Figure 1.1 Classical omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acid synthesis pathways and the role of omega-3 fatty acid in regulating health/disease markers
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), through its Evidence-based Practice Centers (EPCs), sponsors the development of evidence reports and technology assessments to assist public- and private-sector organizations in their efforts to improve the quality of health care in the United States. This report on Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acids on Lipids and Glycemic Control in Type II Diabetes and the Metabolic Syndrome and on Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Renal Disease, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, and Osteoporosis was requested and funded by the Office of Dietary Supplements, National Institutes of Health, through the EPC Program at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The reports and assessments provide organizations with comprehensive, science-based information on common, costly medical conditions and new health care technologies. The EPCs systematically review the relevant scientific literature on topics assigned to them by AHRQ and conduct additional analyses when appropriate prior to developing their reports and assessments.
To bring the broadest range of experts into the development of evidence reports and health technology assessments, AHRQ encourages the EPCs to form partnerships and enter into collaborations with other medical and research organizations. The EPCs work with these partner organizations to ensure that the evidence reports and technology assessments they produce will become building blocks for health care quality improvement projects throughout the Nation. The reports undergo peer review prior to their release.
AHRQ expects that the EPC evidence reports and technology assessments will inform individual health plans, providers, and purchasers as well as the health care system as a whole by providing important information to help improve health care quality.
We welcome written comments on this evidence report. They may be sent to: Director, Center for Outcomes and Evidence, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 540 Gaither Road, Rockville, MD 20850.
Carolyn M. Clancy, M.D.
Director
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Paul Coates, Ph.D.
Director, Office of Dietary Supplements
National Institutes of Health
Jean Slutsky, P.A., M.S.P.H.
Acting Director, Center for Outcomes and Evidence
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
The authors of this report are responsible for its content. Statements in the report should not be construed as endorsement by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services of a particular drug, device, test, treatment, or other clinical service.
We thank Herbert D. Woolf, PhD, of BASF Corporation for providing us with unpublished data on omega-3 fatty acids. We thank Antonio LaCava, MD, PhD for providing translation of Italian studies, Takahiro Higashi, MD for providing translation of Japanese studies, Markus Rihl, MD for providing translation of German studies, and Anna Maria Björnsdotter, BA, for providing translation of Swedish studies.
Chapter 1 was written in collaboration with the Tufts-New England Medical Center Evidence-based Practice Center.
Context: Clinical trials report differing effects of omega-3 fatty acids on lipids and glycemic control in type II diabetes and the metabolic syndrome and on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), rheumatic arthritis, renal disease, systemic lupus erythemosus (SLE), and osteoporosis.
Objectives: To assess the effect of omega-3 fatty acids on 1) total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and insulin resistance in type-II diabetes and the metabolic syndrome, 2) clinical score, sigmoidoscopic score, histologic score and requirement for immunosuppressive therapy in IBD, 3) pain, swollen and tender joint counts, acute phase reactants, patient global assessment, and requirement for anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive therapy in rheumatoid arthritis, 4) renal function, progression to end-stage renal disease, hemodialysis graft patency, mortality, and requirement for immunosuppressive therapy in renal disease, 5) disease activity, damage, patient's perception of disease activity, and requirement for immunosuppressive therapy in SLE, and 6) bone mineral density and fracture rates.
Data Sources: We searched on-line databases to identify potentially relevant studies and contacted industry experts for unpublished data.
Study Selection: We screened 4,212 titles, reviewed 1,097 articles, and included 83 articles. We restricted to randomized controlled trials (RCTs), but included case-control and cohort studies for bone/fracture. We had no language restrictions.
Data Extraction: We abstracted data on study design, study population, and outcomes; source, amount, and duration of omega-3 fatty acid consumption; and randomization, dropouts, blinding, and allocation for RCTs.
Data Synthesis: We performed meta-analyses for diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and IBD; and qualitative analyses for the other conditions.
For diabetes, omega-3 fatty acids had a favorable effect on triglyceride levels but no significant effect on total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, fasting blood sugar, or glycosylated hemoglobin. There was no effect on plasma insulin or insulin resistance in type II diabetics or the metabolic syndrome.
For IBD, omega-3 fatty acids had variable effects on clinical score, sigmoidoscopic score, histologic score, induced remission, and relapse, and no effect on the relative risk of relapse in ulcerative colitis. There was a statistically non-significant reduction in requirement for corticosteroids. No studies evaluated requirement for other immunosuppressive agents.
For rheumatoid arthritis, omega-3 fatty acids had no effect on patient report of pain, swollen joint count, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, and patient's global assessment. There was no effect on joint damage, contrary to a previous meta-analysis. There was a reduced requirement for anti-inflammatory drugs or corticosteroids. No studies assessed requirements for disease modifying antirheumatic drugs.
For renal disease, omega-3 fatty acids had varying effects on serum creatinine and creatinine clearance. Single studies respectively demonstrated reduced progression to end-stage renal disease and improvements on hemodialysis graft patencyrelative. No studies assessed requirements for corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive drugs.
For SLE, omega-3 fatty acids had variable effects on clinical activity. No studies assessed the effect on end organ damage, patient perception of disease, or requirements for other immunosuppressive drugs. One study showed no effect on corticosteroid requirements.
For bone mineral density, the effect of omega-3 fatty acids was variable. No studies assessed the effect on fracture.
Conclusions: The evidence for effects of omega-3 fatty acids on outcomes in the conditions assessed varies greatly. Omega-3 fatty acids appear to reduce serum triglycerides among type II diabetics, but have no effect on total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol. There appears to be no effect on most clinical outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis, although tender joint count may be reduced. There are insufficient data to draw conclusions about IBD, renal disease, SLE, bone density or fractures, requirement for anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive drugs, or insulin resistance among type II diabetics.
This report is one of a group of evidence reports prepared by three Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)-funded Evidence-Based Practice Centers (EPCs) on the role of omega-3 fatty acids (both from food sources and from dietary supplements) in the prevention or treatment of a variety of diseases. These reports were requested and funded by the Office of Dietary Supplements, National Institutes of Health. The three EPCs – the Southern California EPC (SCEPC, based at RAND), the Tufts-New England Medical Center (NEMC) EPC, and the University of Ottawa EPC – have each produced evidence reports. To ensure consistency of approach, the three EPCs collaborated on selected methodological elements, including literature search strategies, rating of evidence, and data table design.
The aim of these reports is to summarize the current evidence on the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases, cancer, child and maternal health, eye health, gastrointestinal/renal diseases, asthma, immune-mediated diseases, tissue/organ transplantation, mental health, and neurological diseases and conditions. In addition to informing the research community and the public on the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on various health conditions, it is anticipated that the findings of the reports will also be used to help define the agenda for future research.
This report focuses on the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on immune-mediated diseases, bone metabolism, and gastrointestinal/renal diseases. Subsequent reports from the SCEPC will focus on cancer and neurological diseases and conditions.
This chapter provides a brief review of the current state of knowledge about the metabolism, physiological functions, and sources of omega-3 fatty acids.
Dietary fat has long been recognized as an important source of energy for mammals, but in the late 1920s, researchers demonstrated the dietary requirement for particular fatty acids, which came to be called essential fatty acids. It was not until the advent of intravenous feeding, however, that the importance of essential fatty acids was widely accepted: Clinical signs of essential fatty acid deficiency are generally observed only in patients on total parenteral nutrition who received mixtures devoid of essential fatty acids or in those with malabsorption syndromes. These signs include dermatitis and changes in visual and neural function. Over the past 40 years, an increasing number of physiological functions, such as immunomodulation, have been attributed to the essential fatty acids and their metabolites, and this area of research remains quite active.1, 2
The fat found in foods consists largely of a heterogeneous mixture of triacylglycerols (triglycerides)--glycerol molecules that are each combined with three fatty acids. The fatty acids can be divided into two categories, based on chemical properties: saturated fatty acids, which are usually solid at room temperature, and unsaturated fatty acids, which are liquid at room temperature. The term “saturation” refers to a chemical structure in which each carbon atom in the fatty acyl chain is bound to (saturated with) four other atoms, these carbons are linked by single bonds, and no other atoms or molecules can attach; unsaturated fatty acids contain at least one pair of carbon atoms linked by a double bond, which allows the attachment of additional atoms to those carbons (resulting in saturation). Despite their differences in structure, all fats contain approximately the same amount of energy (37 kilojoules/gram, or 9 kilocalories/gram).
Note: Appendixes and Evidence Tables are provided electronically at
The class of unsaturated fatty acids can be further divided into monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids. Monounsaturated fatty acids (the primary constituents of olive and canola oils) contain only one double bond. Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) (the primary constituents of corn, sunflower, flax seed and many other vegetable oils) contain more than one double bond. Fatty acids are often referred to using the number of carbon atoms in the acyl chain, followed by a colon, followed by the number of double bonds in the chain (e.g., 18:1 refers to the 18-carbon monounsaturated fatty acid, oleic acid; 18:3 refers to any 18-carbon PUFA with three double bonds).
| Names | Abbreviations | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trivial | IUPAC* | Carboxyl-reference | Omega-reference | Other |
| Linolenic acid | 9,12,15-octadecenoic acid | 18:3Δ9 12 15 | 18:3n-3 | ALA |
| 18:3 (ω-3) | α-LA | |||
| LNA | ||||
| α-LNA | ||||
| Docosahexaenoic acid | 4,8,12,15,19- docosahexaenoic acid | 22:6Δ4 8 12 15 19 | 22:6n-3 | DHA |
| 22:6 (ω-3) | ||||
| Docosapentaenoic acid | 7,10,13,16,19- docosapentaenoic acid | 22:5Δ7 10 13 16 19 | 22:5n-3 | DPA |
| 22:5 (ω-3) | ||||
| Eicosapentaenoic acid | 5,8,11,14,17- eicosapentaenoic acid | 20:5Δ5 8 11 14 17 | 20:5n-3 | EPA |
| Icosapentaenoic acid | 20:5 (ω-3) | |||
| Timnodonic acid | ||||
IUPAC=International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry
Finally, PUFAs can be categorized according to their chain length. The 18-carbon n-3 and n-6 short-chain PUFAs are precursors to the longer 20- and 22-carbon PUFAs, called long-chain PUFAs (LCPUFAs).
Mammalian cells can introduce double bonds into all positions on the fatty acid chain except the n-3 and n-6 position. Thus, the short-chain alpha-linolenic acid (ALA, chemical abbreviation: 18:3n-3) and linoleic acid (LA, chemical abbreviation: 18:2n-6) are essential fatty acids. No other fatty acids found in food are considered ‘essential’ for humans, because they can all be synthesized from the short chain fatty acids.
Following ingestion, ALA and LA can be converted in the liver to the long chain, more-unsaturated n-3 and n-6 LCPUFAs by a complex set of synthetic pathways that share several enzymes (Figure 1
The omega-6 fatty acid LA is converted to gamma-linolenic acid (GLA, 18:3n-6), an omega-6 fatty acid that is a positional isomer of ALA. GLA, in turn, can be converted to the longer-chain omega-6 fatty acid, arachidonic acid (AA, 20:4n-6). AA is the precursor for certain classes of an important family of hormone-like substances called the eicosanoids (see below).
The omega-3 fatty acid ALA (18:3n-3) can be converted to the long-chain omega-3 fatty acid, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA; 20:5n-3). EPA can be elongated to docosapentaenoic acid (DPA 22:5n-3), which is further desaturated to docosahexaenoic acid (DHA; 22:6n-3). EPA and DHA are also precursors of several classes of eicosanoids and are known to play several other critical roles, some of which are discussed further below.
The conversion from parent fatty acids into the LC PUFAs - EPA, DHA, and AA - appears to occur slowly in humans. In addition, the regulation of conversion is not well understood, although it is known that ALA and LA compete for entry into the metabolic pathways.
As stated earlier, fatty acids play a variety of physiological roles. The specific biological functions of a fatty acid are determined by the number and position of double bonds and the length of the acyl chain.
Both EPA (20:5n-3) and AA (20:4n-6) are precursors for the formation of a family of hormone-like agents called eicosanoids. Eicosanoids are rudimentary hormones or regulating -molecules that appear to occur in most forms of life. However, unlike endocrine hormones, which travel in the blood stream to exert their effects at distant sites, the eicosanoids are autocrine or paracrine factors, which exert their effects locally – in the cells that synthesize them or adjacent cells. Processes affected include the movement of calcium and other substances into and out of cells, relaxation and contraction of muscles, inhibition and promotion of clotting, regulation of secretions including digestive juices and hormones, and control of fertility, cell division, and growth.3
EPA (22:6 n-3) also affects lipoprotein metabolism and decreases the production of substances - including cytokine, interleukin 1β (IL-1β), and tumor necrosis factor a (TNF-a) - that have pro-inflammatory effects (such as stimulation of collagenase synthesis and the expression of adhesion molecules necessary for leukocyte extravasation [movement from the circulatory system into tissued]) 2 The mechanism responsible for the suppression of cytokine production by omega-3 LC PUFAs remains unknown, although suppression of omega-6-derived eicosanoid production by omega-3 fatty acids may be involved, because the omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids compete for a common enzyme in the eicosanoid synthetic pathway, delta-6 desaturase.
DPA (22:5n-3) (the elongation product of EPA) and its metabolite DHA (22:6n-3) are frequently referred to as very long chain n-3 fatty acids (VLCFA). Along with AA, DHA is the major PUFA found in the brain and is thought to be important for brain development and function. Recent research has focused on this role and the effect of supplementing infant formula with DHA (since DHA is naturally present in breast milk but not in formula).
Both ALA and LA are present in a variety of foods. LA is present in high concentrations in many commonly used oils, including safflower, sunflower, soy, and corn oil. ALA is present in some commonly used oils, including canola and soybean oil, and in some leafy green vegetables.
| Food/supplement | EPA | DHA | DPA | ALA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20:5n-3 | 22:6n-3 | 22:5n-3 | 18:3n-3 | |
| Foods in which Total Omega-3 Fatty Acids account for more than 50% of Total PUFA | ||||
| Fish | ||||
| Anchovy | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
| Halibut | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
| Herring | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
| Mackerel | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
| Salmon | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
| Sardine | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
| Tuna Canned, waterpacked | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
| Fresh Bluefin | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
| Oils/Supplements | ||||
| Cod liver oils | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
| Coromega * | ![]() | ![]() | ||
| Fish oil capsules* | ![]() | ![]() | ||
| Flaxseed/linseed oil* | ![]() | |||
| Herring oil | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
| MaxEPA* | ![]() | ![]() | ||
| Menhaden oil | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
| Neuromins* | ![]() | |||
| Omacor* | ![]() | ![]() | ||
| Ropufa* | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
| Salmon oil | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
| Sardine oil | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
| Seeds | ||||
| Flaxseeds/Linseeds | ![]() | |||
| Foods/Supplements in which total Omega 3 fatty acids are 10–50% of total PUFA | ||||
| Oils | ||||
| Black currant oil | ![]() | |||
| Canola oil** | ![]() | |||
| Mustard seed oils | ![]() | |||
| Soybean oil | ![]() | |||
| Walnut oil | ![]() | |||
| Wheat germ oil | ![]() | |||
| Other foods | ||||
| Wheat germ | ![]() | |||
| Human milk | ![]() | |||
| Foods/Supplements in which total Omega 3 fatty acids are less than 10% of total PUFA | ||||
| Efamol Marine* | ![]() | ![]() | ||
| Soybeans | ![]() | |||
| Walnuts | ![]() | |||
Dietary Supplement
Also called rapeseed oil
| EPA+DHA | ALA | EPA+DHA | ALA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fish (3oz. Cooked) | Oils (1 Tbs.) | ||||
| Anchovy | ![]() | Canola | ![]() | ||
| Halibut | ![]() | Cod liver | ![]() | ||
| Herring, Atlantic | ![]() | Flaxseed/linseed | ![]() | ||
Pacific | ![]() | Herring | ![]() | ||
| Mackerel, Atlantic | ![]() | Menhaden | ![]() | ||
Pacific | ![]() | Salmon | ![]() | ||
| Salmon, Atlantic** | ![]() | Sardine | ![]() | ||
| Sardines | ![]() | Soybean | ![]() | ||
| Trout, Rainbow | ![]() | Walnut | ![]() | ||
| Tuna, Albacore |
| Wheat germ |
| ||
Canned light, water-packed |
| ||||
Canned white, water-packed |
| ||||
Fresh Bluefin | ![]() | ||||
| Organ Meats (3 oz. Cooked) | Seeds | ||||
| Brain, lamb | ![]() | Flaxseeds/linseeds (1 Tbs.) | ![]() | ||
| Brain, pork | ![]() | ||||
| Thymus, calf | ![]() | ||||
| Other Foods | |||||
| Caviar (1 oz.)# | ![]() | ||||
| Human breast milk (1c)# | ![]() | ||||
| Soybeans, cooked (1/2c) | ![]() | ||||
| Tofu, regular (1/2c) | ![]() | ||||
| Walnuts (1/4c) | ![]() | ||||
| Wheat germ (1/4c)# | ![]() | ||||
Source: Figures adapted from USDA, 2003; *Foods that provide (per serving) 10% or more of the Adequate Intake (AI) for ALA or the Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Range (AMDR) for EPA and DHA (10% of the AMDR for ALA); an AI is a recommended average daily intake level based on observed or experimentally determined estimates of nutrient intake by a group of apparently healthy people (thus, assumed to be adequate) when an RDA cannot be determined; an AMDR is defined as “a range of intakes for a particular energy source that is associated with reduced risk of chronic disease while providing adequate intake of essential nutrients.”5
# Standard serving size not established; **Farm-raised Atlantic salmon have nearly identical omega-3 fatty acid levels to wild Atlantic salmon and significantly more omega-3 fatty acids than wild Pacific salmon.
| Grams/day | Percent energy intake/day | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SEM | Median (range)** | Mean ± SEM | Median (range)** | |
| LA (18:2n-6) | 14.1 ± 0.2 | 9.9 (0 – 168) | 5.79 ± 0.05 | 5.30 (0 – 39.4) |
| ALA (18:3n-3) | 1.33 ± 0.02 | 0.90 (0 – 17) | 0.55 ± 0.004 | 0.48 (0 – 4.98) |
| EPA (20:5n-3) | 0.04 ± 0.003 | 0.00 (0 – 4.1) | 0.02 ± 0.001 | 0.00 (0 – 0.61) |
| DHA (22:6n-3) | 0.07 ± 0.004 | 0.00 (0 – 7.8) | 0.03 ± 0.002 | 0.00 (0 – 2.86) |
*Based on analysis of a single 24-hour dietary recall from NHANES III data; **Distributions are not adjusted for the over-sampling of Mexican –Americans, non-Hispanic African Americans, children 5 years old and under, and adults 60 years and over in the NHANES III dataset.
| Mean (gms/d) (± SEM)** | Range of Means (gms/d) (±SEM) | Median (gms/d) (± SEM)** | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LA (18:2n-6) | 13.0 ± 0.1 | 6.7 ± 0.1-17.6 ± 0.5 | 12.0 ± 0.1 |
| Total n-3 FA | 1.40 ± 0.01 | 0.72 ± 0.02 – 1.86 ± 0.04 | 1.30 ± 0.01 |
| ALA (18:3n-3) | 1.30 ± 0.01 | 0.72 ± 0.02 – 1.73 ± 0.04 | 1.21 ± 0.01 |
| EPA (20:5n-3) | 0.028 | 0.002 – 0.049 | 0.004 |
| DPA (22:5n-3) | 0.013 | 0.001 – 0.019 | 0.005 |
| DHA (22:6n-3) | 0.057 ± 0.018 | < 0.0005 ± 0.001 | 0.046 ± 0.013 |
Source: Adapted from Dietary Reference Intakes Report;5 *Estimates are based on respondents’ intakes on the first day of survey and were adjusted using the Iowa State University method; **For all individuals.
Lacking sufficient evidence from research on the effects or correction of dietary deficiencies to establish Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDAs) for the essential fatty acids, the Food and Nutrition Board (FNB) of the Institute of Medicine5 has set adequate intakes2 (AI) for the essential fatty acids, based on the average intakes of healthy CSFII participants. The AIs for the essential fatty acids vary by age group and sex, as well as for particular conditions such as pregnancy and breastfeeding. For ALA, the AI for men 19 and older, is 1.6 grams/day and the AI for (non-pregnant, non-breastfeeding) women is 1.1 grams/day. The AI for LA is 17 grams/day for men and 11 grams/day for women.
| Food item | EPA | DHA | ALA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fish (Rawa) | |||
| Anchovy, European | 0.6 | 0.9 | - |
| Bass, Freshwater, Mixed Sp. | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
| Bass, Striped | 0.2 | 0.6 | trace |
| Bluefish | 0.2 | 0.5 | - |
| Carp | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 |
| Catfish, Channel | trace | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Cod, Atlantic | trace | 0.1 | trace |
| Cod, Pacific | trace | 0.1 | trace |
| Eel, Mixed Sp. | trace | trace | 0.4 |
| Flounder & Sole Sp. | trace | 0.1 | trace |
| Grouper, Mixed Sp. | trace | 0.2 | trace |
| Haddock | trace | 0.1 | trace |
| Halibut, Atlantic and Pacific | trace | 0.3 | trace |
| Halibut, Greenland | 0.5 | 0.4 | trace |
| Herring, Atlantic | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.1 |
| Herring, Pacific | 1.0 | 0.7 | trace |
| Mackerel, Atlantic | 0.9 | 1.4 | 0.2 |
| Mackerel, Pacific and Jack | 0.6 | 0.9 | trace |
| Mullet, Striped | 0.2 | 0.1 | trace |
| Ocean Perch, Atlantic | trace | 0.2 | trace |
| Tuna, Fresh, Yellowfin | trace | 0.2 | trace |
| Tuna, Light, Canned in Oil e | trace | 0.1 | trace |
| Tuna, Light, Canned in Water e | trace | 0.2 | trace |
| Tuna, White, Canned in Oil e | trace | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Tuna, White, Canned in Water e | 0.2 | 0.6 | trace |
| Whitefish, Mixed Sp. | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.2 |
| Whitefish, Mixed Sp., Smoked | trace | 0.2 | - |
| Wolf fish, Atlantic | 0.4 | 0.3 | trace |
| Shellfish (Raw) | |||
| Abalone, Mixed Sp. | trace | - | - |
| Clam, Mixed Sp. | trace | trace | trace |
| Crab, Blue | 0.2 | 0.2 | - |
| Crayfish, Mixed Sp., Farmed | trace | 0.1 | trace |
| Lobster, Northern | - | - | - |
| Mussel, Blue | 0.2 | 0.3 | trace |
| Oyster, Eastern, Farmed | 0.2 | 0.2 | trace |
| Oyster, Eastern, Wild | 0.3 | 0.3 | trace |
| Oyster, Pacific | 0.4 | 0.3 | trace |
Studies show that tissue levels of AA and EPA-derived eicosanoids influence many physiological processes, including platelet aggregation, vessel wall constriction, and immune cell function (IOM), resulting in protection against heart attack and stroke as well as certain inflammatory diseases like arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and asthma. Epidemiological studies have suggested that groups of people who consume diets high in omega 3 FAs may experience a lower prevalence of these conditions, and many small trials have attempted to assess the effects of adding omega 3 fatty acids to the diet, either as omega-3 FA-rich foods or as dietary supplements (primarily fish oils). In addition, dietary omega 3FA have been found to increase calcium absorption, rates of bone formation, and bone strength in rodents and birds. In response to this evidence, a number of omega-3 FA-containing dietary supplements that claim to protect against a variety of conditions have appeared on the market. Thus, AHRQ and the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements have requested a synthesis of the research to date on the health effects of diets rich in omega-3 FA.
The remainder of this report is organized into four chapters. Chapter Two describes the methods we used to identify and review studies related to the role of omega-3 fatty acids in immune-mediated diseases, bone metabolism, and gastrointestinal/renal diseases. Chapter Three presents our findings related to the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on those diseases/conditions. Chapter Four presents our conclusions and recommendations for future research in this area.
The topic of this report was nominated by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS). The three participating Evidence-Based Practice Centers (EPCs) were asked to examine the effects of omega-3 fatty acids, in general, and on the following conditions: Cardiovascular Disease, Transplantation, Immune-Mediated Diseases, Gastrointestinal/Renal Diseases, Cancer, Neurology, Asthma, Child/Maternal Health, Eye Health, and Mental Health. The Southern California EPC (SCEPC) was responsible for examining Immune-Mediated Diseases and Gastrointestinal/Renal Diseases in Year 1 of the project and Cancer and Neurology in Year 2 of the project.
The methodology that we used for this study included the following:
Refining the preliminary questions provided by AHRQ,
Convening a technical expert panel to advise the SCEPC on the study,
Identifying sources of evidence in the scientific literature,
Establishing inclusion/exclusion criteria for the articles identified in the scientific literature,
Identifying potential evidence with attention to controlled clinical trials using omega-3 fatty acids,
Evaluating potential evidence for methodological quality and relevance,
Extracting data from studies meeting methodological and clinical criteria,
Synthesizing the results,
Performing further statistical analysis on selected studies,
Performing pooled analyses where appropriate,
Submitting the results to technical experts for peer review,
Incorporating reviewers' comments into a final report for submission to AHRQ.
Preliminary questions for the project were developed by ODS in collaboration with the following NIH Institutes: (a) National Cancer Institute (NCI); (b) National Eye Institute (NEI); (c) National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI); (d) National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA); (e) National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); (f) National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS); (g) National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD); (h) National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK); (i) National Institute of Mental Health; and (j) National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS).
Note: Appendixes and Evidence Tables cited in this report are provided electronically at http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcindex.htm
The general and disease-specific questions that were originally proposed are detailed in Appendix A.1, “Methodologic Approach.”
Each AHRQ evidence report is guided by a Technical Expert Panel (TEP). The TEP advises the SCEPC on refining the preliminary questions, determining the proper inclusion/exclusion criteria for the study and the populations of interest, establishing the proper outcomes measures, and conducting the appropriate analyses.
We convened three TEPs that focused on the following conditions: 1) rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosis (SLE), and bone density/osteoporosis; 2) renal disease and diabetes; and 3) gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. The TEPs were composed of distinguished basic scientists and clinicians, with established expertise in the following areas: omega-3 fatty acids, human nutrition, dietary assessment methods, gastroenterology, nephrology, diabetes, osteoporosis, immunology, and rheumatology. In addition to the experts that we identified, AHRQ and the relevant NIH Institute(s) recommended a number of industry experts. The members of our technical expert panels and a summary of their key comments and recommendations are listed in Appendix A.2.
Based on input from our three TEPs, the preliminary disease-specific questions were revised. Additionally, in consultation with the Task Order Officer and the other participating EPCs, we added several questions to our scope of work that had previously been assigned to the NEMC/EPC because they were related to topics we were reviewing. Similarly, a question that had been assigned to the SCEPC for year two was reassigned to the NEMC-EPC. Lastly, one additional question (pertaining to rheumatoid arthritis - number of tender joints) was suggested by a TEP member after reviewing the draft report and was assessed post-hoc. The questions that are addressed in this report are as follows:
What is the evidence in adults or children with a) type II diabetes, or b) insulin resistance/the metabolic syndrome for the efficacy of omega-3 fatty acids in treatment of:
total cholesterol
HDL cholesterol
LDL cholesterol
Triglycerides
What is the evidence in adults and children for an effect of omega-3 fatty acids on insulin sensitivity in a) type II diabetes, or b) the metabolic syndrome?
What is the evidence for the efficacy of omega-3 fatty acids in treatment of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis?
What is the evidence that in adults or children with inflammatory bowel disease, omega-3 fatty acids can replace steroids or other immunosuppressive drugs?
What is the evidence that the benefits of omega-3 fatty acids are influenced by the concomitant administration of various immunosuppressive agents in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease?
What is the evidence that in adults or children with rheumatoid arthritis, omega-3 fatty acids affect:
pain
number of swollen joints
disease activity
patient's global assessment
joint damage
number of tender joints
What is the evidence that in adults or children with rheumatoid arthritis, omega-3 fatty acids can replace other more potent anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive drugs such as steroids and NSAIDs?
What is the evidence that the benefits of omega-3 fatty acids are influenced by the concomitant administration of various immunosuppressive agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis?
What is the evidence for the efficacy of omega-3 fatty acids in treatment of renal inflammation and glomerulosclerosis?
What is the evidence that in adults or children with immune-mediated renal disease, omega-3 fatty acids can replace steroids or other immunosuppressive drugs?
What is the evidence that the benefits of omega-3 fatty acids are influenced by the concomitant administration of various immunosuppressive agents in the treatment of immune-mediated renal disease?
What is the evidence that in adults or children with systemic lupus erythematosus, omega-3 fatty acids affect disease activity, damage, or patient perceptions of outcomes?
What is the evidence that in adults or children with systemic lupus erythematosus, omega-3 fatty acids can replace steroids or other immunosuppressive drugs?
What is the evidence that the benefits of omega-3 fatty acids are influenced by the concomitant administration of various immunosuppressive agents in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus?
What is the evidence that omega-3 fatty acids help maintain bone mineral status?
For each of the study questions we also assessed 1) the effect of omega-3 fatty acids on sub-populations, 2) the effects of covariates, dose, source, and exposure duration on the outcomes of interest, and 3) the sustainment of effect.
In addition to assessing the efficacy of omega-3 fatty acids as specified above, we evaluated the data on adverse events that were reported in the studies we reviewed. We recognized, a priori, that adverse events are not reported in a standard way across clinical trials either in terms of the specific adverse events assessed or in the reporting of these adverse events. Hence, the purpose of this analysis was to define in general terms adverse events that occur with omega-3 fatty acids in order to identify specific adverse events that might warrant further investigation.
From each study, we extracted the number of adverse events reported for both intervention and placebo groups. We grouped the adverse events into the following categories:
Clinical bleeding
Gastrointestinal complaints or nausea
Diarrhea
Headache
Dermatological
Withdrawal due to adverse event
We calculated rates of adverse events within the intervention and placebo groups. Adverse event rates were calculated as the percentage of patients pooled across all conditions who had one of the adverse events. Reporting of adverse events varied greatly across studies. Many studies did not report on adverse events. If a study did not report on an adverse event (i.e. missing value), it was not used in that adverse event calculation. If a study reported not having an adverse event (i.e. adverse event rate of 0%), it was used in the calculation. Studies that did not specify the group allocation of the adverse events were excluded. We also excluded studies that reported the number of adverse events but did not report the group sample sizes.
Potential evidence for our study came from three sources: on-line library databases, the reference lists of all relevant articles, and industry experts.
Jessie McGowan, Senior Information Scientist, and Nancy Santesso, Knowledge Translation Specialist, at the University of Ottawa were responsible for developing a common search strategy for omega-3 fatty acids for the 3 participating EPCs. Nancy Santesso developed a core omega-3 search strategy in collaboration with project librarians, biochemists, nutritionists, and clinicians, who also provided biochemical names, abbreviations, food sources, and commercial product names for omega-3 fatty acids. The literature search was not restricted by language of publication or by study design, except with the MeSH term, “dietary fats,” in order to increase specificity. When possible, the searches were limited to studies involving human subjects. The core search strategy is detailed in Appendix A.3.
For the SCEPC, this core search strategy was incorporated into 6 specific searches that focused on our relevant disease categories: rheumatoid arthritis, bone density, SLE, renal disease, diabetes, and gastrointestinal diseases. The strategies for these searches are detailed in Appendix A.3.
The following databases were searched: Medline (1966-July, 2003), Premedline (July 8, 2003), Embase (1980-Week 27, 2003), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2nd Quarter, 2003), CAB Health (1973-June 2003), Dissertation Abstracts (1861-to December 2002). All of these databases were searched using the Ovid interface, except CAB Health, which was searched through SilverPlatter. Any duplicate records were identified and removed within each search question using Reference Manager software, except for the last update, which was imported into EndNote. The citations obtained from these literature searches were sent to the SCEPC via e-mail.
The citations were transferred to a secured Internet-based software system (termed D2D) that enabled us to view article titles and abstracts electronically. Two reviewers, Walter Mojica and James Pencharz, used the computerized software system to independently evaluate the citations and abstracts using the review form in Figure B.1, Appendix B, which was loaded onto the computerized system.
The reviewers flagged article titles that focused on omega-3 fatty acids and any of the following disease conditions: diabetes mellitus, inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease), rheumatoid arthritis, SLE, renal disease, osteoporosis, or bone mineral status. In addition, they flagged article titles that pertained to the disease conditions of the other participating EPCs (i.e., cardiovascular disease or asthma). Language was not a barrier to inclusion. Articles that either reviewer flagged were ordered, as well as those articles in which it was unclear from the title or abstract whether the article was relevant. The articles were ordered from the RAND library, the UCLA library, or Kessler-Hancock, a San Francisco-based literature retrieval firm with contacts around the world. The literature was tracked using ProCite and Access software.
In addition, we sent letters to industry experts recommended by the Office Dietary Supplements to obtain any unpublished data (Figure A.3.1).
For the articles that passed our screening criteria, two reviewers independently abstracted detailed data onto a specialized quality review form (QRF) (Figure B.3, Appendix B). Walter Mojica and Jennifer Grossman reviewed all of the articles except those pertaining to diabetes, which were reviewed by Walter Mojica and Puja Khanna. We consulted with several outside scientists to complete QRFs for foreign-language articles. The reviewers resolved differences through consensus, and a senior physician researcher resolved any disagreements that could not be resolved through this method.
The QRF included questions about the trial design; the outcomes of interest; the quality of the trial; the number and characteristics of the patients; details on the intervention, such as the dose, frequency, and duration; the types of outcome measures; adverse events; and the elapsed time between the intervention and outcome measurements.
We performed both a qualitative and quantitative synthesis of the evidence. We performed a meta-analysis for those studies that sufficiently assessed interventions, populations, and outcomes to justify pooling. For the remaining studies, we performed a qualitative analysis.
Our meta-analytic methods are sufficiently comparable across conditions and outcomes that we describe them in general in this section. Individual approaches and decisions are discussed as necessary and appropriate in the discussion of results for particular conditions and outcomes.
For each condition, we identified a set of relevant outcomes, e.g., cholesterol outcomes for the condition of diabetes, based on input from our TEP. Trials were considered for further analysis if they contained information on a chosen outcome collected within a follow-up interval for which measures were considered clinically comparable.
For some trials, several publications presented the same outcome data. In these cases, we picked the most informative of the duplicates; for example, if one publication was a conference abstract with preliminary data and the second was a full journal article, we chose the latter. The publications dropped for duplicate data do not appear in the evidence table but are noted in the results text. We note that multiple citations of the same article were removed at the title screening stage of the project.
In order for a trial to be included in further analysis, the associated publication(s) had to report on the outcome, and contain sufficient statistical information for the calculation of a summary statistic. A trial also had to provide data prior to the crossover point if the trial was a crossover design to mirror the data available from a non-crossover trial, i.e., to enable the inclusion of a treatment effect uncontaminated by other treatments. Had data been included after the cross-over, the uncontaminated placebo or control group outcome would not have been available for example.
Each trial contained one control or placebo group. Some trials contained more than one treatment (omega-3) group. In order not to double-count patients, we chose the most clinically relevant treatment group to enter our analysis, or in some cases combined treatment groups. For those outcomes that were dichotomous, the summary statistic was a risk ratio, that is, the risk of the outcome in the treatment (omega-3) group divided by the risk of the outcome in the control or placebo group. A risk ratio greater than one indicates that the risk of the outcome in the treatment group is larger than that in the control or usual care arm. For example, if the risk ratio is 1.10, then patients in the treatment group are 1.10 times as likely to have the outcome as those in the control or placebo group.
For each study, we estimated the log risk ratio and its standard deviation. We conducted the analysis on the logarithmic scale for variance-stabilization reasons.7 We then back-transformed to the risk ratio scale for interpretability.
For those outcomes that were continuous, we extracted the follow-up means and standard deviations for the treatment and control or placebo groups respectively. If a study did not report a follow-up mean, or a follow-up mean could not be calculated from the given data, the study was excluded from analysis. For studies that did not report a standard deviation or for which a standard deviation could not be calculated from the given data, we imputed the standard deviation by using those studies and groups that did report a standard deviation and weighting all groups equally, or we assumed that the standard deviation was 0.25 of the theoretical range for the specific measure in the study. For example, if a study measured pain on a 0–100 scale, we assumed the standard deviation was 25.
If all studies measured the outcome on the same scale or the measures could all be converted to the same scale, e.g., cholesterol measurements measured in mg/dL or mmol/L which could all be converted to mg/dL, the summary statistic was the mean difference (MD) between the treatment group follow-up mean and the control or placebo group follow-up mean:
Mean difference = treatment follow-up mean - control follow-up mean
We estimated the standard deviation for that mean difference.8 If the studies used different measurements of the same outcome and we could not convert them all to the same scale, the summary statistic was an effect size. The effect size is the mean difference at follow-up divided by the pooled standard deviation. This summary statistic is unitless and indicates the number of standard deviations by which the treatment and control or placebo group means differ. We estimated an unbiased estimate9 of Hedges' g effect size10 and its standard deviation. A negative mean difference or effect size indicates that the treatment is associated with a decrease in the outcome at follow-up as compared with the control or usual care group.
For each condition, we performed, as permissible given available data, stratified analyses on subgroups of studies defined by patient population, type of omega-3, and dose of omega-3. We will discuss the particular strata definitions for each condition in the relevant results sections in Chapter 3. In general, a paucity of available data precluded us from pooling data separately in most strata. However, we do discuss the results qualitatively in each stratum when possible.
In some cases, the trials were judged too clinically heterogeneous to combine. Furthermore, for each outcome, condition, and trial stratum combination, we required that at least three trials be available for pooling. In heterogeneous settings and those with insufficient data, we conduct only a descriptive analysis and present the study-level summary statistics but do not estimate a pooled effect.
For those conditions for which trials were determined to be clinically comparable and for which there were at least three trials, we estimated a pooled random-effects estimate11 by combining summary statistics across trials. We also report the chi-squared test of heterogeneity p-value.9
Forest plots were constructed for each setting. Each individual trial summary statistic is shown as a box whose area is inversely proportional to the estimated variance of the summary statistic in that trial. The trial's confidence interval is shown as a horizontal line through the box. The pooled estimate and its confidence interval are shown as a diamond at the bottom of the plot with a dotted vertical line indicating the pooled estimate value. A vertical solid line at one for dichotomous outcomes or at zero for continuous outcomes indicates no treatment effect.
We conducted post hoc sensitivity analysis for meta-analyses that exhibited significant (p<0.05) heterogeneity based on the chi-squared test of heterogeneity. In these sensitivity analyses, we removed the most outlying study chosen based on a visual inspection of the forest plot of the original meta-analysis, and estimated a new pooled estimate. We compared this pooled estimate to the original result as well as observed whether significant heterogeneity still remained.
We assessed the possibility of publication bias by evaluating a funnel plot of summary statistics for asymmetry, which can result from the nonpublication of small trials with negative results. These funnel plots include a horizontal line at the fixed-effects pooled estimate and pseudo-95% confidence limits.9 If bias due to nonpublication exists, the distribution is asymmetric or skewed. Because graphical evaluation can be subjective, we also conducted an adjusted rank correlation test10 and a regression asymmetry test9 as formal statistical tests for publication bias. The correlation approach tests whether the correlation between the effect sizes and their variances is significant, and the regression approach tests whether the intercept of a regression of the effects sizes on their precision differs from zero; that is, both formally test for asymmetry in the funnel plot. We acknowledge that other factors, such as differences in trial quality or true study heterogeneity, could produce asymmetry in funnel plots.
The mean difference pooled results are readily interpretable as they are measured in a clinically interpretable metric. To aid in interpreting the pooled effect size and risk ratio, whenever possible we back-transformed each pooled estimate to a specific metric. In order to do this, we multiplied each pooled effect size estimate by the average standard deviation of the most clinically relevant outcome measured across the trials, e.g., pain on the VAS scale, included in the pooled estimate. For each pooled risk ratio, we estimated a number needed to treat (NNT) or number needed to harm (NNH) depending on whether the risk ratio was less than or greater to one, by assuming that the population outcome risk was equal to the average control group risk observed across the trials. By average in either calculation, we mean a simple average across relevant placebo/control and/or treatment groups in the relevant studies. We note these back-transformations require assuming a particular underlying standard deviation or outcome risk. Readers may wish to apply their own standard deviation or underlying risk, based on the particular patient population to which they wish to apply the results. We conducted all analyses and drew all graphs using the statistical package Stata.11
* One article reported both lupus and renal outcomes.
Of the 1,097 articles retrieved, 115 were accepted for further review, because they reported on results from randomized clinical trials or controlled clinical trials of omega-3 fatty acids in the treatment of RA, IBD, diabetes, renal disease, and SLE or reported results from randomized clinical trials, controlled clinical trials, or case series of omega-3 fatty acids on the effects on bone mineral metabolism. Of those articles that were rejected at this stage, 149 reported on a condition other than those of interest, 301 reported on a topic other than omega-3 fatty acids, 22 did not report on a population of interest, and 504 were rejected for study design (i.e., descriptive studies or editorials/commentaries, previous reviews or meta-analyses, and observational studies in all topic areas except bone mineral metabolism). Three articles were duplicates of articles already on file, and four were not reviewed due to language.
Of the 115 articles that went to further review, 10 were rejected because they did not report on outcomes of interest, 15 because they did not report a difference in omega-3 content among study arms, and 7 because they were duplicate reports of the same trial. Thus, a total of 83 articles were accepted for supplementary analysis. Of these, 21 articles reported on RA, 13 articles reported on IBD, 34 articles reported on diabetes, 9 articles reported on renal, 3 articles reported on lupus, and 4 articles reported on bone mineral metabolism. One article reported outcomes for both SLE and renal disease.
Due to the limited number of articles found for renal failure, SLE, and bone mineral metabolism, these outcomes are discussed qualitatively.
Ten trials16–25 were included in the meta-analysis of RA outcomes (not all trials were included for each outcome). Eleven trials were not included in meta-analysis for the following reasons: insufficient statistics26–35 and no outcome of interest.38
Three trials39–41 were included in the meta-analysis of remission/relapse in ulcerative colitis. Ten trials were not included in meta-analysis for the following reasons: insufficient statistics,42, 43, 95 no outcome of interest,44, 46, 52, 53, 94 and wrong disease (Crohn's disease, not ulcerative colitis).54, 55
Eighteen trials56–73 were included in the meta-analysis of diabetes outcomes (not all trials were included for each outcome). Sixteen articles were not included in meta-analysis for insufficient statistics.74–83, 86–91
In addition, as a result of our request to industry experts for unpublished data, Herbert Woolf, Technical Marketing Manager for BASF Corporation, sent us the following document: “Food Labeling: Health Claims and Label Statement - Omega-3 Fatty Acids and Coronary Heart Disease,” prepared by members of the Joint Task Group (CHPA, CRN, NFI), FDA Docket No: 91N‐0103.15
Appendixes and Evidence Tables cited in this report are provided electronically at http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcindex.htm
Summaries of all evaluated diabetes studies can be found in appendix C.1.
| Intervention | Control | Mean Difference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trial | Source | n | Source | n | (mg/dl) (95% CI) |
| Alekseeva65 | Linseed oil | 30 | Placebo | 30 | 2.32 (-24.97, 29.60) |
| Annuzzi57 | Max EPA (Fish oil) | 4 | Placebo | 4 | 6.80 (-21.65, 34.00) |
| Chan58 | Omacor | 12 | Placebo | 13 | -11.58 (-36.35, 13.19) |
| Omacor/Atorvastatin | 11 | Atorvastatin | 13 | 11.58 (-9.59, 32.76) | |
| Dunstan59 | Fish oil/light exercise | 12 | Placebo | 12 | -19.31 (-46.67, 8.06) |
| Fish/moderate exercise | 14 | Placebo | 11 | 7.72 (-19.28, 34.73) | |
| Hendra60 | Max EPA (fish oil) | 40 | Placebo | 40 | -11.58 (-30.89, 7.72) |
| Meshcheriakova66 | Linseed oil/Eiconol | 60 | Low-fat/Low sodium diet | 60 | 4.63 (-15.75, 25.01) |
| Morgan61 | Fish oil | 10 | Placebo | 10 | -13.13 (-37.43, 11.18) |
| Fish oil | 10 | Placebo | 10 | ||
| Morgan67 | Low dosage Fish oil | 7 | Placebo | 6 | -37.00 (-96.98, 22.98) |
| High dosage Fish oil | 6 | Placebo | 6 | 24.00 (-5.75, 53.75) | |
| Patti68 | Fish oil | 8 | Placebo | 8 | -19.31 (-57.98, 19.37) |
| Pelikanova62 | Fish oil | 10 | Placebo | 10 | 18.92 (-12.96, 50.80) |
| Petersen63 | Futura 1000 (fish oil) | 20 | Placebo | 22 | 16.99 (-5.97, 39.95) |
| Sarkkinen70 | Rapeseed (LEAR) oil | 17 | Sunflower oil | 14 | -17.76 (-45.21, 9.69) |
| Shimizu56 | EPA-E | 29 | Placebo | 16 | 12.40 (-2.30, 27.10) |
| Woodman72 | EPA | 17 | Placebo | 16 | -4.75 (-22.48, 12.97) |
| DHA | 18 | ||||
| Pooled Random Effects Estimate* | 0.72 (-5.90, 7.33) | ||||
*Chi-squared test of heterogeneity p-value = 0.22
Sub-populations. None of the studies evaluated the differential effects of omega-3 fatty acids on distinct subpopulations. There were insufficient data to perform pooled analyses on subpopulations across studies.
Covariates. One study58 assessed the effects of fish oil alone, atorvastatin alone, and combined fish oil and atorvastatin. Both atorvastatin alone and combined fish oil and atorvastatin reduced total cholesterol significantly, relative to placebo; there was an insignificant reduction with fish oil alone. The reduction for atorvastatin alone was greater than that for the other groups, although statistical testing was not reported.
Effects of dose, source and exposure duration. None of the studies specifically assessed the effects of dose, source, or exposure duration. A pooled analysis of dose effect using meta-regression revealed no significant dose effect. On stratified analysis of source, the pooled random effects estimates of the mean difference between omega-3 fatty acids and placebo, for studies using a fish-oil and studies using a plant source, respectively, were 1.21 mg/dl (95% CI, -6.51, 8.49) and -1.82 (95% CI, -5.87, 12.20).
Sustainment of effect. Sustainment of effect was not assessed in any of the reports.
| Methodological Quality | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicability | A | B | C | |||||
| I | Study | n | Mean difference (95% CI) | Study | n | Mean difference (95% CI) | ||
| Hendra60 | 80 | -11.58 (-30.89, 7.72) | Shimizu56 | 45 | 12.40 (-2.30, 27.10) | |||
| Morgan67 | 13 | -37.00 (-96.98, 22.98) | Morgan61 | 40 | -13.13 (-37.43, 11.18) | |||
| 12 | 24.00 (-5.75, 53.75) | |||||||
| Petersen63 | 42 | 16.99 (-5.97, 39.95) | Patti68 | 16 | -19.31 (-57.98, 19.37) | |||
| Sarkkinen70 | 31 | -17.76 (-45.21, 9.69) | ||||||
| II | Chan58 | 25 | -11.58 (-36.35, 13.19) | Annuzzi57 | 8 | 6.18 (-21.65, 34.00) | ||
| 24 | 11.58 (-9.59, 32.76) | |||||||
| Woodman72 | 51 | -4.75 (-22.48, 12.97) | Dunstan59 | 24 | -19.31 (-46.67, 8.06) | |||
| 25 | 7.72 (-19.28, 34.73) | |||||||
| Pelikanova62 | 20 | 18.92 (-12.96, 50.80) | ||||||
| III | ||||||||
| Methodological Quality | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicability | A | B | C | |||||
| I | Study | n | Mean difference (95% CI) | Study | n | Mean difference (95% CI) | ||
| Hendra60 | 80 | -7.72 (-14.68, -0.76) | Shimizu56 | 45 | 5.80 (-2.70, 14.30) | |||
| Morgan67 | 13 | 9.00 (-3.49, 21.49) | Morgan61 | 40 | 2.70 (-6.18, 11.58) | |||
| 12 | 9.00 (-13.03, 31.03) | |||||||
| Petersen63 | 42 | 6.56 (0.13, 13.00) | Patti68 | 14 | -2.32 (-10.78, 6.14) | |||
| Sarkkinen70 | 31 | -3.09 (-9.84, 3.67) | ||||||
| II | Chan58 | 25 | -0.77 (-6.33, 4.78) | Annuzzi57 | 8 | 0.00 (-3.21, 3.21) | ||
| 24 | 8.11 (0.63, 15.59) | |||||||
| Woodman72 | 51 | 2.02 (-4.44, 8.48) | Dunstan59 | 24 | 4.63 (-3.90, 13.16) | |||
| 25 | 0.39 (-8.03, 8.80) | |||||||
| III | ||||||||
| Intervention | Control | Mean Difference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trial | Source | n | Source | n | (mg/dl) (95% Cl) |
| Annuzzi57 | Max EPA (Fish oil) | 4 | Placebo | 4 | 0.00 (-3.21, 3.21) |
| Chan58 | Omacor | 12 | Placebo | 13 | -0.77 (-6.33, 4.78) |
| Omacor/Atorvastatin | 11 | Atorvastatin | 13 | 8.11 (0.63, 15.59) | |
| Dunstan59 | Fish oil/light exercise | 12 | Placebo | 12 | 4.63 (-3.90, 13.16) |
| Fish oil/mod. exercise | 14 | Placebo | 11 | 0.39 (-8.03, 8.80) | |
| Hendra60 | Max EPA (fish oil) | 40 | Placebo | 40 | -7.72 (-14.68, -0.76) |
| Morgan61 | Fish oil | 10 | Placebo | 10 | 2.70 (-6.18, 11.58) |
| Fish oil | 10 | Placebo | 10 | ||
| Maffettone73 | Fish oil | 8 | Placebo | 8 | -2.32 (-10.69, 6.06) |
| Morgan67 | Low dosage Fish oil | 7 | Placebo | 6 | 9.00 (-3.49, 21.49) |
| High dosage Fish oil | 6 | Placebo | 6 | 9.00 (-13.03, 31.03) | |
| Patti68 | Fish oil | 8 | Placebo | 8 | -2.32 (-10.78, 6.14) |
| Petersen63 | Futura 1000 (fish oil) | 20 | Placebo | 22 | 6.56 (0.13, 13.00) |
| Sarkkinen70 | Rapeseed (LEAR) oil | 17 | Sunflower oil | 14 | -3.09 (-9.84, 3.67) |
| Shimizu56 | EPA-E | 29 | Placebo | 16 | 5.80 (-2.70, 14.30) |
| Woodman72 | EPA | 17 | Placebo | 16 | 2.02 (-4.44, 8.48) |
| DHA | 18 | ||||
| Pooled Random Effects Estimate* | 1.17 (-1.08, 3.42) | ||||
*Chi-squared test of heterogeneity p-value = 0.13
Covariates. One study assessed the effects of fish oil alone, atorvastatin alone, and combined fish oil and atorvastatin.58 There was an insignificant increase and decrease in HDL with atorvastatin alone and fish oil alone, respectively, and a significant increase with a combination of fish oil and atorvastatin.
Effects of dose, source, and exposure duration. None of the studies specifically assessed the effects of dose, source or exposure duration. A pooled analysis of dose effect using meta-regression revealed no significant dose effect. In one study, plants were the source of omega-3 fatty acids. In this study,70 the mean difference between omega-3 fatty acids and placebo for HDL cholesterol was -3.09 mg/dl (95% CI, -9.84, 3.67). Restricting the pooled analysis to the remaining studies, which used a fish source, the pooled random effects estimate of the mean difference between omega-3 fatty acids and placebo for HDL cholesterol was 1.53 mg/dl (95% CI, -0.82, 3.87).
Sustainment of effect. Sustainment of effect was not assessed in any of the reports.
| Intervention | Control | Mean Difference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trial | Source | n | Source | n | (mg/dl) (95% CI) |
| Annuzzi57 | Max EPA (Fish oil) | 4 | Placebo | 4 | 23.17 (-9.22, 55.56) |
| Chan58 | Omacor | 12 | Placebo | 13 | -5.79 (-20.88, 9.29) |
| Omacor/Atorvastatin | 11 | Atorvastatin | 13 | 11.97 (-4.51, 28.45) | |
| Dunstan59 | Fish oil/light exercise | 12 | Placebo | 12 | 5.02 (-21.44, 31.48) |
| Fish oil/mod. exercise | 14 | Placebo | 11 | 19.31 (-6.81, 45.42) | |
| Hendra60 | Max EPA (fish oil) | 40 | Placebo | 40 | -3.86 (-22.97, 15.25) |
| Morgan61 | Fish oil | 10 | Placebo | 10 | 8.11 (-19.46, 35.67) |
| Fish oil | 10 | Placebo | 10 | ||
| Maffettone73 | Fish oil | 8 | Placebo | 8 | -0.39 (-47.32, 46.55) |
| Morgan67 | Low dosage Fish oil | 7 | Placebo | 6 | 8.00 (-52.53, 68.53) |
| High dosage Fish oil | 6 | Placebo | 6 | 23.00 (-31.39, 77.39) | |
| Petersen63 | Futura 1000 (fish oil) | 20 | Placebo | 22 | 21.62 (2.79, 40.45) |
| Rivellese69 | Fish oil | 8 | Placebo | 8 | -0.39 (-47.31, 46.54) |
| Sarkkinen70 | Rapeseed (LEAR) oil | 17 | Sunflower oil | 14 | -10.04 (-37.38, 17.30) |
| Woodman72 | EPA | 17 | Placebo | 16 | 0.50 (-13.80, 14.79) |
| DHA | 18 | ||||
| Pooled Random Effects Estimate* | 5.12 (-1.02, 11.25) | ||||
*Chi-squared test of heterogeneity p-value = 0.62
Sub-populations. None of the studies evaluated the differential effects of omega-3 fatty acids on distinct subpopulations. There were insufficient data to perform pooled analyses on subpopulations across studies.
Covariates. One study58 assessed the effects of fish oil alone, atorvastatin alone, and a combination of fish oil and atorvastatin. Atorvastatin alone and combined fish oil and atorvastatin reduced LDL cholesterol with significantly relative to placebo; fish oil alone reduced LDL cholesterol relative to placebo, though not significantly. The reduction was greatest for atorvastatin alone, although statistical testing between atorvastatin and fish oil groups was not reported.
Effects of dose, source and exposure duration. None of the studies specifically assessed the effects of dose, source or exposure duration. A pooled analysis of dose effect using meta-regression revealed no significant dose effect. In one study, plants were the source of omega-3 fatty acids. In this study,70 the mean difference between omega-3 fatty acids and placebo for LDL cholesterol was -10.04 mg/dl (95% CI, -37.38, 17.30). Restricting the pooled analysis to the remaining studies, which used a fish source, the pooled random effects estimate of the mean difference between omega-3 fatty acids and placebo for LDL cholesterol was 5.92 mg/dl (95% CI, -0.38, 12.22).
Sustainment of effect. Sustainment of effect was not assessed in any of the reports.
| Methodological Quality | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicability | A | B | C | |||||
| I | Study | n | Mean difference (95% CI) | Study | n | Mean difference (95% CI) | ||
| Hendra60 | 80 | -3.86 (-22.97, 15.25) | Morgan61 | 40 | 8.11 (-19.46, 35.67) | |||
| Morgan67 | 13 | 8.00 (-52.53, 68.53) | Rivallese69 | 16 | -0.39 (-47.31, 46.54) | |||
| 12 | 23.00 (-31.39, 77.39) | |||||||
| Petersen63 | 42 | 21.62 (2.79, 40.45) | Sarkkinen70 | 31 | -10.04 (-37.38, 17.30) | |||
| II | Chan58 | 25 | -5.79 (-20.88, 9.29) | Annuzzi57 | 8 | 23.17 (-9.22, 55.56) | ||
| 24 | 11.97 (-4.51, 28.45) | |||||||
| Woodman72 | 51 | 0.50 (-13.80, 14.79) | Dunstan59 | 24 | 5.02 (-21.44, 31.48) | |||
| 25 | 19.31 (-6.81, 45.42) | |||||||
| III | ||||||||
| Intervention | Control | Mean Difference | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trial | Source | n | Source | n | (mg/dl) (95% CI) | ||
| Annuzzi57 | Max EPA (Fish oil) | 4 | Placebo | 4 | -32.74 | (-84.25, 18.77) | |
| Alekseeva65 | Linseed oil | 30 | Placebo | 30 | 53.10 | (-33.54, 139.74) | |
| Chan58 | Omacor | 12 | Placebo | 13 | -123.89 | (-366.93, 119.14) | |
| Omacor/Atorvastatin | 11 | Atorvastatin | 13 | -17.70 | (-52.99, 17.59) | ||
| Dunstan59 | Fish oil/light exercise | 12 | Placebo | 12 | -115.04 | (-195.84, -34.24) | |
| Fish oil/moderate exercise | 14 | Placebo | 11 | -53.10 | (-132.84, 26.65) | ||
| Hendra60 | Max EPA (fish oil) | 40 | Placebo | 40 | -44.25 | (-89.80, 1.31) | |
| Meshcheriakova66 | Linseed oil/Eiconol | 60 | Low-fat/Low sodium diet | 60 | -35.40 | (-88.83, 18.03) | |
| Morgan61 | Fish oil | 10 | Placebo | 10 | -346.90 | (-656.00, -37.81) | |
| Fish oil | 10 | Placebo | 10 | ||||
| Morgan67 | Low dosage Fish oil | 7 | Placebo | 6 | -116.00 | (-267.44, 35.44) | |
| High dosage Fish oil | 6 | Placebo | 6 | -7.00 | (-110.19, 96.19) | ||
| Patti68 | Fish oil | 8 | Placebo | 8 | -19.47 | (-89.24, 50.30) | |
| Pelikanova62 | Fish oil | 10 | Placebo | 10 | -36.28 | (-101.90, 29.33) | |
| Petersen63 | Futura 1000 (fish oil) | 20 | Placebo | 22 | -80.53 | (-175.69, 14.63) | |
| Sarkkinen70 | Rapeseed (LEAR) oil | 17 | Sunflower oil | 14 | -23.01 | (-80.05, 34.03) | |
| Shimizu56 | EPA-E | 29 | Placebo | 16 | 30.40 | (-23.37, 84.17) | |
| Woodman72 | EPA | 17 | Placebo | 16 | -39.52 | (-68.98, -10.06) | |
| DHA | 18 | ||||||
| Pooled Random Effects Estimate* | -31.61 | (-49.58, -13.64) | |||||
Chi-squared test of heterogeneity p-value = 0.16
Sub-populations. None of the studies evaluated the differential effects of omega-3 fatty acids on distinct subpopulations. There were insufficient data to perform pooled analyses on subpopulations across studies.
Covariates. One study58 assessed the effects of fish oil alone, atorvastatin alone and combined fish oil and atorvastatin. Fish oil alone, atorvastatin alone and combined fish oil and atorvastatin reduced triglycerides significantly relative to placebo. The reduction for combined atorvastatin and fish oil was greater that for either drug alone, although statistical testing was not reported.
One study assessed the independent and combined effects of aerobic exercise and dietary fish intake on serum lipids and glycemic control.93 There was a significant reduction in triglycerides and an increase in glycosylated hemoglobin with a diet high in fish. With combined moderate exercise and the fish diet, reduction in triglycerides was maintained and glycosylated hemoglobin did not increase.
Effects of dose, source, and exposure duration. None of the studies specifically assessed the effects of dose, source, or exposure duration. A pooled analysis of dose effect using meta-regression revealed no significant dose effect. On stratified analysis of source, the pooled random effects estimates of the mean difference between omega-3 fatty acids and placebo, for studies using a fish-oil and studies using a plant source, respectively, were -35.93 mg/dl (95% CI, -56.02, -15.83) and -12.08 (95% CI, -56.90, 32.73).
Sustainment of effect. Sustainment of effect was not assessed in any of the reports.
| Methodological Quality | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicability | A | B | C | |||||
| I | Study | n | Mean difference (95% CI) | Study | n | Mean difference (95% CI) | ||
| Hendra60 | 80 | -44.25 (-89.80, 1.31) | Shimizu56 | 45 | 30.40 (-23.37, 84.17) | |||
| Morgan67 | 13 | -116.00 (-267.44, 35.44) | Morgan61 | 40 | -346.90 (-656.00, -37.81) | |||
| 12 | -7.00 (-110.19, 96.19) | |||||||
| Petersen63 | 42 | -80.53 (-175.69, 14.63) | Patti68 | 14 | -19.47 (-89.24, 50.30) | |||
| Sarkkinen70 | 31 | -23.01 (-80.05, 34.03) | ||||||
| II | Chan58 | 25 | -123.89 (-366.93, 119.14) | Annuzzi57 | 8 | -32.74 (-84.25, 18.77) | ||
| 24 | -17.70 (-42.99, 17.59) | |||||||
| Woodman72 | 51 | -39.52 (-68.98, -10.06) | Dunstan59 | 24 | -115.04 (-195.84, -34.24) | |||
| 25 | -53.10 (-132.84, 26.65) | |||||||
| Pelikanova62 | 20 | -36.28 (-101.90, 29.33) | ||||||
| III | ||||||||
Overall effect. We identified 3 studies that evaluated the effect to of omega-3 fatty acids on plasma insulin in type II diabetics,57, 82, 93 and 1 that evaluated this effect in the metabolic syndrome.92 We did not perform meta-analysis because the outcomes used for measuring plasma insulin in these studies were sufficiently different to preclude pooling across studies.
In one study among type II diabetics, glucose-stimulated plasma insulin response during a hyperglycemic clamp was not influenced by fish oil.57 In the second study, there was no effect on fasting serum insulin or insulin as measured by area under the curve during a fasting glucose tolerance test.93 In the third study, there was no difference in insulin suppression of hepatic glucose production or in insulin stimulation of whole-body glucose disposal measured by the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp.82
In the study of metabolic syndrome, fish oil had no effect on insulin resistance estimated by Homeostatic Model Assessment.92
| Intervention | Control | Mean Difference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trial | Source | n | Source | n | (mg/dl) (95% CI) |
| Annuzzi57 | Max EPA (Fish oil) | 4 | Placebo | 4 | -7.93 (-66.18, 50.32) |
| Alekseeva65 | Linseed oil | 30 | Placebo | 30 | 9.01 (-24.30, 42.32) |
| Dunstan59 | Fish oil/light exercise | 12 | Placebo | 12 | 9.01 (-33.00, 51.02) |
| Fish oil/mod. exercise | 14 | Placebo | 11 | 3.60 (-37.85, 45.06) | |
| Hendra60 | Max EPA (fish oil) | 40 | Placebo | 40 | 21.62 (-18.06, 61.3) |
| Morgan61 | Fish oil | 10 | Placebo | 10 | -14.41 (-52.95, 24.12) |
| Fish oil | 10 | Placebo | 10 | ||
| Morgan67 | Low dosage Fish oil | 7 | Placebo | 6 | -41.00 (-114.16, 32.16) |
| High dosage Fish oil | 6 | Placebo | 6 | -17.00 (-89.43, 55.43) | |
| Patti68 | Fish oil | 8 | Placebo | 8 | 10.81 (-28.67, 50.29) |
| Sirtori64 | Esepent (fish oil) | 203 | Placebo | 211 | 4.30 (-2.82, 11.42) |
| Woodman72 | EPA | 17 | Placebo | 16 | 19.81 (2.25, 37.37) |
| DHA | 18 | ||||
| Pooled Random Effects Estimate* | 5.87 (-0.15, 11.88) | ||||
Chi-squared test of heterogeneity p-value = 0.76
| Intervention | Control | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trial | Source | n | Source | n | (%) (95% CI) |
| Morgan61 | Fish Oil | 10 | Placebo | 10 | -0.10 (-1.25, 1.05) |
| Fish Oil | 10 | Placebo | 10 | ||
| Morgan67 | Low dosage Fish oil | 7 | Placebo | 6 | -1.30 (-3.42, 0.82) |
| High dosage Fish oil | 6 | Placebo | 6 | 0.70 (-0.68, 2.08) | |
| Patti68 | Fish Oil | 8 | Placebo | 8 | 0.60 (-0.79, 1.99) |
| Pelikanova62 | Fish oil | 10 | Placebo | 10 | 0.90 (0.02, 1.78) |
| Shimizu50 | EPA-E | 29 | Placebo | 16 | 0.06 (-8.44, 8.56) |
| Sirtori64 | Esepent (fish oil) | 203 | Placebo | 211 | 0.17 (-0.12, 0.46) |
| Westerveld71 | EPA-E | 8 | Placebo | 8 | -1.30 (-3.55, 0.95) |
| EPA-E | 8 | ||||
| Woodman72 | EPA | 17 | Placebo | 16 | 0.23 (-0.28, 0.75) |
| DHA | 18 | ||||
| Pooled Random Effects Estimate* | 0.21 (-0.01, 0.44) | ||||
*Chi-squared test of heterogeneity p-value = 0.52
Sub-populations. The effects of omega-3 fatty acids on insulin were assessed in type II diabetes and metabolic syndrome.
Covariates. One study assessed the effects of fish oil alone, atorvastatin alone and combined fish oil and atorvastatin.92 There were increases in HOMA scores with fish oil alone, atorvastatin alone and combined fish oil and atorvastatin relative to placebo, though none were significant. Statistical testing was not reported, except the comparisons with placebo.
One study assessed the independent and combined effects of aerobic exercise and dietary fish intake on serum lipids and glycemic control.93 There was a significant reduction in triglycerides and an increase in glycosylated hemoglobin with fish diet. With a combination of moderate exercise and fish diet, reduction in triglycerides was maintained and glycosylated hemoglobin did not increase.
Effects of dose, source, and exposure duration. None of the studies specifically assessed the effects of dose, source, or exposure duration. A pooled analysis of dose effect using meta-regression revealed no significant dose effect on fasting blood glucose or glycosylated hemoglobin. No studies were identified that assessed the effects of omega-3 fatty acids from a plant source on insulin sensitivity or glycemic control.
Sustainment of effect. Sustainment of effect was not assessed in any of the reports.
| Methodological Quality | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicability | A | B | C | |||||
| I | Study | n | Mean difference (95% CI) | Study | n | Mean difference (95% CI) | ||
| Hendra60 | 80 | 21.62 (-18.06, 61.30) | Morgan61 | 40 | -14.41 (-52.95, 24.12) | |||
| Morgan67 | 13 | -41.00 (-114.16, 32.16) | Patti68 | 16 | 10.81 (-28.67, 50.29) | |||
| 12 | -17.00 (-89.43, 55.43) | |||||||
| Sirtori64 | 414 | 4.30 (-2.82, 11.42) | ||||||
| II | Woodman72 | 51 | 19.81 (2.25, 37.37) | Annuzzi57 | 8 | -7.93 (-66.18, 50.32) | ||
| Dunstan59 | 24 | 9.01 (-33.00, 51.02) | ||||||
| 25 | 3.60 (-37.85, 45.06) | |||||||
| III | ||||||||
| Methodological Quality | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicability | A | B | C | |||||
| I | Study | n | Mean difference (95% CI) | Study | n | Mean difference (95% CI) | ||
| Morgan67 | 13 | -1.30 (-3.42, 0.82) | Morgan61 | 40 | -0.10 (-1.25, 1.05) | |||
| 12 | 0.70 (-0.68, 2.08) | |||||||
| Sirtori64 | 414 | 0.17 (-0.12, 0.46) | Patti68 | 16 | 0.60 (-0.79, 1.99) | |||
| Westerveld 71 | 24 | 1.30 (-3.55, 0.95) | ||||||
| II | Woodman72 | 51 | 0.23 (-0.28, 0.75) | Pelikanova62 | 20 | 0.90 (0.02, 1.78) | ||
| III | ||||||||
Summaries of all inflammatory bowel disease studies that were evaluated can be found in appendix C.2.
Overall effect. The effect of omega-3 fatty acids on each of the following outcomes was assessed: clinical score, sigmoidoscopic score, histologic score, induced remission and relapse. In total, 13 studies described in 14 reports were identified that reported these outcomes. All outcomes were assessed separately for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. There were sufficient data to perform meta-analysis only for relapse and only for ulcerative colitis. Clinical score was described for ulcerative colitis in 5 studies; two reported no effect39, 52 and three reported statistically significant improvement with omega-3 fatty acids.44, 46, 94 Clinical score was described for Crohn's disease in only 1 study, which reported no effect.52
Sigmoidoscopic score was reported for ulcerative colitis in 3 studies,44, 52, 94 each of which reported a statistically significant improvement with omega-3 fatty acids. Sigmoidoscopic score was reported for Crohn's disease in 1 study,52 which showed a statistically significant improvement with omega-3 fatty acids. Histologic score was reported for ulcerative colitis in 3 studies; 2 reported no effect42, 46 and 1 statistically significant improvement.44 Histologic score was not reported in any of the studies of Crohn's disease.
Induction of remission was reported for ulcerative colitis in 2 studies,44, 95 both of which showed improvement with omega-3 fatty acids. However, neither was statistically significant, and in one study,44 comparable data for the placebo group was not reported. Induction of remission was not reported in the studies of Crohn's disease.
| Intervention | Control | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trial | Source | n | Source | n | Relative Risk (95% CI) |
| Hawthorne41 | Hi EPA | 35 | Placebo | 34 | 1.32 (0.71, 2.46) |
| Loeschke39 | Fish oil | 31 | Placebo | 33 | 1.06 (0.69, 1.64) |
| Mantzaris40 | Max EPA (fish oil) | 22 | Placebo | 18 | 0.98 (0.36, 2.70) |
| Pooled Random Effects Estimate* | 1.13 (0.81, 1.57) | ||||
Chi-squared test of heterogeneity p-value = 0.82
Relapse was described for Crohn's disease in two studies; one reported a significantly lower relapse rate with omega-3 fatty acids than with placebo.54
Sub-populations. Among the 13 studies identified, the study sample was restricted to patients with ulcerative colitis in 1039–44, 46, 53, 94, 95 and to Crohn's disease in two;54, 55 one study included both patients with ulcerative colitis and those with Crohn's disease and reported data separately for each disease.52 In this study, the effect of omega-3 fatty acids on clinical score was the same for subjects with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease (no effect). The effect on histologic score was also the same; however the improvement reached statistical significance only when diseases were pooled.
Covariates. Reported covariates included use of other drugs, previous surgery and presence of fistulae. However, no comparisons of the effects of covariates on outcomes were identified.
Effects of dose, source, and exposure duration. All studies identified used fish oil as the source of omega-3 fatty acids. No studies compared the effect of different doses of omega-3 fatty acids. There were too few studies that assessed the effects of any single outcome to perform a pooled analysis of dose effect.
Of note, one study administered the fish oil via an enteric-coated capsule, which was designed to deliver the omega-3 fatty acids to the small bowel. 54 This study, which included only patients with Crohn's disease, demonstrated a reduced relapse rate relative to placebo.
Duration of exposure varied from 2 to 24 months across the studies. Too few studies assessed any single outcome across similar time periods to analyze the effect of duration of exposure.
Sustainment of effect. Sustainment of the assessed effects was not evaluated in any of the studies.
Quality and applicability. Among studies that entered the meta-analysis, none had both an applicability rating of I (representative of general population with IBD) and a summary quality score of A (Jadad score = 5 with concealment of allocation). Similarly, there were no studies with the lowest rating of both applicability (III) and quality (C). Most studies were applicable to the general population of adult patients with IBD. Of note, no studies that assessed the effect of omega-3 fatty acids among children with IBD were identified.
Overall effect. We identified only 2 studies that assessed the effect of omega-3 fatty acids on requirements for corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive agents, both of which assessed the effect on corticosteroid requirement.44, 53 Both of these studies found a reduced requirement for corticosteroids with omega-3 fatty acid treatment relative to placebo, but the differences were not statistically significant. Sustainment of effect after discontinuation of the omega-3 fatty acids was not assessed.
We found no data on the effect of omega-3 fatty acids on requirements for steroids and other immunosuppressive drugs for different subpopulations, doses, exposures and sources.
Summaries of all rheumatoid arthritis studies we evaluated can be found in Appendix C.3.
| Intervention | Control | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trial | Source | n | Source | n | Effect Size (95% CI) |
| Cleland16 | Max EPA (fish oil) | 23 | Placebo | 23 | -0.02 (-0.60, 0.56) |
| Geusens17 | Fish oil | 21 | Placebo | 20 | -0.04 (-0.57, 0.50) |
| Fish oil | 19 | ||||
| Kremer19 | Fish oil | 20 | Placebo | 12 | -0.04 (-0.69, 0.61) |
| Fish oil | 17 | ||||
| Kremer18 | Max EPA (fish oil) | 17 | Placebo | 20 | -0.13 (-0.78, 0.51) |
| Magaro21 | Max EPA (fish oil) | 10 | Placebo | 10 | 0.41 (-0.48, 1.29) |
| Nielsen22 | Pikasol (fish oil) | 27 | Placebo | 24 | -0.85 (-1.42, -0.27) |
| Nordstrom23 | Flaxseed oil | 11 | Placebo | 11 | -0.21 (-1.04, 0.63) |
| Skoldstam25 | Max EPA (fish oil) | 22 | Placebo | 21 | 0.04 (-0.56, 0.63) |
| Tulleken24 | Fish oil | 13 | Placebo | 14 | -0.72 (-1.5, 0.06) |
| Pooled Random Effects Estimate* | -0.19 (-0.43, 0.06) | ||||
Chi-squared test of heterogeneity p-value = 0.23
Sub-populations. None of the studies assessed the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on different subpopulations of patients with RA.
Covariates. One study assessed the effect of different diets (Western versus modified lacto-vegetarian) combined with omega-3 fatty acids on pain in RA.26 In this study, among subjects treated with fish oil, there was a reduction in pain among patients on a modified lacto-vegetarian diet relative to a Western diet (P<0.01)
Effects of dose, source, and exposure duration. One study assessed the effect of different doses of omega-3 fatty acids on outcomes in RA.19 In this study, the effect of fish oil on pain did not differ among doses. There were insufficient data across studies to perform a pooled analysis of dose or source effect.
In 1 study, plants were the source of omega-3 fatty acids. In this study23 the effect size for omega-3 fatty acids for pain was -0.21 (95% CI, -1.04, 0.63). Restricting the pooled analysis to the remaining studies, which used a fish source, the pooled random effects estimate of the effect size for pain is unchanged at -0.19 (95% CI, -0.46, 0.09).
Only 1 study assessed the effects of different durations of exposure on outcomes in RA.19 In this study, there was no effect on pain at 24 and 36 weeks, although statistical testing of the effect between these time points was not performed. There were insufficient data across studies to perform a pooled analysis of exposure duration effect.
Sustainment of effect. Two studies assessed the sustainment of effects of omega-3 fatty acids on outcomes in RA.18, 28 In 1 study, pain worsened in a fish oil-treated arm 3 months after discontinuation of the fish oil (p<0.05). In the other study, 100% of the control arm (evening primrose oil) and 80% of the fish oil group “returned to baseline or became worse.” Although pain, joint swelling, and acute phase reactants were assessed in this study, the parameters on which this assessment was made were not specified. There were insufficient data across studies to perform a pooled analysis of sustainment of effect.
| Methodological Quality | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applicability | A | B | C | |||||
| I | Study | n | Effect Size(95% CI) | Study | n | Effect Size(95% CI) | ||
| Cleland16 | 46 | -0.02 (-0.60, 0.56) | Kremer19 | 49 | -0.04 (-0.69, 0.61) | |||
| Geusens17 | 60 | -0.04 (-0.57, 0.50) | ||||||
| Kremer18 | 37 | -0.13 (-0.78, 0.51) | ||||||
| Skoldstam25 | 43 | 0.04 (-0.56, 0.63) | ||||||
| II | Tulleken24 | 27 | -0.72 (-1.5, 0.06) | Magaro 21 | 20 | 0.41 (-0.48, 1.29) | ||
| III | ||||||||
| Intervention | Control | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trial | Source | n | Source | n | Effect Size (95% CI) |
| Cleland16 | Max EPA (fish oil) | 23 | Placebo | 23 | 0.04 (-0.54, 0.62) |
| Kremer19 | Fish oil | 20 | Placebo | 12 | -0.63 (-1.30, 0.03) |
| Fish oil | 17 | ||||
| Kremer18 | Max EPA (fish oil) | 17 | Placebo | 20 | -0.02 (-0.66, 0.63) |
| Magalish20 | Omega-3 fatty acid (source not specified) | 65 | Placebo | 47 | -0.13 (-0.51, 0.25) |
| Nielsen22 | Pikasol (fish oil) | 27 | Placebo | 24 | 0.00 (-0.55, 0.55) |
| Nordstrom23 | Flaxseed oil | 11 | Placebo | 11 | -0.06 (-0.90, 0.77) |
| Tulleken24 | Fish oil | 13 | Placebo | 14 | -0.26 (-1.02, 0.50) |
| Pooled Random Effects Estimate | -0.13 (-0.35, 0.08) | ||||
Chi-squared test of heterogeneity p-value = 0.81
The effect of omega-3 fatty acids on swollen joints in rheumatoid arthritis has also been assessed in a previously published meta-analysis. 97 This meta-analysis reported improvement favoring fish oil over placebo that was not statistically significant (estimate not reported).
Sub-populations. No studies assessed the effect on specific subpopulations.
Covariates. One study assessed the effect of two different diets (Western versus modified lacto-vegetarian) combined with omega-3 fatty acids on joint swelling in RA.26 In this study, among subjects treated with fish oil, there was a reduction in the number of swollen joints among patients on a modified lacto-vegetarian diet relative to a Western diet (p < 0.01)
Effects of dose, source, and exposure duration. One study assessed the effect of two different doses of omega-3 fatty acids on outcomes in RA.19 In this study, there was a significant improvement in the number of swollen joints at 24 and 36 weeks relative to baseline for subjects treated with a lower dose of fish oil. Among patients treated with a higher dose of fish oil, the improvement relative to baseline was significant only at 24 weeks. There were insufficient data across studies to perform a pooled analysis of dose effect.
In one study, plants were the source of omega-3 fatty acids. In this study23 the effect size of omega-3 fatty acids for swollen joints was -0.06 (95% CI, -0.90, 0.77). Restricting the pooled analysis to the remaining studies, which a fish source, the pooled random effects estimate of the effect size for swollen joints unchanged at -0.14 (95% CI, -0.36, 0.09).
Sustainment of effect. Two studies assessed the sustainment of effects of omega-3 fatty acids on outcomes in RA.18, 28 In one study, there was no change in swollen joint count in a fish oil-treated arm 1–2 months after discontinuation of the fish oil (p<0.05). In the other study, 100% of the control arm (evening primrose oil) and 80% of the fish oil group “returned to baseline or became worse.” Although pain, joint swelling, and acute phase reactants were assessed in this study, the parameters on which this assessment was made were not specified. There were insufficient data across studies to perform a pooled analysis of sustainment of effect.
| Intervention | Control | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trial | Source | n | Source | n | Effect Size (95% CI) |
| Kremer18 | Max EPA (fish oil) | 17 | Placebo | 20 | -0.44 (-1.1, 0.21) |
| Magaro21 | Max EPA (fish oil) | 10 | Placebo | 10 | -0.16 (-1.04, 0.72) |
| Nielsen22 | Pikasol (fish oil) | 27 | Placebo | 24 | 0.06 (-0.49, 0.61) |
| Nordstrom23 | Flaxseed oil | 11 | Placebo | 11 | 0.13 (-0.71, 0.96) |
| Skoldstam25 | Max EPA (fish oil) | 22 | Placebo | 21 | 0.04 (-0.55, 0.64) |
| Tulleken24 | Fish oil | 13 | Placebo | 14 | -1.82 (-2.71, -0.92) |
| Pooled Random Effects Estimate | -0.32 (-0.83, 0.19) | ||||
Chi-squared test of heterogeneity p-value = 0.01
Of note, there was significant heterogeneity among these studies (chi-squared test of heterogeneity =0.01). Visual inspection of the Forest plot identified one outlier study.24 With this study removed from the pooled analysis, the pooled random effects estimate for the effect of omega-3 fatty acids on ESR relative to placebo is -0.07 (95% CI, -0.37, 0.23), and the chi-squared test for heterogeneity is not significant (p = .77). The outlier study is similar to the other studies in the pooled analysis in terms of study design, source, dose, and duration of omega-3 fatty acid treatment. The characteristics of the study population in the outlier study are also similar to those of the other studies in the pooled analysis in terms of age, disease duration, number of swollen joints, and number of tender joints. However, the baseline ESR and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) values for the control group in the outlier study were significantly higher than for the experimental group (p<0.05). This observation suggests that the disease activity may have been higher in the control group than in the experimental group, which could bias toward a more favorable estimate of the effect of omega-3 fatty acids.
The effect of omega-3 fatty acids on ESR in rheumatoid arthritis has also been assessed in a previously published meta-analysis. 97 This meta-analysis reported improvement with fish oil relative to placebo; however, this improvement was not statistically significant (estimate not reported).
Sub-populations. One study assessed the effect of cod liver oil on ESR among children with JRA. This study demonstrated a significant reduction in ESR for cod liver oil relative to placebo.27
Covariates. The effect of covariates on the efficacy of omega-3 fatty acids was not specifically assessed in any of the studies identified.
Effects of dose, source, and exposure duration.One study assessed the effect of two different doses of omega-3 fatty acids on outcomes in RA.19 In this study, there was a significant improvement in ESR at 24 and 36 weeks relative to baseline for subjects treated with a lower dose of fish oil. Among patients treated with a higher dose of fish oil, the improvement relative to baseline was significant only at 24 weeks. There were insufficient data across studies to perform a pooled analysis of dose or source effect.
In one study, plants were the source of omega-3 fatty acids. In this study,23 the effect size of omega-3 fatty acids for ESR was 0.13 (95% CI, -0.71, 0.96). Restricting the pooled analysis to the remaining studies, which used a fish source, the pooled random effects estimate of the effect size for ESR was -0.41 (95% CI, -0.99, 0.18).
Sustainment of effect.The sustainment of effects of omega-3 fatty acids on ESR or CRP in RA was not clearly described in any studies. In one study,28 100% of the control arm (evening primrose oil) and 80% of the fish oil group “returned to baseline or became worse.” Although pain, joint swelling, and ESR were assessed in this study, the parameters on which this assessment was made were not specified.
| Intervention | Control | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trial | Source | n | Source | n | Effect Size (95% CI) |
| Geusens17 | Fish oil | 21 | Placebo | 20 | -1.38 (-1.97, -0.79) |
| Fish oil | 19 | ||||
| Kremer19 | Fish oil | 20 | Placebo | 12 | -0.13 (-0.78, 0.52) |
| Fish oil | 17 | ||||
| Kremer18 | Max EPA (fish oil) | 17 | Placebo | 20 | -0.24 (-0.89, 0.41) |
| Nordstrom23 | Flaxseed oil | 11 | Placebo | 11 | 0.26 (-0.58, 1.10) |
| Skoldstam25 | Max EPA (fish oil) | 22 | Placebo | 21 | 0.11 (-0.49, 0.71) |
| Pooled Random Effects Estimate | -0.30 (-0.90, 0.30) | ||||
Chi-squared test of heterogeneity p-value = 0.002
Of note, there was significant heterogeneity among these studies (chi-squared test of heterogeneity =0.002). Visual inspection of the Forest plot identified one outlier study.17 With this study removed from the pooled analysis, the pooled random effect estimate for the effect of omega-3 fatty acids on patient global assessment relative to placebo is -0.02 (95% CI, -0.36, 0.31) and the chi-squared test for heterogeneity is not significant (p = .76). On qualitative review of the outlier study, we could find no characteristics that differed from the other studies. The outlier study is similar to the other studies in the pooled analysis in terms of study design, source, and dose of omega-3 fatty acid. The characteristics of the study population in the outlier study are similar to those of the other studies in the pooled analysis in terms of age, disease duration, number of swollen joints, and number of tender joints. Although the study duration is longer (12 months) in the outlier study than in the other studies (3–9 months), a common time point for assessment (3 months) was used in the pooled analysis.
The effect of omega-3 fatty acids on patient's global assessments in RA has also been assessed in a previously published meta-analysis.97 This meta-analysis reported improvement with fish oil relative to placebo; however, this improvement was not statistically significant (estimate not reported).
Sub-populations. No studies assessed the effects across sub-populations.
Covariates. One study assessed the effect of combining different diets (Western versus modified lacto-vegetarian) with omega-3 fatty acids on patient's global assessment in RA.26 In this study, among subjects treated with fish oil, there was a reduction in patient's global assessment among patients on a modified lacto-vegetarian diet relative to a Western diet (p<0.01)
Effects of dose, source, and exposure duration. One study assessed the effect of different doses of omega-3 fatty acids on outcomes in RA.19 In this study, the effect of fish oil on patient's global assessment did not differ between doses. There were insufficient data across studies to perform a pooled analysis of dose or source effect.
In one study plants were the source of omega-3 fatty acids. In this study,23 the effect size of omega-3 fatty acids for patient global assessment was 0.26 (95% CI, -0.58, 1.10). Restricting the pooled analysis to the remaining studies, which used a fish source, the pooled random effects estimate of the effect size for patient global assessment was -0.42 (95% CI, -1.09, 0.26).
One study assessed the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on outcomes in RA for different durations of exposure.19 In this study, there was no effect on patient's global assessment at 24 and 36 weeks, although statistical testing of the effect between these time points was not performed.
Sustainment of effect. One study assessed the sustainment of effects of omega-3 fatty acids on patient's global assessment in RA.18 In this study, patient's global assessment worsened in a group that had been in a fish oil-treated arm, 3 months after discontinuation of the fish oil (p<0.05).
| Sample Size | Adverse evenet count | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adverse Event | Total # of studies | N for Omega 3 | N for Placebo/ Control | N for Omega 3 | N for Placebo/ Control | Adverse event rate Omega 3 | Adverse event rate Placebo | ||
| Clinical bleeding | 1 | 73 | NR** | 2 | 0 | 2.74% | ---- | ||
| GI complaint or nausea | 13 | 885 | 685 | 72 | 34 | 8.14% | 4.96% | ||
| Diarrhea | 3 | 159 | 104 | 11 | 5 | 6.92% | 4.81% | ||
| Headaches | 2 | 31 | 26 | 2 | 0 | 6.45% | 0.00% | ||
| Withdrawal due to adverse event | 10 | 353 | 228 | 13 | 9 | 3.68% | 3.95% | ||
| Dermatological | 4 | 190 | 159 | 5 | 10 | 2.63% | 6.29% | ||
• N = number of individuals with an adverse event. **Not reported. No placebo arm reported on clinical bleeding.
Overall effect. We identified one study that assessed the effect of omega-3 fatty acids on joint damage in RA.29 In this study, the Larsen score of radiographic damage was not affected by administering the omega-3 fatty acids in the form of a diet high in fish.
Overall effect. The effect of omega-3 fatty acids on tender joint count in RA has been assessed in a previously published meta-analysis. 97 Inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis were 1) double blind, placebo controlled trial, 2) use of at least one of seven predetermined outcome measures, including tender joint count, 3) results reported for both placebo and treatment groups at baseline and follow-up, 4) randomization, and 5) parallel or cross-over design. A Medline search through 1991 identified 10 trials that met the inclusion criteria, 6 of which were analyzed for tender joint count. The rate difference between fish oil and placebo for tender joint count was -2.9 (95% CI, -3.8, -2.1).
Analysis of subpopulations and covariates, effects of dose, source, and exposure duration, and sustainment of effect were not addressed in this meta-analysis.
Overall effect. We identified 7 studies that assessed the effect of omega-3 fatty acids on anti-inflammatory and/or immunosuppressive drug requirements among patients with RA. All 7 studies assessed the effect on requirement for anti-inflammatory drugs. Among these studies, there was significant improvement relative to placebo for omega-3 treated subjects in 3,30–32 significant improvement relative to baseline requirements in 3,25, 26, 28 and no difference in NSAID requirement in 1.29 One study, which assessed the effect of omega-3 fatty acids on steroid requirements, demonstrated significant improvement relative to placebo.30 We did not identify any studies that assessed the effect of omega-3 fatty acids on disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) requirement.
Sub-populations. Not assessed in any identified studies.
Covariates. Not assessed in any identified studies.
Effects of dose, source, and exposure duration. The effects of dose, source, and exposure duration were not specifically assessed in any of the studies.
Sustainment of effect. Two studies demonstrated that the effect of omega-3 fatty acids on the requirement for NSAIDs in RA was not sustained.30, 31
Summaries of all renal disease studies we evaluated can be found in Appendix C.4.
Overall effect. The effect of omega-3 fatty acids on each of the following was assessed in patients with renal disease: serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, progression to end stage renal disease (ESRD), hemodialysis graft thrombosis/patency, and mortality. A total of studies were identified that reported these outcomes. There were insufficient data to perform meta-analysis on any of the outcomes.
Effects on serum creatinine were described in 4 studies: 1 reported a statistically significant improvement with fish oil relative to placebo,98 1 reported no effect,99 and 2 reported worsening.100, 101 Among the studies that reported worsening, neither reported testing of statistical significance between the omega-3 and control arms, and in one, there was worsening for both the omega-3 and control group.
Creatinine clearance was reported in 3 studies: 1 reported a statistically significant improvement with fish oil relative to placebo,98 and 2 reported worsening.100, 101 Among the studies that reported worsening, neither reported testing of statistical significance between the omega-3 and control arms, and in one, there was worsening for both the omega-3 and control groups.
Progression to ESRD was reported in 2 studies:98, 100 one demonstrated a favorable effect for fish oil relative to placebo,98 and the other demonstrated no effect.
Hemodialysis graft thrombosis/patency was described in 2 studies.102, 103 In one, graft patency was significantly better for fish oil than for placebo.102 There were no graft thromboses in either the omega-3 fatty acid or the control groups.103
Mortality was reported in two studies.98, 104 Statistical testing for between group mortality rates was not reported in either. In one, mortality over 5 years was 2.0% in the placebo group and 1.8% in the omega-3 group;98 in the other, the mortality over 5 years was zero in a low-dose fish oil group and 6% in a high-dose fish oil group.104
Meta-Analysis. Across the studies identified, only three were sufficiently homogeneous in terms of the population studies and the outcomes reported to consider for meta-analysis. These studies evaluated the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on Immunoglobulin A(IgA) nephropathy.98, 100, 101 These studies, along with two other studies117, 118 that were identified but not included in this report because they did not meet our inclusion criteria, have been evaluated in a previously published meta-analysis.105 This meta-analysis calculated effect sizes for treatment effect based on either serum creatinine concentration or creatinine clearance. Although the pooled effect size for the five studies was positive (i.e. favoring treatment over control), it was small (0.25) and not statistically significant (p=0.27).
Sub-populations. No studies that assessed the differential effect of omega-3 fatty acids across distinct subpopulations of renal disease were identified. Among the studies identified, the renal disease in the study sample was IgA nephropathy in four,98, 100, 101, 104lupus nephritis in one,99 glomerular disease in one,106 and ESRD requiring dialysis in two.102, 103
Covariates. The effect of omega-3 fatty acids on covariates was not assessed in any of the identified studies.
Dose and source effect. Dose and source effects of omega-3 fatty acids were not assessed in any of the identified studies.
Exposure duration. Effect of exposure duration of omega-3 fatty acids was not assessed in any of the identified studies.
Sustainment of effect. Sustainment of effect after discontinuation of omega-3 fatty acids was not assessed in any of the identified studies.
We did not identify any studies that assessed the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on requirements for corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive drugs.
Summaries of all systemic lupus erythematosus studies we evaluated can be found in Appendix C.5.
Overall effect. The effect of omega-3 fatty acids on each of the following was assessed in patients with SLE: disease activity, damage, and patient perception of disease. A total of 3 studies was identified that reported disease activity;99, 107, 108 no studies that assessed the other outcomes were identified. There were insufficient data to perform meta-analysis on disease activity.
Disease activity was described using clinical and laboratory scores. Improvement in disease activity was reported in one study, which used a clinical score developed for that study (validity of score not described).107 The other studies reported no effect on the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI)99 or on another clinical score developed for the study (validity of instrument not described).108 Levels of anti-DNA antibodies and complement levels were assessed in two of the studies;99, 108 neither demonstrated an omega-3 fatty acid effect. No studies were identified that assessed effect on damage or patient perception of disease.
Sub-populations. No studies that assessed the differential effect of omega-3 fatty acids across distinct subpopulations of SLE were identified.
Covariates. The effect of omega-3 fatty acids on covariates were not assessed in any of the identified studies.
Dose and source effect. Dose and source effects of omega-3 fatty acids were not assessed in any of the identified studies.
Exposure duration. Effect of exposure duration of omega-3 fatty acids was not assessed in any of the identified studies.
Sustainment of effect. One study was designed to evaluate for sustainment of effect after discontinuation of omega-3 fatty acids.108 However, in this study, no main effect was demonstrated before discontinuation of the omega-3 fatty acid.
We identified one study that assessed the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on requirements for corticosteroids.99 In this study, omega-3 fatty acids had no effect on steroid requirements. We identified no studies that assessed the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on requirements for other immunosuppressive drugs.
Summaries of all bone density/osteoporosis studies evaluated can be found in Appendix C.6.
Overall effect. The effects of omega-3 fatty acids on bone mineral density and fracture rate were assessed. In total, 5 studies described in 4 reports were identified that reported bone mineral density;109–112 no studies of fracture rate were identified. There were insufficient data to perform meta-analysis on bone mineral density.
Improvement in bone mineral density for omega-3 fatty acids relative to placebo was described in one study;111 improvement relative to baseline was described in one study.110 In two studies, omega-3 fatty acids had no effect on bone mineral density.109, 112
Sub-populations. One report described separate studies performed in pre-menopausal and post-menopausal women. No effect was seen in either population.
Covariates. The effect of omega-3 fatty acids on covariates was not assessed in any of the identified studies.
Dose and source effect. Dose and source effects of omega-3 fatty acids were not assessed in any of the identified studies.
Exposure duration. Effect of exposure duration of omega-3 fatty acids was not assessed in any of the identified studies.
Sustainment of effect. Sustainment of effect after discontinuation of omega-3 fatty acids was not assessed in any of the identified studies.
There was no evidence of publication bias on the funnel plots and adjusted rank correlation testing (not shown) performed for studies that entered meta-analysis.
We screened 4,212 titles, from which we reviewed 1,097 full text articles. Among these, 83 articles met our inclusion criteria; 34 for diabetes/ metabolic syndrome, 13 for inflammatory bowel disease, 21 for rheumatoid arthritis, 9 for renal disease, 3 for systemic lupus erythematosus and 4 for bone density and fractures. All articles except one were randomized controlled trials; one was an observational study of bone density.
Most of the studies assessed the effect of omega-3 fatty acids in the form of fish oil; however, some assessed the effect of diets rich in fish. Across all conditions and studies, only 4 studies evaluated omega-3 fatty acids derived from plant oils; three for diabetes 65, 66, 70 and 1 for RA.23 Few studies assessed dose or source effect, effect of treatment duration, or the sustainment of effect after discontinuation of omega-3 fatty acid consumption.
Diabetes/metabolic syndrome. Among 13 studies of type II diabetes or the metabolic syndrome, that were assessed by meta-analysis, omega-3 fatty acids had a favorable effect on triglyceride levels relative to placebo (pooled random effects estimate: -31.61; 95% CI, -49.58, -13.64) but had no effect on total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, fasting blood sugar, or glycosylated hemoglobin, by meta-analysis. Omega-3 fatty acids had no effect on plasma insulin or insulin resistance in type II diabetics or patients with the metabolic syndrome, by qualitative analysis of four studies.
These results are consistent with the results of another meta-analysis for fish oil,116 which found significant triglyceride-lowering and LDL-raising effects and no significant effect on fasting blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, total cholesterol, or HDL cholesterol among diabetics. Although the analysis presented here did not find a significant effect on LDL, the point estimate is consistent with a LDL raising effect and the confidence interval barely crosses null (95% CI, -1.02, 11.25).
The effects of omega-3 fatty acids on triglycerides in diabetics presented here and elsewhere are consistent with the triglyceride-lowering effects of omega-3 fatty acids that have been demonstrated for the general population and are being detailed in a separate evidence report “Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acids on Cardiovascular Risk Factors” (in preparation at the New England Medical Center Evidence Based Practice Center). Regarding the lack of effect that omega-3 fatty acids have on insulin sensitivity, it is possible that any beneficial effects of omega-3 fatty acids on insulin sensitivity could be attenuated by their high calorie content.
Inflammatory bowel disease. Among 13 studies reporting outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, variable effects of omega-3 fatty acids on clinical score, sigmoidoscopic score, histologic score, induced remission, and relapse were reported. In ulcerative colitis, omega-3 fatty acids had no effect on the relative risk of relapse in a meta-analysis of 3 studies. There was a statistically non-significant reduction in requirement for corticosteroids for omega-3 fatty acids relative to placebo in 2 studies. No studies evaluated the effect of omega-3 fatty acids on requirement for other immunosuppressive agents.
Appendixes and Evidence Tables cited in this report are provided electronically at http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcindex.htm
Rheumatoid arthritis. Among 9 studies reporting outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, omega-3 fatty acids had no effect on patient report of pain, swollen joint count, ESR, and patient's global assessment by meta-analysis. The one study that assessed the effect on joint damage found no effect. In a qualitative analysis of 7 studies that assessed the effect of omega-3 fatty acids on anti-inflammatory drug or corticosteroid requirement, 6 demonstrated reduced requirement for these drugs. No studies assessed the effect on requirements for disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. None of the studies used a composite score that incorporates both subjective and objective measures of disease activity, such as the American College of Rheumatology response criteria.
A previously performed meta-analysis97 reached the same conclusions for swollen joint count, ESR, and patient's global assessment. That meta-analysis found a statistically significant improvement in tender joint count compared to placebo (rate difference= -2.9, 95% CI -3.8, -2.1).
Renal disease. In a qualitative analysis of nine studies that assessed the effect of omega-3 fatty acids in renal disease, there were varying effects on serum creatinine and creatinine clearance; one study demonstrated less progression to end stage renal disease with omega-3 fatty acids relative to control. In a single study that assessed the effect on hemodialysis graft patency, graft patency was significantly better with fish oil than with placebo. No studies that assessed the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on requirements for corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive drugs for the treatment of renal disease were identified.
Systemic lupus erythematosus. Among 3 studies that assessed the effects of omega-3 fatty acids in SLE, variable effects on clinical activity were reported. No studies were identified that assessed effect on damage or patient perception of disease. Omega-3 fatty acids had no effect on corticosteroid requirements in 1 study. No studies were identified that assessed the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on requirements for other immunosuppressive drugs for SLE. None of the studies used a measure of disease activity that incorporates both subjective and objective measures of disease activity.
Bone mineral density/fracture. Among five studies described in 4 reports the effect of omega-3 fatty acids on bone mineral density was variable. No studies that assessed the effect of omega-3 fatty acids on fracture were identified.
Dose, source, duration effects and sustainment of effect. Among studies that assessed the effects of omega-3 fatty acids in diabetes, there was no dose effect for any outcome by meta-regression. There are insufficient data to draw conclusions about source or duration effects, or about sustainment of effect.
Adverse events. Across all conditions, the incidence of gastrointestinal complaints or nausea, diarrhea, and headaches appears to be higher among patients receiving omega-3 fatty acids than among those in control groups. Strong conclusions cannot be drawn from this observation because adverse events were not reported in a standard manner in clinical trials, either in terms of the events defined or the frequency with which they were recorded. Additionally, the underlying conditions being studied will affect the rates of specific adverse events.
The quantity and strength of evidence for effects of omega-3 fatty acids on outcomes in the conditions assessed varies greatly. The findings of many studies among type II diabetics provide strong evidence that omega-3 fatty acids reduce serum triglycerides but have no effect on total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol. For rheumatoid arthritis, the available evidence suggests that omega-3 fatty acids reduce tender joint counts and may reduce requirements for corticosteroids, but does not support an effect of omega-3 fatty acids on other clinical outcomes. There are insufficient data available to draw conclusions about the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on inflammatory bowel disease, renal disease, SLE, bone density, or fractures or the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on insulin resistance among type II diabetics.
We offer the following observations and recommendations regarding future research on the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on lipids and glycemic control in type II diabetes and the metabolic syndrome and on inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthritis, renal disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, and osteoporosis.
Additional research on the effects of omega-3 fatty acids need to be performed on inflammatory bowel disease, renal disease, SLE, bone density, or fractures or the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on insulin resistance among type II diabetics before recommendations regarding the use of omega-3 fatty acids for these conditions can be made.
Studies of inflammatory bowel disease that include patients with both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis should report data separately for these groups.
Studies that assess the effects of omega-3 fatty acids should use standard validated instruments to assess clinical outcomes.
Trials that assess the effects of omega-3 fatty acids should be designed to evaluate the effect of source, dose, treatment duration, and the sustainment of effect after discontinuation of omega-3 fatty acid consumption.
Studies of omega-3 fatty acids should explicitly define both the quantity of the omega-3 fatty acid source and of the specific omega-3 fatty acids present in a study dose of that source.
Trials of omega-3 fatty acids should include a baseline assessment of dietary omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acid intake.
In controlled trials that assess the effects of omega-3 fatty acids, analysis should include and report explicit testing of the effects of the omega-3 fatty acid relative to the control substance.
In studies that use a crossover design, outcome data for all study arms should be reported at the end of each treatment period.
| AA | Arachidonic acid |
| Ab | Antibody |
| AHRQ | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality |
| Al | Adequate intake |
| ALA | Alpha-linolenic acid |
| AMDR | Acceptable macronutrient distribution ranges |
| ANCOVA | Analysis of covariance |
| ANOVA | Analysis of variance |
| Ca | Calcium |
| CCT | Controlled clinical trial |
| CI | Confidence interval |
| CRP | C-reactive protein |
| CSFII | Continuing Food Survey of Intakes by Individuals |
| d | day |
| D6D | Delta-6 Desaturase |
| DGLA | Dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid |
| DHA | Docosahexaenoic acid |
| DPA | Docosapentaenoic acid |
| DRI | Dietary Reference Intake |
| Ds-DNA | Double-stranded DNA |
| EF | Effect size |
| EFA | Essential fatty acid |
| EPA | Eicosapentaenoic acid |
| EPC | Evidence-Based Practice Center |
| ESR | Erythrocyte sedimentation rate |
| FNB | Food and Nutrition Board |
| g | grams |
| GI | Gastrointestinal |
| GLA | Gamma-linolenic acid |
| HDL | High density lipoprotein |
| IBD | Inflammatory bowel disease |
| IL-1ß | Interleukin 1ß |
| JRA | Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis |
| IOM | Institute of Medicine |
| LA | Linoleic acid |
| LC PUFA | Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid |
| LDL | Low density lipoprotein |
| MA | Metaanalysis |
| MANOVA | Multivariate analysis of variance |
| MeSH Term | Medical Subject Headings Term |
| mg/dl | Milligrams per deciliter |
| min | Minutes |
| Mo | Month |
| n | Number |
| n-3 | Omega-3 |
| n-6 | Omega-6 |
| NA | Not applicable |
| NHANES III | The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination |
| NCI | National Cancer Institute |
| NEI | National Eye Institute |
| NEMC | New England Medical Center |
| NHANES | National Health and Nutrition Examination |
| NHLBI | National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute |
| NIAAA | National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism |
| NIAID | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases |
| NIAMS | National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases |
| NICHD | National Institute of Child Health and Human Development |
| NIDDK | National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases |
| NIH | National Institutes of Health |
| NNH | Number needed to harm |
| NR | Not reported |
| NSAIDS | Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs |
| ODS | Office of Dietary Supplements |
| PG | Prostaglandin |
| PGD | Prostaglandin-D |
| PGE | Prostaglandin-E |
| PGF | Prostaglandin-F |
| PGL | Prostaglandin-L |
| PGH | Prostaglandin-H |
| PUFA | Polyunsaturated fatty acid |
| QRF | Quality review form |
| RA | Rheumatoid arthritis |
| RCT | Randomized controlled trial |
| RDA | Recommended daily allowances |
| RXT | Randomized crossover trial |
| Sd | Standard deviation |
| SCEPC | Southern California Evidence-Based Practice Center |
| SLE | Systemic lupus erythematosus |
| SEM | Standard errors of the means |
| TEP | Technical expert panel |
| TNF-a | Tumor necrosis factor-a |
| TX | Treatment |
| TXA | Thromboxane-A |
| UCLA | University of California, Los Angeles |
| VLCFA | Very long chain fatty acid |
| VLN-3FA | Very long chain n-3 fatty acids |
| wk | Week |
| General Questions: Questions posed for all three participating EPCs, for years 1 and 2. |
|
| DISEASE-SPECIFIC QUESTIONS: questions posed to the SCEPC for Year 1 of the project: |
| Immune-Mediated Diseases |
|
| Gastrointestinal/Renal |
|
| Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosis, and Bone Density TEP | ||
| Name | Area of Expertise | Institution |
| Judith Ashley, PhD, MSPH, RD | Omega-3 Fatty Acids | University of Nevada School of Medicine |
| William S. Harris, PhD | Omega-3 Fatty Acids | University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine |
| Robert P. Heaney, MD | Bone | Creighton University |
| David A. Isenberg, MD | SLE | University College London Medical School |
| Joel Kremer, MD | Rheumatoid Arthritis | The Center for Rheumatology |
| Bruce A. Watkins, PhD | Omega-3 Fatty Acids | Purdue University |
| Josiah F. Wedgwood, MD, PhD | Rheumatoid Arthritis | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases |
| Renal Disease and Diabetes TEP | ||
| Name | Area of Expertise | Institution |
| Judith Ashley, PhD, MSPH, RD | Omega-3 Fatty Acids | University of Nevada School of Medicine |
| Mayer B. Davidson, MD | Diabetes | Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science |
| James V. Donadio, MD | Renal Diseases | Mayo Medical School |
| William S. Harris, PhD | Omega-3 Fatty Acids | University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine |
| Michael D. Jensen, MD | Diabetes | Mayo Medical School |
| William F. Keane, MD | Renal Diseases | Merck and Co., Inc. |
| Catherine Meyers, MD | Renal Diseases | NIDDK, Division of Kidney, Urologic & Hematologic Diseases |
| Gastrointestinal Diseases TEP | ||
| Name | Area of Expertise | Institution |
| Judith Ashley, PhD, MSPH, RD | Omega-3 Fatty Acids | University of Nevada School of Medicine |
| Andrea Belluzzi, MD | Irritable Bowel Disease | S Orsola Hospital, Bologna, Italy |
| Frank Hamilton, MD | Irritable Bowel Disease | NIDDK, Division of Digestive Diseases & Nutrition |
| William S. Harris, PhD | Omega-3 Fatty Acids | University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine |
| Stephen James, MD | Inflammatory Bowel Disease | NIDDK, Division of Digestive Diseases & Nutrition |
| Michael Ken May, PhD | Inflammatory Bowel Disease | NIDDK, Division of Digestive Diseases & Nutrition |
| William F. Stenson, MD | Inflammatory Bowel Disease | Washington University |
| Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosis, and Bone Density TEP |
| 1. What is the evidence that in adults or children with rheumatoid arthritis, omega-3 fatty acids decrease pain or the number of swollen joints? |
• Restrict the search to randomized control trials. |
• Include children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis for now. |
• If possible, the outcome measures should include: disease activity, damage, and patient perception (i.e. patient global assessment). |
| 2. What is the evidence that omega-3 fatty acids help maintain bone mineral status? |
• Include both randomized controlled trials and observational studies. |
• The populations of interest are older women and women with osteoporosis. |
• Outcomes for randomized controlled trials will likely be measures of bone density and biologic markers. |
• Outcomes for observational studies are more likely to include fracture rates. |
• There is a need to adjust for ethnicity in the analyses because bone shape may affect the • rate of fractures. |
• In studies that report t-scores, there is a need to note the standard used to compute the t-score; WHO and NHANES are two different standards that may be used. |
| 3. What is the evidence that in adults or children with systemic lupus erythematosus, omega-3 fatty acids prolong longevity? |
• Restrict the study to randomized controlled trials. |
• Longevity is not the correct outcome to assess. |
• Recommended outcomes for assessment include disease activity, damage, and • patient perception (i.e. patient global assessment). |
General Comments |
• Note reported side effects of omega-3 fatty acids when reviewing the literature. |
| Renal Disease and Diabetes TEP |
| 1. What is the evidence for the efficacy of omega-3 fatty acids in treatment of hypertriglyceridemia of type II diabetes, insulin resistance, or the metabolic syndrome? |
• The question should be re-worded in the following way: What is the evidence in adults or children for the efficacy of omega-3 fatty acids in treatment of hyperlipedemia in a) type II diabetes, or b) insulin resistance/the metabolic syndrome? |
• Do not to limit the review to hypertriglyceridemia; collect data on other lipids, as well. |
• The question pertains specifically to the effect of omega-3 fatty acids on lipids in two different clinical syndromes: type II DM and the insulin resistance/metabolic syndrome. |
• The question pertains to both adults and children. |
| 2. What is the evidence that in adults or children with type I diabetes, omega-3 fatty acids increase insulin sensitivity? |
• Since insulin resistance is not a feature of type I diabetes, the questions should be re-worded in the following way: What is the evidence in adults and children for an effect of omega-3 fatty acids on insulin sensitivity in a) type II diabetes, or b) the metabolic syndrome? |
| 3. What is the evidence for the efficacy of omega-3 fatty acids in treatment of renal inflammation and glomerulosclerosis? |
• There was no consensus on how “renal inflammation” and “glomerulosclerosis” should be defined. |
• There was no consensus about whether to assess the effect of omega-3 fatty acids on the progression of renal disease. |
• Randomized controlled trials should be examined to determine whether sufficient evidence exists to assess the effect of omega-3 fatty acids on renal inflammation and/or the progression of renal acute or chronic renal insufficiency. |
• The question may be re-worded after the literature review has been completed. |
| Gastrointestinal Diseases TEP |
| 1. What is the evidence for the efficacy of omega-3 fatty acids in treatment of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis? |
• There are so few studies on the efficacy of omega-3 fatty acids in treating inflammatory bowel disease that it may be necessary to do a qualitative rather than a quantitative review of the literature. |
• Efficacy is not uniformly defined in IBD. However, a recent NIH conference addressed defining efficacy in Crohn's disease. |
• There are many potential confounders/effect modifiers for IBD, especially for Crohn's disease, including disease characteristics (severity, presence or absence of fistulas in Crohn's), medication use, and population characteristics. |
| 2. What is the evidence that in adults or children with inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease), omega-3 fatty acids lower leukotriene B4 or prostaglandin E2 levels? |
• A review of the effect of omega-3 fatty acids on leukotriene B4 or prostaglandin E2 should not be included in the report since neither is a measure of prevention or efficacy in IBD. |
• There are no studies of the effects of omega-3 fatty acids on IBD in children. |
General Comments |
• Take note of the omega-3 preparation. |
• Abstract and report side effects. |
|
| Diabetes |
|
| Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Renal Disease |
|
| Rheumatoid Arthritis |
|
| Systemic Lupus Erythematosus |
|
| Bone Density/Osteoporosis |
|
| Name | Affiliation |
|---|---|
| Ian Newton | Roche Vitamins |
| Herb Wool, PhD | BASF Corporation |
| Annette Dickinson | Council for Responsible Nutrition |
| Assessed the effect of omega-3 fatty acids on arthritis (including rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile rheumatoid arthritis), bone mineral metabolism, diabetes, IBD, lupus, or renal disease |
| Presented research on human subjects |
| Reported the results of randomized or controlled clinical trials or cohort/case control studies;† we accepted observational studies for bone mineral status only. |
| For cross-over studies, reported outcomes for each arm before the cross-over at the end of the first phase of treatment‡ |
Language was not a barrier to inclusion;
We defined a randomized controlled trial (RCT) as one in which the participants were assigned to one of two (or more) study groups using a process of random allocation (e.g., random number generation, coin flips); we defined a controlled clinical trial (CCT) as one in which participants were either: (1) assigned to one of two (or more) study groups using a quasi-random allocation method (e.g., alternation, date of birth, patient identifier), or (2) possibly assigned to one of two (or more) study groups using a process of random or quasi-random allocation;
We did not use data from the end of the study period in studies with a cross-over design because as a result of this design, the treatment and placebo groups from these studies are not comparable to the treatment and placebo groups of the non-cross-over randomized controlled trials with which they would be pooled in a meta-analysis. For example, one half of the placebo group in a cross-over trial will have been exposed to treatment with omega-3 fatty acids prior to placebo and hence the measured effect could be biased by earlier treatment with Omega-3 fatty acids.
| Summary Score | Jadad Score | Concealment of Allocation |
|---|---|---|
| A | 5 | Performed |
| B | 5 | Not performed, or Not reported |
| 3 or 4 | Performed, Not performed, or Not reported | |
| 0,1, or 2 | Performed | |
| C | 0, 1, or 2 | Not performed or not reported |
| Applicability | Health state | |
|---|---|---|
| I | Sample is representative of the U.S. population. | A General population. Typical healthy people similar to Americans without known cardiovascular diseases. |
| II | Sample is representative of a relevant sub-group of the target population, but not the entire population. For example, a study that is restricted to women or a fish oil study in Japan where the background diet is very different from that of the US would fall into this category. | B Diseased population. Subjects with any of the following: inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthritis, renal disease, systemic lupus erythematosus or osteoporosis. |
| III | Sample is representative of a narrow subgroup of subjects only, and not well applicable to other subgroups. For example, a study of oldest old men or a study of a population on highly controlled diet. | |
* Jadad A, Moore A, Carrol D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17:1–12.
| Peer Reviewer | Area of Expertise | Affiliation |
|---|---|---|
| Richard Glassock, MD | nephrology | UCLA |
| David Heber, MD | nutrition | UCLA |
| Ted Kraegen, PhD | diabetes, nutrition | Garvan Research Institute, Sydney |
| Kenneth Saag, MD, MPH | osteoporosis, SLE | University of Alabama |
| Walter Willett, MD | epidemiology, nutrition | Harvard University |
| Robert Zurier, MD | rheumatoid arthritis, omega-3 fatty acids | University of Massachusetts Medical School |








Free Full text in PMC]
Free Full text in PMC]
Free Full text in PMC]
Free Full text in PMC]
Free Full text in PMC]
Free Full text in PMC]
Free Full text in PMC]
Free Full text in PMC]
[PubMed]
Free Full text in PMC]
Free Full text in PMC]
Free Full text in PMC]
Free Full text in PMC]
[PubMed]
Free Full text in PMC]
[PubMed]
Free Full text in PMC]
[PubMed]
Free Full text in PMC]
Free Full text in PMC]
Free Full text in PMC]
Free Full text in PMC]
Free Full text in PMC]
Free Full text in PMC]
Free Full text in PMC]
Free Full text in PMC]
Free Full text in PMC]
Free Full text in PMC]