The combined risk ratio (RR) for deaths was 0.48 (95% CI: 0.24–0.95). With fish oil supplementation, for VT the RR was 0.49 (95%CI 0.29–0.83), and 0.68 (95%CI 0.50–0.91), for ischemia and reperfusion-induced arrhythmias, respectively. With fish oil supplementation, for VF, the RR was 0.21 (95%CI 0.07–0.63), and 0.44 (95%CI 0.25–0.79), for ischemia and reperfusion-induced arrhythmias, respectively. There was no significant effect for ALA oil supplementation, however.
There were twenty-one studies using isolated organs and cells from whole animals fed omega-3 fatty acids that examined the following parameters: contractile, basoelectromechanical, ion pumps and ion movements, ion currents, and ion channels. Although seven of these studies evaluated the effect of omega-3 fatty acid enriched diets on contractile parameters, they each compared different diets and used different experimental conditions.
Thirty-nine studies evaluated the effect of omega-3 fatty acids on isolated organ and cell cultures. Omega 3 fatty acids were applied either directly to the cell culture medium (free) or incubated with the cells to allow incorporation into membrane phospholipids (bound). These studies examined parameters similar to the whole animal isolated organ and cell studies. Seven studies of arrhythmia reported that omega- 3 fatty acids (predominantly EPA and DHA but in one instance ALA) appeared to have a protective effect against spontaneous or induced arrhythmias in both rat and guinea pig models. Four of these studies, however, were from the same collaborative group. In the presence of various arrhythmogenic agents and across the different types of species studied, omega-3 fatty acids compared to controls were reported to consistently decrease contraction rate, thereby exerting a protective effect with respect to arrhythmia. In studies without an arrhythmogenic agent, the results were inconsistent, with three showing a decrease in contractility and three showing no effect.
Conclusions. Fish oil supplementation (EPA and/or DHA) might have anti-arrhythmic effects when compared with omega-6, monounsaturated, or saturated fatty-acids in pre-fed fish oil in studies of various animal species. Fish oil supplements in rats showed significant protective effects for ischemia- and reperfusion- induced arrhythmias by reducing the incidence of ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation but no beneficial effects for ALA supplementation were found. The arrhythmic effects for infused omega-3 fatty-acid treatments are still unknown.
In studies using isolated organs and cells from animals fed omega-3 fatty acids and in studies using isolated organ and cell culture where fatty acids were directly applied to the culture medium, the question regarding plausible biochemical or physiological mechanisms to explain the potential antiarrhythmogenic effects of omega 3 fatty acids cannot be answered definitively at this time, despite some apparent trends. Due to numerous sub-parameters within each of the major electrogenesis areas (i.e. ion channels, ion currents, ion pumps and ion movement, contractility) studied , and a variety of experimental conditions, it is more difficult to draw a conclusion about the various parameters.
This evidence report is one of three reports prepared by the Tufts-New England Medical Center (Tufts-NEMC) Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) concerning the health benefits of omega-3 fatty acids on cardiovascular diseases. These reports are among several that address topics related to omega-3 fatty acids, and that were requested and funded by the Office of Dietary Supplements, National Institutes of Health (NIH) through the EPC program at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Three EPCs — the Tufts-NEMC EPC, the Southern California-RAND EPC, and the University of Ottawa EPC — each produced evidence reports. To ensure consistency of approach, the three EPCs collaborated on selected methodological elements, including literature search strategies, rating of evidence, and data table design.
The aim of these three reports is to summarize the current evidence on the health effects of omega-3 fatty acids on the following: cardiovascular diseases, cancer, child and maternal health, eye health, gastrointestinal/renal diseases, asthma, autoimmune diseases, immune-mediated diseases, transplantation, mental health, and neurological diseases and conditions. In addition to informing the research community and the public on the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on various health conditions, it is anticipated that the findings of the reports will also be used to help define the agenda for future research.
The focus of this report is on the effect of omega-3 fatty acids on cardiac electrogenesis and arrhythmias. The other two reports focus on the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on cardiovascular disease and effects of omega-3 fatty acids on cardiovascular disease risk factors. In this chapter, we review the metabolism, physiological functions, and sources of omega-3 fatty acids. In addition, we examine some basic aspects of cardiac electrophysiology or electrogenesis and discuss the analytic framework for this report. Subsequent chapters describe the methods used to identify and review studies related to omega-3 fatty acids and cardiac electrogenesis, findings related to the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on cardiac electrogenesis and arrhythmias, and recommendations for future research in this area.
Dietary fat is an important source of energy for biological activities in human beings. Dietary fat encompasses saturated fatty acids, which are usually solid at room temperature, and unsaturated fatty acids, which are liquid at room temperature. Unsaturated fatty acids can be further divided into monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids. Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) can be classified on the basis of their chemical structure into two groups: omega-3 (n-3) fatty acids and omega-6 (n-6) fatty acids. The omega-3 or n-3 notation means that the first double bond from the methyl end of the molecule is in the third. The same principle applies to the omega-6 or n-6 notation. Despite their differences in structure, all fats contain the same amount of energy (9 kcal/g or 37 kJ/g).
Of all fats found in food, 2 — alpha-linolenic acid (chemical abbreviation: ALA, 18:3 n-3) and linoleic acid (LA, 18:2 n-6) — cannot be synthesized in the human body, yet are necessary for proper physiological functioning. These 2 fats are called essential fatty acids. The essential fatty acids can be converted in the liver to long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC PUFAs), which have a higher number of carbon atoms and double bonds. These LC PUFAs retain the omega type (n-3 or n-6) of the parent essential fatty acids.
ALA and LA comprise the bulk of the total PUFAs consumed in a typical North American diet. Typically, LA comprises 89% of the total PUFAs consumed, while ALA comprises 9%. Smaller amounts of other PUFAs make up the remainder 1. Both ALA and LA are present in a variety of foods. For example, LA is present in high concentrations in many commonly used oils, including safflower, sunflower, soy, and corn oil. ALA, which is consumed in smaller quantities, is present in leafy green vegetables and in some commonly used oils, including canola and soybean oil. Some novelty oils, such as flaxseed oil, contain relatively high concentrations of ALA, but these oils are not commonly found in the food supply.
The Institute of Medicine suggests that, for adults 19 and older, an adequate intake (AI) of ALA is 1.1–1.6 g/day, while an adequate daily intake of LA is 11–17 g/day 2. Recommendations regarding AI differ by age and gender groups, and for special conditions such as pregnancy and lactation.
As shown in Figure 1.1
The specific biological functions of fatty acids depend on the number and position of double bonds and the length of the acyl chain. Both EPA and AA are 20-carbon fatty acids and are precursors for the formation of prostaglandins, thromboxane, and leukotrienes — hormone-like agents that are members of a larger family of substances called eicosanoids. Eicosanoids are localized tissue hormones that seem to be one of the fundamental regulatory classes of molecules in most higher forms of life. They do not travel in the blood, but are created in the cells to regulate a large number of processes, including the movement of calcium and other substances into and out of cells, dilation and contraction of muscles, inhibition and promotion of clotting, regulation of secretions including digestive juices and hormones, and control of fertility, cell division, and growth 4.
In addition to affecting eicosanoid production as described above, EPA also affects lipoprotein metabolism and decreases the production of other compounds — including cytokines, interleukin 1ß (IL-1ß), and tumor necrosis factor a (TNF-a) — that have pro-inflammatory effects. These compounds exert pro-inflammatory cellular actions that include stimulating the production of collagenases and increasing the expression of adhesion molecules necessary for leukocyte extravasation 6. The mechanism responsible for the suppression of cytokine production by omega-3 LC PUFAs remains unknown, although suppression of eicosanoid production by omega-3 fatty acids may be involved. EPA can also be converted into the longer chain omega-3 form of docosapentaenoic acid (DPA, 22:5 n-3), and then further elongated and oxygenated into DHA. EPA and DHA are frequently referred to as very long chain omega-3 fatty acids. DHA, which is thought to be important for brain development and functioning, is present in significant amounts in a variety of food products, including fish, fish liver oils, fish eggs, and organ meats. Similarly, AA can convert into an omega-6 form of DPA. Studies have reported that omega-3 fatty acids decrease triglycerides (Tg) and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) in hypertriglyceridemic subjects, with a concomitant increase in high density lipoprotein (HDL). However, they appear to increase or have no effect on low density lipoprotein (LDL). Omega-3 fatty acids apparently lower Tg by inhibiting VLDL and apolipoprotein B-100 synthesis and decreasing post-prandial lipemia 7. Omega-3 fatty acids, in conjunction with transcription factors (small proteins that bind to the regulatory domains of genes), target the genes governing cellular Tg production and those activating oxidation of excess fatty acids in the liver. Inhibition of fatty acid synthesis and increased fatty acid catabolism reduce the amount of substrate available for Tg production 8
As noted earlier, omega-6 fatty acids are consumed in larger quantities (>10 times) than omega-3 fatty acids. Maintaining a sufficient intake of omega-3 fatty acids is particularly important since many of the body's physiologic properties depend upon their availability and metabolism.
In this report, we examine evidence that omega-3 fatty acids affect cell organelles — such as cardiac ion channels, pumps, or exchange mechanisms — that are involved in cardiac electrophysiology or electrogenesis. This section of the report reviews some basic aspects of electrogenesis and omega-3 fatty acids., and discusses the analytic framework that guided our systematic review of the literature. Two accompanying reports --- Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acids on Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors and Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acids on Cardiovascular Disease review evidence from clinical studies focused on the relationship between omega-3 fatty acids and outcomes in humans including sudden death.
The heart's beating rate is controlled by specialized, spontaneously firing pacemaker cells in the sino-atrial node (a bundle of specialized cardiac muscle cells in the right atrium of the heart) and by sympathetic and parasympathetic nerve fibers that influence the ion balance in heart muscle cells. The pacemaker cells initiate an electrical impulse that produces a change in the voltage of heart cell membranes. This change in voltage, also called an action potential, is generated by the relative concentration of different types of ions across the cell membrane, and moves from one heart muscle cell (or myocyte) to another 9.
Calcium, potassium, and sodium ions are central to the generation of action potentials. These ions, in the form of currents, move across cell membranes through pathways called channels. The speed at which ions traverse these channels varies due to channel characteristics. Some channels open or close as a function of membrane potential, while others respond to neurotransmitters or other molecules. Sodium and calcium ions also use an energy-dependent pumping process to cross the membrane. 9.
These electrophysiological processes interact with structural components of cardiac myocytes to cause synchronized contraction and relaxation of the heart muscle. The sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) — a system of membranes in cardiac muscle cells — stores calcium ions during the diastolic, or relaxation, phase of the contraction cycle. Infoldings of the cell membrane (or sarcolemma) called T-tubules transmit the action potential along the membrane far into the cell. The resulting excitation-contraction coupling process increases the concentration of intracellular free calcium ions during depolarization across the cell membrane and T-tubules. The calcium ions facilitate muscle contraction by interacting with other cellular components. The exchangers and pumps that support the contractile process rely on the presence of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and are affected by the concentration gradients of sodium, potassium, and calcium ions. The strength of cardiac muscle contraction, or myocardial contractility, can be increased by norepinephrine, which is secreted by sympathetic nerves and mediated by ß-adrenergic receptors and calcium channels. Myocardial muscle relaxation occurs when the calcium is returned to the sarcoplasmic reticulum or is pumped out of the cell by sodium-calcium exchangers and calcium adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) pumps 9.
Cardiac arrhythmias, or disorders of the heart's rhythm, are a serious cause of morbidity and mortality. Serious arrhythmias can cause sudden death (abrupt loss of heart function or cardiac arrest) — a leading cause of death in industrialized societies. According to the Heart and Stroke Statistical Update for 2003 10 arrhythmias were a direct cause of 37,646 deaths in the United States and were an underlying or contributing cause of another 491,000 deaths. In addition to contributing to sudden death, serious arrhythmias can compromise the normal flow of blood through the coronary arteries, resulting in impaired oxygenation of the heart muscle (myocardial ischemia) or death of cardiac muscle tissue (myocardial infarction or heart attack). Arrhythmias can also lead to other cardiovascular conditions, such as stroke, congestive heart failure, and peripheral embolism.
There are many potential causes of arrhythmias, including disruption of ion channels or pumps, reduction in blood flow to the heart muscle (ischemia), and alteration of the eicosanoid system and adrenoceptors (membrane proteins whose function in the heart is to transmit the neuroendocrine message sent by catecholamines like adrenaline and its derivatives). Changes in these systems result in electrical abnormalities in the heart leading to disturbances in the heart rhythm such as tachycardia, bradycardia, or uncoordinated contraction of the heart muscle cells.
A key purpose of this report is to examine the evidence that omega-3 fatty acids directly affect cell organelles such as cardiac ion channels, pumps, or exchange mechanisms involved in electrogenesis. The accompanying reports, entitled Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acids on Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors and Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acids on Cardiovascular Disease, provide a review of the evidence from clinical studies of the effect of omega-3 fatty acids on arrhythmia and sudden death in humans.
As described above, cell organelles such as cardiac ion channels, pumps, currents, and exchange mechanisms are essential electrophysiological processes that ensure normal heart rate and coronary blood flow. These processes depend upon the concentration gradient of sodium, potassium, and calcium, and associated enzymes. Disruptions in these concentrations can lead to asynchronous contractility of the myocardium and result in arrhythmias. Clinically, the main causes of arrhythmia are ischemia, electrolyte disturbances, drugs, and underlying structural problems (e.g. bypass tracts). The physiologic mechanisms underlying these effects involve such mechanisms as ion channels and pumps and membrane currents.
Omega-3 LC PUFAs may exert an anti-arrhythmic effect on cardiac cells in several ways. For example, they can affect the adrenoceptors that transmit neuroendocrine messages sent by catecholamines. The omega-3 fatty acid, DHA, for instance, causes both a decrease in the production of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), the main ß-adrenergic messenger, and an increase in chronotropic response or heart rate11. Omega-3 LC PUFAs also appear to act like another group of cardiovascular drugs, calcium channel blockers, by increasing intracellular calcium sequestration and interfering with receptor-operated calcium channels, influx 12.
This evidence report on the effect of omega-3 fatty acids on cardiac electrogenesis and arrhythmias is based on a systematic review of the literature. To identify the specific issues central to this report, the Tufts-New England Medical Center (Tufts-NEMC) evidence-based practice center (EPC) held meetings and teleconferences with a Technical Expert Panel (TEP) formed for this project and with participants from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and the Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS). In addition, teleconferences with the Southern-California RAND (SC-RAND) and University of Ottawa (UO) EPCs were held to discuss common methodological issues associated with the production of the evidence report. A comprehensive search of the scientific literature was conducted to identify studies addressing the key questions. Evidence tables of study characteristics and results were compiled, and the methodological quality and applicability of the studies were appraised. Results were summarized with both qualitative reviews of the evidence and quantitative meta-analyses, as appropriate.
The TEP served in an advisory capacity for this project. It helped to refine key questions, identify important issues, and define parameters of the report. Additional domain expertise was obtained through consultation with lipid/nutrition experts.
Question: What is the evidence from whole animal studies that omega-3 fatty affect arrhythmogenic outcomes (and intermediate outcomes)?
Question: What is the evidence from intact {intact, whole animal} cell culture and tissue studies (including animal and human cardiac tissue). that omega-3 fatty acids directly affect cell organelles such as cardiac ion channels, pumps, or exchange mechanisms involved in electrogenesis?
Question: What is the evidence from cell culture and tissue studies (including animal and human cardiac tissue). that omega-3 fatty acids directly affect cell organelles such as cardiac ion channels, pumps, or exchange mechanisms involved in electrogenesis?
What is the evidence from whole animal studies that omega-3 fatty acids affect arrhythmogenic outcomes (and intermediate outcomes)?
What is the evidence from cell culture and tissue studies (including animal and human cardiac tissue) that omega-3 fatty acids directly affect cell organelles such as cardiac ion channels, pumps, or exchange mechanisms involved in electrogenesis?
Potential mechanisms suggested by different investigators to explain the antiarrhythmic action of omega-3 fatty acids can be broadly classified into several categories (See list of Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Parameters). These include the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on:
Contractile parameters (e.g. contractility)
Basoelectromechanical parameters (e.g. action potential)
Ion channels and pumps (e.g. calcium channels)
Membrane currents (e.g. depolarizing current)
Receptors (e.g. beta adrenergic)
Membrane characteristics (e.g. fluidity and composition)
Enzymes (e.g. sodium, potassium ATPases, adenosine triphosphatase)
Eicosanoid system (e.g. prostaglandins)
Our focus in this report is limited to contractile parameters, basoelectromechanical parameters, ion pumps, channels, and membrane currents.
A comprehensive literature search was conducted to address the key questions. Relevant studies were identified primarily through search strategies conducted in collaboration with the UO EPC. Preliminary searches were conducted at the Tufts-NEMC EPC using the OVID search engine on the Medline database. The final searches used five databases including:
- Medline from 1966 to week 2 of February 2003
- PRE-MEDLINE from February 7, 2003
- Embase from 1980 to week 6 of 2003
- Biological Abstracts 1990 - December 2002
- Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau (CAB) Health from 1973 to December 2002
Subject headings and text words were selected so that the same set could be applied to each of the different databases with their varying attributes. Supplemental search strategies were conducted as needed. Additional publications were referred to us by the TEP and the other two EPCs.
A targeted search was conducted to retrieve articles that examined the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on cell organelles involved in electrophysiology. This search included in-vivo as well as in vitro animal studies. MeSH subject headings and text words were defined by reviewing key articles supplied by researchers and members of the TEP. In addition, citation analyses of key articles were conducted using the Science Citation Index database from the Institute for Scientific Information's Web of Science. Publications that cited the key articles were scanned for appropriateness and for additional subject headings or text words. These additional headings and text words were then added to those used in the search strategy.
Numbers for the final results of the database search strategies are approximate. Because the 5 main databases used in the search employ different citation formats, a number of duplicate publications were encountered. Although the UO EPC eliminated some of the duplicates, it was impossible to identify all of them. We eliminated additional duplicate publications as they were discovered. The database searches were updated regularly. The last update was conducted on April 18, 2003.
Abstracts identified through the literature search were screened using eligibility criteria defined to include all English language primary experimental studies that evaluated the impact of omega-3 fatty acids on arrhythmia, intermediate mechanisms of arrhythmia, and electrogenesis. Reports published only as letters or abstracts were excluded.
Articles associated with abstracts that passed these screens were retrieved and screened once more for eligibility. Inclusion and exclusion criteria used in this round of review are summarized below.
Studies were included if they examined the effect of omega-3 fatty acids on one of the following:
Arrhythmia
Adenosine triphophatase (ATPase, either Calcium, Sodium, Potasssium, or Magnesium)
Beating rate
Cardiac dynamics
Cardiac or myocyte contraction
Cardiomyocytes
Cell organelles in cardiac tissue (sarcoplasmic reticulum or endoplasmic reticulum; mitochondria)
Cell signaling
Coronary perfusion pressure
Cultured myocytes
Electrogenesis in cardiac myocyte
Electrophysiology
Heart rate or rhythm
Ion channels, pumps, currents, voltage dependant/sensitive channels (Calcium (Ca2+), Sodium (Na+), Potassium (K+), K+ transient outward current, delayed rectifier current, inward rectifier current, L-type Ca2+ current or channel)
Ischemia/ischemic reperfusion in heart
Sudden cardiac death
Ventricular fibrillation (VF)
Ventricular fibrillation threshold (VFT)
Ventricular ectopic beats (VEB)
Ventricular premature beats (VPB); sometimes referred to as premature ventricular complex (PVC)
The TEP agreed that given the wide range and number of studies of potential relevance, prioritization of which to include was important. We therefore identified studies of the following mechanisms related to the antiarrhythmic action of omega-3 fatty acids but judged them not immediately relevant to the scope of the key questions to include in this report. Mechanisms excluded were:
Eicosanoid production (prostaglandins, leucotrienes, thromboxanes)
Enzymes (5′nuclotidase, phospholipase, cyclo-oxygenase)
Receptors (ß-adrenergic, thromboxane)
Membrane composition, fluidity, or phospholipids
For articles identified through the review, grounds for rejection included: non-mammalian animals or cell lines, no outcome of interest reported (see below), no omega-3 fatty acid intervention, review article, non-English article, and toxicology study/safety assessment. For each study that was rejected, the reason(s) for rejection was noted. Basic information about all studies that addressed relevant outcomes was recorded.
A standardized data extraction process was followed to ensure consistency across reviewers. Definitions for terms used in the extraction process were specified by consensus. As part of the training process, data extractors extracted data from 2 of the same studies to compare interpretations. After this process, each study was partially screened to determine whether it met eligibility criteria and addressed relevant outcomes. Studies deemed eligible were then fully extracted by a single reviewer. Issues and discrepancies encountered during the extraction process were addressed at weekly meetings.
For both animal and in vitro studies, general items extracted included country in which the experiment occurred, funding source, and sample size. Extraction of additional data relating to the intervention, intermediate outcomes, potential mechanisms, and arrhythmogenic outcomes was guided by the analytic framework described in Chapter 1.
For animal and animal in vitro studies, data extracted regarding the intervention included species of animal, animal characteristics, control and experimental diets (including detailed description of any omega-3 fatty acids), and dosage and duration of feeding or infusion. For animal studies, data extracted about intermediate outcomes included heart rate, coronary flow, and electrocardiogram (ECG) changes. Data extracted about arrhythmogenic outcomes included induced arrhythmia, ventricular ectopic beats, ventricular fibrillation, and atrial fibrillation.
For in vitro studies, data extracted regarding the intervention included species of animal, animal characteristics, cell line, sample sizes, number of experiments, detailed description of any omega-3 fatty acids, and whether the fatty acids were free (directly added to the cell culture medium) or bound (incubated with the fatty acid and incorporated into membrane phospholipid). Data extracted about potential mechanisms of arrhythmia included ion channels, ion pumps, and ion movement, as well as ion currents, contractility, and basoelectromechanical parameters.
We report the evidence in three forms: (1) Evidence tables offer a detailed description of the studies we identified that address each of the key questions. These tables provide detailed information about the study design, characteristics of the animal and in vitro model used in the study, inclusion and exclusion criteria, intervention or test evaluated, and outcomes. Where appropriate, we graded the studies according to the methodological quality, applicability, size, and the effect or test performance. (2) Summary tables report on each study in an abbreviated form using summary measures of the main outcomes. These tables were developed by condensing information from the evidence tables to provide a concise overview of study quality and results, and are designed to facilitate comparisons across studies. Summary tables include important variables including study size, omega-3 fatty acids evaluated in the study, study dosages and duration, the animal model, outcomes, and methodological quality. (3) Additional tables were developed to provide an overall synthesis of information related to several key questions.
For the whole animal studies, wherever feasible, we performed meta-analyses combining the results from individual experiments. It is important, however, to interpret results cautiously when combining data that are highly variable. We identified key measures and subgroups to construct random effects meta-analysis models 13.
For the isolated organ and cell studies, we frequently developed a qualitative summary of data presented in the articles. When possible, we report percentage changes in evidence tables. When a treatment group was compared to a control group, the difference in percentage change between the treatment group and control group was calculated. When one omega-3 fatty acid was compared to another fatty acid, we first report results of the comparisons to omega-6 fatty acids, followed by comparisons to monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs), then to saturated fatty acids (SFAs), and finally to other omega-3 fatty acids. In the summary tables, percentage changes are characterized as a statistically significant (P<.05) increase, decrease, improvement, or no change (i.e. change not statistically significant (P>.05).
The criteria used to assess the methodological quality of animal studies are different from those used for human studies. Compared to human clinical trials, methods used to evaluate animal studies are not as advanced and there are no quality assessment rating schemes in widespread use. It is, however, important to stratify analyses, where possible, by the rigor of the study design and by the conduct, analysis, and reporting of the study. Since diet composition and the structure of the comparisons is a key aspect of study design in studies using intact animals fed different diets, we devised a four level categorization schema that is based on the fatty acid and/or level of fat contained in the comparison diet. The levels range from A to D, where the comparison diet in level A is most similar to eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, 20:5 n-3) and decosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22:6 n-3), and the comparison diet in level D is least similar. Specifically:
Omega-3 (fish, soybean, canola, linseed oils) vs. omega-6 (e.g. corn, safflower, sunflower oils) fatty acids. The omega-6 comparison oils have the longest fatty acid chains normally consumed by humans, and are most similar to EPA and DHA. They provide a similar level of dietary fat and have a similar number of double bonds.
Omega-3 fatty acids vs. MUFAs (e.g. olive oil). As with omega-6 comparison oils, MUFA oils have the longest fatty acid chains normally consumed by humans. They contain at least one double bond and provide a similar level of dietary fat.
Omega-3 fatty acids vs. SFA (e.g. butter, lard, palm oil, coconut oil, sheep fat). These saturated fatty acids provide a level of dietary fat in the comparison diet that is similar to the level obtained with omega-3 fatty acids.
Omega-3 fatty acids vs. control (e.g. standard chow). Standard chow is most different from the omega-3 enriched diet because no “counter-balancing” fatty acids are contained in this comparison diet.
In some studies, certain dietary comparisons conducted by the article authors were not relevant to this report. In such instances, only those components of the analysis that addressed the objectives of this report were extracted, using the scheme described above (order of comparison: omega-3 fatty acids to omega-6 fatty acids, MUFA, SFA, other omega-3 fatty acid).
Data from the whole animal isolated organ and cell studies and the pure isolated organ and cell studies are presented in the evidence and summary tables in a specific order. Studies and/or comparisons are presented in the rows, and results or outcomes (e.g., contractile parameters [CP], basoelectromechanical parameters [BEP], ion pumps and ion movements, [IPIM], ion currents [ICU], and ion channels [ICH]) are presented in the table columns. For each outcome, the omega-3 fatty acid used, the dose, and the experimental condition under which the study was performed, is noted. Outcomes or results obtained under ‘ambient’ (no perturbation) conditions are presented first, followed by outcomes or results under other conditions. Presenting results in this order is similar to the order followed in the studies themselves: after observations were made in the ambient condition, specific blocking or facilitating agents (e.g., antagonists such as iosproteronol and agonists such as BAY8644 (BAY), respectively) were often introduced to investigate specific mechanisms (e.g., receptors) that are affected by the fatty acids. For example, isoproteronol was used in some studies to produce arrhythmia. This approach provides an understanding about which specific receptors are affected by omega-3 fatty acids and which omega-3 fatty acids might yield anti-arrhythmogenic effects. The parameter of interest in some studies is electrical current, which must be elicited by electrical stimulation. For the purposes of this report electrical stimulation is not considered an ‘agent’.
In this chapter, we provide an overview of our literature search and discuss findings from the studies that met our search criteria. An overview of the literature search is presented first, followed by a review of whole animal studies, whole animal isolated organ and cell studies, and isolated organ and cell culture studies.
Through the literature search, we identified 1,807 abstracts that met our search criteria. After screening the abstracts, we retrieved 274 articles. Of these, 184 were rejected after reviewing the full text. The reasons for rejection are as follows: no omega-3 fatty acids (30), not specific to arrhythmia (31), no cardiac cells (4), fatty acid composition or products only (34), other reasons (90). Details associated with the reasons for rejection are summarized in the reasons for rejection section. At the end of this process, 89 articles were accepted and reviewed.
| Author, Year | Omega-3 Arm(s) | Control Arm* | Animals | Outcomes Evaluated | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VF | VT | VPB | AS | Deaths | IS | TSR | VFT | ||||
| Feeding studies: | |||||||||||
| Omega-3 PUFAs vs Omega-6 PUFAs | |||||||||||
| Abeywardena, 1995 | Soybean, MaxEPA™ | SSO | Rats | v | v | v | v | v | |||
| Anderson, 1996 | MaxEPA™ | Safflower | Rats | v | v | v | v | ||||
| Charnock, 1992 | Fish oil | SSO | Monkeys | v | v | ||||||
| Charnock, 1991 | Fish oil | SSO | Rats | v | v | v | v | ||||
| Hock, 1990 | Menhaden | Corn | Rats | v | v | v | |||||
| Hock, 1987 | Menhaden | Corn | Rats | v | v | ||||||
| Isensee, 1994 | Linseed, Fish oil | Corn | Rats | v | v | v | v | ||||
| McLennan, 1995 | Canola, Soybean | SSO | Rats | v | v | v | v | v | |||
| McLennan, 1992 | Tuna | SSO | Monkeys | v | v | ||||||
| McLennan, 1993 | Fish oil | SSO | Rats | v | v | v | v | v | v | ||
| McLennan, 1990 | Tuna | SSO | Rats | v | v | v | v | v | v | ||
| McLennan, 1988 | Tuna | SSO | Rats | v | v | v | v | v | |||
| McLennan, Bridle, 1993 | Fish oil | SSO | Monkeys | v | v | ||||||
| Omega-3 PUFAs vs MUFAs | |||||||||||
| McLennan, 1996 | EPA-e, DHA-e, EPA-e+DHA-e | Olive | Rats | v | v | ||||||
| Omega-3 PUFAs vs SFAs | |||||||||||
| al Makdessi, 1995 | Sardine | Coconut | Rats | v | v | ||||||
| Chen, 1994 | Fish oil | Coconut | Rabbits | v | v | ||||||
| Hartog, 1987 | Mackerel | Lard | Piglets | v | v | v | v | ||||
| Pepe, 1996 | Fish oil | Sheep fat | Rats | v | v | v | v | ||||
| Yang, 1993 | Fish oil | Butter | Rats | v | v | ||||||
| Omega-3 PUFAs vs Chows | |||||||||||
| Culp, 1980 | Menhaden | Friskies Dinner | Dogs | v | v | v | |||||
| Kinoshita, 1994 | EPA-e | Oriental Yeast Co. | Dogs | v | v | v | v | ||||
| Oskarsson, 1993 | MaxEPA™ | Chows | Dogs | v | |||||||
| Otsuji, 1993 | EPA-e | Oriental Yeast Co. | Dogs | v | v | v | |||||
| Total = | 17 | 12 | 12 | 10 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 4 | |||
| Infusion studies: | |||||||||||
| Omega-3 PUFAs vs Omega-6 PUFAs | |||||||||||
| Billman, 1999 | Albumin-bound ALA, EPA, DHA | Soybean or saline | Dogs | v | |||||||
| Billman, 1994 | Fish oil emulsion | Soybean | Dogs | v | |||||||
| Omega-3 PUFAs vs Chows | |||||||||||
| Lo, 1991 | ALA | Buffer | Dogs | v | v | ||||||
| Total = | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
SSO = sunflower seed oil; VF=ventricular fibrillation; VT=ventricular tachycardia; VPB=ventricular premature beats; AS=arrhythmia score; IS=infarct size; VFT=ventricular fibrillation threshold, measured only in VF inducible animals; TSR =length of time in normal sinus rhythm; EPA-e = EPA esters; DHA-e = DHA esters
For the purposes of our evidence review, only optimal comparison group was chosen. See Chapter 2: Methods.
| Author | Species | Stage* | ICU | ICH | IPIM | BEP | CP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bogdanov, 1998 | Rat | Adult | v | v | |||
| Courtois, 1992 | Rat | W | v | ||||
| De Jonge, 1996 | Rat | W | v | ||||
| Hallaq, 1990 | Rat | W | v | v | |||
| Hallaq, 1992 | Rat | W | v | v | v | ||
| Honore, 1994 | Mouse | W | v | v | |||
| Jahangiri, 2000 | Rat | Adult | v | ||||
| Kang, 1994 | Rat | W | v | ||||
| Juan, 1987 | Guinea pig | Adult | v | ||||
| Xiao, 2002 | Ferret | Adult | v | ||||
| Kang, 1996 | Rat | W | v | v | |||
| Leifert, 1999 | Rat | Adult | v | ||||
| Leifert, 2000 | Rat | Adult | v | ||||
| Rodrigo, 1999 | Rat, guinea pig | ND | v | v | |||
| MacLeod, 1998 | Rat, guinea pig | Adult | v | v | |||
| O'Neill, 2002 | Rat | Not sure | v | v | |||
| Durot, 1997 | Rat | W | v | v | |||
| Grynberg, 1988 | Rat | W | v | v | |||
| Kang, 1995a | Rat | W | v | ||||
| Kang, 1997 | Rat | W | v | ||||
| Li, 1997 | Rat | W | v | ||||
| Negretti, 2000 | Rat | ND | v | v | v | ||
| Pepe, 1994 | Rat | 2–3 mo | v | v | v | ||
| Phillipson, 1985 | Dog | ND | v | ||||
| Phillipson, 1987 | Dog | ND | v | ||||
| Grynberg, 1996 | Rat | W | v | v | |||
| Kang, 1995b | Rat | W | v | ||||
| Fournier, 1995 | Rat | W | v | v | |||
| Grynberg, 1995 | Rat | W | v | ||||
| Ferrier, 2002 | Guinea pig | Adult | v | v | |||
| Reithman, 1996 | Rats | W | v | v | |||
| Ponsard, 1999 | Rats | W | v | ||||
| Xiao, 1997 | Rats | Adult | v | v | |||
| Xiao, 1995 | Rats | W | v | ||||
| Goel, 2002 | Pig | Adult | v | ||||
| Vitelli, 2002 | Rats | Adult | v | ||||
| Weylandt,1996 | Rats | W | v | ||||
| Rinaldi, 2002 | Rats | Adult | v | v | |||
| Bayer, 1979 | Cat | Adult | v | ||||
| Total | 12 | 3 | 12 | 10 | 23 | ||
ICU=ion currents; ICH=ion channels; IPIM=ion pumps and ion channel movement; BEP=basal electromechanical parameters; CP=contractile parameters.
Stage: ND=no data; W = weanling
| Author, Year | Omega-3 Arms | Dosage, g/100 g | Duration | Omega-3 Fatty Acids | Control | RR (95% CI) | Experiment Protocols | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Event | Total | Event | Total | ||||||
| ALA Oils | |||||||||
| Abeywardena, 1995 | Soybean | 0.4 | 9 months | 2 | 18 | 1 | 18 | 2.0 (1.5–20) | 5-min ischemia; 10-min reperfusion |
| McLennan, 1995 | Soybean | 1.1 | 5 weeks | 3 | 10 | 2 | 10 | 1.5 (0.32–7.1) | 5-min ischemia; reperfusion |
| 1.3 (0.25–6.8) | |||||||||
| McLennan, 1995 | Soybean | 1.1 | 5 weeks | 2* | 13 | 2† | 14 | 0.20 (0.01–3.7) | 15-min ischemia; reperfusion |
| 1.3 (0.25–6.8) | |||||||||
| McLennan, 1995 | Canola | 1.2 | 5 weeks | 0 | 10 | 2 | 10 | 0.20 (0.01–3.7) | 5-min ischemia; reperfusion |
| McLennan, 1995 | Canola | 1.2 | 5 weeks | 3‡ | 16 | 2† | 14 | 1.1 (0.18–6.6) | 15-min ischemia; reperfusion |
| Meta-analysis: Total subjects = 133 | 10 | 67 | 9 | 66 | 1.2 (0.51–2.6) | Random-effect model | |||
| Fish Oils (EPA+DHA) | |||||||||
| Hock, 1987 | Menhaden | 1.0 | 4 weeks | 2‡ | 13 | 2‡ | 14 | 1.1 (0.18–6.6) | 15-min after ischemia without reperfusion |
| Hock, 1990 | Menhaden | 1.0 | 4 weeks | 5 | 21 | 13 | 22 | 0.40 (0.17–0.93) | 15-min ischemia; 24 h reperfusion |
| McLennan, 1993 | Fish oil | 2.6 | 12 weeks | 0 | 10 | 1* | 12 | 0.39 (0.02–8.7) | 5-min ischemia; 5-min reperfusion |
| McLennan, 1993 | Fish oil | 2.6 | 12 weeks | 0 | 14 | 1* | 13 | 0.31 (0.01–7.0) | 15-min ischemia; 5-min reperfusion |
| Abeywardena, 1995 | MaxEPA™ | 3.3 | 9 months | 0 | 18 | 1 | 18 | 0.33 (0.01–7.7) | 5-min ischemia; 10-min reperfusion |
| McLennan, 1988 | Tuna | 3.7 | 12 months | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 1.0 (0.02–46) | 15-min ischemia; reperfusion |
| McLennan, 1990 | Tuna | 3.7 | 18 months | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 1.0 (0.02–45) | 15-min ischemia; reperfusion |
| Meta-analysis: Total subjects = 169 | 7 | 83 | 18 | 86 | 0.47 (0.23–0.93) | Random-effect model | |||
RR=risk ratio=(omega-3 FA event rate)/(control's event rate)
All deaths occured during ischemia procedure
One death occured during ischemia procedure
Deaths were observed 15-min after ischemia procedure without reperfusion
| Author, Year | Omega-3 Arms (N) | Dosage | Controls (N) | Results | Experiment Protocols | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Billman, 1994 | 10 ml fish oil conc (n=4), or 5 ml fish oil + 5 ml Tg conc (n=4) | Fish oil conc.: 70% EPA+DHA | Saline (n=3) or lipid emulsion (n=5) | N | VF incidence | Exercise-ischemia (2-min) test | ||
| T conc.: 65% EPA+DHA | Fish oil infusion | 8 | 13%* | |||||
| Controls | 8 | 100% | ||||||
| *P<0.005 compared to controls | ||||||||
| Billman, 1999 | Albumin-bound | 98% EPA | SBO lipid emulsion, containing 7%~8% ALA (n=7) | N | VF incidence | Exercise-ischemia (2-min) test | ||
| ALA (n=8) | 91% DHA | ALA | 8 | 25%* | ||||
| EPA (n=7) | >99% ALA | EPA | 7 | 29%* | ||||
| DHA (n=8) | No data on the amount (ml) infused | DHA | 8 | 25%* | ||||
| Controls | 7 | 100% | ||||||
| *P<0.05 compared to controls | ||||||||
| Lo, 1991 | ALA (n=8)1 | 1, 5, 10, 20, 30, or 60 mg/kg | Control buffer, pH 8.1 (no lipids) | Eight dogs were infused control buffer or different doses of ALA. No events of VT or VPB were observed when infusing control buffer, or ALA up to 10 mg/kg. | Normal condition | |||
| ALA (mg/kg) | 20 | 30 | 60 | |||||
| VPC | 25% | 75% | 88% | |||||
| VT | 13% | 38% | 63% | |||||
| *P<0.05 compared to control buffer | ||||||||
Tg = triglyceride; VF = ventricular fibrillation; VPC = ventricular premature complex; VT = ventricular tachycardia; conc = concentrate; SBO = soybean oil
A left atrial injection instead of intravenous injection was used as the route of administration in this study
| Author, yr | Study Characteristics | Animal Model | Exposure Duration | Ref. Diet | Dietary Characteristics | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Groups | Total Fat | % of Total Fatty Acids | Other | ||||||||||
| ALA | E+D | n-6 | SFA | MUFA | |||||||||
| Abeywardena, 1995 | Country: Australia | Mean age: ND | 9 months | Standard rat chow (Milling Industries, Adelaide, Australia) | SSO | 15* %w/w or 32* %kcal | 0.9 | 0 | 59* | 13* | 22* | ||
| Animal: Wistar rats | Age grp: ND | SBO | 2.8 | 0 | 44* | 21* | 25* | ||||||
| Funding: Industry | Sex: Males | FO (MaxEPA) | 1.4 | 22 | 7* | 28* | 15* | ||||||
| al Makdessi, 1995 | Country: Germany | Mean age: ND | 10 weeks | Low-fat (<1% w/w) standard chow from (Altromin GmbH & Co.) | FO (sardine oil) | 10% w/w | 1.3 | 29 | ND | 31* | ND | ||
| Animal: Wistar rats | Age grp: Young | Coconut oil | 0.9 | 0 | ND | >60* | ND | ||||||
| Funding: ND | Sex: Males | ||||||||||||
| Anderson, 1996 | Country: Australia | Mean age: ND | 8 weeks | Total fat: 3.5% | FO (MaxEPA) | Initially given at 0.6 ml and + 0.1 ml/wk up to 1.0 ml w/ increasing body weight | ND | ND | 0 | 10 | 28 | Total n3 = 41% | |
| Animal: Sprague-Dawley rats | Age grp: Adult | Safflower oil | 0 | 0 | 75 | 25 | 15 | ||||||
| Funding: Government | Sex: Males | ||||||||||||
| Billman, 1994 | Country: US | Mean age: ND | Infusion study | ND | Saline (n=3) or I.V. infusion (n=5) | 100 ml of Intralipid, a 10% lipid emulsion | 7 | 0 | ND | ND | ND | ||
| Animal: Mongrel dogs | Age grp: ND | Emulsion of fish oil | 10 ml FO concentrate (n=4)5 ml same FO concentrate + 5 ml TG concentrate (n=4) | ND | 70 | ND | ND | ND | |||||
| Funding: Government | Sex: ND | ND | 65 | ND | ND | ND | |||||||
| Billman, 1999 | Country: US | Mean age: ND | Infusion study | ND | SBO lipid emulsion (n=7) or saline (n=7) | ND | 7~8 in SBO | 0 | ND | ND | ND | ||
| Animal: Mongrel dogs | Age grp: ND | EPA | 0 | E=98 | ND | ND | ND | ||||||
| Funding: Government | Sex: ND | D=1 | |||||||||||
| DHA | 0 | E=1 | ND | ND | ND | ||||||||
| D=91 | |||||||||||||
| ALA | >99 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Charnock, 1992 | Country: Australia | Mean age: > 3 years old | 30 months | ND | SSO | 12* %w/w or 28 %kcal | 1.1 | 0 | ND | 23* | 23* | N3/n6 = 0.02= 2.0 | |
| Animal: Wistar rats | Age grp: Adult | FO | 1.4 | 20 | ND | 29* | 26* | ||||||
| Funding: ND | Sex: ND | ||||||||||||
| Charnock, 1991 | Country: Australia | Mean age: near 1 yr old | 12 months | NDMilling Industries Australia. Total fat: 3 %w/w | SF/SSO | 16* %w/w or 35 %kcal | ND | ND | 19 | 45 | 29 | TT n-3 = 1.1 | |
| Animal: Wistar rats | Age grp: Adult | TT n6 = 19 | |||||||||||
| Funding: ND | Sex: males | SF/FO | ND | ND | 12 | 41 | 29 | TT n-3 = 13 | |||||
| TT n6 = 12 | |||||||||||||
| Chen, 1994 | Country: Taiwan | Mean age: ND | 2 weeks. | Standard rabbit chow (Purina 5321, St. Louis, MO, USA) | HC (1% CHOL-enriched diet) | 40 %kcal (1% chol) | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
| Animal: rabbits | Age grp: ND | HCF (1% CHOL and 10% FO) | 40% energy (1% chol +10% fish oil) | ND | 52 | ND | ND | ND | |||||
| Funding: Government | Sex Males | ||||||||||||
| Culp, 1980 | Country: US | Mean age: ND | 36 to 45 days | Standard dog chow (Friskies Dinner) | Standard dog chow | ND | ND | 0.1 | ND | 32 | 34 | ||
| Animal: Mongrel dogs | Age grp: ND | FO (Menhaden) | +25 %kcal | ND | 13 | ND | 32 | 20 | |||||
| Funding: Government | Sex: ND | ||||||||||||
| Germain, 2003 | Country: France | Mean age: ND | >= 3 weeks | APAE, Jouy en Josas, France. | Palm oil | +15% of total fat | ND | ND | ND | high MUFA level | ND | ||
| Animal: Sprague-Dawley rats | Age grp: ND | DHASCO (DHA fom purified TGs) | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||||||
| Funding: Government | Sex: Females | ||||||||||||
| Hartog JM 1987 | Country: Netherlands | Mean age: 5 weeks | 16 weeks | ND | Lard fat (9% w/w) | ND | 1 | 0 | ND | 36 | ND | ||
| Animal: Yorkshire piglets | Age grp: Unclear | ML (4.5% mackerel oil + 4.5% lard fat) | 1 | 13 | ND | 32 | ND | ||||||
| Funding: Dutch Heart Foundation | Sex: ND | ||||||||||||
| Hock, 1990 | Country: US | Mean age: ND | 4 weeks | Fat-free purified diet | CO (corn oil) | 12 %kcal or 5 %w/w | 1 | 0 | 59 | 14* | 25* | n3/n6= 0.02 | |
| Animal: Sprague-Dawley rats | Age grp: Weanling | MO (Menhaden oil) | 2 | 20 | 5 | 33* | 27* | =6.06 | |||||
| Funding: Government | Sex: ND | ||||||||||||
| Hock, 1987 | Country: US | Mean age: ND | 4 weeks | Fat-free purified diet | CO (corn oil) | 12 %kcal or 5 %w/w | 1 | 0 | 59 | 14* | 25* | n3/n6= 0.02 | |
| Animal: Sprague-Dawley rats | Age grp: Adult | MO (Menhaden oil) | 2 | 21 | 4 | 31* | 27* | =7.99 | |||||
| Funding: Government | Sex: Males | ||||||||||||
| Isensee H 1994 | Country: Germany | Mean age: 2 months | 10 weeks | Low-fat (<1 %w/w ) basic diet (Altromin GmbH, Lage, Germany) | CO | 10 %w/w | 1 | 0 | 50 | 16 | 31 | ||
| Animal: Wistar rats | Age grp: Young | LO (Linseed oil) | 52 | 0 | 20 | 9 | 16 | ||||||
| Design: A | Sex: Males | FO | 0.3 | 29 | 12 | 31 | 26 | ||||||
| Funding: Alfred Teufel-Stiftung research foundation | |||||||||||||
| Kinoshita, 1994 | Country: Japan | Mean age: ND | 8 weeks | Standard diet (Oriental Yeast Co.) | Standard diet | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
| Animal: Mongrel dogs | Age grp: Adult | EPA ester | Mochida Pharmaceutical Co | ND | 100 mg/kg BW/d | ND | ND | ND | |||||
| Diseased: Funding: ND | Sex: ND | ||||||||||||
| Lo, 1991 | Country: Taiwan | Mean age: ND | Infusion study | Same dogs were infused control buffer or different dosages of ALA. | Control buffer | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
| Animal: Mongrel dogs | Age grp: ND | ALA infusion | 1, 5, 10, 20, 30, or 60 mg/kg | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||||||
| Funding: ND | Sex: MixSex : “either sex” | ||||||||||||
| McLennan, 1996 | Country: Australia, Switzerland | Mean age: ND | 5 weeks | ND | Olive oil | 5% w/w from olive oil | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
| Animal: spontaneously hypertensive Wistar rats | Age grp: ND | EPA | 0.5% from n-3; 4.5% from olive oil | ND | E:0.5 w/w | ND | ND | ND | |||||
| Funding: ND | Sex: Males | DHA | ND | D:0.5w/w | ND | ND | ND | ||||||
| EPA+DHA | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||||||||
| McLennan, 1995 | Country: Australia | Mean age: 12 weeks | 12 weeks | Nonpurified lab rat diet. Total fat = 4% w/w | CAN | 15 %w/w or 32 %kcal | 8 | 0 | 21 | 12 | 60 | N3/n6 = 0.37 | |
| Animal: Sprague-Dawley rats | Age grp: Adult | SBO | 7 | 0 | 52 | 19 | 22 | = 0.14 | |||||
| Funding: ND | Sex: Males | SSO | 5 | 0 | 64 | 12 | 23 | =0.008 | |||||
| McLennan, Bridle, 1993 | Country: Australia | Mean age: ND | 16 weeks | Low-fat marmoset diet (Milling Industries, Adelaide, Australia) Total fat = 6% w/w | SF/SSO (8% sheep perirenal fat + 2% SSO) | 16 %w/w | 0.8 | 1 | 20 | 48 | ND | N3/n6 = 0.12 | |
| Animal: Marmoset monkeys | Age grp: Old | SF/FO (7% SF + 3% FO) | 0.8 | 11 | 10 | 47 | ND | =1.25 | |||||
| Funding: Government | Sex: 50% Males | ||||||||||||
| McLennan, 1993 | Country: Australia | Mean age: 30 weeks | 12 weeks | Basic laboratory diet (Milling Industries, Adelaide, Australia) Total fat = 4% w/w | SSO | 15 %w/w or 32 %kcal | ND | ND | 56 | 15 | 25 | Total n3 = 4% | |
| Animal: Sprague-Dawley rats | Age grp: Old | FO | ND | ND | 8 | 40 | 25 | =17% | |||||
| Funding: International Olive Oil Council | Sex: ND | ||||||||||||
| McLennan, 1992 | Country: Australia | Mean age: 2 years | 30 months | Total fat: 4 %w/w SFA: 37.3%MUFA: NDPUFA: 18.3% | SSO | 12 %w/w or 29 %kcal | ND | ND | 54 | 23 | ND | ND | |
| Animal: Marmoset monkeys | Age grp: Unclear | TFO (tuna fish oil) | ND | ND | 11 | 29 | ND | Total n3 = 23% | |||||
| Funding: ND | Sex: breeding pairs | ||||||||||||
| McLennan, 1990 | Country: Australia | Mean age: 2 months | 18 months | Standard lab rat diet. Total fat = 4% w/w | SF+SSO | 16 %w/w or 35 %kcal | 0 | 0 | 58 | 16 | ND | ||
| Animal: Sprague-Dawley rats | Age grp: Adult | SF+TFO | ND | 23 | 9 | 31 | ND | ||||||
| Funding: Government | Sex: Males | ||||||||||||
| McLennan, 1988 | Country: Australia | Mean age: “age-matched” | 12 months | Standard lab rat diet. Total fat = 4% w/w | SSO | 16 %w/wor 35 %kcal | ND | 0 | 58 | ND | ND | ||
| Animal: Wistar rats | Age grp: Unclear | TFO | ND | 23 | 9 | ND | ND | ||||||
| Funding: Government | Sex: Males | ||||||||||||
| Oskarsson, 1993 | Country: US | Mean age: ND | 6 weeks | ND | No fish oil Rx | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
| Animal: Mongrel dogs | Age grp: ND | MaxEPA | ND | 0.1 g/kg/d | ND | ND | ND | ||||||
| Funding: ND | Sex: “Mixed Sex” | ||||||||||||
| Otsuji, 1993 | Country: Japan | Mean age: ND | 8 weeks | Standard diet prepared by Oriental Yeast Co. | Standard dog chow | 30 g/kg BW /day | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
| Animal: Mongrel dogs | Age grp: Adult | EPA ester | 100 mg/kg BW/day | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | |||||
| Funding: ND | Sex: MixSex : No data on the distribution | ||||||||||||
| Pepe, 1996 | Country: Australia | Mean age: 16 weeks | 16 weeks | Nonpurified diet fed to all rats (Milling Industries, Adelaide, Australia).Total fat = 7.6% | SAT (sheep perirenal fat) | 15.3% w/w | 1.5 | 1 | 8 | 55 | ND | ||
| Animal: Wistar rats | Age grp: Young | FO | 1.2 | 36 | 8 | 25 | ND | ||||||
| Funding: ND | Sex: Males | ||||||||||||
| Yang, 1993 | Country: US | Mean age: ND | 5 days | Standard rat nonpurified diet (Purina Mills, St. Louis, MO)Total fat = 5 %kcal | Butter | 17 %kcal | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
| Animal: Sprague-Dawley rats | Age grp: ND | FO (fish oil rich pellets | ND | 32 | 23 | 25 | 15 | ||||||
| Funding: Government | Sex: Males | ||||||||||||
estimated values, not reported in original paper
Types of study design:
A = N-3 PUFAs vs. n-6 PUFAs
B = N-3 PUFAs vs. MUFAs
C = N-3 PUFAs vs. SFAs
D = N-3 PUFAs vs. Standard chows
Individual summary tables were created to show the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on various arrhythmic outcomes. Studies were grouped first by outcomes, then by species, and finally by experimental protocols (or mechanisms) for induced arrhythmias. Within each table, comparisons were first clustered into alpha linolenic acid (ALA, 18:3 n 3) oils or fish oils, and then sorted by the dose of omega-3 fatty acids. Frequently, studies had more than one comparison and used more than one experimental protocol. As a result, some studies appear multiple times in one table (once for each comparison group) or appear in several different tables.
In general, the arrhythmic outcomes assessed were defined consistently across the 26 whole-animal studies with the exception of the definition for arrhythmia score, which varied somewhat across studies. The following arrhythmic outcome measures and general definitions were used in the original studies:
Ventricular Tachycardia (VT): A run of four or more consecutive ventricular premature beats 14.
Ventricular Fibrillation (VF): A signal for which individual QRS deflections can no longer be distinguished from one another (implying morphological instability) and for which a rate can no longer be measured 14.
Ventricular Premature Beats (VPB): Isolated ventricular premature beats are generally defined as discrete and identifiable premature QRS complexes (premature in relation to the P wave) 14.
Arrhythmia Score (AS): A hierarchical scale of 0 to 9 during occlusion as most described by Curtis et al., 1987 15, and during reperfusion using a slightly modified version of the scale as described by McLennan et al., 1988 16.
Infarct Size (IS): The under-perfused ischemic regions determined by dye exclusion and expressed as a percentage of wet weight in both ventricles 16. In the studies examined for this report, infarct size reflects myocardial tissue that has sustained damage due to the ischemia procedures that were used to induce arrhythmias.
We performed meta-analyses for each of the outcomes. In these analyses, fish oils and ALA oils were analyzed separately and in combination.
In the following sections, the 23 pre-fed studies are discussed first and are grouped according to the comparison substance. Studies comparing omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) to omega-6 PUFAs are presented first, followed by studies comparing omega-3 PUFAs to a-linolenic acid, monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs), saturated fatty acids (SFAs), and no treatment. The 3 studies that infused free form omega-3 fatty acids are reviewed at the end of the Whole Animal Studies section.
| Author, Year | Omega-3 Arms | Dosage, g/100 g | Duration | Omega-3 Fatty Acids | Control | Experiment Protocols | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Event | Total | Event | Total | |||||
| McLennan, 1992 | Tuna | 2.8 | 30 months | 0 | 16 | 3 | 13 | Control condition, ischemia, and isoproterenol (0.5 ug/kg body weight/minute) models |
Total ventricular fibrillation (VF) deaths were combined in control condition, ischemia, and isoproterenol models.
| Sensitivity Analysis - Sequential Dropping of One Study Random Effects Model - Risk Ratio (D&L method) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study Dropped | Study Year | Size | Total N | Risk Ratio | 95% CI | 2P | |
| Low | High | ||||||
| Hock | 1987 | 27 | 142 | 0.41 | 0.19 | 0.86 | 0.018 |
| Hock | 1990 | 43 | 126 | 0.64 | 0.19 | 2.14 | 0.47 |
| McLennan | 1993 | 22 | 147 | 0.47 | 0.23 | 0.96 | 0.038 |
| McLennan | 1993 | 27 | 142 | 0.48 | 0.24 | 0.97 | 0.041 |
| Abeywardena | 1995 | 36 | 133 | 0.48 | 0.23 | 0.97 | 0.040 |
| McLennan | 1990 | 14 | 155 | 0.46 | 0.23 | 0.92 | 0.028 |
A separate meta-analysis combined comparisons involving ALA with comparisons involving eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, 20:5 n-3) plus decosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22:6 n-3). The overall risk ratio of deaths in this analysis was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.40–1.2).
| Author, Year | Omega-3 Arms | Dosage, g/100 g | Duration | Omega-3 Fatty Acids | Control | RR (95% CI) | Experiment Protocols | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Event | Total | Event | Total | ||||||
| ALA Oils | |||||||||
| Abeywardena, 1995 | Soybean | 0.4 | 9 months | 8 | 18 | 7 | 18 | 1.1 (0.53–2.5) | 5-min ischemia |
| McLennan, 1995 | Soybean | 1.1 | 12 weeks | 8 | 13 | 13 | 14 | 0.66 (0.42–1.0) | 15-min ischemia |
| McLennan, 1995 | Canola | 1.2 | 12 weeks | 12 | 16 | 13 | 14 | 0.81 (0.59–1.1) | 15-min ischemia |
| Isensee, 1994 | Linseed | 5.2 | 10 weeks | 6 | 10 | 4 | 9 | 1.4 (0.56–3.3) | 20-min ischemia |
| Meta-analysis: Total subjects = 112 | 34 | 57 | 37 | 55 | 0.82 (0.65–1.0) | Random-effect model | |||
| Fish Oils (EPA+DHA) | |||||||||
| Charnock, 1991 | Fish oil | 2.1 | 12 months | 7 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0.71 (0.41–1.1) | 15-min ischemia |
| McLennan, 1993 | Fish oil | 2.6 | 12 weeks | 5 | 14 | 12 | 13 | 0.39 (0.19–0.79) | 15-min ischemia |
| Isensee, 1994 | Fish oil | 3.0 | 10 weeks | 0 | 10 | 4 | 9 | 0.10 (0.01–1.7) | 20-min ischemia |
| Abeywardena, 1995 | MaxEPA | 3.3 | 9 months | 1 | 18 | 7 | 18 | 0.14 (0.02–1.1) | 5-min ischemia |
| McLennan, 1988 | Tuna | 3.7 | 12 months | 2 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 0.25 (0.07–0.90) | 15-min ischemia |
| McLennan, 1990 | Tuna | 3.7 | 18 months | 4 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 1.0 (0.40–2.5) | 15-min ischemia |
| Meta-analysis: Total subjects = 136 | 19 | 69 | 45 | 67 | 0.49 (0.29–0.83) | Random-effect model | |||
| Author, year | Omega-3 Arms | Dosage, g/100 g | Duration | Omega-3 Fatty Acids | Control | RR (95% CI) | Experiment Protocols | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Event | Total | Event | Total | ||||||
| ALA oils | |||||||||
| Abeywardena, 1995 | Soybean | 0.4 | 9 months | 13 | 17 | 7 | 18 | 2.0 (1.0–3.7) | 5-min Ischemia; 10-min Reperfusion |
| McLennan, 1995 | Soybean | 1.1 | 12 weeks | 9 | 10 | 7 | 10 | 1.3 (0.82–2.0) | 5-min Ischemia; 10-min Reperfusion |
| McLennan, 1995 | Soybean | 1.1 | 12 weeks | 7 | 11 | 9 | 13 | 0.92 (0.52–1.6) | 15-min Ischemia; 10-min Reperfusion |
| McLennan, 1995 | Canola | 1.2 | 12 weeks | 7 | 10 | 7 | 10 | 1.0 (0.56–1.8) | 5-min Ischemia; 10-min Reperfusion |
| McLennan, 1995 | Canola | 1.2 | 12 weeks | 4 | 13 | 9 | 13 | 0.44 (0.18–1.1) | 15-min Ischemia; 10-min Reperfusion |
| Meta-analysis: Total subjects = 125 | 40 | 61 | 39 | 64 | 1.1 (0.73–1.6) | Random-effect model | |||
| Fish Oils (EPA+DHA) | |||||||||
| Anderson, 1996 | MaxEPA | 41% of TT FAs | 8 weeks | 3* | 8 | 3* | 6 | 0.75 (0.23–2.5) | 20-min ischemia; reperfusion |
| McLennan, 1993 | Fish oil | 2.6 | 12 weeks | 6 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 0.72 (0.41–1.3) | 5-min Ischemia; 5-min Reperfusion |
| McLennan, 1993 | Fish oil | 2.6 | 12 weeks | 3 | 14 | 8 | 12 | 0.32 (0.11–1.0) | 15-min ischemia; 5-min reperfusion |
| Abeywardena, 1995 | MaxEPA | 3.3 | 9 months | 4 | 18 | 7 | 18 | 0.57 (0.20–1.6) | 5-min ischemia; 10-min reperfusion |
| McLennan, 1988 | Tuna | 3.7 | 12 months | 5 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 0.63 (0.31–1.3) | 15-min ischemia; reperfusion |
| McLennan, 1990 | Tuna | 3.7 | 18 months | 5 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 0.83 (0.48–1.5) | 15-min ischemia; 10-min reperfusion |
| Meta-analysis: Total subjects = 132 | 26 | 67 | 42 | 65 | 0.68 (0.50–0.91) | Random-effect model | |||
TT FAs = total fatty acids; RR = risk ratio; VF = ventricular fibrillation; VT = ventricular tachycardia
Sustained VT and/or VF were excluded from the analyses
The other 6 comparisons were combined to evaluate the effects of fish oils (EPA plus DHA) on the incidence of VT in ischemia-induced arrhythmias (Figure 4). The combined risk ratio of deaths in this analysis was 0.49 (95% CI: 0.29–0.83). The studies were heterogeneous. Sensitivity analysis did not show that any single study had a dominating effect.
A separate meta-analysis combined comparisons involving ALA with comparisons involving EPA plus DHA. In this meta-analysis, the overall risk ratio of VT in ischemia-induced arrhythmias was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.53–0.92).
Among the 11 comparisons, 5 examined the effects of ALA vs.omega-6 PUFA oils on the incidence of VT in reperfusion-induced arrhythmias (Figure 5). The combined risk ratio of deaths was 1.1 (95% CI: 0.73–1.6). The studies were heterogeneous.
The other 6 comparisons were combined to evaluate the effects of fish oils (EPA plus DHA) on the incidence of VT in reperfusion-induced arrhythmias (Figure 6). The combined risk ratio of deaths was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.50–0.91). There was no statistically significant heterogeneity between studies.
In the meta-analysis that combined comparisons involving ALA with comparisons involving EPA plus DHA, the overall risk ratio of VT in reperfusion-induced arrhythmias was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.65–1.1).
| Author, Year | Omega-3 Arms | Dosage, g/100 g | Duration | Omega-3 Fatty Acids | Control | RR (95% CI) | Experiment Protocols | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Event | Total | Event | Total | ||||||
| ALA oils | |||||||||
| McLennan, 1995 | Soybean | 1.1 | 12 weeks | 5 | 13 | 6 | 14 | 0.90 (0.36–2.2) | 15-min ischemia |
| McLennan, 1995 | Canola | 1.2 | 12 weeks | 7 | 16 | 6 | 14 | 1.0 (0.45–2.3) | 15-min ischemia |
| Isensee, 1994 | Linseed | 5.2 | 10 weeks | 4 | 10 | 4 | 9 | 0.90 (0.31–2.6) | 20-min ischemia |
| Meta-analysis: Total subjects = 76 | 16 | 39 | 16 | 37 | 0.95 (0.56–1.6) | Random-effect model | |||
| Fish Oils (EPA+DHA) | |||||||||
| Charnock, 1991 | Fish oil | 2.1 | 12 months | 0 | 10 | 6 | 10 | 0.08 (0.00–1.2) | 15-min ischemia |
| McLennan, 1993 | Fish oil | 2.6 | 12 weeks | 0 | 14 | 5 | 13 | 0.08 (0.01–1.4) | 15-min ischemia |
| Isensee, 1994 | Fish oil | 3.0 | 10 weeks | 1 | 10 | 4 | 9 | 0.22 (0.03–1.7) | 20-min ischemia |
| McLennan, 1988 | Tuna | 3.7 | 12 months | 0 | 10 | 1* | 10 | 0.33 (0.02–7.3) | 15-min ischemia |
| McLennan, 1990 | Tuna | 3.7 | 18 months | 1 | 7 | 2 | 7 | 0.50 (0.06–4.3) | 15-min ischemia |
| Meta-analysis: Total subjects = 100 | 2 | 51 | 18 | 49 | 0.21 (0.07–0.63) | Random-effect model | |||
Estimated from graph
| Author, Year | Omega-3 Arms | Dosage, g/100 g | Duration | Omega-3 Fatty Acids | Control | RR (95% CI) | Experiment Protocols | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Event | Total | Event | Total | ||||||
| ALA Oils | |||||||||
| Abeywardena, 1995 | Soybean | 0.4 | 9 months | 4 | 17 | 2 | 18 | 2.1 (0.44–10) | 5-min ischemia; 10-min reperfusion |
| McLennan, 1995 | Soybean | 1.1 | 12 weeks | 5 | 10 | 5 | 10 | 1.0 (0.42–2.4) | 5-min Ischemia; Reperfusion |
| McLennan, 1995 | Soybean | 1.1 | 12 weeks | 3 | 11 | 3 | 13 | 1.2 (0.30–4.7) | 15-min ischemia; reperfusion |
| McLennan, 1995 | Canola | 1.2 | 12 weeks | 1 | 10 | 5 | 10 | 0.20 (0.03–1.4) | 5-min ischemia; reperfusion |
| McLennan, 1995 | Canola | 1.2 | 12 weeks | 0 | 13 | 3 | 13 | 0.14 (0.01–2.5) | 15-min ischemia; reperfusion |
| Isensee, 1994 | Linseed | 5.2 | 10 weeks | 6 | 10 | 7 | 9 | 0.77 (0.42–1.4) | 20-min ischemia; 20-min reperfusion |
| Meta-analysis: Total subjects = 144 | 19 | 71 | 25 | 73 | 0.84 (0.52–1.3) | Random-effect model | |||
| Fish Oils (EPA+DHA) | |||||||||
| Anderson, 1996 | MaxEPA™ | 41% of TT FAs | 8 weeks | 1* | 8 | 2* | 6 | 0.38 (0.04–3.2) | 20-min ischemia; reperfusion |
| Hock, 1990 | Menhaden | 1.2 | 4 weeks | 1† | 7 | 9† | 10 | 0.16 (0.03–0.99) | 15-min ischemia; 6-hr reperfusion |
| McLennan, 1993 | Fish oil | 2.6 | 12 weeks | 1 | 10 | 3 | 12 | 0.40 (0.05–3.3) | 5-min ischemia; 5-min reperfusion |
| McLennan, 1993 | Fish oil | 2.6 | 12 weeks | 0 | 14 | 1 | 12 | 0.29 (0.01–6.5) | 15-min ischemia; 5-min reperfusion |
| Isensee, 1994 | Fish oil | 3.0 | 10 weeks | 4 | 10 | 7 | 9 | 0.51 (0.22–1.2) | 20-min ischemia; 20-min reperfusion |
| Abeywardena, 1995 | MaxEPA™ | 3.3 | 9 months | 1 | 18 | 2 | 18 | 0.50 (0.05–5.0) | 5-min ischemia; 10-min reperfusion |
| McLennan, 1988 | Tuna | 3.7 | 12 months | 0 | 10 | 3 | 10 | 0.14 (0.01–2.5) | 15-min ischemia; reperfusion |
| McLennan, 1990 | Tuna | 3.7 | 18 months | 2 | 7 | 2 | 7 | 1.0 (0.19–5.2) | 15-min ischemia; reperfusion |
| Meta-analysis: Total subjects = 168 | 10 | 84 | 29 | 84 | 0.4 (0.25–0.79) | Random-effect model | |||
TT FA = total fatty acids; VT = ventricular tachycardia; VF = ventricular fibrillation
Sustained VT and/or VF were excluded from the analyses
VT or VF (%)
| Author, Year | Omega-3 Arms | Dosage, (g/100 g) | Duration | Omega-3 Fatty Acids | Control | VFT¶ | Experiment Protocols | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Event | Total | Event | Total | ||||||
| Electrical-Stimulation Arrhythmias† | |||||||||
| McLennan, Bridle, 1993 | Fish oil | 1.8 | 16 weeks | 6 | 10 | 5 | 9 | +133% * | Electrical stimulation in control condition |
| Charnock, 1992 | Fish oil | 2.4 | 16 weeks | 8% | ND | 13% | ND | NS | Electrical stimulation in control condition |
| McLennan, 1992 | Tuna | 2.8 | 30 months | 10 | 16 | 8 | 13 | NS | Electrical stimulation in control condition |
| Electrical-Stimulation Arrhythmias in Ischemic Hearts† | |||||||||
| McLennan, Bridle, 1993 | Fish oil | 1.8 | 16 weeks | 10 | 10 | 9 | 9 | +79% * | Electrical stimulation + 5-min ischemia |
| Charnock, 1992 | Fish oil | 2.4 | 16 weeks | Nil | ND | 13% | ND | NS | Electrical stimulation + ischemia |
| McLennan, 1992 | Tuna | 2.8 | 30 months | 12 | 16 | 8 | 13 | NS | Electrical stimulation + 5-min ischemia |
| Electrical-Stimulation Arrhythmias With Isoproterenol† | |||||||||
| McLennan, Bridle, 1993 | Fish oil | 1.8 | 16 weeks | 3 | 10‡ | 7 | 9‡ | +55% * | Electrical stimulation + 30-min isoproterenol (0.5 ug/kg BW/min) |
| McLennan, Bridle, 1993 | Fish oil | 1.8 | 16 weeks | 5 | 10‡ | 9 | 9‡ | +75% | Electrical stimulation + 30-min isoproterenol (2.0 ug/kg BW/min) |
| McLennan, 1992 | Tuna | 2.8 | 30 months | 7 | 16 | 10 | 13 | NS | Electrical stimulation + 30-min Iisoproterenol (0.5 ug/kg BW/min) |
ND = no data; BW = body weight; min = minute; VFT = ventricular fibrillation threshold, measured only in VF inducible animals; NS = no significant difference compared to controls
P<0.05 compared to control animals
Same monkeys underwent electrical stimulation in control condition, 5 minutes after ischemia. procedure, and 30 minutes after restoration of coronary blood flow during the infusion of isoproterenol.
Same monkeys injected 0.5 ug/kg BW/min isoproterenol, then the dosage of isoproterenol was increased to 2.0 ug/kg BW/min.
An increase in VFT is a desirable outcome for antiarrhythimic effects. See Chapter 2: Methods for the effects expressed as percent change.
Among the 8 comparisons, 3 examined the effects of ALA vs. omega-6 PUFA oils on the incidence of VF in ischemia-induced arrhythmias (Figure 7). The combined risk ratio of deaths was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.56–1.6). There was no statistically significant heterogeneity between studies.
The other 5 comparisons were combined to evaluate the effect of fish oils on the incidence of VF in ischemia-induced arrhythmias (Figure 8). The combined risk ratio of deaths was 0.21 (95% CI: 0.07–0.63). There was no statistically significant heterogeneity between studies.
In the meta-analysis that combined ALA comparisons and EPA plus DHA comparisons, the overall random-effect risk ratio of VF in ischemia-induced arrhythmias was 0.69 (95% CI: 0.41–1.24).
Among the 14 comparisons, 6 examined the effects of ALA vs. omega-6 PUFA oils on the incidence of VF in reperfusion-induced arrhythmias (Figure 9). The combined risk ratio of deaths was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.52–1.3). The studies were heterogeneous.
The other 8 comparisons were combined to evaluate the effects of fish oils on the incidence of VF in reperfusion-induced arrhythmias (Figure 10). The combined risk ratio of deaths was 0.44 (95% CI: 0.25–0.79). There was no statistically significant heterogeneity between studies.
In the meta-analysis combining ALA comparisons and EPA plus DHA comparisons, the overall random-effect risk ratio of VT in reperfusion-induced arrhythmias was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.65–1.1).
For each of the arrhythmia induction protocols, the investigators compared the proportion of monkeys from the fish oil group that experienced inducible VF to the proportion in the sunflower seed oil group that experienced VF. In the first protocol (electrical stimulation in control condition), the investigators found no difference between groups. In the second protocol (electrical stimulation five minutes after an ischemia procedure), 2 of the 3 studies found no difference in the proportion of monkeys that had inducible VF 24, 25. One study 26, however, reported that while no VF was inducible in the monkeys fed fish oil, VF was induced in 13% of the monkeys fed sunflower seed oil . In the third protocol (electrical stimulation during the infusion of isoproterenol), VF was induced in 30% to 50% of the monkeys fed fish oil compared to 77% to 100% of the monkeys fed sunflower seed oil.
Ventricular fibrillation thresholds (VFTs) were measured only among the VF inducible monkeys. In 2 studies24, 26, VFTs remained unchanged in both groups in all conditions. However, one study 25 found that VFTs were significantly increased among monkeys that were fed fish oil relative to those fed sunflower seed oil in all conditions (note that an increased threshold indicates a desirable outcome).
| Author, Year | Omega-3 Arms | Dosage, g/100 g | Duration | Total N | Arrhythmia Outcomes1 | Experimental Protocols | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VPB | AS2 | IS | TSR3 | ||||||
| ALA Oils | |||||||||
| Abeywardena, 1995 | Soybean | 0.4 | 9 months | 36 | +176% | +107%* | - | - | 5-min ischemia; 10-min reperfusion |
| McLennan, 1995 | Canola | 1.1 | 5 weeks | 30 | -13% | -11% | - | - | 15-min ischemia |
| -43% | -64% | - | - | 10-min reperfusion | |||||
| McLennan, 1995 | Canola | 1.1 | 5 weeks | 20 | -19% | -41%* | - | - | 5-min ischemia; 10-min reperfusion |
| Isensee, 1994 | Linseed | 5.2 | 10 weeks | 20 | - | - | NS | NS | 20-min ischemia |
| McLennan, 1995 | Soybean | 1.2 | 5 weeks | 27 | -14% | -18% | - | - | 15-min ischemia |
| -2% | -12% | - | - | 10-min reperfusion | |||||
| McLennan, 1995 | Soybean | 1.2 | 5 weeks | 20 | +34% | +30% | - | - | 5-min ischemia; 10-min reperfusion |
| Fish Oils (EPA+DHA) | |||||||||
| Anderson, 1996 | MaxEPA | 41% of TT FAs | 8 weeks | 14 | -31% | -54% | - | - | 20-min ischemia; reperfusion |
| Hock, 1990 | Menhaden | 1.0 | 4 weeks | 17 | - | -77%† | - | - | 15-min ischemia; 6-hr reperfusion |
| Hock, 1987 | Menhaden | 1.0 | 4 weeks | 23 | NC | - | - | - | 15-min after ischemia w/o reperfusion |
| Charnock, 1991 | Fish oil | 2.1 | 12 months | 20 | -72%* | -59%* | - | - | 15-min ischemia |
| McLennan, 1993 | Fish oil | 2.6 | 12 weeks | 27 | -10% | -41%* | - | +12% | 15-min ischemia |
| -31% | -63%* | - | +2% | 5-min reperfusion | |||||
| McLennan, 1993 | Fish oil | 2.6 | 12 weeks | 22 | -27% | -48% | - | +16% | 5-min ischemia; 5-min reperfusion |
| Isensee, 1994 | Fish oil | 3.0 | 10 weeks | 20 | - | - | NS | Increased* | 20-min ischemia |
| Abeywardena, 1995 | MaxEPA | 3.3 | 9 months | 36 | -13% | -40% | - | - | 5-min ischemia; 10-min reperfusion |
| McLennan, 1990 | Tuna | 3.7 | 18 months | 14 | +6% | NS | - | -5% | 15-min ischemia |
| -24%* | NS | +21% | 10-min reperfusion | ||||||
| McLennan, 1988 | Tuna | 3.7 | 12 months | 20 | - | NS -44%* | +7%, NS | - | 15-min ischemia reperfusion |
TT FAs = total fatty acids; VPB = ventricular premature beats/complex; IS = infarct size/size of ischemia zone; AS = arrhythmia score (according to Curtis et. al.); TSR =length of time in normal sinus rhythm; ISO = Isoproterenol
Not reported NS = no significant difference compared to controls
P<0.05 compared to controls
P<0.01 compared to controls
See Methods for the effects expressed as percent change.
AS in all studies were calculated according to Curtis et al [Cardiovascular Research 22, 656–665], except Hock, 1990 used a modified method
An increase in TSR is a desirable outcomes for antiarrhythmic effects.
No consistent results were found in studies that compared rats fed ALA oils (soybean, linseed or canola oils) to rats fed omega-6 PUFA oils. However, when rats fed fish oils were compared to rats fed omega-6 PUFA oils, the studies found that most of the fish oil fed rats had less severe ischemia-induced and/or reperfusion-induced arrhythmias than the omega-6 PUFA fed rats.
| Author, Year | Omega-3 Arms | Dosage, g/100 g | Duration | Animal | Sample Size | Arrhythmia Outcomes | Experimental Protocols | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deaths | VT | VF | VPB/10 min | IS | AS | TSR¶, min | |||||||
| Abeywardena, 1995 | Soybean | 0.4 | 9 months | Rats | 18 | 11% | 76% | 23% | 298 | - | 3.1 | - | 5-min ischemia |
| MaxEPA | 3.3 | 9 months | Rats | 18 | 0% | 22% | 5% | 94 | - | 0.9 | - | 10-min reperfusion | |
| Isensee, 1994 | Linseed | 5.2 | 10 weeks | Rats | 10 | - | 60% | 40% | - | 35%* | - | 5.5*† | 20-min ischemia |
| - | 60% | - | - | 20-min reperfusion | |||||||||
| Fish oil | 3.0 | 10 weeks | Rats | 10 | - | 0% | 10% | - | 36%* | - | 10*† | 20-min ischemia | |
| - | 40% | - | - | 20-min reperfusion | |||||||||
VT = ventricular tachycardia; VF = ventricular fibrillation; VPB = ventricular premature beats; IS = infarct size/size of ischemia zone; AS = arrhythmia score (according to Curtis et. al.); TSR = length of time in normal sinus rhythm; min = minute
Not reported
estimated value from figures
p<0.05 between groups
An increase in TSR is a desirable outcomes for antiarrhythmic effects
Indirect comparisons between omega-3 long chain PUFAs (EPA and DHA) and ALA based on meta-analysis are described in the Discussion (Chapter 4).
| Author, year | Omega-3 Arms | Dosage, g/100 g | Duration | Omega-3 Fatty Acids | Control | Experiment Protocols | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Event | Total | Event | Total | |||||
| Rabbits | ||||||||
| Chen, 1994 | Fish oil | 5.2 %kcal | 2 weeks | 3* | 12 | 5* | 14 | 10-min ischemia; 1-hr reperfusion |
| Chen, 1994 | Fish oil | 5.2 %kcal | 2 weeks | 6 † | 14 | 8 † | 15 | 1-hr ischemia; 4-hr reperfusion |
| Piglets | ||||||||
| Hartog, 1987 | Mackerel | 0.6 | 16 weeks | 1 | 7 | 0 | 6 | 5-min ischemia; 10-min reperfusion |
Two deaths in each group occurred during reperfusion
50% deaths occurred during ischemia; 50% occurred during reperfusion
In another study 30, 13 piglets were fed either 9%w/w lard fat (n=6) or 4.5%w/w mackerel oil plus 4.5%w/w lard fat (n=7) for 16 weeks. The corresponding dose of EPA plus DHA in the group fed mackerel oil plus lard fat was 0.6g/100g. Defibrillation was unsuccessful in one piglet from the mackerel plus lard oil group. This piglet died of ventricular asystole during the fifth reperfusion.
| Author, year | Omega-3 Arms | Dosage, g/100 g | Duration | Omega-3 Fatty Acids | Control | Experiment Protocols | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Event | Total | Event | Total | |||||
| Rats | ||||||||
| Pepe, 1996 | Fish oil | 5.2 | 16 weeks | 7 † | 20 | 14 † | 20 | 15-min ischemia; 10-min reperfusion |
| Piglets | ||||||||
| Hartog, 1987 | Mackerel | 0.6 | 16 weeks | 2* | 7 | 1* | 6 | 5-min ischemia; 10-min reperfusion |
All events occurred during ischemia procedure
Some events occurred during ischemia; some occurred during reperfusion
In the piglet study, the incidence of VT was 29% (n=7) and 17% (n=6) in piglets fed mackerel oil and lard fat, respectively. All VT events occurred during the ischemia procedure.
| Author, year | Omega-3 Arms | Dosage, g/100 g | Duration | Omega-3 Fatty Acids | Control | Experiment Protocols | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Event | Total | Event | Total | |||||
| Rats | ||||||||
| Pepe, 1996 | Fish oil | 5.2 %kcal | 16 weeks | 0 | 20 | 16 | 20 | 15-min ischemia; 10-min reperfusion |
| Yang, 1993 | Fish oil | 5.4 %kcal | 5 days | 3 * | 8 | 7* | 9 | 15-min ischemia; 10-min reperfusion |
| Piglets | ||||||||
| Hartog, 1987 | Mackerel | 0.6 | 16 weeks | 3 † | 7 | 0 | 6 | 5-min ischemia; 10-min reperfusion |
VT (%) or VF (%). All events occurred during reperfusion
Some events occurred during ischemia; some occurred during reperfusion
In the piglet study, the incidence of VF was 43% (n=7) in piglets fed mackerel oil, while no piglet fed lard fat developed VF in ischemia-reperfusion-induced arrhythmias. In the same study, programmed electrical stimulation was performed to induce VF in another 20 piglets, 10 in the mackerel-oil group and 10 in the control group. The incidence of VF was not reported, but VFTs were measured in control condition and during 15 minutes of ischemia. The threshold current for VF induction was reduced in all dietary groups during ischemia but remained significantly higher in the mackerel-oil-fed group than in the saturated-fat-fed group.
| Author, Year | Omega-3 Arms | Dosage, g/100 g | Duration | Animals | Total N | VPB 1 | Experiment Protocols |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ischemia-Induced Arrhythimas | |||||||
| Chen, 19942 | Fish oil | 5.2 %kcal | 2 weeks | Rabbits | 22 | -50% | 10-min ischemia |
| -35% | 1-hr ischemia | ||||||
| Hartog, 1987 | Mackerel | 0.6 | 16 weeks | Piglets | 13 | +53% | 5-min ischemia |
| Pepe, 1996 | Fish oil | 5.2 %kcal | 5 days | Rats | 40 | -73%* | 15-min ischemia |
| Reperfusion-Induced Arrhythimas | |||||||
| Chen, 19942 | Fish oil | 5.2 %kcal | 2 weeks | Rabbits | 22 | 0% | 10-min ischemia; 1-hr reperfusion |
| -25% | 1-hr ischemia; 4-hr reperfusion | ||||||
| Hartog, 1987 | Mackerel | 0.6 | 16 weeks | Piglets | 13 | -65%* | 15-min ischemia; 10-min reperfusion |
VPB = ventricular premature beat
P<0.05
See Chapter 2: Methods for the effects expressed as percent change
Study results were biased by excluding more subjects who died from
Effects on arrhythmia scores or severity of arrhythmias. None of the studies that compared the arrhythmic effects of omega-3 PUFAs and saturated fatty acids reported arrhythmia scores as an outcome.
Effects on infarct size. None of the studies that compared the arrhythmic effects of omega-3 PUFAs and saturated fatty acids reported infarct size as an outcome.
Effects on length of time in sinus rhythm. None of the studies that compared the arrhythmic effects of omega-3 PUFAs and saturated fatty acids reported length of time in sinus rhythm as an outcome.
| Author, Year | Omega-3 Arms | Dosage, g/100 g | Duration | Omega-3 Fatty Acids | Control | Experiment Protocols | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Event | Total | Event | Total | |||||
| Culp, 1980 | Menhaden | 3.3 %kcal | 5~7 weeks | 3 | 10 | 5 | 17 | Coronary artery thrombosis induced by electrical stimulation |
| Otsuji, 1993 | EPA ester | 1.0 | 8 weeks | 0 | 10 | 5 | 15 | Coronary artery ligation (or ischemia) |
Effects on incidence of ventricular tachycardia and/or ventricular fibrillation. The incidence of VT and/or VF in induced arrhythmias was evaluated in a study of 30 dogs. 38. Fifteen dogs were fed standard dog chow plus 1.0g/100g EPA ester for 8 weeks. Fifteen untreated control dogs were fed standard dog chow for 8 weeks. An ischemia-induced arrhythmia model was used in 10 experimental dogs and 10 controls. A digitalis-induced arrhythmia model was used in 5 dogs from each group. A fatal dose of digoxin (0.025 mg/kg/min) was administrated intravenously over a 60-second period immediately after coronary artery ligation.
There was no difference in the incidence of VF in ischemia between the groups. Two dogs in each group (20% vs. 20%) developed VF within 3 hours after coronary ligation. All 10 dogs that underwent digitalis-induced arrhythmias developed VT or VF. However, the VT or VF did not occur until at least 25 minutes after the administration of digoxin in the dogs fed EPA ester, while the events occurred about 10 to 15 minutes within administration of digoxin in the untreated control dogs.
| Author, Year | Omega-3 Arms | Dosage, g/100 g | Duration | Total N | Arrhythima Outcomes 1 | Experimental Protocols | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VPB | AS 3 | IS | ARAr | ||||||
| Kinoshita, 1994 | EPA ester | 1.0 | 8 weeks | 20 | -44%* | -55% † | - | - | 3-hr ischemia |
| Culp, 1980 | Menhaden | 3.3 %kcal | 5~7 weeks | 27 | Decreased | - | -52% | - | Electrical stimulation |
| Otsuji, 19932 | EPA ester | 1.0 | 8 weeks | 20 | - | - | -40%† | NS | Ischemia |
| Oskarsson, 1993 | MaxEPA | 1.0 | 6 weeks | 22 | - | - | -55%* | NS | 90-min ischemia; 30-min reperfusion |
VPB = ventricular premature beats/complex; IS = infarct size/size of ischemia zone; AS = arrhythima score (according to Curtis et al, 1987); TSR =length of time in normal sinus rhythm; ARAr = areas at risk of arrhythmias; ISH = ischemia
Not reported NS = no significant difference compared to controls
P<0.05 compared to controls
p<0.01 compared to controls
See Chapter 2: Methods for the effects expressed as percent change
Study results were biased by excluding more subjects who died from arrhythmias in the control group
Effects on length of time in sinus rhythm. None of the studies that compared the arrhythmic effects of omega-3 PUFAs vs. untreated controls reported length of time in sinus rhythm as an outcome.
| Author, year | Animal Model [Type, Age, Sex] | Exposure Duration (weeks) | Comparison Groupa | Amount of Omega-3 | Expt. Condition | Agent | INa | Ito | ICaL | IK | IKI | IKUR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omega-3 Fatty Acid (n) | Control (n) | ||||||||||||
| RAT | |||||||||||||
| Minarovic, 1998 | ventricular myocyte, Young adult, male | 2 | FO (ND) | HF (ND) | 100g/Kg/d | Ambient | None | NC Ac | |||||
| NC InAc | |||||||||||||
| NC A | |||||||||||||
| Leifert, 2000 | ventricular myocyte, Young adult, male | 3 | FO (17–28) | LARD (17–28) | 29% Energy | Ambient | None | NC Ac | NC Ac | ||||
| NC InAc | NC InAc | ||||||||||||
INa=initial fast current; Ito=transient K + outward current or initial outward current; Ica.L=voltage dependent L-type Calcium current/inward current/calcium sparks; I K=delayed rectifier K + current; Iki=inward rectifier K + current; Ikur=ultra rapid K + current; Ac-activation parameter; In Ac = inactivation parameter; D = decrease; I = increase; NC = no change; ND=no data;
= p<0.05
= p<0.01;
= p<0.001
A =amplitude
Ac =activation parameter
FO = fish oil
InAc =inactivation parameter
HF =high fat
NC =no change
| Author, yr | Country Funding | Species Stage Sex | Exp-osure Duration (weeks) | Group [Sample Size] | Total Fat (omega-3 fatty acids) | Unit | SFA | MUFA | PUFA | ALA | EPA | DHA | Other omega-3 fatty acids |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benediktsdottir, 1988 | Iceland U | Rats | 16 | Corn oil (CO) [ND] | 10 %w | % total fatty acids | 14.5 | 24.5 | 57.8 | ND | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.03 |
| Adult | |||||||||||||
| Male | Cod-liver oil (CLO) [ND] | 10 %w | 22.0 | 47.0 | 27.2 | ND | 6.9 | 7.2 | 0.93 | ||||
| Black, 1989 | Canada G | Rats | 4 | STD [6] | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
| Adult | |||||||||||||
| Male | STD+FO [6] | 0.5ml/kg/day | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||||
| Chemla, 1995 | France G | Rats | 4 | N-3 [15] | 15%w | %TFA | 20.0 | 57.7 | 11.4 | 0.8 | 4.3 | 4.1 | |
| Adult | |||||||||||||
| Male | N-6 [15] | 15%w | 19.8 | 58.9 | 20.7 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| Chen, 1994 | Taiwan G | Rabbits | 2 | High cholesterol (HC) [11–15] | 40 %kcal | % w/w | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | |
| Adult | 40 %kcal (10 %kcal from fish oil) | ||||||||||||
| Male | HC+FO [11–12] | ND | ND | ND | ND | 30.2 | 21.5 | ||||||
| Croset, 1989a | USA G1 | Mouse | 2 | STD [10] | 0 %w | Mol% | 11.8 | 31.7 | 56.1 | 0.0 | ND | 0.0 | |
| Weanling | STD+0.4 %w/w DHAe[10] | 10 %w/w | 11.7 | 28.8 | 59.1 | 0.0 | ND | 0.1 | |||||
| Male | STD+0.8 %w/w DHAe[10] | 10%w/w | 11.5 | 25.7 | 61.6 | 0.0 | ND | 0.2 | |||||
| STD+ 4%w/w DHAe [10] | 10 %w /w | 5.3 | 9.3 | 85.3 | 0.0 | ND | 0.8 | ||||||
| Croset, 1989b | USA | Mouse | 2 | OO+ALA e [6] | 1.5+0.5%w | Mol% | 27.6 | 44.5 | 27.9 | 20.5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | |
| Weanling | OO+EPA e [6] | 1.5+0.5%w | 30.3 | 49.8 | 19.9 | 1.0 | 8.1 | 1.9 | |||||
| Male | OO+DHA e [6] | 1.5+0.5%w | 27.5 | 47.3 | 25.1 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 16.5 | |||||
| Demaison, 1993 | France G | Rats | 8 | SF [32] | 100g/Kg | % TFA | 11.8 | 16.2 | 71.7 | 0.2 | ND | ND | |
| Weanling | LIN [29] | 100g/kg | 8.7 | 20.3 | 71.0 | 53.5 | ND | ND | |||||
| Male | |||||||||||||
| Gillis, 1992 | Canada G | Rabbits | 6 | SAF (9) | 10%w | %w | 9.6 | 13.1 | 77.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.03 |
| Weanling | FO (9) | 10%w | 23.5 | 29.2 | 47.3 | 1.4 | 26.5 | 8.6 | 2.33 | ||||
| ND | |||||||||||||
| Gudmundsdottir, 1991 | Iceland U | Rats | 20 | CO [5] | 10%w | %w | 13.6 | 24.6 | 58.6 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Adult | CLO (4) | 10%w | 18.1 | 51.0 | 27.7 | 0.0 | 7.1 | 8.1 | |||||
| Male | |||||||||||||
| Rats | 88 | CO [5] | 10%w | %w | 13.6 | 24.6 | 58.6 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
| Aged | CLO (4) | 10%w | 18.1 | 51.0 | 27.7 | 0.0 | 7.1 | 8.1 | |||||
| Male | |||||||||||||
| Heard, 1992 | USA U | Rats | 4 | SAF [18] | 20%w | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | |
| Adult | MenO+SAF [18] | 19.5%+0.5%w | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | |||||
| Male | |||||||||||||
| Honen, 2002 | Australia G | Rats | 3 | Canola oil (6) | 3ml/d | % TFA | 6.2 | 60.0 | 33.8 | 12.1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Adult | FO(6) G | 3ml/d | 1.7 | 15.8 | 77.7 | 0.5 | 48.0 | 26.2 | |||||
| Male | |||||||||||||
| Karmazyn, 1987 | Canada G | Rats | 12 | STD [14] | 10%w | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | |
| Weanling | STD+Cod liver oil (CLO) [14] | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||||||
| Male/ Female | |||||||||||||
| Kinoshita, 1994 | Japan U | Dogs | 8 | STD (15) | 100mg/kg | mg/k | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | |
| Adult | STD+EPAe (15) | g/d | ND | ND | ND | ND | 100 | ND | |||||
| ND | |||||||||||||
| Ku, 1997 | Japan G | Rats | 12 | HC (5) | 5.1%w | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | |
| Aged | HC+EPA (5) | 5.1%w (300mg/kg) | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | |||||
| Female | HC+DHA (5) | 5.1%w (300mg/kg) | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | |||||
| Lamers, 1988 | Neth.; Italy G | Pigs | 8 | LARD [8] | 9%w | %TFA | 36 | 46 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Weanling | |||||||||||||
| Male/ Female | FO +LARD [8] | 4.5% +4.5%w | 32 | 40 | 11 | 1 | 8 | 5 | |||||
| Laustiola, 1986 | Finland U | Rats | 16 | STD [20] | % TFA | 26.2 | 23.6 | 49.7 | 5.3 | 1.3 | 2.7 | 0.23 | |
| Weanling | 10%na | 2.74 | |||||||||||
| Male | STD+CLO [33] | 22.8 | 46.5 | 28.6 | 1.7 | 6.4 | 8.2 | 0.73 | |||||
| 8.24 | |||||||||||||
| Leifert, 2000a | Australia G | Rats | 3 | LARD [6–8] | 29% E (74kJ fat/d) | % w | 58.0 | 39.4 | 2.6 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.03 |
| Young | FO [6–8] G5 | 29% E (74kJ fat/d) | 27.3 | 28.2 | 44.6 | 1.1 | 24.3 | 12.1 | 2.33 | ||||
| Adult | |||||||||||||
| Male | |||||||||||||
| Leifert, 2001 | Australia I+NP | Rats | 3 | SF (6) | 17%w (10%w) | %w | 36.4 | 55.1 | 8.5 | 1.2 | 0 | 0 | 0.03 |
| Adult | FO (6) | 17%w (10%w) | 18.6 | 44.0 | 37.4 | 0.9 | 17.8 | 8.9 | 1.73 | ||||
| Male | |||||||||||||
| Maixent, 1999 | France G+NPl | Rats | 8 | STD [11] | 0.5g of oil/kg | mg/g of oil | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | |
| Adult | STD+FO [10] | ND | ND | ND | ND | 180 | 120 | ||||||
| Male | |||||||||||||
| Minaro-vic, 1997 | Slovak G | Rats | 2 | HF [10] | 300g/kg | % w | 47.0 | 39.7 | 13.3 | ND | ND | ND | |
| Young | FO [10] | 100g/kg | 13.0 | 29.4 | 57.6 | ND | ND | ND | |||||
| Adult | |||||||||||||
| Male | |||||||||||||
| Pepe, 1999 | USA U | Rats | 6 | N-6 (6) | 15.6% w (11.7%w) | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Young | FO (5) | 15.6%w (11.7%w) | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||||
| Adult | |||||||||||||
| Male | |||||||||||||
| Reig, 1993 | Spain U | Rats | 5 | HF (20) | 37%w | %TFA | 36.7 | 40.0 | 19.4 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.03 |
| Young | HF+FO (20) | 31%+6%w | 30.0 | 33.0 | 37.1 | 3.4 | 4.6 | 3.4 | 1.03 | ||||
| Adult | |||||||||||||
| Male | |||||||||||||
| Swan-son, 1989 | USA G | Mouse | 2 | SAF+CO (9) | 12%w (2%+10%w) | %w | 14.5 | 24.2 | 60.9 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.03 |
| Weanling | SAF+MenO (9) | 12%w (2%+10%w) | 28.5 | 26.1 | 44.7 | 1.8 | 12.9 | 9.1 | 2.03 | ||||
| Male | |||||||||||||
| Taffet, 1993 | USA G | Rats | 3 | CO [11] | 20%w | Mol % | 14.3 | 26.3 | 59.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ND | |
| Young | CO+MenO [12] | 3%+17%w | 39.9 | 28.3 | 31.9 | 1.3 | 16.5 | ND | |||||
| Adult | |||||||||||||
| Female | |||||||||||||
| Author, Year | Animal Model [Type, Age, Sex] | Exposure Duration (Weeks) | Comparison Groupsa | Amount of Omega-3 Fatty Acid | Experimental Condition | Agentb | Heart Rate | Contractilityc | IPd | Cardiac Work | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omega-3 Fatty Acid (n) | Control (n) | ||||||||||
| RAT | |||||||||||
| Chemla, 1995 | Myocardium, Adult, Male | 4 | N-3 (15) | N-3 (16) | 15%wt | Ambient | None | NC (FVR) | |||
| Demaison, 1993 | Isolated heart, weanling, male | 8 | LIN (29) | SF (32) | 100g/kg | Ambient | None | NC | |||
| Heard, 1992 | Atrial tissue, adult, male | 4 | FO+SAF (6–11) | SAF (6–11) | 19.5%+0.5%wt | Ambient | ISO | NC (FOC) | |||
| FO+SAF (6–11) | SAF (6–11) | 19.5%+0.5%wt | Ambient | Saline | NC | NC (FOC) | |||||
| NC (df/dt) | |||||||||||
| NC (-df/df) | |||||||||||
| FO+SAF (6–11) | SAF (6–11) | 19.5%+0.5%wt | Ambient | LPS | D* | I* (FOC) | |||||
| I* (df/dt) | |||||||||||
| I* (-df/df) | |||||||||||
| Ku, 1997 | Isolated heart, aged female | 12 | HC+EPA | HC | 300mg/kg | Ambient | None | NC | |||
| HC+DHA | HC | 300mg/kg | Ambient | None | NC | ||||||
| HC+DHA | HC+EPA | 300mg/kg | Ambient | None | NC | ||||||
| Leifert, 2000 | Ventricular myocyte, young adult, male (Gavage) | 3 | FO (29–36) | LARD (29–36) | 35g/d | Ambient | None | NC (DCL) | |||
| NC (SCL) | |||||||||||
| NC (PCL) | |||||||||||
| NC (PRP) | |||||||||||
| FO (6 animals) | LARD (6 animals) | 35g/d | Ambient | ISO | D* | ||||||
| FO (6–9 animals) | LARD (6–9 animals) | 35g/d | Ambient | FRGS | D* | ||||||
| Leifert, 2001 | Ventricular myocyte, adult male | 3 | FO (6 animals) | SF (6 animals) | 10%wt | Ambient | ISO | D*** | |||
| D* (Time) | |||||||||||
| NC (#) | |||||||||||
| Reig, 1993 | Ventricular tissue, young adult, male | 5 | FO (5) | HF (5) | 6%wt | Ambient | None | NC | |||
| Laustiola, 1986 | Atrial myocyte, weanling, male | 16 | CLO (7–11) | Std (7–11) | 10% wt | High O2 | None | D*** | D*** (A) | ||
| CLO (4–11) | Std (4–11) | 10% wt | High O2 | NA | NC | NC (A) | |||||
| CLO (4–11) | Std (4–11) | 10% wt | Hypoxia | NA | D*** | D*** (A) | |||||
| CLO (4–11) | Std (4–11) | 10% wt | Reoxygenation | NA | NC | NC (A) | |||||
IP= inotropic parameters; D = decrease; I = increase; NA = not applicable ; NC = no change; ND= no data;
= p<0.05
= p<0.01;
= p<0.001
A = amplitude
CLO = cod liver oil
D = decrease
DCL =diastolic cell length
df/dt =maximum rate of rise of contraction
DHA =decosahexaenoic acid
EPAe =EPA esters
FO = fish oil
FOC =force of contraction
FRGS =free radical generating system
FVR =force-velocity relationship
HC = high cholesterol
HF = high fat
ISO =isoproteronol
LIN = linseed oil
LPS =lipopolysaccharide
PCL =percent cell length
PRP =post rest potentiation
SAF = safflower oil
SF = saturated fat
STD = standard chow
| Author, Year | Animal Model [Type, Age, Sex] | Exposure Duration (Weeks) | Comparisonsa | Amount of Omega-3 | Experiment Condition | Agent | VERP | ARP | RRP | QRS | QT | MAP | RDT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omega-3 Fatty Acid (n) | Control (n) | |||||||||||||
| RAT | ||||||||||||||
| Reig, 1993 | Ventricular, young adult, male | 5 | FO+HF (5) | HF (5) | 6+31% wt | Ambient | None | D* | ||||||
| Karmazyn, 1987 | Isolated heart weanling male/female | 12 | CLO (5–9) | STD (5–9) | 10% wt | Ischemia | None | NC | ||||||
| RABBIT | ||||||||||||||
| Gillis, 1992 | SR vesicles, weanling, ND | 6 | FO (9) | SAF (9) | 10% wt | Ambient | None | NC | NC | NC | NC | NC | NC epi | |
| NC endo | ||||||||||||||
VERP=left ventricular effective refractory period; ARP=absolute refractory period; RRP=relative refractory period; QRS=ventricular conductance time; Qt=electrocardiogram interval; MAP=monophasic action potential duration; RDT=developed or resting tention; D=decrease; I=increase; NA=not applicable; NC=no change; ND=no data;
=p<0.05
=p<0.01;
=p<0.001
CLO=cod liver oil
D=decrease
endo=endocardial
epi=epicardial
FO=fish oil
HF=high fat
NC=no change
ND=no data
SAF=safflower oil
STD=standard chow
SR=sarcoplasmic reticulum
| Author, Year | Animal Model [Type, Age, Sex] | Feeding Duration (Weeks) | Comparison Groupsa | Am-mount of Omega-3 | Experiment Condition | Agent | Pumpa Activity | Cys Ca2+ Influx | Cys Ca2+ Efflux | Cys Ca2+ Content | SR Ca2+ Content | SR Ca2+ Release | SR Ca2+ Uptake | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omega-3 Fatty Acid (N) | Control (N) | |||||||||||||
| MOUSE | ||||||||||||||
| Croset, 1989b | SR vesicles, weanling, male | 2 | ALA ester (3) | SAF (3) | 0.5%wt | Ambient | None | D* | ||||||
| EPA ester (3) | SAF (3) | 0.5%wt | Ambient | None | NC SR Ca2+Mg2+ | D* | ||||||||
| DHA ester (3) | SAF (3) | 0.5%wt | Ambient | None | NC SR Ca2+Mg2+ | D* | ||||||||
| Swanson, 1989 | SR vesicles, weanling, male | 2 | SAF+FO (3ht) | SAF+CO (3ht) | 10% wt | Ambient | None | D* Ca2+Mg2+ | D** | |||||
| Croset, 1989a | SR vesicles, weanling, male | 2 | DHA ester (10) | STD (10) | 0.4 g/100 g | Ambient | None | NC SR Ca2+Mg2+ | ||||||
| DHA ester (10) | STD (10) | 0.8 g/100 g | Ambient | None | NC SR Ca2+Mg2+ | |||||||||
| DHA ester (10) | STD (10) | 4 g/100 g | Ambient | None | NC SRCa2+Mg2+ | |||||||||
| Cardiac, weanling, male | 2 | DHA ester (10) | STD (10) | 0.4 g/100 g | Ambient | Oligomycin | I* Ca2+Mg2+ | |||||||
| DHA ester (10) | STD (10) | 0.8 g/100 g | Ambient | Oligomycin | I* Ca2+Mg2+ | |||||||||
| DHA ester (10) | STD (10) | 4 g/100 g | Ambient | Oligomycin | NCCa2+Mg2+ | |||||||||
| RAT | ||||||||||||||
| Benedikts-dottir, 1988 | Cardiac, adult male | 16 | Cod liver (ND) | Corn (ND) | 10% wt | Ambient | None | NC Na+K+ | ||||||
| Pepe, 1999 | Cardiac, aged & young adults, male | 2 | Fish oil (5) | Omega-6 (6) | 11.7% wt | Ambient | None | NC | ||||||
| Fish oil (5) | Omega-6 (6) | 11.7% wt | Ambient w/ NorEpi | None | D* total | |||||||||
| D* aged | ||||||||||||||
| NC young | ||||||||||||||
| Fish oil (5) | Omega-6 (6) | 11.7% wt | 15-minute ischemia; 5-minute reperfusion | None | D* aged | |||||||||
| D*** young | ||||||||||||||
| Taffet, 1993 | SR vesicle, young adult, female | 3 | CO+FO (11–12) | CO (11–12) | 17% wt | Ambient | None | D* | ||||||
| CO+FO (11–12) | CO (11–12) | 17% wt | Ambient | Ca2+ 50uM ATP | D* SR | |||||||||
| Ca2+Mg2+ | ||||||||||||||
| D* Ca2+ | ||||||||||||||
| CO+FO (11–12) | CO (11–12) | 17% wt | Ambient | Ca2+ 50uM ATP+ Ionomycin | D* SR | |||||||||
| Ca2+Mg2+ | ||||||||||||||
| D* Ca2+ | ||||||||||||||
| NC Mg2+ | ||||||||||||||
| CO+FO (11–12) | CO (11–12) | 17% wt | Ambient | Ca2+ 1 mM ATP+ Ionomycin | D* Ca2+Mg2+ | D* | ||||||||
| D* Ca2+ | ||||||||||||||
| D*Mg2+ | ||||||||||||||
| Leifert, 2001 | Cardiac, adult, male | 3 | Fish oil (8) | SFA (8) | 10% wt | Ambient | NC | NC | ||||||
| Fish oil (8) | SFA (8) | 10% wt | Ambient | Caffeine | NC | |||||||||
| Fish oil (8) | SFA (8) | 10% wt | Ambient | DBHQ | NC | I* Ca2+ exchanger efflux | ||||||||
| Fish oil (8) | SFA (8) | 10% wt | Ambient | ISO | NC | I* Ca2+ exchanger or SR efflux | ||||||||
| Black, 1989 | SR, adult, male (Gavage) | 4 | FO (6) | STD(6) | 0.5 ml/kg/d | Ambient | Ca2+ | NCCa2+ transport activity | ||||||
| Karmazyn, 1987 | Ventricular, weanling, male/female | 12 | Cod liver (5–9) | STD (up to 11) | 10%wt | 20-minute ischemia; 30-minute reperfusion | None | I** | NC | |||||
| Maixent, 1999 | Cardiac, adult, male | 8 | Fish oil (4) | STD (4) | 0.5 g/kg | Ambient | OUA | NC Na+K+ | ||||||
| Chen, 1994 | Cardiac, adult, male | 2 | Fish oil (5) | Coconut (5) | 10%wt | Ischemia | None | NC | ||||||
| Fish oil (5) | Coconut (5) | 10%wt | 10-minute ischemia; 1-hour reperfution | None | NC | |||||||||
| Fish oil (5) | Coconut (5) | 10%wt | 1-hour ischemia; 4-hour reperfusion | None | NC | |||||||||
| Kinoshita, 1994 | Cardiac, adult ND | 8 | EPA ester (6) | STD (ND) | 100 mg/kg/d | Ambient | None | I* Ca2+Mg2+ (Vmax) | ||||||
| NC Km | ||||||||||||||
| EPA ester (6) | STD (ND) | 100 mg/kg/d | Ischemic | None | I* Ca2+Mg2+ (Vmax) | |||||||||
| NC Km | ||||||||||||||
| EPA ester (6) | STD (ND) | 100 mg/kg/d | Ambient | OUA | NC Na+K+ | |||||||||
| EPA ester (6) | STD (ND) | 100 mg/kg/d | Ischemic | OUA | NC Na+K+ | |||||||||
| Honen, 2002 | Atrial, adult, male | 3 | Fish oil (6) | Canola (6) | 3 ml/d | Ambient | None | NC | ||||||
| PIG | ||||||||||||||
| Lamers, 1988 | Sarcolemma, weanling, male/female | 8 | Fish oil (8) | Lard (8) | 4.5%w | Ambient | Ca2+ | I*Ca2+ | ||||||
| Ischemia Reper-fusion | Ca2+ | I*Ca2+ | ||||||||||||
Cys= cytosolic; SR= sarcoplasmic reticulum; D = decrease; I = increase; NC = no change; ND= no data;
= p<0.05
= p<0.01;
= p<0.001
ALAe =alpha linoleic acid
ATP =adenosine triphosphate
CO = corn oil
D = decrease
DBHQ =2,4-Di-tert-buytlhydroquinone
DHA =decosahexaenoic acid
EPAe =eicosapentaenoic acid
FO = fish oil
I =increase
ISO =isoproteronol
Mg2+=magnesium
NC =no change
ND =no data
OUA =ouabain
SAF = safflower oil
SFA =saturated fatty acid
STD =standard chow
SR=sarcoplasmic reticulum
uM =micromoles
| Author, year | Animal Model [Type, Age, Sex] | Exposure Duration (weeks) | Comparison Groupsa | Amount of omega-3 | Experimental Condition | Agentb | Binding to the Ca2+ Channel | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omega-3 FA (n) | Control (n) | |||||||
| RAT | ||||||||
| Gudmundsdottir, 1991 | Ventricular SL, Adult, male | 20 | CLO (4–5) | CO (4–5) | 10% wt | Ambient | NIT | NC Kd |
| NC Bmax | ||||||||
| Ventricular SL, Aged, male | 88 | CLO (4–5) | CO (4–5) | 10% wt | Ambient | NIT | NC Kd | |
| NC Bmax | ||||||||
| Ventricular SL, Adult & aged, male | 20 & 88 | CLO (5) | CO (5) | 10% wt | Ambient | NIT | D* Kd | |
| NC Bmax | ||||||||
| Minarovic, 1997 | Ventricular myocytes, Young adult, male | 2 | FO (ND) | HF (ND) | 100g/kg | Ambient | VER | No effect of agent |
| FO (ND) | HF (ND) | 100g/kg | Ambient | DIL | No effect of agent | |||
D = decrease; I = increase; NC = no change; ND= no data;
= p<0.05
= p<0.01;
= p<0.001
CLO = cod liver oil
CO = corn oil
D = decrease
DIL =diltiazem
FA =fatty acid
FO = fish oil
HF = high fat
NC =no change
ND =no data
NIT =nitrendipine
VER =verapamil
| Author, Year | Model [Animal, Age, Type] | Exposure Duration | Comparison Groupsa | Am-ount of Omega-3 | Experi-mental Con-dition | Agentb | ARc | Con- Tractilityd | IP | tC20 | CD20 | CD80 | -Cmax | +Cmax | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omega-3 Fatty Acid (n) | Control (n) | ||||||||||||||
| RAT | |||||||||||||||
| Hallaq, 1992 | Rat, neonatal, ventricular | 1–2 min Free | DHA (6) | STD (6) | 5uM | Ambient | None | NC | |||||||
| DHA (10) | STD (10) | 5uM | Ambient | OUA | P* T* | ||||||||||
| DHA (6) | STD (6) | 5uM | Ambient | NIT | B* | ||||||||||
| DHA (4) | STD (4) | 5uM | Ambient | BAY | B* | ||||||||||
| DHA (3–4) | STD (3–4) | 5uM | Ambient | VER | NB | ||||||||||
| DHA (3–4) | STD (3–4) | 5uM | Ambient | DIL | NB | ||||||||||
| EPA (ND) | STD (ND) | 5uM | Ambient | OUA | P* | ||||||||||
| Jahangiri, 2000 | Rat, adult, atrial | 7 minFree | EPA (107/7ht) | STD (107/7ht) | 10uM | Ambient | ISO | D** | |||||||
| DHA (101/5ht) | STD (101/5ht) | 10uM | Ambient | ISO | D* | ||||||||||
| DHA m.e. (71/4ht) | STD (71/4ht) | 10uM | Ambient | ISO | NC | ||||||||||
| Kang & Leaf, 1994 | Rat, neonatal, cardiac | 3 minFree | ALA (5) | STD (5) | 5–10uM | Ambient | None | D* | |||||||
| EPA (46) | STD (46) | 5–10uM | Ambient | None | D* | NC A | |||||||||
| EPA (ND) | STD(ND) | 5–10uM | Ambient | Vara | D* | ||||||||||
| EPA (ND) | STD(ND) | 5–10uM | Ambient | Ca2+ | P* T* | ||||||||||
| EPA (ND) | STD(ND) | 5–10uM | Ambient | OUA | P* T* | ||||||||||
| EPAe.e.(3) | STD(3) | 5–10uM | Ambient | None | NC | ||||||||||
| DHA (32) | STD(32) | 5–10uM | Ambient | None | D* | NC A | |||||||||
| DHA (ND) | STD(ND) | 5–10uM | Ambient | Ca2+ | P* T* | ||||||||||
| DHA (ND) | STD(ND) | 5–10uM | Ambient | OUA | P* T* | ||||||||||
| Kang & Leaf, 1996 | Rat, neonatal, cardiac | 3–7 min free | ALA (5) | STD (5) | 10–15uM | Ambient | LPC | P* | D* | ||||||
| 3–7 min free | ALA (5) | STD (5) | 10–15uM | Ambient | PTC | P* T* | |||||||||
| 3–7 min free | EPA (5) | STD (5) | 10–15uM | Ambient | LPC | P* T* | D* | ||||||||
| 3–7 min free | EPA (5) | STD (5) | 10–15uM | Ambient | PTC | P* T* | |||||||||
| 3–7 min free | EPA (5) | STD (5) | 10–15uM0 | Ambient | Ca2+ Ionophore | P* T* | |||||||||
| 3–7 min free | EPA (7) | STD (7) | 15uM | Ambient | Electrical pacing | D** EA | |||||||||
| 3–7 min free | DHA (5) | STD (5) | 10–15uM | Ambien | LPC | P* | D* | ||||||||
| 3–7 min free | DHA (5) | STD (5) | 10–15uM | Ambient | PTC | P* T* | |||||||||
| Kang, 1995b | Rat, neonatal, cardiac | 5 min Free | EPA (4) | STD (4) | 8uM | Ambient | Cholera toxin | DND | |||||||
| EPA (5–8) | STD (5–8) | 5–10uM | Ambient | ISO | P* T* | DND | |||||||||
| EPA (3) | STD (3) | 5–10uM | Ambient | ISO+INDO+BW | P* | ||||||||||
| EPA (5) | STD (5) | 5–10uM | Ambient | cAMP | T* | ||||||||||
| DHA (3) | STD (8) | 5–10uM | Ambient | ISO+INDO+BW | P* | ||||||||||
| Leifert, 2000 | Rat, adult, ventricular | ND Free | DHA (5) | DA (5) | 10uM | Ambient | ISO | D** | |||||||
| DHA (4) | Stearic A (4) | 10uM | Ambient | LPC | D** | ||||||||||
| DHA (4) | Stearic A (4) | 10uM | Ambient | ISO | D* | ||||||||||
| Li, 1997 | Rat, neonatal, cardiac | ND Free | EPA (ND) | STD (ND) | 10uM | Ambient | Eico | T* | D* | ||||||
| MacLeod, 1998 | Rat,adult, ventricular | 5 min Free | EPA (6–8) | STD (6–8) | 1–7.5uM | Ambient | None | IND TS | |||||||
| EPA (6–8) | STD (6–8) | >10uM | Ambient | None | DND TS | ||||||||||
| DHA (6–8) | STD (6–8) | 1–7.5uM | Ambient | None | IND TS | ||||||||||
| DHA (6–8) | STD (6–8) | >10uM | Ambient | None | DND TS | ||||||||||
| Negretti, 2000 | Rat, adult ventricular | ND Free | EPA (6–57) | STD (6–57) | 10uM | Ambient | None | D*** F | I*** RCL | ||||||
| Pepe, 1994 | Rat, adult, cardiac | 4 min Free | DHA (6) | STD (6) | 5 uM | Ambient | None | NC DL | |||||||
| NC TA | |||||||||||||||
| NC VS/DL | |||||||||||||||
| DHA (6) | STD (6) | 5 uM | Ambient | NIT | B* TA | ||||||||||
| B* VS/DL | |||||||||||||||
| DHA (6) | STD (6) | 5 uM | Ambient | ISO | NC TA | ||||||||||
| NC DL | |||||||||||||||
| DHA (6) | STD (6) | 5 uM | Ambient | BAY | B* TA | ||||||||||
| B* VS/DL | |||||||||||||||
| Rodrigo, 1999 | Rat, adult, ventricular | 10 min Free | EPA (8) | STD (8) | 5uM | Ambient | None | D***TS | |||||||
| Rat, adult, SSP ventricular | 10 min Free | EPA (5) | STD (5) | 5uM | Ambient | Ca2+ | D* F | ||||||||
| NC Relax | |||||||||||||||
| EPA (5) | STD (5) | 10uM | Ambient | Ca2+ | D* F | ||||||||||
| NC Relax | |||||||||||||||
| Weylandt, 1996 | Rat, neonatal, cardiac | 3–12min Free | EPA (8) | STD (8) | 15uM | Ambient | ISO | T* | |||||||
| EPA (12) | STD (12) | 15uM | Ambient | Ca2+ | D* | ||||||||||
| DHA (8) | STD (8) | 15uM | Ambient | ISO | T* | ||||||||||
| DHA (12) | STD (12) | 15uM | Ambient | Ca2+ | D* | ||||||||||
| 3–12 min Free 48 hr Bound | DHA Free (23) | DHA Bound (23) | 15uM | Ambient | ISO | T* | |||||||||
| EPA Free (23) | EPA Bound (23) | 15uM | Ambient | ISO | T* | ||||||||||
| DHA Free (10) | DHA Bound (10) | 15uM | Ambient | Ca2+ | D* | ||||||||||
| EPA Free (10) | EPA Bound (10) | 15uM | Ambient | Ca2+ | D* | ||||||||||
| Courtois, 1992 | Rat, neonatal, ventricular | 24 hr Bound | SM3-Na-Al (5) | STD (5) | 28%ALA+ 30%EPA | Ambient | None | NC | NC | NC | NC | ||||
| SM3-Na-Al (5) | STD (5) | 28%ALA+ 30%EPA | Ambient | ISO | D* | NC | NC | NC | |||||||
| SM3-Na-Al (5) | SM6-Na-Al (5) | 28%ALA+ 30%EPA | Ambient | None | NC | NC | NC | I** | |||||||
| SM3-Na-Al (5) | SM6-Na-Al (5) | 28%ALA+ 30%EPA | Ambient | ISO | NC | NC | NC | NC | |||||||
| De Jonge, 1996 | Rat, neonatal, ventricular | 4–5 d Bound | EPA (4) | STD (4) | 214uM | Ambient | None | D* | |||||||
| Durot, 1997 | Rat, neonatal, ventricular | 4 d Bound | SM3 (6) | SM6 (6) | 25uM EPA+ 25 uM DHA-Al | Ambient | None | NC | NC | NC | NC | NC | |||
| SM3 (6) | SM6 (6) | 25uM EPA+ 25uM DHA-Al | Hypoxia | None | NC | NC | NC | NC | NC | ||||||
| SM3 (6) | SM6 (6) | 25uM EPA+ 25uM DHA-Al | Reoxy | None | NC | NC | NC | NC | NC | ||||||
| Fournier, 1995 | Rat, neonatal, ventricular | 4 d Bound | EPA (11) | DHA (11) | 100uM | Ambient | None | NC | NC | NC | NC | NC | |||
| Grynberg, 1988 | Rat, neonatal, ventricular | 24 h Bound | SM3 (11) | SM6 (11) | 57%ALA +7%LA +0.2% AA-Na-Al | Ambient | None | NC | NC | ||||||
| SM3 (11) | SM6 (11) | 57%ALA +7%LA +0.2% AA-Na-Al | Hypoxia | None | NC | NC | |||||||||
| SM3 (11) | SM6 (11) | 57%ALA +7%LA +0.2% AA-Na-Al | Reoxy | None | NC | NC | |||||||||
| Grynberg, 1995 | Rat, neonatal, ventricular | 4 d Bound | EPA-Na-Al (12) | DHA-Na-Al (12) | 100uM | Ambient | None | NC F | NC | NC | NC | NC | |||
| EPA-Na-Al (6) | DHA-Na-Al (6) | 100uM | Ambient | ISO | D* F | NC | |||||||||
| EPA-Na-Al (6) | DHA-Na-Al (6) | 100uM | Ambient | Phe | NC | NC | |||||||||
| EPA-Na-Al (6) | DHA-Na-Al (6) | 100uM | Ambient | dBcAMP | D* | ||||||||||
| Grynberg, 199 | Rat, neonatal, ventricular | 4 d Bound | EPA-Al (10) | DHA-Al (10) | 0.1mM | Ambient | None | NC | NC | NC | NC | NC | |||
| 4 d Bound | EPA-Al (10) | DHA-Al (10) | 0.1mM | Ambient | Phe | NC | |||||||||
| 4 d Bound | EPA-Al (10) | DHA-Al (10) | 0.1mM | Ambient | ISO | D** | |||||||||
| 4 d Bound | EPA-Al (10) | DHA-Al (10) | 0.1mM | Ambient | dBcAMP | D** | |||||||||
| Hallaq, 1990 | Rat, neonatal | 3–5 d Bound | EPA (6) | STD (6) | 5uM | Ambient | None | NC | NC A | ||||||
| EPA (6) | STD (6) | 5uM | Ambient | OUA | D*** | I***A | |||||||||
| Ponsard, 1999 | Rat, neonatal, ventricular | 4 d Bound | EPA+DHA-Al (13) | STD (13) | 5%EPA+ 7%DHA | Ambient | None | NC | NC | NC | NC | NC | |||
| EPA+DHA-Al (7) | N-6 (7) | 5%EPA+ 7%DHA | Ambient | ISO | I* | NC | NC | NC | NC | ||||||
| EPA+DHA-Al (6) | N-6 (6) | 5%EPA+ 7%DHA | Ambient | PHE | I* | NC | NC | NC | NC | ||||||
| Reithman, 1996 | Rat, neonatal, cardiac | 3 d Bound | DHA (15) | STD (15) | 60uM | Ambient | NA+TIM | D** | |||||||
| Weylandt, 1996 | Rat, neonatal, cardiac | 48 hr Bound | EPA (107) | STD (51) | 15uM | Ambient | ISO | NC | |||||||
| EPA (20) | STD (14) | 15uM | Ambient | Ca2+ | NC | ||||||||||
| DHA (51) | STD (13) | 15uM | Ambient | ISO | NC | ||||||||||
| DHA (20) | STD (6) | 15uM | Ambient | Ca2+ | NC | ||||||||||
| EPA (107) | DHA (51) | 15uM | Ambient | ISO | NC | ||||||||||
| EPA (6–14) | DHA (6–14) | 15uM | Ambient | Ca2+ | NC | ||||||||||
| GUINEA PIG | |||||||||||||||
| Ferrier, 2002 | Guinea pig, adult, ventricular | 15–20 min Free | DHA m.e. (18–24) | STD (18–24) | 10uM | Ambient | None | D***CICR | |||||||
| NC VSRM | |||||||||||||||
| Juan, 1987 | Guinea pig, adult, isolated heart | 30 min Free | EPA-Na (8) | STD (8) | 6x10-8 mol/min | Ambient | OvAl | NC | |||||||
| EPA-Na (8) | STD (8) | 15x10-8 mol/min | Ambient | OvAl | D* | ||||||||||
| EPA-Na (5) | STD (5) | 15×10-8 mol/min | Ambient | OvAl+Es | D* | ||||||||||
| MacLeod, 1998 | Guinea pig, adult, ventricular | 5 min Free | EPA (6–8) | STD (6–8) | 5–20uM | Ambient | None | DND TS dd | |||||||
| DHA (6–8) | STD (6–8) | 5–20uM | Ambient | None | DND TS dd | ||||||||||
| Rodrigo, 1999 | Guinea pig, adult, ventricular | 10 min Free | EPA (7) | STD (7) | 5uM | Ambient | None | D***TS | |||||||
| Guinea pig, adult, SSP ventricular | 10 min Free | EPA (5) | STD (5) | 5uM | Ambient | Ca2+ | D* F | ||||||||
| NC Relax | |||||||||||||||
AR = arrhthymia; IP = inotropic parameters; tC20 = contracting coupling delay; CD20 = contraction delay at 20% relaxation ; CD80 = contraction delay at 80% relaxation ; -Cmax = relaxation time; +Cmax = cell shortening velocity; D = decrease; I = increase; NC = no change; ND = no data;
= p<0.05
= p<0.01;
= p<0.001
A = amplitude
AI = adequate intake
ALA = alpha linoleic acid
AR = arrhythmia
B = blocked
BAY = Bay K8644
BW = BW 755c lipoxygenase inhibitor
cAMP = cyclic adenosine monophosphate
CICR = calcium induced contractile response
D = decrease
DA = amplitude
dBcAMP = dibutyryl cyclic adenosine monophosphate
DHA m.e. = decosahexaenoic acid methylated
DIL = diltiazem
DL = diastolic length
Eico = eicosanoids
EPA = eicosapentaenoic acid
EPAe.e. = eicosapentaenoic acid ethylated
Es = esculetin
F = frequency
INDO = indomethacin
IP = inotropic parameters
ISO = isoproteronol
LA = linoleic acid
LPC = lysophosphatidylcholine
N-6 = omega-6
NA+TIM = sodium and timolol
NB = no block
NC = no change
ND = no data
NIT = nitrendipine
OUA = ouabain
OvAI = ovalbumin
P = prevented
PHE = phenylephrine
PTC = palmitoylcamitine
RCL = resting cell length
SM3 = synthesized medium for omega-3 group
SM6 = synthesized medium for omega-6 group
STD = standard chow
T = terminated
TA = twitch amplitude
TS = twitch size
uM = micromoles
VER = verapamil
VS/DL = velocity of shortening/diastolic length
VSRM = voltage sensitive release mechanism
| Author, year | Model [Animal, Age, Type] | Exposure Duration | Omega-3 Fatty Acid (n) | Control (n) | Experimental Condition | Agent | INa | Ito | ICaL | IK | TS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leifert, 1999 | Rat, adult, ventricular | 4 mins Free | DHA | STD | Ambient | None | 6.0 ± 1.2 μM | ||||
| EPA | STD | Ambient | None | 16.2 ± 1.3 μM | |||||||
| ALA | STD | Ambient | None | 26.6 ± 1.3 μM | |||||||
| Macleod, 1998 | Rat, adult, ventricular | 5 mins Free | DHA | STD | Ambient | None | 12.8 ± 0.8 μM | 2.6 ± 0.7 μM | 27.9 ± 2.5 μM | 63 ± 8.3 μM | |
| EPA | STD | Ambient | None | 7.9 ± 0.6 μM | 1.9 ± 0.3 μM | 9.4 ± 0.8 μM | 51 ± 5.0 μM | ||||
| Guinea pig, adult, ventricular | 5 mins Free | DHA | STD | Ambient | None | 15.7 ± 0.9 μM | 34.7 ± 2.6 μM | 8.5 ± 1.1 μM | |||
| EPA | STD | Ambient | None | 8.9 ± 0.5 μM | 8.6 ± 1.5 μM | 6.7 ± 2.2 μM | |||||
| Xiao, 1997 | Rat, adult, ventricular | ND Free | EPA | STD | Ambient | None | 2.1 μM | ||||
| Rat, neonatal, ventricular | ND Free | EPA | STD | Ambient | None | 0.8 μM | |||||
| Xiao, 2002 | Ferret,adult, ventricular | 3min Free | DHA | STD | Ambient | None | 7.5 μM | 20 μM | |||
D = decrease; I = increase; NC = no change; ND= no data;
= p<0.05
= p<0.01;
= p<0.001
DHA = decosahexaenoic acid
EPA = eicosapantaenoic acid
ND = no data
STD = standard chow
TS =twitch size
uM =micromoles
| Author, yr | Study Characteristics | Cells | Fatty Acid | Incubation/ Exposure Duration | Outcome Category | Experimental Condition | Agent [Amt] | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Country: Funding:] | [Animal: Age: Type:] | [N3: Dose: Form:] | ||||||
| Bayer, 1979 | Germany, U | Cat | ALA-Na 2mg/kg/min | 5 min | BEP | Ambient | INDO | ALA vs. Ctrl |
| Adult heart in situ | Free IV | - No change in intra-atrial conduction time | ||||||
| - No change in atrioventricular conduction time | ||||||||
| - No change in functional refractory period of the atrium | ||||||||
| - No change in functional refractory period of atrio-ventricular conducting system | ||||||||
| Bogdanov, 1998 | Russia/USA | Rat | DHA | 3–12 mins | ICU | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl |
| U | Adult | 5μM | - Decreased Ito by 40% (n=ND; p=ND) which were not observed when 4-AP (5μM/ND) was present in the bath medium | |||||
| Ventricular | Free | - Decreased Ito amplitude by 60% (n=ND; p=ND) | ||||||
| - Increased Ito delay (n=ND; p=ND) | ||||||||
| - Decreased time constant of Ito inactivation (t) evoked by a voltage step from -70 to +60MV by 33% within 3mins (n=4; p<0.02). | ||||||||
| - Effects were reversible by BSA | ||||||||
| DHA | 3–12 mins | ICU | Ambient | INDO (10μM) Added with FA | DHA+INDO vs. Ctrl+INDO | |||
| 5μM | - Presence of INDO did not modify effects on Ito indicating that effects of DHA were not related to its cyclooxygenase products (n=ND; p>0.05) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 3–12 mins | ICU | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 50μM | - Decreased ISUS by 32% (n=ND; p=ND) | |||||||
| Free | - No change in IKI at voltages between -120 to -80mV (n=5; p>0.05) | |||||||
| EPA | 3–12 mins | ICU | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 5–10μM | - No change in of ISUS (n=4; p>0.05) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA | 3–12 mins | ICU | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 20μM | - Decreased ISUS by 16% (n=4; p<0.05) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA | 3–12 mins | ICU | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 50μM | - Decreased Ito by 73% (n=4; p<0.05) | |||||||
| Free | - Decreased ISUS by 56% (n=4; p<0.05) | |||||||
| - No change in IKI at voltages between -120 to -80mV (n=5; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| EPA | 10–15 mins | BEP | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 5–10μm | - Increased AP (% in fig) (n=ND; p=ND) | |||||||
| Free | - No change in APA (n=ND; p>0.05) | |||||||
| EPA | 10–15 mins | BEP | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 20μM | - Increased APD (% in fig) (n=ND; p=ND) | |||||||
| Free | - Decreased APA (% in fig) (n=ND; p<0.05) | |||||||
| - Decreased Vmax (% in fig) (n=ND; p=ND) | ||||||||
| DHA | 10–15 mins | BEP | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 10–50μM | - Similar effects as EPA on APD, APA and Vmax (data not shown) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| Courtois, 1992 | France | Rat | SM3-Na-BSA | 24 hour s | CP | Ambient | None | SM3 vs. Ctrl |
| G | Neonatal | (ALA+EPA) 28.3+29.9% of total FA's Bound | - No change in contraction rate (n=5; p>0.05) | |||||
| Ventricular | - No change in CD80 (n=5; p>0.05) | |||||||
| - No change +Cmax (n=5; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in -Cmax (n=5; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| SM3 vs. SM6 | ||||||||
| - No change in contraction rate (n=5; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in CD80 (n=5; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - Increased +Cmax (n=5; p<0.01) | ||||||||
| - No change in -Cmax (n=5; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| SM3-Na-BSA | 24 hour s | CP | Ambient | ISO (10-7 M) Added after FA | SM3+ISO vs. Ctrl+ISO | |||
| (ALA+EPA) 28.3+29.9% of total FA's Bound | - Decreased contraction rate by10% (n=5; p<0.05) | |||||||
| - No change in CD80 (n=5; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in +Cmax (n=5; p>0.5) | ||||||||
| - No change in -Cmax (n=5; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| SM3+ISO vs. SM6+ISO | ||||||||
| - No change in contraction rate (n=5;p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in CD80 (n=5; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in +Cmax (n=5; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in -Cmax (n=5; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| SM3+Iso vs. SM3 | ||||||||
| - Increased contraction rate by 18% (n=5; p<0.01) | ||||||||
| - Decreased CD80 by -12% (n=5; p<0.01) | ||||||||
| - No change +Cmax (n=5; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - Decreased -Cmax by 13% (n=5; p<0.01) | ||||||||
| de Jonge, 1996 | Netherlands | Rat | EPA | 4–5 days | CP | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl |
| G | Neonatal | 214μM | - Decreased irregularity of spontaneous contractions (n=4; p<0.05) | |||||
| Ventricular | Bound | |||||||
| Durot, 1997 | France | Rat | SM3 media containing 25μM EPA-Al + 25μM | 4 days | BEP | Ambient | None | SM3 vs. SM6 |
| G | Neonatal | DHA-Al Bound | - Increased Vmax by 16% (n=9; p<0.05) | |||||
| Ventricular | - No change in MDP (n=9; p>0.05) | |||||||
| - No change in OS (n=9; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in AP (n=9; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in APA (n=9; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in APD40 (n=9; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in APD80 (n=9; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| SM3 media containing 25μM EPA-Al + 25μM | 4 days | BEP | Hypoxia (N2) | None | SM3 vs. SM6 | |||
| DHA-Al Bound | - Decreased APA (% in fig)(n=5; p<0.05) | |||||||
| - Decreased APD40 (% in fig) (n=5; p<0.01) | ||||||||
| - Decreased APD80 (% in fig)(n=5; p<0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in MDP (n=5; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in AP (n=5; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in upstroke velocity (n=5; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in Vmax (n=5; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| Durot, 1997 | France | Rat | SM3 media containing 25μM EPA-Al + 25μM | 4 days | BEP | Reoxy (O2 for 1.5 hrs) | None | SM3 vs. SM6 |
| G | Neonatal | DHA-Al Bound | - No change in APA (n=5; p>0.05) | |||||
| Ventricular | - No change in APD40 (n=5; p>0.05) | |||||||
| - No change in APD80 (n=5; p<0.05 ) | ||||||||
| - Recovery of MDP was significantly increased i.e. improvement (n=5, p<0.01) | ||||||||
| - No change in Vmax (n=5; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| SM3 media containing 25μM EPA-Al + 25μM | 4 days | CP | Ambient | None | SM3 vs. SM6 | |||
| DHA-Al Bound | - No change in tC20 (n=6, p>0.05) | |||||||
| - No change in CD20 (n=6, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in CD80 (n=6, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in +Cmax, (n=6, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in +Cmax (n=6, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| SM3 media containing 25μM EPA-Al + 25μM | 4 days | CP | Hypoxia (N2) | None | SM3 vs. SM6 | |||
| DHA-Al Bound | - No change in tC20 (n=6, p>0.05) | |||||||
| - No change in CD20 (n=6, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in CD80 (n=6, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in +Cmax (n=6, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in -Cmax (n=6, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| SM3 media containing 25μM EPA-Al + 25μM | 4 days | CP | Reoxy (O2 for 1.5 hrs) | None | SM3 vs. SM6 | |||
| DHA-Al Bound | - No change in tC20 (n=6, p>0.05) | |||||||
| - No change in CD20 (n=6, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in CD80 (n=6, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in +Cmax (n=6, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in -Cmax (n=6, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| Ferrier, 2002 | Canada | Guinea Pig | DHAm.e. | 20 mins | ICU | Ambient | None | DHAm.e. vs. Ctrl |
| G | Adult | 10μM | - Inhibition in the magnitude of the peak Ica.L by 85% (n=18–24; p<0.001) | |||||
| Ventricular | Free | |||||||
| DHAm.e. | 20 mins | CP | Ambient | None | DHAm.e. vs. Ctrl | |||
| 10μM | - Decreased amplitude of CICR induced contractions by 93% (n=18–24; p<0.001) | |||||||
| Free | - No change in VSRM induced contractions (n=18–24; p>0.05) | |||||||
| Fournier, 1995 | France | Rat | EPA 100μM Bound | 4 days | CP | Ambient | None | EPA vs. DHA |
| G/ NP | Neonatal | DHA 100μM Bound | - No change in tC20 (n=11; p>0.05) | |||||
| Ventricular | - No change in CD20 (n=11; p>0.05) | |||||||
| - No change in CD80 (n=11; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in +Cmax (n=11; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in -Cmax (n=11; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| Fournier, 1995 | France | Rat | EPA 100μM Bound | 4 days | BEP | Ambient | None | EPA vs. DHA |
| G/ NP | Neonatal | DHA 100μM Bound | - Increased APA due to a higher plateau phase (%in fig) (n=11; p<0.05 | |||||
| Ventricular | - Increased OS (% in fig) (n=11; p<0.05) | |||||||
| - No change in MDP (n=11; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in ADP40 (n=11; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in ADP80 (n=11; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in AP (n=11; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in Vmax (n=11; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| Goel, 2002 | Canada | Pig | EPA | 90+/- 30s | IPIM | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl |
| G/NP | Adult | 10μM | - No change in H+ dependent Na+ uptake (Na+/H+ exchange) (n=3–5; p>0.05) | |||||
| Ventricular | Free | |||||||
| SL vesicles | ||||||||
| EPA | 90+/- 30s | IPIM | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 25μM | - No change in H+ dependent Na+ uptake (Na+/H+ exchange) (n=3–5; p>0.05) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA | 90+/- 30s | IPIM | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 50μM | - Decreased H+ dependent Na+ uptake by 24% (Na+/H+ exchange) (n=3–5; p<0.05) which occurred at all reaction times (2–60 secs) and at all extravesicular pH values except pH 6 | |||||||
| Free | - No change in passive Na+ efflux (n=6; p>0.05) | |||||||
| EPA | 90+/- 30s | IPIM | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 100μM | - Decreased H+ dependent Na+ uptake (Na+/H+ exchange) (% in fig) (n=3–5; p<0.05) which occurred at all reaction times (2–60 secs) and at all extravesicular pH values except pH 6 | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 90+/- 30s | IPIM | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 10μM | - No change in H+ dependent Na+ uptake (Na+/H+ exchange) (n=3–5; p>0.05) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 90+/- 30s | IPIM | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 25μM | - Decreased H+ dependent Na+ uptake (Na+/H+ exchange) (% in fig) (n=3–5; p<0.05) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 90+/- 30s | IPIM | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 50μM | - Decreased H+ dependent Na+ uptake (Na+/H+ exchange) by 34% (n=3–5; p<0.05) | |||||||
| Free | - No change in passive Na+ efflux (n=6; p>0.05) | |||||||
| DHA | 90+/- 30s | IPIM | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 100μM | - Decreased H+ dependent Na+ uptake (Na+/H+ exchange) (% in fig) (n=3–5; p<0.05) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| ALA | 90+/- 30s | IPIM | Ambient | None | ALA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 50μM | - No change in H+ dependent Na+ uptake (Na+/H+ exchange) (n=3–5; p>0.05) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 90+/- 30s | IPIM | Ambient | Na+ (0.05, 2.5 or 10mM) | DHA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 50μM | - Decreasd H+ dependent Na+ uptake (Na+/H+ exchange) as a function of Na+ by 30–40% (n=3–4; p<0.05) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| Grynberg, 1988 | France | Rats | SM3 media containing 57% ALA+7%LA +0.2% AA as Na-Al | 24 hours | BEP | Ambient | None | SM3 vs. SM6 |
| G | Neonatal | - No change in AP (n=11, p>0.05) | ||||||
| Ventricular | - No change in APA (n=11, p>0.05) | |||||||
| - No change in APD40 (n=11, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in APD80 (n=11, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in MDP (n=11, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in OS (n=11, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in Vmax (n=11, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| SM3 media containing 57% ALA+7%LA +0.2% AA as Na-Al | 24 hours | BEP | Hypoxia(N2) | None | SM3 vs. SM6 | |||
| - No change in AP (n=11; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - Decreased APA (n=11, p<0.01). | ||||||||
| - No change in APD40 (n=11, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in APD80 (n=11, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in MDP (n=11, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - Decreased OS (n=11, p<0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in Vmax (n=11, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| SM3 media containing 57% ALA+7%LA +0.2% AA as Na-Al | 24 hours | BEP | Reoxy (O2) | None | SM3 vs. SM6 | |||
| - No change in AP (n=11, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in AP (n=11, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - Increased APA (n=11, p<0.01) | ||||||||
| - No change in APD40 (n=11, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in APD80 (n=11, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in MDP (n=11, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - Increased OS (n=11, p<0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in Vmax (n=11, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| SM3 media containing 57% ALA+7%LA +0.2% AA as Na-Al | 24 hours | CP | Ambient | None | SM3 vs. SM6 | |||
| - No change in tC20 (n=11, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in CD80 (n=11, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| SM3 media containing 57% ALA+7%LA +0.2% AA as Na-Al | 24 hours | CP | Hypoxia (N2) | None | SM3 vs. SM6 | |||
| - No change in tC20 (n=11, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in CD80 (n=11, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| SM3 media containing 57% ALA+7%LA +0.2% AA as Na-Al | 24 hours | CP | Reoxy (O2) | None | SM3 vs. SM6 | |||
| - No change in tC20 (n=11, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in CD80 (n=11, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| Grynberg, 1995 | France | Rat | EPA-Na-BSA | 4 days | CP | Ambient | None | EPA vs. DHA |
| G/NP | Neonatal | 100μM | - No change in spontaneous beating frequency (n=12; p>0.05) | |||||
| Ventricular | DHA-Na-BSA | - No change in CD20 (n=12; p>0.05) | ||||||
| 100μM | - No change in CD80 (n=12; p>0.05) | |||||||
| Bound | - No change in +Cmax (n=12; p>0.05) | |||||||
| - No change in -Cmax (n=12; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| EPA-Na-BSA | 4 days | CP | Ambient | ISO (10-7 M) Added after FA | EPA+ISO vs. DHA+ISO | |||
| 100μM | - Decreased spontaneous beating frequency by 40% (n=6; p<0.05) | |||||||
| DHA-Na-BSA | - No change in normalized CD80 (n=6; p>0.05) | |||||||
| 100μM | EPA+ISO vs. EPA | |||||||
| Bound | - Increased spontaneous beating frequency by 30% (n=6; p<0.05) | |||||||
| DHA+ISO vs. DHA | ||||||||
| - Increased spontaneous beating frequency by 50% (n=6; p<0.05) | ||||||||
| EPA-Na-BSA | 4 days | CP | Ambient | Phe (3 ×10-6 M) Added after FA | EPA+Phe vs. DHA+Phe | |||
| 100μM | - No change in spontaneous beating rate (n=6; p>0.05) | |||||||
| DHA-Na-BSA | - No change in CD80 (n=6; p>0.05) | |||||||
| 100μM | ||||||||
| Bound | ||||||||
| EPA-Na-BSA | 4 days | CP | Ambient | dBcAMP (10-73M) Added after FA | EPA+dBcAMP vs. DHA+dBcAMP | |||
| 100μM | - Decreased spontaneous beating rate (% in fig) (n=6; p<0.05) | |||||||
| DHA-Na-BSA | EPA+dBcAMP vs. EPA | |||||||
| 100μM | - Increased spontaneous beating rate by 40% (n=6; p=ND) | |||||||
| Bound | DHA+dBcAMP vs. DHA | |||||||
| - Increased spontaneous beating rate by 60% (n=6; p=ND) | ||||||||
| Grynberg, 1996 | France | Rat | EPA-Albumin | 4 days | CP | Ambient | None | - EPA vs. DHA |
| U | Neonatal | 0.1mM | - No change in spontaneous rate (n=10; p>0.05) | |||||
| Ventricular | Bound | - No change in CD20 (n=10; p>0.05) | ||||||
| DHA-Albumin | - No change in CD80 (n=10; p>0.05) | |||||||
| 0.1mM | - No change in +Cmax (n=10; p>0.05) | |||||||
| Bound | - No change in -Cmax (n=10; p>0.05) | |||||||
| EPA-Albumin | 4 days | CP | Ambient | Phe (3×10-6M) | EPA+Phe vs. DHPA+Phe | |||
| 0.1mM | - No change in contraction rate (n=10; p>0.05) | |||||||
| Bound | ||||||||
| Grynberg, 1996 | France | Rat | EPA-Albumin | 4 days | CP | Ambient | ISO (10-6M) | EPA+ISO vs. DHA+ISO |
| U | Neonatal | 0.1mM | - Decreased contraction rate (% in fig) (n=10; p<0.01) | |||||
| Ventricular | Bound | |||||||
| DHA-Albumin | ||||||||
| 0.1mM | ||||||||
| Bound | ||||||||
| EPA-Albumin | 4 days | CP | Ambient | dBcAMP (10-3M) | EPA+dBcAMP vs. DHA+dBcAMP | |||
| 0.1mM | - Decreased contraction rate (% in fig) (n=10; p<0.01) | |||||||
| Bound | ||||||||
| DHA-Albumin | ||||||||
| 0.1mM | ||||||||
| Bound | ||||||||
| EPA-Albumin | 4 days | BEP | Ambient | None | EPA vs..DHA | |||
| 0.1mM | - Increased APA by 3% (n=10; p<0.05) | |||||||
| Bound | - Increased OS by 13% (n=10; p0<0.05) | |||||||
| DHA-Albumin | - No change in MDP (n=10; p>0.05) | |||||||
| 0.1mM | - No change in APD80 (n=10; p>0.05) | |||||||
| Bound | - No change in Vmax (n=10; p>0.05) | |||||||
| Hallaq,1990 | USA/Germany | Rat | EPA | 3–5 days | CP | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl |
| G | Neonatal | 5μM | - No change in amplitude of contraction (n=6; p>0.05) | |||||
| Ventricular | Bound | - No change in beats/min (n=6; p>0.05) | ||||||
| EPA | 3–5 days | CP | Ambient | OUA (0.1mM) Added after FA | EPA+OUA vs. Ctrl+OUA | |||
| 5μM | - Increased amplitude of contraction by 156% (n=6; p<0.001) | |||||||
| Bound | - Decreased beats/min by 67% (n=6; p<0.001) | |||||||
| EPA vs. EPA+OUA | ||||||||
| - Increased amplitude of contraction by 33% (n=6; p<0.001) | ||||||||
| - Decreased beats/min by 31% (n=6; p<0.001) | ||||||||
| EPA | 3–5 days | IPIM | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 5μM | - No change in cytosolic free Ca2+ (n=8; p>0.05) | |||||||
| Bound | ||||||||
| EPA | 3–5 days | IPIM | Ambient | OUA (1μM) Added after FA | EPA+OUA vs. Ctrl+OUA | |||
| 5μM | - No change in time averaged cytosolic free Ca2+ induced by OUA (n=3; p>0.05) | |||||||
| Bound | ||||||||
| EPA | 3–5 days | IPIM | Ambient | OUA (0.1mM) Added after FA | EPA+OUA vs. Ctrl+OUA | |||
| 5μM | - Decreased time averaged cytosolic free Ca2+ induced by OUA by 75% (n=5; p<0.001) | |||||||
| Bound | ||||||||
| Hallaq, 1990 | USA/Germany | Rat | EPA | 3–5 days | IPIM | Ambient | OUA (0.1mM) Added after FA | EPA+OUA vs. Ctrl+OUA |
| G | Neonatal | 5μM | - No change in OUA sensitive Na, K-ATPase (pump activity) measured as the rate of influx of 86Rb into myocytes (n=10; p>0.05) | |||||
| Ventricular | Bound | - No change in OUA sensitive Na, K-ATPase (pump activity) measured using NADH-coupled enzyme assay to determine rate of ATP hydrolysis by Na, K-ATPase (n=3; p>0.05) | ||||||
| EPA | 3–5 days | IPIM | Ambient | BUME (10μM) Added after FA | EPA+BUME vs. Ctrl+BUME | |||
| 5μM | - No change in BUME sensitive Na, K-ATPase (pump activity) measured as the rate of influx of 86Rb into myocytes which also indicates that the facilitated cotransport pathway for Na+, K+ and 2Cl- is not affected by EPA (n=11; p>0.05) | |||||||
| Bound | ||||||||
| EPA | 3–5 days | IPIM | Ambient | OUA+BUME (0.1mM+10 μM) Added after FA | EPA+OUA+BUME vs. Ctrl+OUA+BUME | |||
| 5μM | - No change in total Na, K-ATPase (pump activity) measured as the rate of influx of 86Rb into myocytes (n=11; p>0.05) | |||||||
| Bound | ||||||||
| Hallaq, 1992 | USA | Rat | DHA | 1–2 mins | CP | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl |
| G | Neonatal | 5μM | - No change in contractility (n=6; p>0.05) | |||||
| Ventricular | Free | |||||||
| DHA | 1–2 mins | CP | Ambient | OUA (0.1mM) Added before or after FA | DHA+OUA vs. Ctrl+OUA | |||
| 5μM | - Prevented or Terminated arrhythmia's (n=10; p<0.05) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 1–2 mins | CP | Ambient | NIT (0.5nM) Added with FA | DHA+NIT vs. NIT | |||
| 5μM | - Prevented the inhibitory effect of NIT on contractility (n=6; p<0.05) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 1–2 mins | CP | Ambient | BAY (0.1μM) Added after FA | DHA+BAY vs. Ctrl+BAY | |||
| 5μM | - Prevented the inhibitory effects of BAY on contractility (n=4; p<0.05) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 1–2 mins | CP | Ambient | VER (10μM) or DIL (1μM) Added with FA | DHA+VER or DIL vs. Ctrl+VER or DIL | |||
| 5μM | - Did not prevent the inhibitory effects of VER or DIL on contractility (n=3–4; p=ND) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA | 1–2 mins | CP | Ambient | OUA (0.1mM) Added after FA | EPA+OUA vs. Ctrl+OUA | |||
| 5μM | - Prevented arrhythmia (n=ND; p<0.05) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA | 4 days | ICH | Ambient | NIT (0.03-10 nM) Added after FA | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 5μM | - Noncompetitive inhibition of the specific binding of NIT by reducing the maximal binding of [3H] NIT | |||||||
| Bound | - Decreased Kd value of high affinity binding site by 97% (n=5–10; p<0.05) | |||||||
| - Decreased the number of high affinity binding sites (BMAX) by -90% (n=5–10; p<0.01) | ||||||||
| - Decreased Kd value of low affinity binding site by 74% (n=5–10; p<0.01) | ||||||||
| - Decreased the number of low affinity binding sites (BMAX) by 60% (n=5–10; p<0.05) | ||||||||
| Hallaq, 1992 | USA | Rat | DHA | 4 days | ICH | Ambient | NIT (0.03-10 nM) Added after FA | DHA vs. Ctrl |
| G | Neonatal | 5μM | - Kd value of high affinity binding site was non detectable due to suppression by DHA (n=5–10; p<0.001) | |||||
| Ventricular | Bound | - Number of high affinity binding sites (BMAX) was non detectable due to suppression by DHA (n=5–10; p<0.001) | ||||||
| - Decreased Kd value of low affinity binding site by 78% (n=5–10; p<0.01) | ||||||||
| - Decreased the number of low affinity binding sites (BMAX) by 64% (n=5–10; p<0.05) | ||||||||
| DHA | 4 days | IPIM | Ambient | OUA (0.1mM) 45Ca2+ | DHA+OUA vs. OUA | |||
| 5uM | - Decreased 45Ca2+ uptake (Ca2+ influx) by 29% (n=4–11; p<0.025) | |||||||
| Bound | ||||||||
| DHA | 4 days | IPIM | Ambient | NIT (0.5nM) Added after FA | DHA+NIT vs. Ctrl+NIT | |||
| 5μM | - Increased 45Ca2+ uptake (Ca2+ influx) by 28% (n=5–14; p=ND) | |||||||
| Bound | DHA+NIT vs. DHA | |||||||
| - No change in 45Ca2+ uptake (Ca2+ influx) (n=5–14; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| DHA | 4 days | IPIM | Ambient | BAY (0.1μM) Added after FA | DHA+BAY vs. Ctrl+BAY | |||
| 5μM | - Decreased 45Ca2+ uptake (Ca2+ influx) by 32% (n=5–14; p=ND) | |||||||
| Bound | DHA+BAY vs. DHA | |||||||
| - No change in 45Ca2+ uptake (Ca2+ influx) (n=5–14; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| DHA | 4 days | IPIM | Ambient | OUA+ NIT (0.1mM+0.5 nM) Added after FA | DHA+OUA+NIT vs. Ctrl+OUA+NIT | |||
| 5μM | - Increased 45Ca2+ uptake (Ca2+ influx) by 13% (n=5–14; p=ND) | |||||||
| Bound | DHA+OUA+NIT vs. DHA | |||||||
| - No change in 45Ca2+ uptake (Ca2+ influx) (n=5–14; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| DHA | 4 days | IPIM | Ambient | BAY+ NIT (0.1μM+ 0.5 nM) Added after FA | DHA+BAY+NIT vs. Ctrl+BAY+NIT | |||
| 5μM | - Increased 45Ca2+ uptake (Ca2+ influx) by 55% (n=5–14; p=ND) | |||||||
| Bound | DHA+Bay+NIT vs. DHA | |||||||
| - No change in 45Ca2+ uptake (Ca2+ influx) (n=5–14; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| EPA | 4 days | IPIM | Ambient | NIT (0.5nM) Added after FA | EPA+NIT vs. Ctrl+NIT | |||
| 5μM | - Increased 45Ca2+ uptake (Ca2+ influx) by 34% (n=5–14; p=ND) | |||||||
| Bound | EPA+NIT vs. EPA | |||||||
| - No change in 45Ca2+ uptake (Ca2+ influx) (n=5–14; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| EPA | 4 days | IPIM | Ambient | BAY (0.1μM) Added after FA | EPA+BAY vs. Ctrl+BAY | |||
| 5μM | - Decreased 45Ca2+ uptake (Ca2+ influx) by 30% (n=5–14; p=ND) | |||||||
| Bound | EPA+BAY vs. EPA | |||||||
| - No change in 45Ca2+ uptake (Ca2+ influx) (n=5–14; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| EPA | 4 days | IPIM | Ambient | OUA+ NIT (0.1mM+0.5 nM) Added after FA | EPA+OUA+NIT vs. Ctrl+OUA+NIT | |||
| 5μM | - Increased 45Ca2+ uptake (Ca2+ influx) by 20% (n=5–14; p=ND) | |||||||
| Bound | EPA+OUA+NIT vs. EPA | |||||||
| - No change in 45Ca2+ uptake (Ca2+ influx) (n=5–14; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| EPA | 4 days | IPIM | Ambient | BAY+ NIT (0.1μM+0.5 nM) Added after FA | EPA+BAY+NIT vs. Ctrl+BAY+NIT | |||
| 5μM | - Increased 45Ca2+ uptake (Ca2+ influx) by 39% (n=5–14; p=ND) | |||||||
| Bound | EPA+BAY+NIT vs. EPA | |||||||
| - No change in 45Ca2+ uptake (Ca2+ influx) (n=5–14; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| Honore, 1994 | France | Mouse | DHA | ND | ICH | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl |
| G/NP | Neonatal | 30μM | - Blocked delayed rectifier K+ channel (Kv1.5) activity (% in fig) (n=5–11; p<0.05) | |||||
| Ventricular | Free | |||||||
| ALA | ND | ICH | Ambient | None | ALA vs. Ctrl | |||
| ND | - No change in delayed rectifier K+ channel (Kv1.5) activity (n=ND; p>0.05) | |||||||
| ND | ||||||||
| DHA | ND | ICU | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 30μM | - Intracellular DHA included in the pipette medium did not alter the Kv1.5 current (n=9; p>0.05) | |||||||
| Free | - Addition of DHA to the external medium inhibited the Kv1.5 current within 20 seconds indicating that binding occurs on an external site (n=9; p<0.05) | |||||||
| DHA | ND | ICU | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 30μM | - No change in inward rectifier K+ current (n=4; p>0.05) | |||||||
| Free | - Decreased ultra rapid K+ current (IKUR) measured at +30mV by 52% (n=4; p<0.05) | |||||||
| Jahangiri, 2000 | Australia | Rat | EPA | 7 mins | CP | Ambient | ISO (10μM) | EPA+ISO vs. Ctrl+ISO |
| U | Adult | 10μM | Added with FA | - Decreased the number of asynchronously contracting atrial myocytes by 76% (n=107/7hearts; p<0.01) | ||||
| Atrial | Free | |||||||
| DHA | 7 mins | CPr | Ambient | ISO (10μM) | DHA+ISO vs. Ctrl+ISO | |||
| 10μM | Added with FA | - Decreased the number of asynchronously contracting atrial myocytes by 69% (n=101/5 hearts; p<0.05) | ||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA m.e | 7 mins | CP | Ambient | ISO (10μM) | DHA m.e+ISO vs. Ctrl+ISO | |||
| 10μM | Added with FA | - No change in the number of asynchronously contracting atrial myocytes (n=71/4 hearts; p>0.05) | ||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| Juan, 1987 | Austria | Guinea Pigs | EPA-Na | 30mins | CP | Ambient | Antigen-ovalbumin (1mg/0.1ml) | EPA+Antigen vs. Ctrl+Antigen |
| U | Adult | 6×10 -8mol/min | Added before FA | - No change in duration of arrhythmia (n=8; p>0.05) | ||||
| Isolated heart | Free | |||||||
| EPA-Na | 30mins | CP | Ambient | Antigen-ovalbumin (1mg/0.1ml) | EPA+antigen vs. Ctrl+Antigen | |||
| 15×10-8mol/min | Antioxidant-esculetin (1×10-7mol) | - Decreased duration of arrhythmia by 56% (n=8; p<0.05) | ||||||
| Free | Added before FA | EPA+Antioxidant+Antigen vs. Ctrl+Antigen | ||||||
| - Decreased duration of arrhythmia by 52% (n=5; p<0.05) | ||||||||
| Kang, 1994 | USA | Rat | EPA | 3 mins | CP | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl |
| G | Neonatal | 5–10μM | - Decreased contraction rate by 50 to 80% within 2 mins (n=46; p<0.05) and effects were reversed by BSA | |||||
| Cardiac | Free | - No change in amplitude of contraction (n=ND; p>0.05) | ||||||
| DHA | 3 mins | CP | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 5–10μM | - Decreased contraction rate by 50 to 80% within 2 mins (n=32; p<0.05) and effects were reversed by BSA | |||||||
| Free | - No change in amplitude of contraction (n=ND; p>0.05) | |||||||
| Kang, 1994 | USA | Rat | EPA | 3 mins | CP | Ambient | INDO (10–20μM/) | EPA+agents vs. Ctrl+agents |
| G | Neonatal | 5–10μM | BW755c (20μM) | - No change in EPA induced reductions in beating rate (n=ND; p>0.05) | ||||
| Cardiac | Free | BHT (0.005%/ Vitamin E (0.5uNIT/ml) and ETYA (ND) | ||||||
| Added with FA | ||||||||
| EPA | 3 mins | CP | Ambient | Ca2+(7–10μM) | EPA+Ca2+ vs. Ctrl+Ca2+ | |||
| 5–10μM | Added before or after FA | - Prevented or Terminated arrhythmia (n=ND; p<0.05) and the effects were reversible by BSA | ||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 3 mins | CP | Ambient | Ca2+ (7–10μM) | DHA+Ca2+ vs. Ctrl+Ca2+ | |||
| 5–10μM | Added before or after FA | - Prevented or Terminated arrhythmia (n=ND; p<0.05) and the effects were reversible by BSA | ||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA | 3 mins | CP | Ambient | OUA (0.1mM) | EPA+OUA vs. Ctrl+OUA | |||
| 5–10μM | Added before FA | - Terminated contractures/fibrillations (n=ND; p<0.05) and the effects were reversible by BSA | ||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 3 mins | CP | Ambient | OUA (0.1mM) | DHA+OUA vs. Ctrl+OUA | |||
| 5–10μM | Added before FA | - Terminated contractures/fibrillation (n=ND; p<0.05) and the effects were reversible by BSA | ||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| ALA | 3 mins | CP | Ambient | None | ALA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 5–10μM | - Decreased beating rate by 40% (mean of the range (n=5; p<0.05) and the effects were reversible by BSA | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA e.e | 3 mins | CP | Ambient | None | EPAe.e vs. Ctrl | |||
| 5–10μM | - No change in beating rate (n=3; p>0.05) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| Kang, 1995a | USA | Rats | EPA | 2–5 mins | BEP | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl |
| G | Neonatal | 10μM | - Hyperpolarizing RMP by 5±1 mV (n=8, p<0.05). The effect was reversible by BSA (2mg/ml). | |||||
| Ventricular | Free | - Depolarizing APT by 9±3 mV (n=8, p<0.05). The effect was reversible by BSA (2mg/ml). | ||||||
| - Decreased APD75 by 21% (n=8, p<0.01) | ||||||||
| - No change in APA (n=8, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in Vmax (n=8, p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - Decreased action-potential frequency by 50% after 3 minutes EPA addition (n=8, p<0.05) | ||||||||
| - Increased the stimulation strengths required to initiate action potentials by 49% (n=ND, p<0.01) Effect was reversible by BSA | ||||||||
| Kang, 1995b | USA | Rat | EPA | 5mins | CP | Ambient | ISO (3uM) | EPA+ISO vs. ISO |
| G/NP | Neonatal | 5–10μM | Added before or after FA | - Prevented or Terminated arrhythmia within 2–3 mins (n=8; p<0.05) | ||||
| Cardiac | Free | - Decreased contraction rate (%=ND) (n=5; p=ND) | ||||||
| - Effects were reversible by BSA. | ||||||||
| Kang, 1995b | USA | Rat | EPA | 5 mins | CP | Ambient | ISO (3uM)+ | EPA+ISO+INDO+BW vs. Ctrl+ISO+INDO+BW |
| G/NP | Neonatal | 5–10μM | INDO (20 uM/)+ BW (ND) | - Prevented arrhythmia (n=3; p<0.05) | ||||
| Cardiac | Free | Added before FA | ||||||
| DHA | 5 mins | CP | Ambient | ISO (3uM)+ | DHA+ISO+INDO+BW vs. Ctrl+ISO+INDO+BW | |||
| 5–10μM | INDO (20 uM/)+ | - Prevented arrhythmia (n=3; p<0.05) | ||||||
| Free | BW (ND) | |||||||
| Added before FA | ||||||||
| EPA | 5 mins | CP | Ambient | cAMP (250uM) | EPA+cAMP vs. Ctrl+cAMP | |||
| 5–10μM | Added after FA | - Terminated arrhythmias w/in 3–5min (n=5; p<0.05) | ||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA | 5 mins | CP | Ambient | Cholera toxin | EPA+Cholera toxin vs. Cholera toxin | |||
| 8μM | (2ug/ml) (Gs protein activator) | - Decreased beating rate (%=ND) (n=4; p=ND) | ||||||
| Free | - Effects were reversed by BSA | |||||||
| Kang , 1996 | USA | Rat | EPA | 3–7 mins | CP | Ambient | LPC (5–10 μM) | EPA+LPC vs. Ctrl+LPC |
| G | Neonatal | 10–15μM | Added before or 3–5 mins after FA | - Prevented tachycardia and slowed beating rate with 2–3 mins and also terminated arrhythmia (n=5; p<0.05) | ||||
| Cardiac | Free | - Effects were reversible by BSA | ||||||
| DHA | 3–7 mins | CP | Ambient | LPC (5–10 μM) | DHA+LPC vs. Ctrl+LPC | |||
| 10–15μM | Added before FA | - Prevented tachycardia and slowed beating rate with 2–3 mins (n=5; p<0.05) | ||||||
| Free | - Effects were reversible by BSA | |||||||
| ALA | 3–7 mins | CP | Ambient | LPC (5–10 μM) | ALA+LPC vs. Ctrl+LPC | |||
| 10–15μM | Added before FA | - Prevented tachycardia and slowed beating rate with 2–3 mins (n=5; p<0.05) | ||||||
| Free | - Effects were reversible by BSA | |||||||
| EPA | 3–7 mins | CP | Ambient | PTC (2–10 μM) | EPA+PTC vs. Ctrl+LPC | |||
| 10–15μM | Added before or after FA | - Prevented or Terminated occurrence of arrhythmia (n=5;p<0.05) | ||||||
| Free | - Effects were reversible by BSA | |||||||
| DHA | 3–7 mins | CP | Ambient | PTC (2–10 μM) | DHA+PTC vs. Ctrl+LPC | |||
| 10–15μM | Added before or after FA | - Prevented or Terminated occurrence of arrhythmia (n=5;p<0.05) | ||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| ALA | 3–7 mins | CP | Ambient | PTC (2–10 μM) | ALA+PTC vs. Ctrl+LPC | |||
| 10–15μM | Added before or after FA | - Prevented or Terminated occurrence of arrhythmia (n=5;p<0.05) | ||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA | 7mins | CP | Ambient | Ca2+ ionophore (5μM) | EPA+ Ca2+ vs. Ctrl+ Ca2+ | |||
| 10–15μM | Added before FA | - Prevented or Terminated occurrence of arrhythmia (n=5;p<0.05) | ||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA | 3–5mins | CP | Ambient | Electrical pacing (15V) | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 15μM | - Decreased electrical automaticity/ excitability of the cardiac myocyte by 50% (n=7; p<0.01) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| Kang , 1996 | USA | Rat | EPA | 7mins | IPIM | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl |
| G | Neonatal | 10–15μM | - No change in systolic and diastolic (cytosolic) Ca2+ (n=6; p>0.05) | |||||
| Cardiac | Free | |||||||
| EPA | 7mins | IPIM | Arr | LPC (5–10 μM) | EPA+LPC vs. Ctrl+LPC | |||
| 10–15μM | Added before FA | - Terminated intermittent fluctuation of Ca2+ (n=6; p<0.05) | ||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| Kang, 1997 | USA | Rats | EPA | 3–4 days | ICH | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl |
| G | Neonatal | 20μM | - No change in the number of Na+ channels per 106 cell, measured by the binding of [3H] BTXB (n=4, p>0.05) | |||||
| Cardiac | Bound | |||||||
| EPA | 3–4 days | ICH | Ambient | MEX (20 uM) | EPA+MEX vs. Ctrl+ MEX | |||
| 20μM | - Decreased the number of Na+ channels per 106 cell by 40% to 50% (n=4, p<0.05) | |||||||
| Bound | - Decreased the MEX induced increase in cardiac Na+ channel expression | |||||||
| Leifert, 1999 | Australia | Rat | DHA | 4 mins | ICU | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl |
| U | Adult | 25μM | - Decreased INa peak current amplitude by 42% (n=7; p=ND) | |||||
| Ventricular | Free | |||||||
| DHA | 4 mins | ICU | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 25μM | - Shifted the voltage dependence of INa activation to more positive potentials as indicated by a decrease in Gmas by 35% and a shift of V' to a more positive potentialby 21% (n=5; p<0.01) | |||||||
| Free | - Shifted the voltage dependence of of INa inactivation to more negative potentials as indicated by a decrease in Imax by 36% and a shift of V' to more hyperpolarized potentials by 30% (n=5; p<0.01) | |||||||
| EPA | 4 mins | ICU | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 25μM | - Shifted the voltage dependence of INa activation to more positive potentials as indicated by a decrease in Gmas by-30% and a shift of V' to a more positive potential by 26% (n=10; p<0.001) | |||||||
| Free | - Shifted the voltage dependence of of INa inactivation to more negative potentials as indicated by a decrease in Imax by 35% and a shift of V' to more hyperpolarized potentials by 25% (n=10; p<0.01) | |||||||
| ALA | 4 mins | ICU | Ambient | None | ALA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 25μM | - Shifted the voltage dependence of INa activation to more positive potentials as indicated by a decrease in Gmas by 18% and a shift of V' to a more positive potential by 25% (n=6; p<0.001) | |||||||
| Free | - Shifted the voltage dependence of of INa inactivation to more negative potentials as indicated by a decrease in Imax by 25% and a shift of V' to more hyperpolarized potentials by 30% (n=6; p<0.01) | |||||||
| Leifert, 2000b | Australia | Rat | DHA | ND | CP | Ambient | ISO (10um) | DHA+ISO vs. Docasanoic Acid+ISO |
| U | Adult | 10μM | Added 5 mins after FA | - Decreased spontaneous contractions by 85% (n=5; p<0.01) | ||||
| Ventricular | Free | |||||||
| DHA | ND | CP | Ambient | LPC (10um) | DHA+LPC vs. Stearic Acid+LPC | |||
| 10μM | Added 5 mins after FA | - Decrease in spontaneous contractions by 77% (n=4; p<0.01) | ||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| Leifert, 2000b | Australia | Rat | DHA | ND | CP | Ambient | Electrical | DHA vs. Stearic Acid |
| U | Adult | 10μM | Stimulation (1Hz at 25 V) | - Decrease in asynchronous contractions by 61% (n=4; p<0.05) | ||||
| Ventricular | Free | |||||||
| Li, 1997 | USA | Rat | EPA | ND | CP | Ambient | Eicosanoids | EPA vs. Ctrl |
| G | Neonatal | 10μM | PGD2+PGE2+P | - Terminated the arrhythmias and contractures within 2–3 minutes (n=ND, p<0.05), followed by a slow beating rate. | ||||
| Cardiac | Free | GF2 +U46619 (3μm-0.5μM) | ||||||
| Macleod, 1998 | New Zealand | Rat | EPA | 5 mins | CP | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl |
| G/NP | Adult | 1–7.5uM | - Increased (prolonged) twitch size (%=ND) (n=6–8; p=ND) | |||||
| Ventricular | Free | |||||||
| DHA | 5 mins | CP | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 1–7.5uM | - Increased (prolonged) twitch size (%=ND) (n=6–8; p=ND) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA | 5 mins | CP | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| >10M | - Decreased twitch size (%=ND) (n=6–8; p=ND) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 5 mins | CP | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl | |||
| >10M | - Decreased twitch size (%=ND) (n=6–8; p=ND) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA | 5 mins | BEP | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 1–7.5uM | - Dose dependant increase (lengthening of early plateau potential) in ADP80 (%=ND) (n=11–14; p=ND) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 5 mins | BEP | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 1–7.5uM | - Dose dependant increase (lengthening of early plateau potential) in ADP80 (%=ND) (n=11–14; p=ND) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA | 5 mins | BEP | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| >10M | - Dose dependant decrease in ADP80 (%=ND) (n=11–14; p=ND) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 5 mins | BEP | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl | |||
| >10M | - Dose dependant decrease in ADP80 (%=ND) (n=11–14; p=ND) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA | 5 mins | ICU | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 5,10 or 20uM | - Dose dependant decrease of the peak amplitude of the INa (%=ND) (n=6–8; p=ND) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 5 mins | ICU | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 5,10 or 20uM | - Dose dependant decrease of the peak amplitude of the INa (%=ND) (n=6–8; p=ND) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA | 5 mins | ICU | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 5,7.5 or 10uM | - Dose dependant decrease of the peak ICa.L (%=ND) (n=5–8; p=ND) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| Macleod, 1998 | New Zealand | Rat | DHA | 5 mins | ICU | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl |
| G/NP | Adult | 5,7.5 or 10uM | - Dose dependant decrease of the peak ICa.L (%=ND) (n=5–8; p=ND) | |||||
| Ventricular | Free | |||||||
| EPA | 5 mins | ICU | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 0.1–10uM | - Dose dependant decrease of Ito (%=ND) (n=5–8; p=ND) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 5 mins | ICU | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 0.1–10uM | - Dose dependant decrease of Ito (%=ND) (n=5–8; p=ND) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA | 5 mins | ICU | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 2um | - Decreased IK and IKI by 30–40%(n=ND; p=ND) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA | 5 mins | ICU | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 5um | - Decreased IK and IKI by 50–60% (n=ND; p=ND) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| Guinea Pig | EPA | 5 mins | CP | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | ||
| Adult | 5–20μM | - Dose dependant decrease in twitch size (%=ND) (n=6–8; p=ND) | ||||||
| Ventricular | Free | |||||||
| DHA | 5 mins | CP | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 5–20μM | - Dose dependant decrease in twitch size (%=ND) (n=6–8; p=ND) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA | 5 mins | BEP | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 1–20μM | - Dose dependant reduction in ADP80 (%=ND) (n=12–16; p=ND) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 5 mins | BEP | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 1–20μM | - Dose dependant reduction in ADP80 (%=ND) (n=12–16; p=ND) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA | 5 mins | ICU | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 5,10 or 20μM | - Dose dependant decrease of the peak amplitude of INa (%=ND) (n=8–10; p=ND) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 5 mins | ICU | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 5,10 or 20μM | - Dose dependant decrease of the peak amplitude of INa (%=ND) (n=8–10; p=ND) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA | 5 mins | ICU | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 5,7.5 or 10μM | - Dose dependant decrease of the peak ICa.L (%=ND) (n=6–10; p=ND) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| Macleod, 1998 | New Zealand | Guinea Pig | DHA | 5 mins | ICU | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl |
| G/NP | Adult | 5,7.5 or 10μM | - Dose dependant decrease of the peak ICa.L (%=ND) (n=6–10; p=ND) | |||||
| Ventricular | Free | |||||||
| EPA | 5 mins | ICU | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 2um | - Decreased IK and IKI by 10% (n=5–8; p=ND) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA | 5 mins | ICU | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 5um | - Decreased IK and IKI by 30–40% (n=5–8; p=ND) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| Negretti, 2000 | Venezuela | Rat | EPA | 3 mins | CP | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl |
| G/NP | Adult | 10μM | - Increased resting cell length by 2% (n=6, p<0.001). | |||||
| Ventricular | Free | - Decreased the spontaneous contraction frequency (n=47 out of 57; p<0.001) | ||||||
| - Effects were reversible by BSA | ||||||||
| EPA | 3 mins | IPIM | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 10μM | - Decreased the frequency of spontaneous waves of calcium release (n=47 out of 57; p<0.001) | |||||||
| Free | - Decreased the amplitude of the wave by 16% (n=41, p<0.001) | |||||||
| - Effects were reversible by BSA | ||||||||
| EPA | 3 mins | IPIM | Ambient | Ca2+ (10uM) | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 10μM | - Decreased the basal level of [Ca2+] by 6% (n=46, p<0.005). The effect was reversible by BSA. | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA | 3 mins | IPIM | Ambient | Caffeine (10mM) | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 5μM | - Increased the SR calcium content indicated by an increase in the caffeine induced Na+-Ca2+ exchange current by 41% (n=4, p<0.05). | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 3 mins | IPIM | Ambient | Caffeine (10mM) | DHA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 5μM | - Increased the SR calcium content indicated by an increase in the caffeine induced Na+-Ca2+ exchange current by 41% (n=4, p<0.05). | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA | 3 mins | ICU | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 10μM | - Decreased the amplitude of ICa.L (n=5; p<0.05) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 3 mins | ICU | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 10μM | - Decreased the amplitude of ICa.L (n=5; p<0.05) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| O'Neill, 2002 | UK/Venezuela | Rat | EPA | ND | ICU | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl |
| G/NP | ND | 10uM | - Decreased frequency of transient inward currents that accompany spontaneous waves of CICR by 33% (n=6; p<0.05) | |||||
| Ventricular | Free | - Increased amplitude of currents activated by each wave by 29% (n-6; p<0.05) | ||||||
| EPA | ND | IPIM | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 10uM | - Decreased resting cytosolic Ca2+ due to decrease Ca2+ influx across surface membrane and not due to increased activation of efflux pathways(n=6; p<0.05) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| O'Neill, 2002 | UK/Venezuela | Rat | EPA | ND | IPIM | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl |
| G/NP | ND | 10uM | - Decreased wave frequency activated by Ca2+ efflux (% in fig) (n=6; p<0.01) | |||||
| Ventricular | Free | - Increased efflux of Ca2+ activated by individual waves by 12% (n=6; p<0.05) | ||||||
| - Decreased wave generated efflux per unit time by 19% (n=6; p<0.01) | ||||||||
| - Decreased total efflux (% in fig) (n=6; p<0.01) | ||||||||
| EPA | ND | IPIM | Ambient | Caffeine (10mM/ND) | EPA+Caffeine vs. Ctrl+Caffeine | |||
| 10uM | - No change in surface membrane Ca2+ efflux pathway (n=12; p>0.1) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| Pepe, 1994 | USA | Rat | DHA | 4 mins | CP | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl |
| G | Young Adult | 5μM | - No change in DL (n=6, p>0.05) | |||||
| Cardiac | Free | - No change in TAt50 (n=6, p>0.05) | ||||||
| - No change in VS/DL (n=6; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| DHA | 4 mins | CP | Ambient | NIT (10nM) | DHA+NIT vs. Ctrl+NIT | |||
| 5μM | - Blocked NIT effect on TA (n=6, p<0.05) | |||||||
| Free | - Blocked NIT effect on VS/DL (n=6; p<0.05) | |||||||
| - Effects were reversible by BSA | ||||||||
| DHA | 4 mins | CP | Ambient | BAY (10nM) | DHA+BAY vs. Ctrl+BAY | |||
| 5μM | - Blocked NIT effect on TA (n=6, p<0.05) | |||||||
| Free | - Blocked NIT effect on VS/DL (n=6; p<0.05) | |||||||
| - Effects were reversible by BSA | ||||||||
| DHA | 4 mins | CP | Ambient | ISO (0.1–1uM) | DHA+ISO vs. Ctrl+ISO | |||
| 5μM | - No change in TA (n=6, p>0.05) | |||||||
| Free | - No change in DL (n=6; p>0.05) | |||||||
| - Effects were reversible by BSA | ||||||||
| DHA | 4 mins | ICU | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 5μM | - No change in peak ICa.L amplitude (n=6; p>0.05) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 4 mins | ICU | Ambient | NIT (10nM) | DHA+NIT vs. Ctrl+NIT | |||
| 5μM | - Increased peak ICa.L amplitude by 50% (n=6; p<0.05) | |||||||
| Free | Effects were reversible by BSA | |||||||
| DHA | 4 mins | ICU | Ambient | BAY (10nM) | DHA+BAY vs. Ctrl+BAY | |||
| 5μM | - Blocked the BAY induced increase in peak ICa.L amplitude (n=6; p<0.05) | |||||||
| Free | - Effects were reversible by BSA | |||||||
| DHA | 4 mins | ICU | Ambient | ISO (0.1–1uM) | DHA+ISO vs. Ctrl+ISO | |||
| 5μM | - No change in peak ICa.L amplitude (n=6; p>0.05) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 4 mins | IPIM | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 5μM | - No change in IFTAdias and IFR t50 indicating no change in cytosolic Ca2+ and Cai2+ transient amplitude (n=6; p>0.05) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 4 mins | IPIM | Ambient | NIT (10nM) | DHA+NIT vs. Ctrl+NIT | |||
| 5μM | - Inhibited NIT blockage of the L-type calcium channel influx (n=6; p<0.05) | |||||||
| Free | - Blocked NIT effect on IFTAdias (n=6; p<0.05) | |||||||
| - Effects were reversible by BSA | ||||||||
| Pepe, 1994 | USA | Rat | DHA | 4 mins | IPIM | Ambient | BAY (10nM) | DHA+BAY vs. Ctrl+BAY |
| G | Young Adult | 5μM | - Inhibited BAY induced potentiation of L-type calcium channel influx (n=6; p<0.05) | |||||
| Cardiac | Free | - Blocked BAY effect on IFTAdias (n=6; p<0.05) | ||||||
| - Effects were reversible by BSA | ||||||||
| DHA | 4 mins | IPIM | Ambient | ISO (0.1–1uM) | DHA+ISO vs. Ctrl+ISO | |||
| 5μM | - No change in ISO induced increase in cytosolic calcium content (n=6; p>0.05) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| Phiipson, 1985 | USA | Dog | ALA | 1.5 sec | IPIM | Ambient | Ca2+ (10uM) Added before FA | ALA vs. Ctrl |
| G | Adult | 30μM | - Increased Na+-Ca2+ exchange measured as Na+ dependent Ca2+ uptake by 112% (n=9, p<0.05) | |||||
| Ventricular | Free | - Preincubation with ALA to ensure complete incorporation resulted in the maximal stimulation of Na+ dependent Ca2+ influx being about 40% less than when the vesicles were only briefly exposed to ALA. | ||||||
| SL vesicles | ||||||||
| ALA | 2 mins | IPIM | Ambient | Preloaded Ca2+ (47.9 nMl) | ALA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 20μM | - Increased passive Ca2+ efflux by 147% (n=3, p<0.05) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| Phiipson, 1987 | USA | Dog | ALA | 1.5 sec | IPIM | Ambient | Ca2+ (10uM) | ALA vs. Ctrl |
| G | Adult | 60μM | - Increased Na+-Ca2+ exchange measured as Na+ dependent Ca2+ uptake by 87% (n=3, p<0.05) | |||||
| Ventricular | Free | |||||||
| SL vesicles | ||||||||
| ALA | 2 minutes | IPIM | Ambient | Preloaded Ca2+ (52.3 nM) | ALA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 30μM | - Increased passive Ca2+ efflux by 170% (n=4, p<0.05) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| Ponsard, 1999 | France | Rat | EPA+DHA-Albumin | 4 days | CP | Ambient | None | EPA+DHA vs. Ctrl |
| NP | Neonatal | 4.6+6.5% | - No change in CR (n=13; p>0.05) | |||||
| Ventricular | Bound | - No change in CD20 (n=13; p>0.05) | ||||||
| - No change in CD80 (n=13; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in +Cmax (n=13; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in -Cmax (n=13; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| EPA+DHA-Albumin | 4 days | CP | Ambient | ISO (10-7M) | EPA+DHA+ISO vs. N-6+ISO | |||
| 4.6+6.5% | - Increased CR by 66% (n=7; p<0.05) | |||||||
| Bound | - No change in CD20 (n=7; p>0.05) | |||||||
| - No change in CD80 (n=7; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in +Cmax (n=7; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in -Cmax (n=7; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| EPA+DHA-Albumin | 4 days | CP | Ambient | PHE (10-6M) | EPA+DHA+PHE vs. N-6+PHE | |||
| 4.6+6.5% | - Increased CR by 115% (n=6; p<0.05) | |||||||
| Bound | - No change in CD20 (n=6; p>0.05) | |||||||
| - No change in CD80 (n=6; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in +Cmax (n=6; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in -Cmax (n=6; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| Ponsard, 1999 | France | Rat | EPA+DHA-Albumin | 4 days | CP | Normoxia-Posthypoxic Reoxy | ISO (10-7M) | EPA+DHA+ISO in Hypoxia vs. EPA+DHA+ISO in Normoxia |
| NP | Neonatal | 4.6+6.5% | - Increased CR (% in fig) (n=6; p<0.001) | |||||
| Ventricular | Bound | - No change in CD20 (n=6; p>0.05) | ||||||
| - No change in CD80 (n=6; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - Increased +Cmax (%=ND) (n=6; p<0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in -Cmax (n=6; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| EPA+DHA-Albumin | 4 days | CP | Normoxia-Posthypoxic Reoxy | PHE (10-6M) | EPA+DHA+PHE in Hypoxia vs. EPA+DHA+PHE in Normoxia | |||
| 4.6+6.5% | - No change (n=6; p>0.05) | |||||||
| Bound | - No change in CD20 (n=6; p>0.05) | |||||||
| - No change in CD80 (n=6; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in +Cmax (n=6; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in -C ax (n=6; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| Reithman, 1996 | Germany | Rat | DHA | 3 days | BEP | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl |
| U | Neonatal | 60μM | - Increased amplitude by 20% (n=28–29; p<0.05) | |||||
| Cardiac | Bound | - No change in APR (n=14–19; p>0.05) | ||||||
| DHA | 3 days | BEP | Ambient | NA + TIM (100μmol/L+10 μmol/L) | DHA+NA+TIM vs. Ctrl+NA+TIM | |||
| 60μM | - Decreased APR by 28% (n=14–19; p<0.05) | |||||||
| Bound | ||||||||
| DHA | 3 days | CP | Ambient | NA + TIM (100μmol/L+10 μmol/L) | DHA+NA+TIM vs. Ctrl+NA+TIM | |||
| 60μM | - Decreased arrhythmias by 84% (n=15–28; p<0.01) | |||||||
| Bound | ||||||||
| DHA | 3 days | BEP | Ambient | Isoprenaline (10 μmol/L) | DHA+Isoprenaline vs. Ctrl+Isoprenaline | |||
| 60μM | - Decreased APR by 26% (n=10–11; p<0.05) | |||||||
| Bound | ||||||||
| DHA | 3 days | BEP | Ambient | OUA (10 μmol/L) | DHA+OUA vs. Ctrl+OUA | |||
| 60μM | - Decreased APR by 16% (n=4 ; p<.05) | |||||||
| Bound | ||||||||
| Rinaldi, 2002 | Italy | Rat | DHA | 20 minutes (acute) | IPIM | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl |
| NP | Adult | 10μM | - No change in basal cytosolic Ca2+ levels (n=9; p>0.5) | |||||
| Ventricular | Free | |||||||
| DHA | 3 days (chronic) | IPIM | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 10μM | - No change in cytosolic Ca2+ levels (n=9; p>0.5) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 20 minutes (acute) | IPIM | Ambient | ET-1 (100nM) | DHA+ET-1 vs. Ctrl | |||
| 10μM | - Increased ET-1 induced cytosolic Ca2+ levels by 128% (n=9; p<0.01) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 3 days (chronic) | IPIM | Ambient | ET-1 (100nM) | DHA+ET-1 vs. Ctrl | |||
| 10μM | - Increased ET-1 induced cytosolic Ca2+ by 148% (n=9; p<0.01) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 20 minutes (acute) | IPIM | Ambient | KCl (50mM) | DHA+KCl vs. Ctrl | |||
| 10μM | Added after FA | - Decreased Ca2+by 71% (n=9; p<0.01) | ||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| Rinaldi, 2002 | Italy | Rat | DHA | 3 days (chronic) | IPIM | Ambient | KCl (50mM) | DHA+KCl vs. Ctrl+KCl |
| NP | Adult | 10μM | Added after FA | - Decreased Ca2+ by 48% (n=9; p<0.01) | ||||
| Ventricular | Free | |||||||
| DHA | 20 minutes (acute) | IPIM | Ambient | KCl (50mM) | DHA+ET-1 (chronic) vs. DHA+ET-1 (acute) | |||
| 10μM | 3 days (chronic) | Added after FA | - Decreased Ca2+ by 17% (n=9; p<0.01) | |||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 20 minutes (acute) | IPIM | Anoxia | 97%N2 and 3% CO2 | DHA+Anoxic Soln vs. Ctrl | |||
| 10μM | - Decreased Ca2+ by 58% (n=9; p<0.01) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 3 days (chronic) | IPIM | Anoxia | 97%N2 and 3% CO2 | DHA+Anoxic Soln vs. Ctrl | |||
| 10μM | - Decreased Ca2+ by 83% (n=9; p<0.01) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 20 minutes (acute) | IPIM | Anoxia | 97%N2 and 3% CO2 | DHA+Anoxic Soln (chronic) vs. DHA+Anoxic Soln (acute) | |||
| 10μM | 3 days (chronic) | - Decreased Ca2+ by 59% (n=9; p<0.01) | ||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 20 minutes (acute) | IPIM | Anoxia | 97%N2 and 3% CO2+ KCl (50mM) | DHA+Anoxic Soln+KCl vs. Ctrl | |||
| 10μM | - Decreased Ca2+ (%=ND) (n=9; p<0.01) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 3 days (chronic) | IPIM | Anoxia | 97%N2 and 3% CO2+ KCl (50mM) | DHA+Anoxic Soln+KCl vs. Ctrl | |||
| 10μM | - Decreased Ca2+ (%=ND) (n=9; p<0.01) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 20 minutes (acute) | IPIM | Anoxia | 97%N2 and 3% CO2+ KCl (50mM) | DHA+Anoxic Soln+KCl (chronic) vs. DHA+Anoxic Soln+KCl (acute) | |||
| 10μM | 3 days (chronic) | - Decreased Ca2+ by 70% (n=9; p<0.01) | ||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 20 minutes (acute) | IPIM | Anoxia | 97%N2 and 3% CO2+ ET-1 (100nM) | DHA+Anoxic Soln+ET-1 vs. Ctrl | |||
| 10μM | - Decreased Ca2+ (%=ND) (n=9; p<0.01) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 3 days (chronic) | IPIM | Anoxia | 97%N2 and 3% CO2+ ET-1 (100nM) | DHA+Anoxic Soln+ET-1 vs. Ctrl | |||
| 10μM | - Decreased Ca2+ (%=ND) (n=9; p<0.01) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | 20 minutes (acute) | IPIM | Anoxia | 97%N2 and 3% CO2+ ET-1 (100nM) | DHA+Anoxic Soln+ET-1 (bound) vs. DHA+Anoxic Soln+ET-1 (free) | |||
| 10μM | 3 days (chronic) | - Decreased Ca2+ by 70% (n=9; p<0.01) | ||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| ALA-Na | 5 mins | CP | Ambient | None | ALA-Na vs. Ctrl | |||
| 2mg/kg/min | - No change in intra-atrial conduction time (AC) (n=7; p>0.05) | |||||||
| Free as IV | - No change in atrio-ventricular conductance time (AVC) (n=7; p>0.05) | |||||||
| - No change in functional refractory period of the atrium (ARP) (n=7; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| - No change in functional refractory period of atrio-ventricular conducting system (AVRP) (n=7; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| Rodrigo, 1999 | New Zealand | Rat | EPA | 10 mins | CP | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl |
| G/NP | Adult | 5μM | - Decreased twitch contraction size by 70 (n=8; p<0.001) | |||||
| Ventricular | Free | - Effects were reversible by BSA | ||||||
| EPA | 10 mins | ICU | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 5μM | - Decreased ICa.L by 72% (n=8; p<0.001) | |||||||
| Free | - Effects were reversible by BSA | |||||||
| Guinea Pig | EPA | 10 mins | CP | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | ||
| Adult | 5μM | - Initial increase in twitch contraction size (% cell shortening) followed by a decrease in twitch contraction strength by -88% (n=7; p<0.001) | ||||||
| Ventricular | Free | - Effects were partially reversible by BSA | ||||||
| Guinea Pig | EPA | 10 mins | ICU | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | ||
| Adult | 5μM | - Decreased ICa.L by 64% (n=11; p<0.001) | ||||||
| Ventricular | Free | - Effects were reversible by BSA | ||||||
| Rat | EPA | 10mins | CP + IPIM | Ambient | Ca2+ (133–267nM) | EPA+Ca2+ vs. Ctrl+Ca2+ | ||
| Adult | 5uM | Added before FA | - Decreased frequency of spontaneous contractions (%=ND) (n=5; p<0.05) due to an inhibition of SR Ca2+ release | |||||
| Skinned/Saponin Permealized Ventricular | Free | - No change in degree of relaxation between spontaneous contractions (n=5; p>0.05) | ||||||
| EPA | 10mins | CP+ IPIM | Ambient | Ca2+ (133–267nM) | EPA+Ca2+ vs. Ctrl+Ca2+ | |||
| 10μM | Added before FA | - Decreased frequency of spontaneous contractions (%=ND) (n=5; p<0.05) due to an inhibition of SR Ca2+ release | ||||||
| Free | - No change in degree of relaxation between spontaneous contractions (n=5; p>0.05) | |||||||
| Guinea Pig | EPA | 10 mins | CP | Ambient | Ca2+ (133–267nM) | EPA+Ca2+ vs. Ctrl+Ca2+ | ||
| Adult | 5μM | Added before FA | - Decreased frequency of spontaneous contractions (%=ND) (n=5; p<0.05) due to an inhibition of SR Ca2+ release | |||||
| Adult Skinned/ Saponin Permealized Ventricular | Free | - No change in degree of relaxation between spontaneous contractions (n=5; p>0.05) | ||||||
| Vitelli, 2002 | Italy | Rat | DHA | 20 mins | IPIM | Ambient | Ca2+ free KRB (1.8mM) | DHA vs. Ctrl |
| U | Adult | 10μM | - No change in basal level of cytosolic Ca2+ (n=ND; p>0.01) | |||||
| Ventricular | Free | |||||||
| DHA | 20 mins | IPIM | Ambient | CaCl2 KRB (1.8mM) | DHA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 10μM | - No change in basal level of cytosolic Ca2+ (n=ND; p>0.01) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| Vitelli, 2002 | Italy | Rat | DHA | 20 mins | IPIM | Ambient | DXR (100uM) | DHA+DXR vs. Ctrl+DXR |
| U | Adult | 10μM | Added after FA | - Decreased peak level of Ca2+ (n=ND; p<0.01) | ||||
| Ventricular | Free | Ca2+ free KRB (1.8mM) | DHA+DXR vs. Ctrl | |||||
| - No change in peak level of Ca2+ (n=ND; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| DHA+DXR vs. DHA | ||||||||
| - No change in peak level of Ca2+ (n=ND; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| DHA | 20 mins | IPIM | Ambient | DXR (100uM) | DHA+DXR vx Ctrl+DXR | |||
| 10μM | Added after FA | - Decreased peak level of Ca2+ (n=9; p<0.01) | ||||||
| Free | CaCl2 KRB (1.8mM) | DHA+DXR vs. Ctrl | ||||||
| - No change in peak level of Ca2+ (n=9; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| DHA+DXR vs. DHA | ||||||||
| - No change in peak level of Ca2+ (n=9; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| DHA | 20 mins | IPIM | Ambient | Caff (10mM) | DHA+Caff vx Ctrl+Caff | |||
| 10μM | Added after FA | - Decreased peak level of Ca2+ (n=9; p<0.01) | ||||||
| Free | Ca2+ free KRB (1.8mM) | DHA+DXR vs. Ctrl | ||||||
| - No change in peak level of Ca2+ (n=9; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| DHA | 20 mins | IPIM | Ambient | Caff (10mM) | DHA+Caff vx Ctrl+Caff | |||
| 10μM | Added after FA | - Decreased peak level of Ca2+ (n=9; p<0.01) | ||||||
| Free | CaCl2 KRB (1.8mM) | DHA+DXR vs. Ctrl | ||||||
| - No change in peak level of Ca2+ (n=9; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| Weylandt, 1996 | USA | Rat | EPA | 48 hrs | CP | Ambient | ISO (3–10uM) | EPA+ISO vs. Ctrl+ISO |
| G | Neonatal | 15μM | - No change in arrhythmias (n=51–107; p=ND) | |||||
| Cardiac | DHA | EPA+ISO vs. DHA+ISO | ||||||
| 15μM | - No change in arrhythmias (n=51–107; p>0.1) | |||||||
| Bound | ||||||||
| DHA | >48 hrs | CP | Ambient | ISO (3–10uM) | DHA+ISO vs. Ctrl+ISO | |||
| 15μM | - No change in arrhythmias (n=13–51; p>0.1) | |||||||
| Bound | ||||||||
| EPA | 48 hrs | CP | Ambient | Ca2+ (7mM) | EPA+ Ca2+ vs. Ctrl+ Ca2+ | |||
| 15μM | - No change in arrhythmias (n=14–20; p>0.1) | |||||||
| DHA | EPA+Ca2+ vs.DHA+Ca2+ | |||||||
| 15μM | - No change in arrhythmias (n=6–14; p>0.1) | |||||||
| Bound | ||||||||
| DHA | 48 hrs | CP | Ambient | Ca2+ (7mM) | DHA+Ca2+ vs. Ctrl+Ca2+ | |||
| 15μM | - No change in arrhythmias (n=6–20; p>0.1) | |||||||
| Bound | ||||||||
| DHA | 3–12mins | CP | Ambient | ISO (3–10uM) | DHA+ISO vs. Ctrl+ISO | |||
| 15μM | Added before FA | - Terminated arrhythmias (n=8; p<0.05) | ||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA | 3–12mins | CP | Ambient | ISO (3–10uM) | EPA+ISO vs. Ctrl+ISO | |||
| 15μM | Added before FA | - Terminated arrhythmias (n=8; p<0.05) | ||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| Weylandt, 1996 | USA | Rat | DHA | 3–12mins | CP | Ambient | ISO (3–10uM) | DHA vs. DHA+ISO |
| G | Neonatal | 15μM | 48 hrs | Added before FA | - Terminated arrhythmias (n=23; p<0.05) | |||
| Cardiac | Bound | EPA vs. EPA+ISO | ||||||
| EPA | - Terminated arrhythmias (n=23; p<0.05) | |||||||
| 15μM | ||||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA or EPA | 3–12mins | CP | Ambient | Ca2+ (7mM)) | DHA+Ca2+ vs. Ctrl+Ca2+ | |||
| 15μM | - Decreased arrhythmias by -83% (n=12; p<0.05) | |||||||
| Free | EPA vs. Ctrl+Ca2+ | |||||||
| - Decreased arrhythmias by -83% (n=12; p<0.05) | ||||||||
| DHA or EPA | 3–12mins | CP | Ambient | Ca2+ (7mM) | DHA (free) vs. DHA (bound)+Ca2+ | |||
| 15μM | 48 hrs | - Decrease in arrhythmias by -90% (n=10; p<0.05) | ||||||
| Bound | EPA (free) vs. EPA (bound)+Ca2+ | |||||||
| DHA or EPA | - Decrease in arrhythmias by -90% (n=10; p<0.05) | |||||||
| 15μM | ||||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| Xiao, 1995 | USA | Rat | EPA | ND | ICU | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl |
| G | Neonatal | 5–10μM | - Suppressed voltage activated Na+ currents within 2mins which was reversible by BSA (n=6; p<0.05) | |||||
| Ventricular | Free | - No change in current-voltage relations or in the activation and inactivation time constants of Na+ current (n=10; p>0.05) | ||||||
| EPA | ND | ICU | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 10–40μM | - Suppressed Na+ current by 68% to 99% with 10um and 40um EPA respectively indicating a dose dependent effect (n=4–10; p<0.05) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA | ND | ICU | Ambient | None | EPA vs..Ctrl | |||
| 10μM | - Modified the voltage dependence of the steady state inactivation of INa (n=7; p<0.001). Inhibition of 83% at -80mV and 29% at -150mV indicating a voltage dependent effect. Application of a train of stimulating pulses at freq.l of 1.0, 0.2, 0.1, or 0.03 Hz had no effect on time required to attain same level of inhibition of INa independent of concentration (n=5; p>0.05) (time and dose but not use dependent effect) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA | ND | ICU | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 5μM | - Inhibition of INa by 51% (n=10; p<0.01) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| DHA | DHA vs. Ctrl | |||||||
| 5μM | - Inhibition of INa by 52% (n=7; p<0.01) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA | ND | ICU | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 10μM | - Inhibition of INa by 64% (n=21; p<0.001) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| Xiao, 1995 | USA | Rat | DHA | ND | ICU | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl |
| G | Neonatal | 10μM | - Inhibition of INa by 66% (n=7; p<0.05) | |||||
| Ventricular | Free | |||||||
| ALA | ND | ICU | Ambient | None | ALA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 10μM | - Inhibition of INa by 71% (n=5; p<0.05) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA | ND | ICU | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 15μM | - Decreased ICa,L by 50% (n=11; p<0.05) and effects were partially reversible by BSA | |||||||
| Free | - No change in shape of current voltage relationship (n=11; p>0.05) | |||||||
| - Negative shift (3.33+/-0.4 mV) of the ICa,L inactivation curve (n=11; p<0.05) and effects were reversible by BSA | ||||||||
| Xiao, 1997 | USA | Rat | EPA | ND | ICU | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl |
| G | Neonatal | 0.1–40μM | - Time and dose dependant decrease in ICa,L within seconds (n=6; p<0.05) | |||||
| Ventricular | Free | ICa,L was almost completely inhibited when the concentration of EPA was above 5 uM | ||||||
| EPA | ND | ICU | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 1μM | - Decreased ICa,L by 33% when elicited from the holding potential -40 to 0mV than from -80 to 0mV indicating a voltage dependent effect (n=6; p<0.05) | |||||||
| Free | Effect was also time but not frequency or use-dependent (n=4; p>0.05) | |||||||
| EPA | ND | ICU | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 5μM | - Inhibition of ICa,L by 83% (n=5; p<0.01) | |||||||
| Free | - EPA, DHA and ALA had similar effects on the steady-state inactivation of the calcium cannel (approx 3 to 5 mV shift to negative potentials a the V1/2 point) | |||||||
| DHA | ND | ICU | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 5μM | - Inhibition of ICa,L by 62% (n=6; p<0.01) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| ALA | ND | ICU | Ambient | None | ALA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 5μM | - Inhibition of ICa,L by 77% (n=5; p<0.01) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA | ND | ICU | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 1μM | - Suppression of ICa,L by 57% (n=5; p<0.01) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA | ND | ICU | Ambient | None | EPA vs.. Ctrl | |||
| 5μM | - Suppression of ICa,L by 47% (n=8; p<0.01) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA | ND | IPIM | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 1.5μM | - Decreased the calcium transients induced by ICa,L (n=ND; p<0.01) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA | ND | ICU | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 15μM | - Decreased the calcium transients induced by ICa,L (n=ND; p<0.01) | |||||||
| Free | - Decreased SR Ca2+ release (n=ND; p<0.05) | |||||||
| - No change in time constant of decay (tau) or temporal and spatial spread of the calcium sparks (n 33–46; p>0.05) indicating no direct action of EPA on SR Ca2+ release or re-uptake | ||||||||
| Xiao, 2002 | USA | Ferret | DHA | ND | ICU | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl |
| G/NP | Adult | 10μM | - Decreased Ik by 62%–69% (n=7–12; p<0.05) | |||||
| Atrial | Free | |||||||
| Ferret | DHA | ND | ICU | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl | ||
| Adult | 0.2–50μM | - Dose dependant decrease in Ik (% in fig) (n=6; p<0.05) | ||||||
| Ventrlcular | Free | |||||||
| DHA | ND | ICU | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 5μM | - Decreased Ik by 31% (n=12; p<0.05) | |||||||
| Free | - No change in IKI (n=6; p>0.05) | |||||||
| DHA | ND | ICU | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 10μM | - Decreased Ik by 42% regardless of holding potential (n=8; p<0.05) | |||||||
| Free | - Decreased Ito by 57% (n=7; p<0.001) | |||||||
| - No change in IKI (n=5; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| DHA | ND | ICU | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 20μM | - Decreased Ik by 50% (n=6; p<0.01) | |||||||
| Free | No change in IKI (n=2; p>0.05) | |||||||
| DHA | ND | ICU | Ambient | None | DHA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 50μM | - Decreased Ik by 61% (n=11; p<0.001) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA | ND | ICU | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 5μM | - Decreased Ik by 26% (n=6; p<0.05) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| EPA | ND | ICU | Ambient | None | EPA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 10μM | - Decreased Ik by 40% (n=8; p<0.001) | |||||||
| Free | - Decreased Ito by 67% (n=4; p<0.01) | |||||||
| - No change in IKI (n=ND; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| ALA | ND | ICU | Ambient | None | ALA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 5μM | - Decreased Ik by 22% (n=7; p<0.01) | |||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| ALA | ND | ICU | Ambient | None | ALA vs. Ctrl | |||
| 10μM | - Decreased Ik by 46% (n=8; p<0.001) | |||||||
| Free | - Decreased Ito by 49% (n=4; p<0.05) | |||||||
| - No change in IKI (n=ND; p>0.05) | ||||||||
| DHA | ND | ICU | Ambient | Sta (0.1μmol/L) | DHA+Sta vs. Ctrl+Sta | |||
| 10μM | Added before FA | - Decreased Ik by 65% (n=5; p<0.05) | ||||||
| Free | ||||||||
| Author, Year | Model [Animal, Type, Age] | Exposure Duration | Omega-3 Fatty Acid (n) | Control (n) | Amount of Omega-3 | Experimental Condition | Agent | AP | APA | APD40 | APD80 | Vmax | MDP | OS | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAT | |||||||||||||||
| Bogdanov, 1998 | Rat, adult ventricular | 10–15 min Free | EPA (ND) | STD (ND) | 5–10uM | Ambient | None | IND | NC | ||||||
| EPA (ND) | STD (ND) | 20uM | Ambient | None | DND | IND | DND | ||||||||
| DHA (ND) | STD (ND) | 10–50uM | Ambient | None | DND | IND | DND | ||||||||
| Kang, 1995 | Rat, neonatal, ventricular | 2–5 min Free | EPA (8) | STD (8) | 10uM | Ambient | None | D*F | NC | D** | NC | ||||
| D** | |||||||||||||||
| MacLeod, 1998 | Rat, adult, ventricular | 5 min Free | EPA (11–14) | STD (11–14) | 1–7.5uM | Ambient | None | INDdd | |||||||
| EPA (11–14) | STD (11–14) | >10uM | Ambient | None | DNDdd | ||||||||||
| DHA (6–8) | STD (6–8) | 1–7.5uM | Ambient | None | IND | ||||||||||
| DHA (11–14) | STD (11–14) | >10uM | Ambient | None | DNDdd | ||||||||||
| Durot, 1997 | Rat, neonatal, ventricular | 4 d Bound | SM3 (9) | SM6 (9) | 25uM EPA+25uM DHA-Al | Ambient | None | NC | NC | NC | NC | I* | NC | NC | |
| SM3 (5) | SM6 (5) | 25uM EPA+25uM DHA-Al | Hypoxia | None | NC | D* | D** | D* | NC | NC | |||||
| SM3 (5) | SM6 (5) | 25uM EPA+25uM DHA-Al | Reoxy | None | NC | NC | NC | NC | NC | Im | |||||
| Fournier, 1995 | Rat, neonatal, ventricular | 4 d Bound | EPA (11) | DHA (11) | 100uM | Ambient | None | NC | I* | NC | NC | NC | NC | I* | |
| Grynberg, 1988 | Rat, neonatal, ventricular | 24 h Bound | SM3 (11) | SM6 (11) | 57%ALA+ 7%LA+ +0.2% AA- Na-Al | Ambient | None | NC | NC | NC | NC | NC | NC | NC | |
| SM3 (11) | SM6 (11) | 57%ALA+7% LA+ +0.2% AA- Na-Al | Hypoxia | None | NC | D** | NC | NC | NC | NC | D* | ||||
| SM3 (11) | SM6 (11) | 57%ALA+ 7% LA +0.2% AA- Na-Al | Reoxy | None | NC | I** | NC | NC | NC | NC | I* | ||||
| Grynberg, 1996 | Rat, neonatal, ventricular | 4 d Bound | EPA-Al (10) | DHA-Al (10) | 0.1mM | Ambient | None | I* | NC | NC | NC | I* | |||
| Reithman, 1996 | Rat, neonatal, cardiac | 3 d Bound | DHA (28–29) | STD (28–29) | 60uM | Ambient | None | NC | I* | ||||||
| DHA (14–19) | STD (14–19) | 60uM | Ambient | NA+TIM | D* | ||||||||||
| DHA (10–11) | STD (10–11) | 60uM | Ambient | ISO | D* | ||||||||||
| DHA (4) | STD (4) | 60uM | Ambient | OUA | D* | ||||||||||
| GUINEA PIG | |||||||||||||||
| MacLeod, 1998 | Guinea pig, adult, ventricular | 5 min Free | EPA (12–16) | STD (12–16) | 1–20uM | Ambient | None | DND dd | |||||||
| DHA (12–16) | STD (12–16) | 1–20uM | Ambient | None | DND dd | ||||||||||
| CAT | |||||||||||||||
| Bayer, 1979 | Cat, adult, heart in situ | 5 min Free IV | ALA-Na (7) | STD (7) | 2mg/kg/ min | Ambient | INDO | NC AC | |||||||
| NC AVC | |||||||||||||||
| NC ARP | |||||||||||||||
| NC | |||||||||||||||
| AVRP | |||||||||||||||
NC = no change; AP=action potential rate; APA= action potential amplitude; APD40= action potential duration at 40% depolarization; APD 80= action potential duration at 80% depolarization; Vmax= maximum rate of depolarization; MDP= maximum diastolic potential; OS= overshoot; I = increase; NC = no change; ND= no data;
= p<0.05
= p<0.01;
= p<0.001
AA =arachidonic acid
AC =intra-atrial conduction time
ALA = alpha linoleic acid
ARP =functional refractory period of the atrium
AVC =atrioventricular conductance time
AVRP =functional refractory period of atrioventricular conducting system
D = decrease
dd = dose dependent
DHA =decosahexaenoic acid
F =frequency
I =increased
INDO =indomethacin
ISO= isoproteronol
LA =linoleic acid
MDP= maximum diastolic potential
N-6 =omega 6
ND =no data
OS= overshoot
SM3=synthesized medium for omega-3 group
SM6 = synthesized medium for omega-6 group
STD = standard chow
SR =sarcoplasmic reticulum
uM =micromoles
Other basoelectromechanical parameters. In a cat model infusion of ALA in the presence of indomethacin there was no change in the following basoelectrical parameters such as AC, AVC, ARP, and AVRP.
| Author, Year | Model [Animal, Type, Age] | Exposure Duration | Comparison Groups | Amount of Omega-3 | Experimental Condition | Agent | Pump Activity | Cys. Ca2+ influx | Cys. Ca2+ efflux | Cys Ca2+ Content | SR Ca2+ Content | SR Ca2+ Uptake | SR Ca2+ Release | Exchanger | Other | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omega-3 Fatty Acid (n) | Control (n) | |||||||||||||||
| RAT | ||||||||||||||||
| Kang & Leaf, 1996 | Rat, neonatal, cardiac | 7min Free | EPA (6) | STD (6) | 10–15uM | Ambient | None | NCsys | ||||||||
| NCdia | ||||||||||||||||
| EPA (6) | STD (6) | 10–15uM | Ambient | LPC | TCaFlu | |||||||||||
| Negretti, 2000 | Rat, ND ventricular | ND Free | EPA (46) | STD (46) | 10uM | Ambient | Ca2+ | D*** | ||||||||
| Bas | ||||||||||||||||
| EPA (4) | STD (4) | 5uM | Ambient | Caff | I* | |||||||||||
| DHA (3) | STD (3) | 5uM | Ambient | Caff | I* | |||||||||||
| O'Neill, 2002 | Rat, ND ventricular | ND Free | EPA (46) | STD (46) | 10uM | Ambient | Ca2+ | D* | NC | DNDBas | ||||||
| EPA (12) | STD (12) | 10uM | Ambient | Caff | NC | |||||||||||
| Pepe, 1994 | Rat, young adult, cardiac | 4 min Free | DHA (6) | STD (6) | 5uM | Ambient | None | NC | ||||||||
| DHA (6) | STD (6) | 5uM | Ambient | NIT | B* | B* | ||||||||||
| DHA (6) | STD (6) | 5uM | Ambient | BAY | B* | B* | ||||||||||
| DHA (6) | STD (6) | 5uM | Ambient | ISO | NC | |||||||||||
| Rinaldi, 2002 | Rat, adult, ventricular | 20 min vs 3 d Free | DHA+KCl (9) | DHA+KCL (9) | 10uM | Ambient | KCl | D*mag of I | ||||||||
| DHA (9) | DHA (9) | 10uM | Ambient | KCl | D** mag of I | |||||||||||
| DHA (9) | DHA (9) | 10uM | Anoxia | None | D** | |||||||||||
| DHA (9) | DHA (9) | 10uM | Anoxia | KCl | D** | |||||||||||
| DHA (9) | DHA (9) | 10uM | Anoxia | ET-1 | D** | |||||||||||
| 20 min free | DHA+ ET-1 (9) | STD (9) | 10uM | Ambient | ET-1 | I** | ||||||||||
| DHA (9) | STD (9) | 10uM | Ambient | ET-1 | D**mag of I | |||||||||||
| DHA (9) | STD (9) | 10uM | Ambient | None | NCbas | |||||||||||
| DHA +KCl (9) | STD (9) | 10uM | Ambient | KCl | I*** | |||||||||||
| DHA (9) | STD (9) | 10uM | Ambient | KCl | D**mag of I | |||||||||||
| DHA+ET-1 (9) | STD (9) | 10uM | Ambient | ET-1 | D**mag of I | |||||||||||
| DHA (9) | STD (9) | 10uM | Ambient | ET-1 | D**mag of I | |||||||||||
| DHA (9) | STD (9) | 10uM | Anoxia | None | D**mag of I | |||||||||||
| DHA (9) | STD (9) | 10uM | Anoxia | KCl | D** | |||||||||||
| DHA (9) | STD (9) | 10uM | Anoxia | ET-1 | D** | |||||||||||
| 3 d Free | DHA (9) | STD (9) | 10uM | Ambient | None | NCbas | ||||||||||
| DHA+KCl (9) | STD (9) | 10uM | Ambient | KCl | I*** | |||||||||||
| DHA (9) | STD (9) | 10uM | Ambient | KCl | D**mag of I | |||||||||||
| DHA (9) | STD (9) | 10uM | Anoxia | None | D** | |||||||||||
| DHA (9) | STD (9) | 10uM | Anoxia | KCl | D** | |||||||||||
| DHA (9) | STD (9) | 10uM | Anoxia | ET-1 | D** | |||||||||||
| Rodrigo, 1999 | Rat, adult, SSP ventricular | 10 min Free | EPA (5) | STD (5) | 5uM | Ambient | Ca2+ | D* | ||||||||
| EPA (5) | STD (5) | 10uM | Ambient | Ca2+ | D* | |||||||||||
| Vitelli, 2002 | Rat, adult, ventricular | 20 min Free | DHA (ND) | STD (ND) | 10uM | Ambient | Ca2+ free KRB | NCbas | ||||||||
| DHA (ND) | STD (ND) | 10uM | Ambient | CaCl2 KRB | NCbas | |||||||||||
| DHA+ DXR (ND) | STD+ DXR (ND) | 10uM | Ambient | DXR+ Ca2+ free KRB | D** | I* | ||||||||||
| DHA+ DXR (ND) | STD (ND) | 10uM | Ambient | DXR+ Ca2+ free KRB | NC | |||||||||||
| DHA+ DXR (ND) | DHA (ND) | 10uM | Ambient | DXR+ Ca2+ free KRB | NC | |||||||||||
| DHA+ DXR (9) | STD+ DXR (9) | 10uM | Ambient | DXR+ CaCl2 KRB | D** | I* | ||||||||||
| DHA+ DXR (9) | STD (9) | 10uM | Ambient | DXR+ CaCl2 KRB | NC | |||||||||||
| DHA+ DXR (9) | DHA (9) | 10uM | Ambient | DXR+ CaCl2 KRB | NC | |||||||||||
| DHA (9) | STD (9) | 10uM | Ambient | Caff+ CaCl2 free KRB | D** | I* | ||||||||||
| DHA+ DXR (9) | STD (9) | 10uM | Ambient | Caff+CaCl2 free KRB | NC | |||||||||||
| DHA (9) | STD (9) | 10uM | Ambient | Caff+ CaCl2 KRB | D** | I* | ||||||||||
| DHA+ DXR (9) | STD (9) | 10uM | Ambient | Caff+CaCl2 KRB | NC | |||||||||||
| Xiao, 1997 | Rat, adult ventricular | ND Free | EPA (ND) | STD (ND) | 1.5uM | Ambient | None | D**calcium transients | ||||||||
| EPA (ND) | STD (ND) | 15uM | Ambient | None | D**calcium transients | |||||||||||
| Hallaq, 1990 | Rat, neonatal, cardiac | 3–5d Boudn | EPA (8) | STD (8) | 5uM | Ambient | None | NC | ||||||||
| 3–5d Bound | EPA (3) | STD (3) | 5uM | Ambient | OUA (1um) | NC | ||||||||||
| 3–5d Bound | EPA (5) | STD (5) | 5uM | Ambient | OUA (0.1m M) | D*** | ||||||||||
| 3–5d Bound | EPA (10) | STD (10) | 5uM | Ambient | OUA (0.1m M) | NC NaK | ||||||||||
| 3–5d Bound | EPA (11) | STD (11) | 5uM | Ambient | BUME | NC NaK | ||||||||||
| 3–5d Bound | EPA (8) | STD (8) | 5uM | Ambient | OUA+ BUME | NC NaK | ||||||||||
| Rat, neonatal, ventricular | 4d Bound | DHA (4–11) | STD (4–11) | 5uM | Ambient | OUA | B* I | |||||||||
| 4d Bound | DHA (5–14) | STD (5–14) | 5uM | Ambient | NIT | BNDD | ||||||||||
| 4d Bound | DHA+NIT (5–14) | DHA (5–14) | 5uM | Ambient | NIT | NC | ||||||||||
| 4d Bound | DHA (5–14) | STD (5–14) | 5uM | Ambient | BAY | BNDI | ||||||||||
| 4d Bound | DHA+ BAY (5–14) | DHA (5–14) | 5uM | Ambient | BAY | NC | ||||||||||
| 4d Bound | DHA (5–14) | STD (5–14) | 5uM | Ambient | OUA + NIT | BND D | ||||||||||
| 4d Bound | DHA +OUA + NIT (5–14) | DHA (5–14) | 5uM | Ambient | OUA + NIT | NC | ||||||||||
| 4d Bound | DHA+Bay+NIT (5–14) | STD+Bay+NIT | 5uM | Ambient | BAY + NIT | BND | ||||||||||
| 4d Bound | DHA+Bay+NIT (5–14) | DHA (5–14) | 5uM | Ambient | BAY + NIT | NC | ||||||||||
| 4d Bound | EPA (5–14) | STD (5–14) | 5uM | Ambient | NIT | BND | ||||||||||
| 4d Bound | EPA+NIT (5–14) | EPA (5–14) | 5uM | Ambient | NIT | NC | ||||||||||
| 4d Bound | EPA (5–14) | STD (5–14) | 5uM | Ambient | BAY | BND I | ||||||||||
| 4d Bound | EPA+BAY (5–14) | EPA (5–14) | 5uM | Ambient | BAY | NC | ||||||||||
| 4d Bound | EPA (5–14) | STD (5–14) | 5uM | Ambient | OUA + NIT | BND D | ||||||||||
| 4d Bound | EPA +OUA + NIT (5–14) | EPA (5–14) | 5uM | Ambient | OUA + NIT | NC | ||||||||||
| 4d Bound | EPA+Bay+NIT (5–14) | STD+Bay+NiIT | 5uM | Ambient | BAY + NIT | BND D | ||||||||||
| 4d Bound | EPA+Bay+NIT (5–14) | EPA (5–14) | 5uM | Ambient | BAY + NIT | NC | ||||||||||
| Rodrigo, 1999 | Guinea pig, adult, SSP ventricular | 10 min Free | EPA (5) | STD (5) | 5uM | Ambient | Ca2+ | D* | ||||||||
| DOG | ||||||||||||||||
| Philipson, 1985 | Dog, adult, ventricular SR vesicles | 1.5 sec Free | ALA (9) | STD (9) | 30uM | Ambient | Ca2+ | I*NaCa exchange | ||||||||
| 2 min Free | ALA (3) | STD (3) | 20uM | Ambient | Pre-loaded Ca2+ | I* SL pass Ca efflux | ||||||||||
| Philipson, 1987 | Dog, adult, ventricular SR vesicles | 1.5 sec Free | ALA (3) | STD (3) | 60uM | Ambient | Ca2+ | I*NaCa exchange | ||||||||
| 2 min Free | ALA (4) | STD (4) | 30uM | Ambient | Pre-loaded Ca2+ | I* SL pass Ca efflux | ||||||||||
| Goel, 2002 | Pig, adult ventricular SR vesicles | 90+/-30s Free | ALA (3–5) | STD (3–5) | 50uM | Ambient | None | NCNa/H exchange | ||||||||
| DHA (3–5) | STD (3–4) | 50uM | Ambient | Na+ | D*Na/H exchange | |||||||||||
| EPA (3–5) | STD (3–5) | 10uM | Ambient | None | NCNa/H exchange | |||||||||||
| EPA (3–5) | STD (3–5) | 25uM | Ambient | None | NCNa/H exchange | |||||||||||
| EPA (3–6) | STD (3–6) | 50uM | Ambient | None | D*Na/H exchaange | NCpass NA efflux | ||||||||||
| EPA (3–5) | STD (3–5) | 100uM | Ambient | None | D*Na/H exchaange | |||||||||||
| DHA (3–5) | STD (3–5) | 10uM | Ambient | None | NCNa/H exchange | |||||||||||
| DHA (3–5) | STD (3–5) | 25uM | Ambient | None | D*Na/H exchange | |||||||||||
| DHA (3–5) | STD (3–5) | 50uM | Ambient | None | D*Na/H exchange | NCpass NA efflux | ||||||||||
| DHA (3–5) | STD (3–5) | 100uM | Ambient | None | D*Na/H exchange | |||||||||||
Cys=cytopsolic; SR=sarcoplasmic reticulum; D=decrease; I=increase; NC=no change; ND=no data;
=p<0.05;
=p<0.01;
=p<0.001
ALA=alpha linoleric acud
B=blocked
Bas=baseline
BAY=Bay K8644
BUME=bumetamide
Caff=caffeine
D=decrease