Chemical structures of 5-hydroxytryptamine and related indolealkylamines. The indole ring structure consists of the benzene ring and the attached five-member ring structure containing nitrogen.
It has been known since the mid-nineteenth century that after blood clots the resulting serum possesses a substance that constricts vascular smooth muscle so as to increase vascular tone. Around the turn of this century, platelets were identified as the source of this substance. In the late 1940s, Rapport and collaborators [1] isolated, purified and identified this “tonic” substance in “serum” (hence, serotonin) as the substituted indole 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT).
Chemical structures of 5-hydroxytryptamine and related indolealkylamines. The indole ring structure consists of the benzene ring and the attached five-member ring structure containing nitrogen.
Schematic drawing depicting the location of the serotonergic cell body groups in a sagittal section of the rat central nervous system and their major projections. OT, olfactory tuberculum; Sept, septum; C. Put, nucleus caudate-putamen; G. Pal, globus pallidus; T, thalamus; H, habenula; S. Nigra, substantia nigra. Modified from [40].
| Groups of serotonin-containing cell bodies | Anatomical structure |
|---|---|
| B1 | Raphe pallidus nucleus, caudal ventrolateral medulla |
| B2 | Raphe obscurus nucleus |
| B3 | Raphe magnus nucleus, rostral ventrolateral medulla, lateral paragigantocellular reticular nucleus |
| B4 | Raphe obscurus nucleus, dorsolateral part |
| B5 | Median raphe nucleus, caudal part |
| B6 | Dorsal raphe nucleus, caudal part |
| B7 | Dorsal raphe nucleus principal, rostral part |
| B8 | Median raphe nucleus, rostral main part; caudal linear nucleus; nucleus pontis oralis |
| B9 | Nucleus pontis oralis, supralemniscal region |
Modified from [3] with permission.
Serotonergic cell bodies in the midbrain raphe nuclei demonstrated by 5-hydroxytryptamine immunocytochemistry. A: Low magnification of transverse section through rat midbrain. The serotonergic cell body groups shown give rise to widespread serotonergic projections to cerebral cortex and forebrain structures. B: Higher magnification micrograph showing serotonergic cell bodies in dorsal and median raphe nuclei. The dorsal raphe nucleus lies in the central gray matter just beneath the cerebral aqueduct. In the transverse plane, the dorsal raphe can be subdivided further into a ventromedial cell cluster between and just above the medial longitudinal fasciculus (MLF)*, a smaller dorsomedial group just below the aqueduct and large bilateral cell groups. The median raphe nucleus lies in the central core of the midbrain, below the MLF. D, dorsal raphe; M, median raphe; A, aqueduct. (From [2], with permission.)
Since the late 1960s, a variety of techniques have been used to characterize the neuronal circuitry of serotonin cells in the CNS. The density of serotonergic innervation in the forebrain was underestimated initially because the original histofluorescence method was limited in sensitivity and did not permit the detection of many fine axons and terminals. Subsequent anatomical techniques, such as immunohistochemical localization of either 5-HT or tryptophan hydroxylase, an enzyme unique to the synthesis of 5-HT, in addition to retrograde and anterograde axonal transport studies, have allowed a more complete and accurate characterization of the serotonergic innervation of forebrain areas.
Two distinct ascending projections arise from the rostral serotonergic system. The two main ascending serotonergic pathways emerging from the midbrain raphe nuclei to the forebrain are the dorsal periventricular path and the ventral tegmental radiations. Both pathways converge in the caudal hypothalamus, where they join the medial forebrain bundle. Axons of both dopaminergic and noradrenergic neurons course anteriorly through the medial forebrain bundle as well (see Chap. 12).
Simplified diagram of the main features of the dual serotonergic system innervating the forebrain. The thin varicose axon system (D fibers) arises from the dorsal raphe (DR) nucleus with fibers that branch profusely in their target areas. It is difficult to demonstrate the synaptic connections of these fibers, and therefore, the incidence of synapses on these fibers is still being debated. The basket axon system (M fibers) arises from the median raphe nucleus (MnR) with thick, nonvaricose axons, giving rise to branches with characteristic axons that appear beaded, with round or oval varicosities. These large terminals make well-defined synapses with target cells. (From [2], with permission.) PAG, periaqueductal gray matter; IC, inferior colliculus; ml, medial lemniscus.
As expected, serotonergic terminals make the usual specialized synaptic contacts with target neurons and release serotonin following nerve stimulation. In some areas of the mammalian CNS, there are sites where 5-HT is released and no evidence for synaptic specialization has been found. For example, it is difficult to demonstrate the synaptic contacts of the fine varicose fibers, whereas large terminals make well defined synapses with target cells. The percentage of 5-HT terminals associated with synaptic specializations appears to vary in particular brain regions. This may have important implications for the type of information processing in which 5-HT is involved in these brain areas. The appearance of specialized synaptic contacts suggests relatively stable and strong associations between a presynaptic neuron and its target. Conversely, the lack of synaptic specialization implies a dynamic, and perhaps less specific, interaction with target neurons. For example, neurotransmitter is released and then diffuses over distances as great as several hundred microns. In this case, 5-HT may act as a neuromodulator to adjust or tune ongoing synaptic activity.
Afferent connections to the raphe nuclei include those between the dorsal and median raphe nuclei, B9, B1 and B3. Connections between the raphe nuclei have been described by retrograde tracing techniques using horseradish peroxidase and wheat germ agglutinin. Such innervation may have considerable physiological and/or pharmacological importance as serotonin released in the vicinity of serotonergic cell bodies regulates the firing of serotonergic neurons through the activation of somatodendritic autoreceptors. The raphe nuclei also receive input from other cell body groups in the brainstem, such as the substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area (dopamine), superior vestibular nucleus (acetylcholine), locus ceruleus (norepinephrine) and nucleus prepositus hypoglossi and nucleus of the solitary tract (epinephrine). Other afferents include neurons from the hypothalamus, thalamus and limbic forebrain structures (see [2–4] for a comprehensive review of serotonergic neuroanatomy).
The biosynthesis and catabolism of serotonin. Note that in the pineal gland, serotonin is converted enzymatically to melatonin.
The Km of partially purified tryptophan hydroxylase for tryptophan is approximately 30 to 60 μM, a concentration comparable to that of tryptophan in brain. If the concentration of tryptophan in serotonergic neurons is assumed to be comparable to that in whole brain, the enzyme would not be saturated with substrate and the formation of 5-HT in brain would be expected to rise as the brain concentration of tryptophan increases. This occurs specifically in response to raising the dietary intake of tryptophan. However, the relationship among tryptophan availability, total tissue 5-HT concentration and 5-HT release is not fully understood.
cDNAs encoding tryptophan hydroxylase from both brain and pineal gland have been cloned and sequenced. Some biochemical differences between the enzyme(s) obtained from brain and from pineal gland, such as molecular weight, substrate specificity and isoelectric point, have been reported previously. However, cDNAs isolated from both tissue sources appear to have identical nucleotide sequences, making it likely that tissue-specific differences in the properties of tryptophan hydroxylase result from differential post-translational processing. Tryptophan hydroxylase contains 444 amino acids, corresponding to a molecular weight of about 51,000, and is 50% homologous with tyrosine hydroxylase, the rate-limiting enzyme in catecholamine (CA) biosynthesis (see Chap. 12). The greatest homology resides in the central and C-terminus regions of these enzymes, making it likely that these areas contain the catalytic site. Substrate specificity may reside in those amino acids nearer the N-terminus.
AADC is present not only in serotonergic neurons but also in catecholaminergic neurons, where it converts 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) to dopamine (see Chap. 12). However, different pH optima or concentrations of substrate or cofactor are required for optimal activity of the enzyme in brain homogenates when using either 5-HTP or DOPA as the substrate. cDNAs encoding AADC have been cloned from various species. The encoded protein contains 480 amino acids and has a molecular weight of 54,000 but it appears to exist as a dimer. Characterization of the protein expressed in cells transfected with the cDNA shows that it decarboxylates either DOPA or 5-HTP. Also, in situ hybridization of the mRNA for the enzyme revealed its presence both in serotonergic cells in the dorsal raphe nucleus and in catecholaminergic cells in brain regions containing catecholaminergic soma [6]. Taken together, these results support the idea that the enzymatic decarboxylation of both DOPA and 5-HTP is catalyzed by the same enzyme.
Because the decarboxylase enzyme is not saturated with 5-HTP under physiological conditions, that is, the concentration of 5-HTP is much less than the Km of 10 μM, it is possible to raise the content of 5-HT in brain not only by increasing the dietary intake of tryptophan but also by raising the intake of 5-HTP. This procedure, though, results in the formation of 5-HT in cells that would not normally contain it, such as catecholaminergic neurons, because of the nonselective nature of AADC.
The initial hydroxylation of tryptophan, rather than the decarboxylation of 5-HTP, appears to be the rate-limiting step in serotonin synthesis. Evidence in support of this view includes the fact that 5-HTP is found only in trace amounts in brain, presumably because it is decarboxylated about as rapidly as it is formed. As might be expected if the hydroxylation reaction is rate-limiting, inhibition of this reaction results in a marked depletion of the content of 5-HT in brain. The enzyme inhibitor most widely used in experiments is parachlorophenylalanine (PCPA). In vivo, PCPA irreversibly inhibits tryptophan hydroxylase, presumably by incorporating itself into the enzyme to produce an inactive protein. This results in a long-lasting reduction of 5-HT levels. Recovery of enzyme activity and 5-HT biosynthesis requires the synthesis of new enzyme. Marked increases in levels of mRNA for tryptophan hydroxylase are found in the raphe nuclei 1 to 3 days after administration of PCPA [7].
Plasticity is an important concept in neurobiology. In general, this refers to the ability of neuronal systems to conform to either short- or long-term demands placed upon their activity or function. One of the processes contributing to neuronal plasticity is the ability to increase the rate of neurotransmitter synthesis and release in response to increased neuronal activity. Serotonergic neurons have this capability; the synthesis of 5-HT from tryptophan is increased in a frequency-dependent manner in response to electrical stimulation of serotonergic soma [8]. The increase in synthesis results from the enhanced conversion of tryptophan to 5-HTP and has an absolute dependence on extracellular Ca2+. It is likely that the increased synthesis results in part from alterations in the kinetic properties of tryptophan hydroxylase, perhaps due to calcium-dependent phosphorylation of the enzyme. The enzyme can be phosphorylated directly by the action of calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II; an activator protein appears to be required for this interaction. In the presence of the activator, tryptophan hydroxylase also may be a substrate for cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA). The increased activity of tryptophan hydroxylase does not result from the removal of enzyme inhibition caused by either 5-HT or 5-HTP.
Short-term requirements for increases in the synthesis of 5-HT can be met by processes that change the kinetic properties of tryptophan hydroxylase, such as phosphorylation, without necessitating the synthesis of more molecules of tryptophan hydroxylase. By contrast, situations requiring long-term increases in the synthesis and release of 5-HT result in the synthesis of tryptophan hydroxylase protein. For example, partial but substantial destruction of >60% of central serotonergic neurons results in an increase in the synthesis of 5-HT in residual terminals. The increase in synthesis initially results from activation of existing tryptophan hydroxylase molecules, but the increased synthesis of 5-HT seen weeks after the lesion results from more tryptophan hydroxylase being present in the residual terminals. An increase in tryptophan hydroxylase mRNA has been reported in residual raphe serotonergic neurons after partial lesioning, consistent with the idea of an increase in the synthesis of tryptophan hydroxylase molecules in residual neurons.
The substituted amphetamine fenfluramine inhibits the transport of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) by both (A) the vesicular transporter and (B) the serotonin transporter (SERT). Substituted amphetamines, such as fenfluramine and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), stimulate the release of 5-HT from serotonergic terminals. These drugs block the vesicular transporter and disrupt the proton gradient across the vesicle membrane. The increase in intracellular 5-HT favors the release of 5-HT by the reverse action of the SERT. These drugs also act as substrates for the SERT so as to inhibit the transport of 5-HT into cells.
Two synaptic vesicle transporters have been cloned, with the predicted amino acid sequence containing 12 transmembrane domains. The first transporter, cloned from chromaffin granules, has been termed vesicular membrane transporter1 (VMAT1). It contains 521 amino acids and a large loop between transmembrane domains 1 and 2, which faces the lumen of the vesicle, contains sites for glycosylation. Both the NH2 and COOH termini face the cytoplasm. A second vesicular transporter (VMAT2), cloned from rat brain, is 62% identical to VMAT1. Human chromosome 8 contains the gene for VMAT1 and chromosome 10 contains the gene for VMAT2. These transporters show homology to a family of drug-resistant transporters in bacteria and yeast. All members of this family function as antiporters to remove toxic compounds from the cytoplasm. It has been suggested that this family, including VMAT1 and VMAT2, be termed T oxin-Extruding Antiporters (TEXANs) [9].
Vesicles storing 5-HT exhibit some differences from those storing CAs. In contrast to CA-containing vesicles, there is virtually no ATP in serotonin vesicles. Also, serotonergic synaptic vesicles, but not chromaffin granules, contain a specific protein that binds 5-HT with high affinity. This serotonin-binding protein is present in serotonergic cells derived ontogenetically from the neuroectoderm [10]. It binds 5-HT with high affinity in the presence of Fe2+. There are three isoforms of serotonin-binding protein. The 45-kDa isoform appears to be packaged in secretory vesicles along with 5-HT, which probably accounts for the observation that newly taken up [3H]5-HT is rapidly complexed with this isoform in brain in situ. This isoform is secreted along with 5-HT by a calcium-dependent process.
There is considerable evidence that the release of 5-HT occurs by exocytosis, that is, by the discharge from the cell of the entire contents of individual storage vesicles. First, 5-HT is ionized sufficiently at physiological pH so that it does not cross plasma membranes by simple diffusion. Second, most intraneuronal 5-HT is contained in storage vesicles and other contents of the vesicle, including serotonin-binding protein (SPB), are released together with serotonin. By contrast, cytosolic proteins do not accompany electrical stimulation-elicited release of 5-HT. Third, the depolarization-induced release of 5-HT occurs by a calcium-dependent process; indeed, it appears that the influx of Ca2+ with or without membrane depolarization can increase the release of 5-HT. Ca2+ has been reported to stimulate the fusion of vesicular membranes with the plasma membrane.
Effects of psychoactive drugs on serotonergic neurotransmission. Drugs that act as agonists are indicated by solid-line arrows, whereas antagonists or inhibitors are shown with broken-line arrows. The 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)1A receptor acts as both the somatodendritic autoreceptor and a postsynaptic receptor. Anxiolytic drugs, such as buspirone, are agonists at this receptor. In terminal fields, the autoreceptor is either the 5-HT1B or 5-HT1D subtype; these receptors also function as postsynaptic receptors. The antimigraine drug sumatriptan is an agonist at these receptors as well as at the 5-HT1F receptor. Hallucinogenic drugs, such as LSD, are agonists at 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors, whereas atypical antipsychotic drugs, such as clozapine and olanzapine, are antagonists. The 5-HT3 receptor, a ligand-gated ion channel, is blocked by drugs effective in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis, such as ondansetron. Another important target for psychotherapeutic drugs is the serotonin transporter, which is blocked by drugs effective in the treatment of depression or obsessive-compulsive disorder, such as clomipramine. The enzyme responsible for the catabolism of serotonin, monoamine oxidase (MAO), is inhibited by another class of antidepressants. MAOI, monoamine oxidase inhibitor; TCA, tricyclic antidepressant; SSRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.
Synaptic effects of many amino acid and monoaminergic neurotransmitters, including 5-HT, are terminated by binding of these molecules to specific transporter proteins. The serotonin transporter (SERT) is located on serotonergic neurons. Evidence for this comes from studies showing that the selective lesioning of serotonergic neurons in brain markedly reduces both the high-affinity uptake of [3H]5-HT in areas of brain receiving serotonergic innervation and the specific binding of radioligands to the serotonin transporter. Activity of the SERT regulates the concentration of 5-HT in the synapse, thereby influencing synaptic transmission.
The cloning, sequencing and expression of several transporter proteins, including that for 5-HT, has aided considerably in understanding structure/function relationships of transporter proteins [11,12]. The cDNA for the SERT isolated from rat brain predicts a protein containing 630 amino acids with a molecular weight of about 68,000. The SERT is encoded by a single gene on the long arm of chromosome 17. The mRNA for the SERT has been localized in brain exclusively to the serotonergic cells in the raphe nuclei. Of interest is the fact that mRNA for the SERT has not yet been detected in glia, even though primary cultures of astrocytes in vitro can take up 5-HT. The inability to detect message for the SERT in glia raises questions about the physiological relevance of the uptake of 5-HT by glia in vitro.
Putative structure of the rat serotonin transporter showing homologous amino acids with the rat dopamine transporter (DAT), human norepinephrine transporter (NET) or both. Possible phosphorylation
sites are shown, as are possible glycosylation sites on the large second extracellular loop. Note the considerable degree of homology in the 12 transmembrane-spanning regions. (Diagram courtesy of Dr. Beth J. Hoffman, Laboratory of Cell Biology, NIMH, Bethesda, MD.)
Of considerable interest is whether the SERT is subject to physiological regulation. Such regulation could occur at the level of transcription or translation or by post-translational modifications, such as glycosylation or phosphorylation. The focus of much of this research, carried out in vitro using cells that naturally express the SERT or cells stably transfected with the SERT, has been on the role of second-messenger systems, particularly those activating protein kinases. It has been established that SERT gene expression is (i) influenced by cAMP-dependent pathways and (ii) rapidly regulated by changes in intracellular Ca2+, treatment with calmodulin inhibitors or activation of PKC as well as nitric oxide synthase (NOS)/cGMP pathways. Most of the kinetic alterations reflect changes in maximal transport capacity (Vmax) rather than in apparent affinity (Km). Activation of PKC causes a loss of SERT protein on the cell surface. It remains to be established, however, whether such processes contribute to modulation of SERT activity in vivo.
Although there is structural homology among the transporters for 5-HT, NE and DA, some drugs exhibit great selectivity at inhibiting the activity of just one of these proteins. For example, secondary amine tricyclic antidepressants, such as desipramine, are 25- to 150-fold more potent at inhibiting transport of NE than 5-HT. By contrast, some of the newer antidepressants, appropriately termed selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), such as fluoxetine, sertraline and paroxetine, are 15 to 75 times more potent at inhibiting the uptake of 5-HT than the uptake of NE. However, there are also drugs, such as cocaine, that are nonselective inhibitors of all three transporters.
There are at least two isoenzymes of MAO, referred to as MAO-A and MAO-B. These isoenzymes are integral flavoproteins of outer mitochondrial membranes in neurons, glia and other cells. Evidence for the existence of isoenzymes was based initially on differing substrate specificities and sensitivities to inhibitors of MAO. For example, both 5-HT and NE are metabolized preferentially by MAO-A. Selective inhibitors of each form of MAO exist: clorgyline or moclobemide for type A and deprenyl for type B. Definitive proof of the existence of these two forms of MAO comes from the cloning of cDNAs encoding subunits of MAO-A and MAO-B from human liver [13]. The deduced amino acid sequences of MAO-A and MAO-B show about 70% homology and have masses of 59.7 and 58.8 kDa, respectively. When each cDNA was cloned into an expression vector and transfected independently into a cell line, the activity of the proteins expressed resembled that of the endogenous enzymes from human brain, such that the expressed MAO-A preferred 5-HT as a substrate and was inhibited preferentially by clorgyline. From such data it was inferred that the functional differences between these two enzymes exist in their primary structures.
Several different techniques have been used to study the neuroanatomical localization of the two forms of MAO in brain. Originally, both histochemical and immunohistochemical techniques were used. More recently, in situ hybridization histochemistry has been used to demonstrate the location of the mRNAs for the two isoenzymes. The development of radioligands selective for each form has enabled their distribution to be revealed by quantitative autoradiography. In general, the results from the use of these different techniques are similar. It is of interest that there is more MAO-A than MAO-B throughout rat brain, whereas human brain contains more MAO-B than MAO-A. Serotonergic cell bodies contain predominantly MAO-B, for which 5-HT is not a preferred substrate. This has led to the hypothesis that MAO-B in serotonergic neurons prevents the cell from accumulating various other natural substrates, such as DA, that could interfere with the storage, release and uptake of 5-HT. Furthermore, treatment of rats with clorgyline, a selective inhibitor of MAO-A, raises the brain content of 5-HT and reduces the conversion of 5-HT to 5-HIAA in brain. Thus, 5-HT may well be oxidized preferentially by MAO-A in vivo, as it is in vitro, even though serotonergic neurons do not contain much of this form of the enzyme.
The use of transgenic mice permits the selective elimination, or “knockout,” of either MAO type [14]. In the brains of mice deficient in MAO-A, the content of 5-HT is elevated markedly for about 12 days after birth and then slowly declines, reaching values comparable to those in normal mice after about 7 months. In MAO-A-deficient mice, the selective inhibitor of MAO-B, deprenyl, had a greater effect on serotonin metabolism than it did in normal mice. Such observations indicate that, in the absence of MAO-A, MAO-B can metabolize 5-HT in vivo. However, mice lacking the MAO-B isoenzyme do not have elevated levels of 5-HT in brain. Of interest are the aggressive behaviors exhibited by mice deficient in MAO-A, consistent with a postulated role of serotonergic neurons in human aggressive behaviors.
The initial suggestion that there might be more than one type of receptor for serotonin came from experiments on the isolated guinea pig ileum, which demonstrated that only a portion of the contractile response to serotonin could be blocked by high concentrations of morphine, whereas the remainder of the response could be blocked by low concentrations of dibenzyline (phenoxybenzamine). Similarly, when maximally effective concentrations of dibenzyline were present, the remaining contractile response elicited by serotonin was blocked by low concentrations of morphine. It was speculated that there were two different receptors for 5-HT in the ileum: D receptors, which are blocked by dibenzyline, and M receptors, which are blocked by morphine. The D receptor was thought to be on the smooth muscle of the ileum, whereas the M receptor was considered to be on ganglia or nerves within the muscle.
In the 1970s, the development of radioligand-binding assays furthered our understanding of subtypes of receptors for serotonin. Initially, a number of radioligands, such as [3H]5-HT, [3H]LSD and [3H]spiperone, were used to label sites related to serotonin receptors. These radioligands originally were proposed to label two classes of serotonin receptor in brain. Binding sites that were labeled with high affinity by [3H]5-HT were designated 5-HT1 receptors; binding sites labeled with high affinity by [3H]spiperone were termed 5-HT2 receptors. Many subsequent experiments have shown that the D receptor and the 5-HT2 receptor are pharmacologically indistinguishable.
The binding of [3H]5-HT to 5-HT1 receptors was shown to be displaced by spiperone in a biphasic manner, suggesting that what was termed the 5-HT1 receptor might be a heterogeneous population of receptors. The [3H]5-HT-binding site that showed high affinity for spiperone was termed the 5-HT1A subtype, whereas the component of [3H]5-HT binding that showed low affinity for spiperone was called the 5-HT1B subtype. A high density of binding sites for [3H]5-HT was found in the choroid plexus. These [3H]5-HT-binding sites were termed the 5-HT1C subtype as they did not show the pharmacological characteristics used to classify the 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B or 5-HT2 binding sites. Subsequently, a fourth binding site for [3H]5-HT was identified in bovine brain and called the 5-HT1D receptor. The 5-HT1D receptor was identified by pharmacological criteria only in brains of species devoid of the 5-HT1B receptor, such as pig, cow, guinea pig and human.
Bradley and associates in 1986 proposed a classification scheme with three major types of receptors for serotonin, using pharmacological criteria and functional responses primarily in peripheral tissues [15]. The receptors were called “5-HT1-like,” 5-HT2 and 5-HT3. The development of potent and selective antagonists of the 5-HT2 receptor, such as ketanserin, facilitated the assignment of certain effects mediated by 5-HT to the 5-HT2 receptor. The M receptor, originally described in guinea pig ileum, is pharmacologically distinct from all of the binding sites associated with the serotonin receptors just described. Bradley and associates renamed this the 5-HT3 receptor. The development of potent selective antagonists and an agonist, 2-methyl-5-HT, provided useful tools for the pharmacological characterization of 5-HT3 receptors.
The first 5-HT receptor to be cloned was the 5-HT1C receptor. Over the course of the next 5 years, the 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B, 5-HT1D, 5-HT2 and 5-HT3 receptors also were cloned. The 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B, 5-HT1C, 5-HT1D and 5-HT2 receptors are single-subunit proteins that are members of the G protein receptor superfamily. This receptor family is characterized by the presence of seven transmembrane domains, an intracellular carboxy-terminus and an extracellular amino-terminus. It is the interaction of the receptor with the G protein that allows the receptor to modulate the activity of different effector systems, such as ion channels, phospholipase C and adenylyl cyclase. The transmembrane domains of G protein-coupled receptors are the most highly conserved regions of these proteins. The 5-HT3 receptor differs from all other known subtypes of serotonin receptor in that it is a member of the ligand-gated ion channel superfamily. Members of this receptor superfamily consist of five subunits, each of which possesses four transmembrane segments and a large, extracellular N-terminal region.
The rapid discovery of additional subtypes of receptor for serotonin made it necessary to establish an unambiguous system of nomenclature. The current classification scheme takes into account not only operational criteria, such as drug-related characteristics, but also information about intracellular signal-transduction mechanisms and amino acid sequence of the receptor protein. For example, the 5-HT1C receptor was reclassified as a 5-HT2 receptor based on the sequence homology, similar pharmacological characteristics and effector coupling of the 5-HT2 and 5-HT1C receptors. The 5-HT2 receptor was renamed 5-HT2A and the 5-HT1C receptor was renamed the 5-HT2C [16]. The amino acid sequence of several new serotonin receptors has been reported. However, the classification of these receptors remains tentative due to limited knowledge of their operational and tranductional characteristics, which have only been described in transfected cell systems for these recombinant receptors. Because the functions mediated by these serotonin receptors in intact tissue are unknown, lowercase appellations are presently used [16].
The three serotonin receptor subfamilies, the 5-HT1 family; the 5-HT2 family; and the family that includes the 5-HT4, 5-ht6 and 5-HT7 receptors, represent the three major classes of serotonin receptor that are members of the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily. As mentioned above, the 5-HT3 receptor is a ligand-gated ion channel and is a separate subfamily. Although each serotonin receptor can be activated potently by serotonin, differences in signal-transduction mechanisms, neuroanatomical distribution and affinities for synthetic chemicals create opportunities for drug discovery and make each serotonin receptor subtype a potential therapeutic target.
| Receptora | Human locus | Distribution | Effector mechanism |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-HT1A | 5q11.2–13 | Hippocampus, amygdala, septum, entorhinal cortex, hypothalamus, raphe nuclei | Inhibition of adenylyl cyclase, opening of K+ channels |
| 5-HT1Dα | 1p34.3–36.3 | Not distinguishable from 5-HT1Dβ | Inhibition of adenylyl cyclase |
| 5-HT1Dβ | 6q13 | Substantia nigra, basal ganglia, superior colliculus | Inhibition of adenylyl cyclase |
| 5-ht1E | ? | ? | Inhibition of adenylyl cyclase |
| 5-ht1F | 3p11 | Cerebral cortex, striatum, hippocampus, olfactory bulb | Inhibition of adenylyl cyclase |
| 5-HT2A | 13q14–21 | Claustrum, cerebral cortex, olfactory tubercle, striatum, nucleus accumbens | Stimulation of phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C, closing of K+ channels |
| 5-HT2B | 2q36.3–37.1 | ? | Stimulation of phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C |
| 5-HT2C | Xq24 | Choroid plexus, globus pallidus, cerebral cortex, hypothalamus, septum, substantia nigra, spinal cord | Stimulation of phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C |
| 5-HT3 | ? | Hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, amygdala, nucleus accumbens, solitary tract nerve, trigeminal nerve, motor nucleus of the dorsal vagal nerve, area postrema, spinal cord | Ligand-gated cation channel |
| 5-HT4 | ? | Hippocampus, striatum, olfactory tubercle, substantia nigra | Stimulation of adenylyl cyclase |
| 5-ht5A | 7q36 | ? | Inhibition of adenylyl cyclase |
| 5-HT5B | 2q11–13 | ? | ? |
| 5-ht6 | ? | ? | Stimulation of adenylyl cyclase |
| 5-HT7 | 10q23.3–24.3 | Cerebral cortex, septum, thalamus, hypothalamus, amygdala, superior colliculus | Stimulation of adenylyl cyclase |
Lower-case appellations are used in some cases because the functions mediated by these receptors in intact tissue are presently unknown.
An issue raised by the use of molecular biological techniques for the study of neurotransmitter receptors is whether a receptor is a subtype or a species homolog, that is, an equivalent receptor in different species. For example, the 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors originally were considered to be species variants of the same receptor because the pharmacological profiles of these two receptors are similar, although not identical; the distribution of these two receptors in brain is very similar; and both receptors are coupled to the inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. Although biochemical, pharmacological and functional data suggest that the 5-HT1B receptor found in rats and mice and the 5-HT1D receptor found in other species, including humans, are functionally equivalent species homologs, the story has been complicated somewhat by the discovery of two genes encoding the human 5-HT1D receptor, 5-HT1Dα and 5-HT1Dβ [16].
Radioligand-binding studies currently do not allow the differentiation of 5-HT1Dα and 5-HT1Dβ receptors, and the binding profiles of these receptor subtypes match the previously described 5-HT1D-binding site. Furthermore, a rat homolog of the human 5-HT1Dα receptor has been isolated and shown to encode a receptor with a 5-HT1D-binding site profile, suggesting that the 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors may not be species homologs but distinct 5-HT receptor subtypes. There is still some debate as to whether a common appellation should be used to refer to the protein products of two distinct genes, the 5-HT1Dα and the 5-HT1Dβ receptor, and whether the human 5-HT1Dβ receptor should be called the human 5-HT1B receptor, even though it has a distinct pharmacological profile from that of the rat 5-HT1B receptor. Because there are no compounds currently available to differentiate between the 5-HT1Dα and the 5-HT1Dβ receptors, we will refer to them in this chapter as 5-HT1D. Furthermore, because of distinct pharmacological profiles of the 5-HT1B receptor found in rat and the 5-HT1D receptor found in other species, we will not refer to the 5-HT1Dβ as the human 5-HT1B receptor.
The 5-ht1E receptor originally was identified in homogenates of human frontal cortex by radioligand-binding studies with [3H]5-HT in the presence of 5-carboxamidotryptamine (5-CT) to block 5-HT1A and 5-HT1D receptor sites. Because of the lack of specific radioligands for the 5-ht1E receptor, the overall distribution in brain is unknown. With the cloning of the various subtypes of receptors for serotonin, knowledge of receptor sequences can be used to generate radioactive probes for mRNAs encoding individual serotonin receptor subtypes. Using in situ hybridization histochemistry, the localization of these mRNAs and, thus, the distribution of cells expressing the mRNAs for serotonin receptors can be established in brain. 5-ht1E receptor mRNA has been found in the caudate putamen, parietal cortex and olfactory tubercle [17]. The function of the 5-ht1E receptor in intact tissue is not known due to the lack of selective agonists or antagonists. In transfected cells, the 5ht1E receptor is coupled to the inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity. The 5-ht1E receptor displays a higher degree of homology with the 5-HT1D receptor (64%) than any other 5-HT1 receptors [16].
The 5-HT1F receptor was cloned and sequenced in 1993 and shares the greatest sequence homology with the 5-ht1E receptor (61%). 5-ht1F receptor mRNA is found in cortex, hippocampus, dentate gyrus, nucleus of the solitary tract, spinal cord, trigeminal ganglion neurons, uterus and mesentery. In transfected cells, the 5-ht1F receptor is coupled to the inhibition of adenylyl cyclase [16]. Because selective agonists or antagonists for the 5-ht1F receptor have not been available until very recently, little is known about the distribution or function of the 5-ht1F receptor in brain. The selective agonist radioligand [3H]LY334370 has been used to demonstrate the presence of 5-ht1F receptor sites in cortex, striatum, hippocampus and olfactory bulb [18]. Activation of 5-ht1F receptors in vivo inhibits neurogenic dural inflammation and dural protein extravasation.
Cloning of the 5-HT2A receptor has been used to gain insight into a controversy over the nature of agonist binding to the 5-HT2A receptor. The hallucinogenic amphetamine derivative [3H]2,5-Dimethoxy-4-bromoamphetamine (DOB), an agonist, binds to a small number of sites with properties very similar to those of the receptor labeled with the antagonist [3H]ketanserin. Agonists, though, have higher affinities for the receptor labeled with [3H]DOB than for that labeled with [3H]ketanserin. Some investigators have interpreted these and other data as evidence for the existence of a new subtype of 5-HT2A receptor, whereas others have interpreted these data as indicative of agonist high-affinity and agonist low-affinity preferring states of the 5-HT2A receptor. In experiments in which the cDNA encoding the 5-HT2A receptor was transfected into clonal cells, binding sites for both the 5-HT2A receptor antagonist [3H]ketanserin and the 5-HT2 receptor agonist [3H]DOB were found. Furthermore, agonists had higher affinities for [3H]DOB binding than for [3H]ketanserin binding. Thus, a single gene produces a protein with both binding sites, substantiating the view that agonist and antagonist binding are to different states, rather than to two different subtypes, of the 5-HT2A receptor.
5-HT4 , 5-ht6 and 5-HT7 receptors are included in a family of serotonin receptors coupled to the stimulation of adenylyl cyclase. The 5-HT4 receptor originally was described in cultured murine collicular neurons as a serotonin receptor coupled to the stimulation of adenylyl cyclase activity, possessing pharmacological characteristics distinct from those of the 5-HT1, 5-HT2 or 5-HT3 receptors. The 5-HT4 receptor gene has been cloned from rat brain RNA by reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR [21]. Two different cDNA clones, the long isoform, 5.5-kb 5-HT41, and the short isoform, 4.5-kb 5-HT4s, have been isolated and are most likely the result of alternative splicing of 5-HT4 receptor mRNA.
The 5-ht6 receptor is approximately 30% homologous to other serotonin receptors. When expressed in transfected cells, it shows high affinity for [125I]LSD and [3H]5-HT. The pharmacology of this recombinant receptor is unique. Interestingly, this receptor has high affinity for various antipsychotic and antidepressant drugs, such as clozapine, amitriptyline, clomipramine, mianserin and ritanserin. The 5-ht6 receptor stimulates adenylyl cyclase when expressed in some, but not all, cell systems. The function of the 5-ht6 receptor in intact tissue has not been characterized due to the lack of selective agonists or antagonists. Expression of 5-ht6 receptor mRNA has been detected in the striatum, nucleus accumbens, olfactory tubercle, hippocampus and cerebral cortex [16].
Two rat 5-HT7 receptor clones, which differ only in the C terminus and presumably result from alternative mRNA splicing, have been identified. The 5-HT7 receptor shows the highest amino acid sequence homology with the Drosophila 5-HT1A receptor, 42%, and approximately 35% homology with all other serotonin receptors. To date, no selective agonists or antagonists have been described for the 5-HT7 receptor. In transfected cells, the 5-HT7 receptor stimulates adenylyl cyclase. 5-HT7 receptors have been identified in human vascular smooth muscle cells and frontal cortical astrocytes in primary culture, where they are coupled to the stimulation of adenylyl cyclase.
The 5-ht5A and 5-HT5B receptors may constitute a new family of serotonin receptors since neither is coupled to adenylyl cyclase or PI-PLC; their effector systems are currently unknown. Both the 5-ht5A and 5-HT5B receptors were cloned by using degenerate oligonucleotides derived from TMDs III and VI of G protein-coupled serotonin receptors. Both genomic clones possess one intron in the middle of the third cytoplasmic loop. The receptor proteins are 77% identical to each other, whereas the homology to other serotonin receptors is low.
5-ht5A receptor mRNA transcripts have been detected by in situ hybridization in the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, granule cells of the cerebellum, medial habenula, amygdala, septum, several thalamic nuclei and olfactory bulb of the rat and mouse. 5-HT5B mRNA has been detected by in situ hybridization in the hippocampus, habenula and the dorsal raphe nucleus of rat and human [16].
Immunohistochemical studies with antibodies to the 5-ht5A receptor have shown this receptor to be expressed predominantly by astrocytes, although some neurons in cortex were labeled as well. In transfected cells expressing the 5-ht5A receptor, 5-HT does not stimulate the formation of cAMP as it does in wild-type cells. Furthermore, 5-HT inhibits forskolin-stimulated cAMP formation, an effect not seen in wild-type cells. Thus, the 5-ht5A receptor appears to be coupled to the inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity [22]. At the present time, the functional correlate and transductional properties are unknown for the 5-HT5B receptor.
An atypical 5-HT receptor exists on the enteric neurons of the gut. This receptor has high affinity for [3H]5-HT and mediates a slow depolarization of particular myenteric neurons that is not blocked by selective 5-HT3 antagonists. It has been termed the 5-HT1P receptor as it has a high affinity for 5-HT and is found in the periphery. The available functional and radioligand-binding data confirm the orphan status of the 5-HT1P receptor and emphasize the need to establish a rigorous basis for its positive identification [16].
Classically, a decrease in exposure of a tissue to its endogenous transmitter leads to a supersensitive, or exaggerated, response to exogenous agonist, which may be accounted for by an increase in the density or upregulation of postsynaptic receptors for the transmitter. Conversely, increased exposure of a tissue to agonists overtime will result in a decreased responsiveness, or desensitization, to the agonist, which may be due, at least in part, to a decrease, or downregulation, in receptor density. Central β1-noradrenergic and D2-dopaminergic receptors undergo such regulatory processes.
Chronic or repeated administration of antidepressant drugs, such as MAO inhibitors or inhibitors of serotonin uptake, or 5-HT1A receptor agonists to laboratory rats results in a desensitization of behavioral and electrophysiological responses believed to be mediated by 5-HT1A receptors. Lesioning serotonergic neurons results in increased behavioral and electrophysiological responses. However, these treatments do not result in changes in 5-HT1A receptors as measured with binding assays. Some investigators have reported diminished 5-HT1A receptor-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cylcase following repeated administration of some antidepressant drugs to rats. However, desensitization of second-messenger function has not been observed consistently after chronic antidepressant or agonist treatments.
Lesions of serotonergic neurons do not cause detectable changes in 5-HT1B receptors in forebrain areas and have been reported to cause upregulation, downregulation or not to effect the density of 5-HT1B receptors in substantia nigra. Interpretation of these reports may be complicated by the fact that the 5-HT1B receptor is located both pre- and postsynaptically. Cells maintained in culture represent an alternative to in vivo systems. The 5-HT1B receptor is found on an epithelial cell line from opossum kidney (OK cells). Exposure of OK cells to 5-HT results in a time- and dose-dependent decrease in the density of 5-HT1B receptors and a desensitization of the 5-HT1B receptor-mediated inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation [25]. It seems, then, that the 5-HT1B receptor can downregulate in response to prolonged exposure to an agonist.
5-HT2A receptors do not respond to changes in agonist exposure in the classic manner. Specifically, no change in 5-HT2A receptor density is observed after lesioning serotonergic neurons or after depletion of serotonin stores. 5-HT2A receptor-mediated phosphoinositide hydrolysis is also unchanged after such treatments, suggesting that denervation supersensitivity does not occur. Thus, it appears that neither the 5-HT2A receptor nor its second-messenger pathway is regulated by a decrease in neurotransmitter exposure. After administration of hallucinogenic 5-HT2 receptor agonists or chronic administration of selective inhibitors of serotonin uptake, 5-HT2A receptor-mediated inositol lipid hydrolysis becomes desensitized and 5-HT2A receptors downregulate. Surprisingly, 5-HT2A receptor desensitization and downregulation also occur following administration of drugs that are antagonists at 5-HT2A receptors, such as ketanserin, the atypical antidepressant mianserin and atypical antipsychotic drugs. Given that agonist exposure causes desensitization of 5-HT2 receptors, it has been proposed that the absence of supersensitivity after denervation may reflect low tonic activity at synapses innervating 5-HT2 receptors [26].
Following the lesioning of serotonergic neurons with neurotoxin, 5-HT2C receptor-mediated phosphoinositide hydrolysis in choroid plexus is increased, indicating that these receptors undergo denervation supersensitivity. However, radioligand-binding studies fail to show an increase in 5-HT2C receptor number or in receptor upregulation. Paradoxically, chronic administration of the 5-HT2 receptor antagonist mianserin to rats results in downregulation of the 5-HT2C receptor. In a fibroblast cell line transfected with 5-HT2C receptor cDNA, phosphorylation is increased by agonist treatment and accompanies agonist-mediated desensitization [27].
5-HT3 receptors, located on neurons in the periphery and in the CNS, mediate fast, excitatory responses, that is, membrane depolarization to serotonin. Like many other receptors that are ligand-gated ion channels, the 5-HT3 receptor exhibits rapid desensitization after sustained agonist exposure. In addition to preparations of peripheral neurons, cultured hippocampal cells and neuroblastoma cells have been used to study this phenomenon.
Studies of 5-HT7 receptor regulation have been performed on rat frontal cortical astrocytes in primary culture. In these cells, 5-HT7 receptors are coupled to the stimulation of adenylyl cyclase. Exposure of astrocytes in culture to the atypical antidepressant mianserin or to the tricyclic antidepressant amitriptyline for 3 days increased the stimulation of cAMP accumulation in response to 5-HT [28]. Whether such effects are relevant for the therapeutic effects of these drugs is a topic for future research.
Serotonin has been implicated in practically every type of behavior, such as appetitive, emotional, motor, cognitive and autonomic. However, from a physiological perspective, it is not clear whether 5-HT affects such behaviors specifically or more generally by coordinating the activity of the nervous system, particularly to set the tone of activity in conjunction with the amount of arousal.
The primary body of data that has contributed to the view that 5-HT has a general effect on behavior by modulating the tone of nervous system activity comes from studies of the firing rate of serotonergic soma in raphe nuclei [29]. Under quiet waking conditions, serotonergic neurons display a slow, clock-like activity of about 1 to 5 spikes/sec, which shows a gradual decline as the animal becomes drowsy and enters slow-wave sleep. A decrease in the regularity of firing accompanies this overall slowing of neuronal activity. During rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, the activity of these neurons becomes silent. In response to certain types of arousing stimuli, the firing rate of these serotonergic neurons increases. Not surprisingly, such data led to the idea that the activity of serotonergic neurons is related to the level of behavioral arousal/activity. Such data also have contributed to the idea that the activity of serotonergic neurons is associated with motor output since atonia of the major skeletal muscle groups occurs during REM sleep. Also oral—buccal motor activity, such as chewing, biting, licking or grooming, causes a marked increase in the firing rate of a subgroup of serotonergic soma that are also activated by somatosensory stimuli applied to the head, neck and face. However, exposing a cat to environmental stressors, such as a loud noise or seeing a dog, although producing strong sympathetic activation and typical behavioral responses, does not alter the firing rate of serotonergic neurons. Thus, the type of motor activity that activates serotonergic soma seems to be repetitive, like that mediated by central pattern generators. Furthermore, activation of serotonergic transmission inhibits information processing in afferent systems. From all such data, it has been suggested that the serotonergic neuronal system functions at the organismic level to integrate functions needed for behavioral output, that is, facilitation of motor output with suppression of activity in sensory systems irrelevant to the ongoing behavior.
Perturbation of the 5-HT system by different types of drugs can elicit alterations in behaviors. Drugs affecting serotonergic neurons and their receptors are used to treat diseases such as depression, anxiety disorders and schizophrenia. In part because of this, 5-HT also has been speculated to be involved specifically in the regulation of all types of behaviors and physiological processes. The possible involvement of 5-HT in three areas, neuroendocrine function, circadian rhythms and feeding behavior, will be highlighted for illustrative purposes.
The hypothalamus secretes several releasing factors and release-inhibiting factors to control the secretion of hormones from the anterior pituitary gland. Serotonin is among the many neurotransmitters that participate in the hypothalamic control of pituitary secretion, particularly in the regulation of adrenocorticotropin (ACTH), prolactin and growth hormone secretion. A direct synaptic connection between serotonergic terminals and corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH)-containing neurons in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus has been described. Precursors of 5-HT or drugs that enhance the effect of 5-HT increase CRH in portal blood and ACTH in plasma. In addition to effects at the hypothalamus, 5-HT may have direct effects on the anterior pituitary to stimulate the release of ACTH and at the level of the adrenal cortex to regulate release of corticosterone or cortisol. Actions of serotonin on 5-HT1A, 5-HT2, 5-HT3 and 5-HT4 receptors seem to be involved in these effects on the hypothalamic—pituitary—adrenal axis [30]. However, what role, if any, is played by serotonin in regulating stress-induced elevations of CRH or the circadian periodicity of the hypothalamic—pituitary—adrenal axis is unclear.
Measurement of these endocrine responses after administration of drugs that increase brain serotonin function provides one of the few methods currently available for assessing such function in humans. Precursors of 5-HT, releasing agents, reuptake inhibitors and receptor agonists and antagonists have been used to probe serotonergic function. For example, intravenous administration of the serotonin precursor l-tryptophan consistently increases plasma concentrations of prolactin and growth hormone but not of ACTH or cortisol. Fenfluramine causes a dose-dependent increase in plasma prolactin. When administered to humans, serotonin agonists that stimulate 5-HT1A and 5-HT2 receptors also increase plasma concentrations of ACTH, cortisol, prolactin and perhaps growth hormone. The neuroendocrine response in humans to such agents has been used clinically to assess the functioning of the central serotonergic system in patients with psychiatric disorders.
Serotonin also appears to be involved in the regulation of circadian rhythms. The suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) of the hypothalamus generate electrophysiological and metabolic cycles which repeat approximately every 24 hr. When isolated in vitro, the SCN continue to produce 24-hr rhythms in metabolism, vasopressin secretion and spontaneous electrical activity, indicating that circadian time-keeping functions or pacemaker activity are endogenous characteristics of the SCN. Ordinarily, this rhythm is synchronized or entrained to the environmental photoperiod, also about 24 hr. A serotonergic contribution to circadian rhythm regulation has been postulated because the SCN receive very dense serotonergic innervation from the midbrain raphe nuclei. In addition, there is a serotonergic innervation to the intergeniculate leaflet (IGL), an area of brain through which photic information indirectly accesses the SCN.
Serotonin appears to function as an inhibitory transmitter that modulates the effects of light on circadian rhythmicity. Direct application of 5-HT or receptor agonists to the SCN blocks light-induced phase shifts during the subjective night but causes phase advances during the subjective day. Such agents inhibit the excitatory effect of light, measured electrophysiologically, in either the SCN or the lateral geniculate complex. The nonselective 5-HT agonist quipazine resets or shifts the rhythm of spontaneous electrical activity of single cells recorded extracellularly in SCN isolated in brain slices.
Lesions of serotonergic neurons in laboratory animals have been reported by some investigators to disrupt locomotor rhythms or result in loss of the daily rhythm of corticosterone. In the hamster, the median raphe nucleus projects to the SCN, whereas the dorsal raphe nucleus innervates the IGL; furthermore, serotonergic innervation to the SCN, and not the IGL, is necessary for the photic entrainment of locomotor activity [31]. It appears, then, that the SCN circadian pacemaker, or clock, is modulated by stimulation of serotonergic receptors in the SCN and that serotonergic projections to the SCN may modulate the phase of the SCN in intact animals.
The possible involvement of 5-HT in feeding behavior has been an active area of research for many years. Pharmacological studies have contributed primarily to the idea that 5-HT has an inhibitory effect on feeding behavior. Drugs that either directly or indirectly activate postsynaptic 5-HT receptors decrease food consumption, whereas agents that inhibit serotonergic transmission increase food intake. Precisely how this occurs is controversial, with claims that 5-HT governs the selection of macronutrients in the diet, influences responses to the taste qualities of food or modulates gastric activity to reduce feeding. Perhaps the most comprehensive and enduring view is that enhanced serotonergic activity enhances satiety, particularly by increasing the rate of satiation and prolonging the state of satiety [32].
Multiple mechanisms in brain appear to be responsible for the effects of serotonergic drugs on satiety; for example, postsynaptic 5-HT1B receptors are involved in regulating the size of meals eaten, but 5-HT2C receptors influence the rate of eating. The sites in brain where these drugs, and presumably 5-HT, cause such effects remain to be identified. The paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of the hypothalamus may be an important site, although there are data indicating that actions on the PVN may be sufficient, but not necessary, to reduce caloric intake. In addition to brain mechanisms, 5-HT may act through peripheral mechanisms to produce satiety.
The pharmacological effects produced by drugs such as fenfluramine on feeding behavior in animals have led to its use in the treatment of obesity in humans. In many double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, chronic administration of fenfluramine causes greater weight loss than placebo. Although not as extensively studied clinically, fluoxetine produces similar effects. Weight gain occurs when fenfluramine is stopped, which indicates that the weight loss was related to its administration [33]. Given all of the medical problems associated with obesity, anorectic agents are valuable tools to be used in association with other modalities, such as diet and exercise, in the treatment of the truly obese individual.
The human pineal gland weighs about 150 mg and occupies the depression between the superior colliculi at the posterior border of the corpus callosum. Although there are physical connections between the pineal gland and brain, the pineal gland lies “outside” the blood—brain barrier (see Chap. 32) and is innervated primarily by sympathetic nerves arising from the superior cervical ganglia.
A unique feature of pineal gland physiology is that the synthesis and secretion of melatonin is influenced markedly by the light—dark cycle, acting through a multisynaptic pathway that relays in the superior cervical ganglia of the sympathetic nervous system. During daylight, the synthesis and secretion of melatonin are reduced, as is impulse flow along the sympathetic nerves innervating the pineal gland. At the onset of darkness, there is activation of these nerves, and the increased release of NE from them activates β adrenoceptors on the pineal gland to increase the formation of cAMP, with activation of α1 adrenoceptors further amplifying the response. This second messenger causes activation of AANAT so as to increase the synthesis of melatonin. The extent of the nighttime increase in AANAT activity is very species-dependent, being, for example, as much as 150-fold in rats but only 1.5-fold in sheep. What type of rhythm is exhibited by humans is not yet known, although mRNA for AANAT is abundant in the pineal gland of humans during the day, as it is in sheep, whereas the transcript is nearly undetectable during the day in the rat pineal gland.
Thus, the pineal gland functions as a neuroendocrine transducer. In mammals, photosensory information impinging on the retina influences the activity of its neuronal projections, which ultimately inhibits or stimulates the secretion of melatonin. A circadian rhythm of melatonin secretion persists in animals housed in continuous darkness. Thus, melatonin synthesis is turned on by an endogenous “clock,” probably located within the SCN of the hypothalamus, with the daily rhythm normally being entrained to the day—night, light—dark cycle [34].
The exact physiological and behavioral effects of melatonin in humans are unclear. Such effects primarily result from the actions of melatonin on the SCN to influence the timing of circadian rhythms. The effects of melatonin are mediated by its activation of specific receptors. Two mammalian receptors for melatonin have been cloned [35], both of which belong to the G protein-coupled receptor family. A third subtype has been cloned from chickens but not yet in mammals. The melatonin1A receptor is expressed in the hypophyseal pars tuberalis (PT) and the SCN, presumed sites of the reproductive and circadian effects of melatonin. The human melatonin1B receptor is 60% identical to, and exhibits similarity in, its pharmacological profile and second-messenger coupling to the melatonin1A receptor. It is found most abundantly in retina and to a lesser extent in brain. It has not been detected in the PT or the SCN. It seems likely that the ability of melatonin to act in the retina to affect some light-dependent functions, such as photopigment disc shedding and phagocytosis, may be due to its activation of the melatonin1B receptor.
Perhaps the strongest case can be made for melatonin playing a role in reproduction, particularly in seasonally breeding mammals such as hamsters or sheep, which time their reproductive cycles via changes in the photoperiod. Information on day length may be relayed to the hypothalamic—pituitary—gonadal axis by the pattern of melatonin production. Although the effects of melatonin on reproduction were believed to be solely antigonadotropic, melatonin has been shown to be capable of causing progonadotropic effects. The type of effect caused by melatonin is dependent on the time point in the photoperiod when it is administered, the length of the photoperiod, the species and the dose administered. In general, the effects of melatonin are most robust when given around the time of the light-to-dark transition.
Melatonin has potent sedative and hypnotic activity. This has been demonstrated in double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. The hypnotic effect of melatonin seems to be separable from its effects on circadian rhythms. Although far from being fully understood, the entraining effect of melatonin on biological rhythms has led to its being used by humans for disorders that may be related to disturbances of circadian rhythms. For example, it is used to alleviate symptoms of jet lag as well as alertness-related problems in shift workers. Much more research will be needed to establish its efficacy in such conditions. Unfortunately, claims of its usefulness for these types of problems far exceed any controlled clinical data demonstrating such effects. At a different level, but one receiving comparable attention in the popular press as those mentioned above, is the purported antiaging properties of melatonin due to its antioxidant properties. Based on its demonstrated antioxidant properties, seen both in vitro and in vivo, melatonin has been speculated to be part of the natural defense system of the body against the toxic effects caused by free radicals.
Inhibition of serotonin uptake not only can cause an antidepressant effect but also may reduce the symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) (see Chap. 52). This clinical effect also is produced by SSRIs but is not found with drugs that inhibit the uptake of NE, such as desipramine. A tricyclic antidepressant, clomipramine, which is somewhat selective in vivo as an inhibitor of 5-HT uptake, does produce clinically significant amelioration of the symptoms associated with OCD.