NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

National Academy of Sciences (US), National Academy of Engineering (US), and Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering. Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2007.

Cover of Beyond Bias and Barriers

Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering.

Show details

DReferences

  1. Aberson CL, Healy M, Romero V. Ingroup bias and self-esteem: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2000;4:157–173.
  2. Adelman C. Answers in the toolbox: Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and bachelor’s degree attainment. Washington, DC: US Department of Education; 1999. (PLLI 1999-8021)
  3. Adelman CL. The Toolbox Revisited: Paths to Degree Completion from High School through College. Washington, DC: US Department of Education; 2006. http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/toolboxrevisit/toolbox.pdf .
  4. Akerlind I, Alexanderson K, Hensing G, Liejon M, Bjurulf P. Sex differences in absence in relation to parental status. Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine. 1996;24(1):27–35. [PubMed: 8740873]
  5. Alderfer CP. Changing race relations embedded in organizations: Report on a longterm project with the XYZ corporation. In: Jackson SE, editor. Diversity in the Workplace: Human Resources Initiatives. New York: Guilford Press; 1992.
  6. Alessio JC, Andrzejski J. Unveiling the hidden glass ceiling. American Sociological Review. 2000;26(2):311–315.
  7. Allison P, Long S. Departmental effects on scientific productivity. American Sociological Review. 1990;55:119–125.
  8. Altonji JG, Blank RM. Race and gender in the labor market. In: Ashenfelter O, Card D, editors. Handbook of Labor Economics. Vol. 3. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 1999.
  9. American Association of University Professors. Statement on Principles of Family Responsibilities and Work. 2001. http://www.aaup.org/statements/REPORTS/re01fam.htm .
  10. American Association of University Women. Cases of Sex Discrimination in Academia. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation and Legal Advocacy Fund; 2004. Tenure Denied.
  11. American Chemical Society. Directory of Graduate Research. Washington, DC: Ameri-can Chemical Society; 2006.
  12. American Council on Education. An Agenda for Excellence: Creating Flexibility in Tenure-Track Faculty Careers, Executive Summary. 2005. http://www.acenet.edu/bookstore/pdf/2005_tenure_flex_summary.pdf .
  13. American Physical Society. Improving the Climate for Women Site Visits. http://www.aps.org/educ/cswp/visits/index.cfm .
  14. American Psychological Association. Women in Academe: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back. 2000. http://www.apa.org/pi/wpo/academe/report.html .
  15. American Society for Cell Biology Web page. http://www.ascb.org/
  16. Anderson DJ, Cheslock JJ. Institutional strategies to achieve gender equity in intercollegiate athletics: Does Title IX harm male athletes? American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings. 2004;94(2):307–311.
  17. Antonio A. Diverse student bodies, diverse faculties. Academe. 2003;89(6):14–18.
  18. Antonio A. Faculty of color reconsidered: Reassessing contributions to scholarship. Journal of Higher Education. 2002;73:582–602.
  19. Ash A, Carr P, Goldstein R, Friedman RH. Compensation and advancement of women in academic medicine: Is there equity. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2004;141(3):205–212. [PubMed: 15289217]
  20. Association of American Law Schools. Retaining faculty of color. AALS Newsletter. 1996. http://www.aals.org/mlt3.html .
  21. Association of American Medical Colleges. Analysis in Brief: The Changing Representation of Men and Women in Academic Medicine. Washington, DC: AAMC; 2005.
  22. Association of American Medical Colleges. Faculty Roster. http://www.aamc.org/data/facultyroster/start.htm .
  23. Association of American Medical Colleges. FAMOUS User’s Guide. http://www.aamc.org/data/facultyroster/famous.pdf .
  24. Association of American Medical Colleges. Reports Available Through Faculty Roster. http://www.aamc.org/data/facultyroster/reports.htm .
  25. Astin HS. Annual Survey of the American Freshman, National Norms. Los Angeles, CA: High Education Research Institute; 2005.
  26. Astin HS, Sax LJ. Developing scientific talent in undergraduate women. In: Davis CS, Ginorio AB, Hollenshead BB, Rayman PM, editors. The Equity Equation: Fostering the Advancement of Women in the Sciences, Mathematics and Engineering. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1996.
  27. August L, Waltman J. Culture, climate, and contribution: Career satisfaction among female faculty. Research in Higher Education. 2004;45(2):177–192.
  28. Baginole B. How to keep a good woman down: An investigation of the role of institutional factors in the process of discrimination against women academics. British Journal of Sociology of Education. 1993;14(3):261–274.
  29. Baillargeon R, Kotovksy L, Needham A. The acquisition of physical knowledge in infancy. In: Sperber D, Premack D, editors. Causal Cognition: A Multidisciplinary Debate. New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press; 1995. pp. pp 79–116.
  30. Ball P. Prestige is factored into journal ratings. Nature. 2006. pp. 770–771. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v439/n7078/pdf/439770a.pdf . [PubMed: 16482116]
  31. Banaji MR, Greenwald AG. Implicit gender stereotyping in judgments of fame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1995;68:181–198. [PubMed: 7877095]
  32. Barbezat D. The market for new PhD economists. Journal of Economic Education. 1992;23:262–276.
  33. Barnes LLB, Agago MO, Coombs WT. Effects of job-related stress on faculty intention to leave academia. Research in Higher Education. 1998;39(4):457–469.
  34. Barnett R, Rivers C. Same Difference: How Gender Myths Are Hurting Our Relationships, Our Children, and Our Jobs. New York: Basic Books; 2004.
  35. Baron-Cohen S. The Essential Difference: The Truth about the Male and the Female Brain. New York: Basic Books; 2002.
  36. Belenkey MF, Clincy BM, Goldberger NR, Tarule JM. Women’s Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind. New York: Basic Books; 1986.
  37. Bellas M. Disciplinary differences in faculty salaries: Does gender play a role? Journal of Higher Education. 1997;68(3):299–321.
  38. Benbow CP. Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability in intellectually talented preadolescents: Their nature, effects, and possible causes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1988;11:169–232.
  39. Benbow C, Arjmand O. Predictors of high academic achievement in mathematically talented students: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1990;82:430–441.
  40. Benbow CP, Lubinski D, Shea DL, Eftekhari-Sanjani H. Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability at age 13: Their status 20 years later. Psychological Science. 2000;11(6):474–480. [PubMed: 11202492]
  41. Benbow CP, Stanley JC. Sex differences in mathematical ability: fact or artifact? Science. 1980;210:1262–1264. [PubMed: 7434028]
  42. Benbow CP, Stanley JC. Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: more facts. Science. 1988;222:1029–1031. [PubMed: 6648516]
  43. Bendick M, Egan ML, Lofhjelm SM. The Documentation and Evaluation of Anti-Discrimination Training in the United States. Geneva: International Labor Organization; 1998.
  44. Berryman SE. Who Will Do Science? Minority and Female Attainment of Science and Mathematics Degrees: Trends and Causes. New York: Rockefeller Foundation; 1983.
  45. Bertrand M, Mullianathan S. Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? American Economic Review. 2004;94(4):991–1013.
  46. The Best Initiative. The Talent Imperative: Diversifying America’s Science and Engineering Workforce. 2004. http://www.bestworkforce.org/PDFdocs/BESTTalentImperativeFINAL.pdf .
  47. Bickel J. Encouraging the advancement of women. JAMA. 2000;283(5):671. [PubMed: 10665713]
  48. Bickel J, Wara D, Atkinson BF, Cohen LS, Dunn M, Hostler S, Johnson TRB, Morahan P, Rubenstein AH, Sheldon GF, Stokes E. Increasing women’s leadership in academic medicine: Report of the AAMC project implementation committee. Academic Medicine. 2002;77(10):1043–1061. [PubMed: 12377686]
  49. Bielby WT. Minimizing workplace gender and racial bias. Contemporary Sociology. 2000;29:12–129.
  50. Biernat M, Thompson ER. Shifting standards and contextual variation in stereotyping. European Review of Social Psychology. 2002;12:103–137.
  51. Blalock HM. Precent non-white and discrimination in the South. American Sociological Review. 1957;22:677–682.
  52. Blank RM. The effects of double-blind versus single-blind reviewing: Experimental evidence from the American Economic Review. American Economic Review. 1991;81:1041–1067.
  53. Blau PM. Inequality and Heterogeneity. New York: Free Press; 1977.
  54. Bobo LD. Racial attitudes and relations at the close of the twentieth century. In: Wilson WJ, Mitchell F, editors. America Becoming: Racial Trends and their Consequences. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
  55. Boyer E. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of a Professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1990.
  56. Brainard SG, Carlin L. A Longitudinal Study of Undergraduate Women in Engineering and Science. 1997. http://fie.engrng.pitt.edu/fie97/papers/1252.pdf .
  57. Brewer MB. The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love of outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues. 1999;55:429–444.
  58. Brewer MB, Brown R. Intergroup relations. In: Gilbert D, Fiske ST, Lindzy G, editors. The Handbook of Social Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1998.
  59. Brewster KL, Rindfuss RR. Fertility and women’s employment in industrialized nations. Annual Review of Sociology. 2000;26:271–296.
  60. Bridgeman B, Wendler C. Gender differences in predictors of college mathematics performance and in college mathematics course grades. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1991;83(2):275–284.
  61. Broder I. Review of NSF economics proposals: Gender and institutional patterns. American Economic Review. 1993;83:964–970.
  62. Brody LE, Mills CJ. Talent search research: What have we learned? High Ability Studies. 2005;16(1):97–111.
  63. Bronstein P, Farnsworth L. Gender differences in faculty experiences of interpersonal climate and processes for advancement. Research in Higher Education. 1998;39(5):557–585.
  64. Brown A, Swinyard W, Ogle J. Women in academic medicine: A report of focus groups and questionnaires, with conjoint analysis. Journal of Women’s Health. 2003;12(10):999–1008. [PubMed: 14709188]
  65. Brown KH, Gillespie D. Responding to moral distress in the university: Augusto Boal’s theater of the oppressed. Change. 1999 September-October:34–39.
  66. Browne KR. Biology at Work. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 2002.
  67. Bullers S. Selection effects in the relationship between women’s work/family status and perceived control. Family Relations: Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies. 1999;48(2):181–188.
  68. Burke D. A New Academic Marketplace. New York: Greenwood Press; 1988.
  69. Burroughs Wellcome Fund and Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Making the Right Moves: A Practical Guide to Scientific Management for Postdocs and New Faculty. 2004. http://www.hhmi.org/labmanagement .
  70. Byrnes JP, Li H, Xhaoging X. Gender differences on the math subset of the scholastic aptitutde test may be culture specific. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 1997;34:49–66.
  71. Calas M, Smircich L. Dangerous liaisons: The feminine-in-management meets globalization. Business Horizons. 1993;36(2):71–81.
  72. Callister RR. The impact of gender and department climate on job satisfaction and intentions to quit for faculty in science and engineering fields. Journal of Technology Transfer. 2006;31:367–375.
  73. Campbell G, Denes R, Morrison C. Access denied: Race, ethnicity, and the scientific enterprise. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.
  74. Campbell JR, Hombo CM, Mazzeo J. NAEP 1999 Trends in Academic Progress: Three Decades of Student Performance. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics; 2000. (NCES 2000-469)
  75. Carnes M. Gender: Macho language and other deterrents. Nature. 2006;442:868. [PubMed: 16929276]
  76. Carnes M, Geller S, Fine E, Handelsman J. NIH Director’s Pioneer Awards: Could the selection process be biased against women? Journal of Women’s Health. 2005;14(8):684–691. [PubMed: 16232100]
  77. Case A, Paxson C. Sex differences in morbidity and mortality. Demography. 2005;42(2):189–214. [PubMed: 15986983]
  78. Casey MB, Nuttall RL, Pezaris E. Mediators of gender differences in mathematics college entrance test scores: A comparison of spatial skills with internalized beliefs and anxieties. Developmental Psychology. 1997;33(4):669–680. [PubMed: 9232382]
  79. Casey MB, Nuttall R, Pezaris E, Benbow CP. The influence of spatial ability differences in mathematics college entrance scores across diverse samples. Developmental Psychology. 1995;31(4):697–705.
  80. Cheng K. Reflections on geometry and navigation. Connection Science. 2005;17(1-2):5–21.
  81. Chesler N, Chesler M. Theater as a community-building strategy for women in engineering: Theory and practice. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. 2005;11(1):83–96.
  82. Chliwniak L. Higher Education Leadership: Analyzing the Gender Gap. Washington, DC: George Washington University; 1997. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report ED 410 847.
  83. The Clare Boothe Luce Program. Proposal Guidelines for Invited Colleges/Universities. http://www.hluce.org/4cbldefm.html .
  84. Clegg R. Faculty hiring preferences and the law. Chronicle of Higher Education. 2006;52(37):B13.
  85. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Science. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988.
  86. Cohen GL, Garcia J, Apfel N, Master A. Reducing the racial achievement gap: A social-psychological intervention. Science. 2006;313:1307–1310. [PubMed: 16946074]
  87. Cohen-Bendahan CCC, van de Beek C, Berenbaum SA. Prenatal sex hormone effects on child and adult sex-typed behavior: Methods and findings. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 2005;29:353–384. [PubMed: 15811504]
  88. Cole JR, Zuckerman H. The productivity puzzle: Persistence and change in patterns of publication of men and women scientists. Advances in Motivation and Achievement. 1984;2:217–258.
  89. Collins DW, Kimura D. A large sex difference on a two-dimensional mental rotation task. Behavioral Neuroscience. 1997;111(4):845–849. [PubMed: 9267662]
  90. Columbia University. Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons Task Force on Women Faculty Report February 2005. 2005. http://www/cumc.columbia.edu/dept/ps/facultycouncil/docs/TaskForceonWomenFacultyFinalReport02_24_05.doc .
  91. Colwell R. Rethinking the Rules to Promote Diversity. NSF Director Rita R. Colwell’s Remarks to the American Chemical Society; 2002. http://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/forum/colwell/rc02081acsdiversity.htm .
  92. Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology. Professional Women and Minorities: A Total Human Resources Data Compendium. Washington, DC: Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology; 2002.
  93. Committee on Women in Science and Engineering. Gender Faculty Studies at Research 1 Institutions. http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cwse/gender_faculty_links.html .
  94. Condry SM, Condry JC. Sex differences: A study of the eye of the beholder. Child Development. 1976;47:812–819.
  95. Condry SM, Condry JC, Pogatshnik LW. Sex differences: A study of the ear of the beholder. Sex Roles. 1983;9(6):697–705.
  96. Congressional Commission on the Advancement of Women and Minorities in Science, Engineering, and Technology Development (CAWMSET) Land of Plenty: Diversity as America’s Competitive Edge in Science, Engineering, and Technology. 2004. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2000/cawmset0409/cawmset_0409.pdf .
  97. Connellan J, Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Batki A, Ahluwalia J. Sex differences in human neonatal social perception. Infant Behavior and Development. 2000;23:113–118.
  98. Corley E, Gaughan M. Scientists’ participation in university research centers: What are the gender differences? Journal of Technology Transfer. 2005;30:371–381.
  99. Cornell University Child Care Grant Subsidy Program. http://www.ohr.cornell.edu/benefits/childcareGrant/index.html .
  100. Correll SJ, Benard S. Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?; Presentation at American Sociological Association Annual Meeting; August 15, 2005; Philadelphia, PA. 2005. http://sociology.princeton.edu/programs/workshops/Correll_Benard_manuscript.pdf .
  101. Couzin J. US rules on accounting for grants amount to more than a hill of beans. Science. 2006;311:168–169. [PubMed: 16410498]
  102. Cox TH. Cultural Diversity in Organizations: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco: Berrett-Keohler; 1993.
  103. Creamer EG. Assessing faculty publication productivity: Issues of equity. Washington, DC: George Washington University; 1998. (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report 26(2))
  104. Crocker J, McGraw KM. What’s good for the goose is not good for the gander: Solo status as an obstacle to occupational achievement for males and females. American Behavioral Scientist. 1984;27(3):357–369.
  105. Crowley K, Callanan MA, Tenenbaum HR, Allen E. Parents explain more often to boys than to girls during shared scientific thinking. Psychological Science. 2001;12(3):258–261. [PubMed: 11437311]
  106. Curtis JW. Balancing work and family for faculty: Why it’s important. Academe. 2004. http://www.aaup.org/publications/Academe/2004/04nd/04ndtoc.htm .
  107. Custred G, Wood T. California’s Proposition 209. 1996. http://www.acri.org/209/209text.html .
  108. Davenport DS, Yurich JM. Multicultural gender issues. Journal of Counseling and Development. 1991;70(1):64–71.
  109. Davies PG, Spencer SJ, Steele CM. Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women’s leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2005;88:276–287. [PubMed: 15841859]
  110. Davies PG, Spencer SJ, Quinn DM, Gerhardstein R. Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2002;28(12):1615–1628.
  111. Davis G. Optimizing the Postdoctoral Experience: An Empirical Approach. Research Triangle Park, NC: Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society; 2005. (Working Paper)
  112. Davison HK, Burke MJ. Sex discrimination in simulated employment contexts: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2000;56:225–248.
  113. Dawson MRW, Medler DA. Dictionary of Cognitive Science. http://www.bcp.psych.ualberta.ca/~mike/Pearl_Street/Dictionary/contents/C/cognitive_psychology.html .
  114. DeAngelis C. Women in academic medicine: New insights, same sad news. New England Journal of Medicine. 2000;342(6):426–427. [PubMed: 10666436]
  115. Delazer M. Sex differences in cognitive functions. Personality and Individual Differences. 2003;35(4):863–875.
  116. Deloitte, Touche Why Flexible Work Arrangements Are Not the Answer: The Case for Career Customization. 2005 (internal document)
  117. Desai S, Waite LJ. Women’s employment during pregnancy and after the first birth: Occupational characteristics and work commitment. American Sociological Review. 1991;56(4):551–566.
  118. Devine PG, Elliott AJ. Are racial stereotypes really fading? The Princeton Trilogy revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1995;21:1139–1150.
  119. Didion CJ, Fox MA, Jones ME. Cultivating Academic Careers: AWIS project on academic climate. AWIS Magazine. 1998. pp. 23–27. http://www.awis.org/pubs/mentoring/98winter.pdf .
  120. Di Stefano C. Feminism/Postmodernism. New York: Routledge; 1990. Dilemmas of difference: Feminism, modernity, and postmodernism.
  121. Dobbin F, Kalev A. Diversity Management and Managerial Diversity: Addendum to “Best Practices or Best Guesses” 2006 Special Report to the National Academies Committee on Women in Academic Science and Engineering.
  122. Dooris MJ, Guidos M. Tenure Achievement Rates at Research Universities. Presentation at the Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research; Chicago, IL. 2006. http://www/psu.edu/president/pia/planning_research/reports/AIR_Tenure_Flow_Paper_06.pdf .
  123. Drago R. Biological, Social, and Organizational Components of Success for Women in Academic Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006. The value of work-family policies.
  124. Drago R, Colbeck C. Final Report from the Mapping Project: Exploring the Terrain of U.S. Colleges and Universities for Faculty and Families. 2003. http://lsir.la.psu.edu/workfam/mappingproject.htm .
  125. Drago R, Colbeck C, Stauffer KD, Pirretti A, Burkum K, Fazioli J, Lazarro G, Habasevich T. Bias against caregiving. Academe. 2005. http://www.aaup.org/publications/Academe/2005/05so/05sodrag.htm .
  126. Dundar H, Lewis DR. Determinants of research productivity in higher education. Research in Higher Education. 1998;39(6):607–631.
  127. Eagly AH, Johannesen-Schmidt MC. The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues. 2001;57(4):781–797.
  128. Eagly AH, Karau SJ. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review. 2002;109:573–598. [PubMed: 12088246]
  129. Eccles JS. Women’s educational and occupational choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 1994;18:585–609.
  130. Edmonson Bell ELJ, Nkomo SM. Our Separate Ways: Black and White Women and the Struggle for Personal Identity. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 2001.
  131. Education Sector. The Truth About Boys and Girls. Washington, DC: Education Sector; 2006.
  132. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 34:49–66.
  133. Ehrenberg RG, Rizzo MJ, Jakubson GH. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2003. Who bears the growing cost of science at universities? (Working Paper 9627) http://www.nber.org/papers/w9627 .
  134. Ely R. A field study of group diversity, participation in diversity education programs and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2004;25(6):755–780.
  135. Ely RJ, Meyerson DE. Theories of gender in organizations: A new approach to organizational analysis and change. Research in Organizational Behavior. 2000;22:105–153.
  136. Ely RJ, Thomas DA. Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly. 2001;46:202–228.
  137. England P. Comparable Worth: Theories and Evidence. New York: Aldine de Gruyter; 1992.
  138. England P, Allison P, Li S, Mark N, Thompson J, Budig M, Sun H. Why Are Some Academic Fields Tipping Toward Female? The Sex Composition of US Fields of Doctoral Degree Receipt, 1971-1998. 2004. http://www.stanford.edu/dept/soc/people/faculty/england/Tipping.pdf .
  139. Epstein CF. Deceptive Distinctions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1988.
  140. Etaugh C, Gilomen G. Perceptions of mothers: Effects of employment status, marital status, and age of child. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research. 1989;20:59–70.
  141. Etaugh C, Moss C. Attitudes of employed women toward parents who choose fulltime or part-time employment following their child’s birth. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research. 2001;44:611–619.
  142. Etzkowitz C Kemelgor, Neuschatz M, Uzzi N. Barriers to women in academic science and engineering. In: Pearson W Jr, Fechter I, editors. Who Will Do Science? Educating the Next Generation. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press; 1994.
  143. Evans ME, Schweingruber H, Stevenson HW. Gender differences in interest and knowledge acquisition: The United States, Taiwan, and Japan. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research. 2002;47(3-4):153–167.
  144. Executive Summary from Task Force Report on Women in Science and Engineering. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University; 2005. http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/daily/2005/05/wise_summary.pdf .
  145. European Science Foundation. Towards a new paradigm of education, training, and career paths in the natural sciences. European Foundation Policy Brief. 2002. http://www.esf.org/publication/139/ESPB16.pdf#SEARCH=%22Torsten%20Wiesel%20training%20paradigm%22 .
  146. Faculty Diversity Committee, Northwestern University. 2004. http://www.northwestern.edu/provost/committees/diversity/reports.html .
  147. Flax J. Postmodernism and gender relations in feminist theory. In: Nicholson LJ, editor. Feminism/Postmodernism. New York: Routledge; 1990.
  148. Fell A. New program to improve lab management. Dateline UC-Davis. 2005. http://www.dateline.ucdavis.edu/dl_detail.lasso?id=8404 .
  149. Ferber MA, Teiman M. Are women economists at a disadvantage in publishing journal articles? Eastern Economic Journal. 1980;6(3-4):189–193.
  150. Fidell L. Empirical verification of sex discrimination in hiring practices in psychology. American Psychologist. 1970;25:1094–1098.
  151. Fine E, Sheridan J. Searching for Excellence & Diversity—Training Workshops for Search Committees; Poster presentation, 5th Annual ADVANCE Institutional Transformation Principal Investigators Meeting; Washington, DC. May 17, 2006; http://wiseli.engr.wisc.edu/initiatives/hiring/UWMadison_Poster2006_2.ppt .
  152. Fisher M, Friedman SB, Strauss B. The effects of blinding on acceptance of research papers by peer review. JAMA. 1994;272:143–146. [PubMed: 8015127]
  153. Fiske ST, Linn M, Neuberg SL. The continuum model: Ten years later. In: Chaiken S, Trope Y, editors. Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology. New York: Guilford Press; 1999.
  154. Fletcher J. Gender, Power, and Relational Practice at Work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2001. Disappearing Acts.
  155. Forsburg S. Ensuring diversity at the podium. The ASCB Newsletter. 2004;27(2):13–14.
  156. Fox MF. Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science. 2005;35(1):131–150.
  157. Fox MF. Research, teaching, and publication productivity: Mutuality versus competition in academia. Sociology of Education. 1992;65(4):293–305.
  158. Fox MF. Publication, performance and reward in science and scholarship. In: Smart JC, editor. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Vol. 1. New York: Agathon; 1985.
  159. Fox MF, Long JS. Scientific careers: Universalism and particularism. Annual Review of Sociology. 1995;21:45–71.
  160. Fox MF, Stephan P. Careers of young scientists: Preferences, prospects and realities by gender and field. Social Studies of Science. 2001;31(1):109–122.
  161. Frank RH. Family location constraints and the geographic distribution ofd female professionals. Journal of Political Economy. 1978;86:117–130.
  162. Franke GR, Crown DF, Spake DF. Gender differences in ethical perceptions of business practice: A social role theory perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1997;82:920–934. [PubMed: 9638088]
  163. Franklin JH. Mirror to America. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux; 2005.
  164. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. Postdoc Childcare Subsidy Program. http://www.fhcrc.org/science/education/grad_postdoc/spac/childcare/index.html .
  165. Freeman R, Jin E, Shen C-Y. Where Do New US-Trained Science-Engineering PhDs Come From? Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2004. (NBER Working Paper 10554)
  166. Fried LP, Francomano CA, MacDonald SM, Wagner EM, Stokes EJ, Carbone KM, Bias WB, Newman MM, Stobo JD. Career development for women in academic medicine: Multiple interventions in a department of medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1996;276(11):898–905. [PubMed: 8782639]
  167. Frost JA, Binder JR, Springer JA, Hammeke TA, Bellgowan PSF, Rao SM, Cox RB. Language processing is strongly lateralized in both sexes. Brain. 1999;122(2):199–208. [PubMed: 10071049]
  168. Gaertner SL, Dovidio JF, Banker BS, Rust MC, Nier JA, Mottola GR, Ward CM. The challenge of aversive racism: Combating pro-white bias. In: Plous S, editor. Understanding Prejudice and Discrimination. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2003.
  169. Gallagher A, Levin JY, Cahalan C. Cognitive Patterns of Gender Differences on Mathematics Admissions Tests. Washington, DC: Educational Testing Service; 2002. (GRE Board Professional Report No. 96-17P)
  170. Gallagher A, De Lisi R, Holst PC, McGillicuddy-De Lisi AV, Morely M, Cahalan C. Gender differences in advanced mathematical problem solving. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2000;75:165–190. [PubMed: 10666324]
  171. Gallagher AM, Kaufman JC. Gender Differences in Mathematics. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
  172. Gaughan M, Robin S. National science training policy and early scientific careers in France and the United States. Research Policy. 2004;33:569–581.
  173. Geary DC. Sex differences in spatial abilities among adults from the United States and China: Implications for evolutionary theory. Evolution and Cognition. 2001;7(2):172–177.
  174. Geary DC. Male, Female: The Evolution of Human Sex Differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1998.
  175. Geary DC. Sexual selection and sex differences in mathematical abilities. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1996;19:229–284.
  176. Geary DC, Saults SJ, Liu F, Hoard MK. Sex differences in spatial cognition, computational fluency, and arithmetical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2000;77:337–353. [PubMed: 11063633]
  177. Georgi H. The Back Page: Is there an unconscious discrimination against women in science? American Physical Society Newsletter. 2000. http://schwinger.harvard.edu/~georgi/women/backpage.htm .
  178. Gerstel N, McGonagle K. Job leaves and the limits of the Family and Medical Leave Act: The effects of gender, race, and family. Work and Occupations. 1999;26:510–534.
  179. Gilbert JA, Stead BA, Ivancevich JM. Diversity management: A new organizational paradigm. Journal of Business Ethics. 1999;21:61–76.
  180. Gilligan C. In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1982.
  181. Ginorio A. Warming the Climate for Women in Academic Science. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities; 1995.
  182. Ginther D. Biological, Social, and Organizational Components of Success for Women in Academic Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006. The economics of gender differences in employment outcomes in academia. (In Press)
  183. Ginther D. Evidence from Academia. Atlanta, GA: Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta; 2001. Does Science Discriminate Against Women? (Working Paper 2001-02)
  184. Ginther D, Kahn S. Does Science Promote Women? Evidence from Academia 1973-2001. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economics Research; 2006. (NBER SEWP Working Paper) http://www.nber.org/~sewp/GintherKahn_Sciences_promo_NBER.pdf .
  185. Gjesdal S, Bratburg E. The role of gender in long-term sickness absence and transition to permanent disability benefits. The European Journal of Public Health. 2002;12(3):180–186. [PubMed: 12232956]
  186. Gladwell M. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Boston, MA: Little, Brown; 2000.
  187. Glick P, Fiske S. The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiation hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1996;70:491–512.
  188. Goldin C. A pollution theory of discrimination: Male and female differences in occupations and earnings. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2002. (Working Paper 8985)
  189. Gmelch WH, Wilke PK, Lovrich NP. Dimensions of stress among university faculty: Factor-analytic results from a national survey. Research in Higher Education. 1986;24:266–286.
  190. Goldin C, Katz LF, Kuziemko I. The Homecoming of American College Women: The Reversal of the College Gender Gap. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2006. (NBER Working Paper 12139)
  191. Gottleib EE, Keith B. The academic research-teaching nexus in eight advancedindustrialized countries. Higher Education. 1997;34:397–420.
  192. Government Accountability Office. Gender Issues: Women’s Participation in the Sciences Has Increased, but Agencies Need to Do More to Ensure Compliance with Title IX. Washington, DC: US Government Accountability Office; 2004. (GAO-04-639)
  193. Gutek B, Morasch B. Sex ratios, sex-role spillover, and sexual harassment of women at work. Journal of Social Issues. 1982;38:55–74.
  194. Gutek BA. Sex and the Workplace. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1985.
  195. Guttierez C. Who will do chemistry? Chemical and Engineering News. 2001;79(21):5.
  196. Guttman JM. Rational actors, tit-for-tat types, and the evolution of cooperation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 1996;29:27–56.
  197. Hagedorn LS. Conceptualizing faculty job satisfaction: Components, theories, and outcomes. New Directions for Institutional Research. 2000;105:5–20.
  198. Hagedorn LS, Arredondo M, Dicrisi FA. Faculty research productivity: Exploring the role of gender and family-related factors. Research in Higher Education. 2002;43(4):423–446.
  199. Halari R, Hines M, Kumari V, Mehrotra R, Wheeler M, Ng V, Sharma T. Sex differences in individual differences in cognitive performance and their relationship to endogenous gonadal hormones and gonadatropins. Behavioral Neuroscience. 2005;119(1):104–117. [PubMed: 15727517]
  200. Halpern DF. Biological, Social, and Organizational Contributions to Science and Engineering Success. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006. Biopsychosocial contributions to cognitive performance.
  201. Halpern DF. Sex, brains, hands: Gender differences in cognitive abilities. Limbic Nutrition. 2005. http://www.limibicnutrition.com/blog/archives/028860.html .
  202. Halpern DF, Tan U. Stereotypes and steroids: Using a psychobiosocial model to understand cognitive sex differences. Brain and Cognition. 2001;45:392–414. [PubMed: 11305881]
  203. Hamilton K. The state of the African American professoriate. Black Issues in Higher Education. 2002;19(7):30–31.
  204. Handelsman J, Cantor N, Carnes M, Denton D, Fine E, Grosz B, Hinshaw V, Marrett C, Rosser S, Shalala D, Sheridan J. More women in science. Science. 2005. pp. 1190–1191. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/309/5738/1190 . [PubMed: 16109868]
  205. Hanson SL. African American women in science: Experiences from high school through the post-secondary years and beyond. NWSA Journal. 2004;16(1):96.
  206. Harding S. The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1986.
  207. Harrigan MN. An Analysis of Faculty Turnover at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Univerisity of Wisconsin-Madison; 1999. http://wiscweb3.wisc.edu/obpa/FacultyTurnover/FacultyTurnover2.html .
  208. Harvard University. Report of the Task Force on Women Faculty. 2005. http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/daily/2005/05/women-faculty.pdf .
  209. Harvard University Dependent Care for Conference Travel Program. http://www.fas.harvard.edu/home/academic_affairs/dependent_care.pdf .
  210. Harvey WB. 20th Anniversary Minorities in Higher Education Annual Status Report. Washington, DC: American Council on Education; 2003.
  211. Hausmann M, Slabbekoorn D, Van Goozen SHM, Cohen-Kettenis PT, Güntürkün O. Sex hormones affect spatial abilities during the menstrual cycle. Behavioral Neuroscience. 2000;114(6):1245–1250. [PubMed: 11142657]
  212. Hechinger FM. About Education. New York Times. 1988;B11 (November 9)
  213. Hedges LV, Nowell A. Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science. 1995;269:41–45. [PubMed: 7604277]
  214. Heilman ME, Wallen AS, Fuchs D, Tamkins MM. Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2004;89(3):416–427. [PubMed: 15161402]
  215. Hemmasi M, Graf LA, Lust JA. Correlates of pay and benefit satisfaction: The unique case of public university faculty. Public Personnel Management. 1992;21(4):442–443.
  216. Hennessey J, Hockfield S, Tilghman S. Women and science: The real issue. The Boston Globe. Feb. 12, 2005. http://www.boston.com/news/education/higher/articles/2005/02/12/women_and_science_the_real_issue/
  217. Herlitz A, Nilsson LG, Baeckman L. Gender differences in episodic memory. Memory and Cognition. 1997;25:801–811. [PubMed: 9421566]
  218. Hill SA. Teaching and doing gender in African American families. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research. 2002;47(11-12):493–506.
  219. Hilton TL, Lee VE. Student interest and persistence in science. Journal of Higher Education. 1988;59(5):510–526.
  220. Hines M. Sex steroids and human behavior: Prenatal androgen exposure and sex-typical play behavior in children. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2003;1007:272–282. [PubMed: 14993060]
  221. Hines M, Fane BA, Pasterski VL, Mathews GA, Conway GS, Brook C. Spatial abilities following prenatal androgen abnormality: Targeting and mental rotations performance in individuals with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2003;28:1010–1026. [PubMed: 14529705]
  222. Hirsh E. Enforcing equal opportunity: The impact of discrimination charges on sex and race segregation in the workplace. Department of Sociology, University of Washington; 2006.
  223. Hoffer TB, Grigorian K. All in a Week’s Work: Average Workweeks of Doctoral Scientists and Engineers. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation; 2005. (NSF 06-302) http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infobrief/nsf06302/nsf06302.pdf .
  224. Hofstede G. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2001.
  225. Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Caelleigh AS. Impartial judgment by the “gatekeepers” of science: Fallibility and accountability in the peer review process. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2003;8(1):75–96. [PubMed: 12652170]
  226. Holder JC, Vaux A. African American professionals: Coping with occupational stress in predominantly white environments. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 1998;53(3):315–333.
  227. Hooks B. Black and female: Reflections on graduate school. In: Glazer-Raymo J, Bensimon EM, Townsend BK, editors. Women in Higher Education. 2. Boston, MA: Pearson Publishing; 2000.
  228. Hopkins N. Diversification of a university faculty: Observations on hiring women faculty in the schools of science and engineering at MIT. MIT Faculty Newsletter. 2006;18(4):1, 16–23.
  229. Horn LJ, Kojaku L. High School Academic Curriculum and the Persistence Path through College: Persistence and Transfer Behavior of Undergraduates 3 Years After Entering 4-Year Institutions. Washington, DC: US Department of Education; 2001. (NCES 2001-163)
  230. Hosek SD, Cox AG, Ghosh-Dastidar B, Kofner A, Ramphal N, Scott J, Berry SH. Gender Differences in Major Federal External Grant Programs. Washington, DC: RAND; 2005.
  231. Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Burroughs Wellcome Fund. A Practical Guide to Scientific Management for Postdocs and New Faculty. Bethesda, MD: HHMI; 2004.
  232. Hrdy S. Raising Darwin’s consciousness: Female sexuality and the prehominid origins of patriarchy. Human Nature. 1997;8(1):1–49.
  233. Hull GT, Smith B, Scott PB, editors. All the Women are White, All the Blacks are Men, But some of Us Are Brave. Toronto: Hushion House; 1982.
  234. Humphreys LG, Lubinski D, Yao G. Utility of predicting group membership and the role of spatial visualization in becoming an engineer, physical scientist, or artist. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1993;78(2):250–261. [PubMed: 8482696]
  235. Huttenlocher J, Levine S, Vevae J. Environmental input and cognitive growth: A study using time-period comparisons. Child Development. 1998;69:1012–1029. [PubMed: 9768484]
  236. Hyde JS. The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist. 2005;60:581–592. [PubMed: 16173891]
  237. Hyde JS, Linn MC. Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin. 1988;104:53–69.
  238. Hyde JS, Fennema E, Lammon JS. Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin. 1990;107(2):139–155. [PubMed: 2138794]
  239. Hyde JS, Fennema E, Ryan M, Frost LA, Hopp C. Gender comparisons of mathematics attitudes and affect: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 1990;14:299–324.
  240. Inglehart R, Norris P. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
  241. Inter Academy Council. Women for Science. Amsterdam: InterAcademy Council; 2006. http://www.interacademycouncil.net/?id=11228 .
  242. Inzlicht M, Ben-Zeev T. A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychological Science. 2000;11(5):365–371. [PubMed: 11228906]
  243. Islam MR, Hewstone M. Dimensions of contact as predictors of intergroup anxiety, perceived out-group variability, and out-group attitude: An integrative model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1993;38:203–210.
  244. Ivie R, Ray KN. Women in Physics and Astronomy, 2005. College Park, MD: American Institute of Physics; 2005. http://www.aip.org/statistics/trends/reports/women05.pdf .
  245. Ivie R, Guo S, Carr A. 2004 Physics and Astronomy Academic Workforce Report. College Park, MD: American Institute of Physics; 2006. http://www.aip.org/statistics/trends/facultytrends.html .
  246. Izraeli DF. Sex effects or structural effects: An empirical test of Kanter’s theory of proportions. Social Forces. 1983;62:153–165.
  247. Jackson PB, Thoits PA, Taylor HF. Composition of the workplace and psychological well-being: The effects of tokenism on America’s black elite. Social Forces. 1995;74(2):543–557.
  248. Jackson SE, May KE, Whitney K. Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision-making teams. In: Guzzo RA, Salas E, editors. Team Effectiveness and DecisionMaking in Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1995.
  249. Jackson SE, Brett JF, Sessa VI, Cooper DM, Julin JA, Peyronnin K. Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1991;76:675–689.
  250. Jacobs J, Winslow S. The academic life course: Time pressures and gender inequality. Community, Work and Family. 2004;7(2):143–161.
  251. Jacobs JE, Eccles JS. The impact of mothers’ gender-role stereotypic beliefs on mothers’ and children’s ability perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1992;63(6):932–944. [PubMed: 1460561]
  252. Jacobs JE, Davis-Kean P, Bleeker M, Eccles JS, Malanchuk O. “I can, but I don’t want to”: The impact of parents, interests, and activities on gender differences in math. In: Gallagher AM, Kaufman JC, editors. Gender Differences in Mathematics: An Integrative Psychological Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
  253. Jaffee S, Hyde JS. Gender differences in moral orientation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin. 2000;126:703–726. [PubMed: 10989620]
  254. Jena SPK. Job, life satisfaction, and occupational stress of women. Social Science International. 1999;15(1):75–80.
  255. Johns M, Schmader T, Martens A. Knowing is half the battle: Teaching stereotype threat as a means of improving women’s math performance. Psychological Science. 2005;16:175–179. [PubMed: 15733195]
  256. Johnson NL. Developmental insights into evolving systems: Roles of diversity, non-selection, self-organization, symbiosis; Paper presented at Seventh International Conference on Artificial Life; Portland OR. August 1-6.2000.
  257. Johnstone WB, Packer AE. Workforce 2000: Work and Workers for the Twenty-First Century. Indianapolis, IN: Hudson Institute; 1987.
  258. Joiner KA. A strategy for allocating central funds to support new faculty recruitment. Academic Medicine. 2005;80(3):218–224. [PubMed: 15734803]
  259. Jordan D. Sisters in Science. Ashland, OH: Purdue University Press; 2005.
  260. Kalev A, Dobbin F, Kelly E. Diversity Management and the Remediation of Inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University; 2006. Best Practices or Best Guesses? (Working Paper) http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~dobbin/cv/working_papers/eeopractice1.pdf .
  261. Kanter RM. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books; 1977.
  262. Kavathas P, LaFrance M, Benhabib S. Task Force on the Retention and Promotion of Junior Faculty. New Haven, CT: Yale Women Faculty Forum; 2006.
  263. Keith B, Layne JS, Babchuk N, Johnson K. The context of scientific achievement: Sex status, organizational environments, and the timing of publication on scholarship outcomes. Social Forces. 2002;80(4):1253–1282.
  264. Keller J. Blatant stereotype threat and women’s performance: Self-handicapping as a strategic means to cope with obtrusive negative performance expectations. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research. 2002;47:193–198.
  265. Kempf M. EmPOWREment and ADVANCEment for women: NSF programs for women in science. Science. 2002 September 20
  266. Kerber LK. We must make the academic workplace more human and equitable. Chronicle of Higher Education. 2005;51(28):B6.
  267. Kern S. Fellowship goals for PhDs and MDs: A primer on the molecular biology postdoctoral experience. Cancer Biology and Therapy. 2002;1:74–85. [PubMed: 12170767]
  268. Kirkman EE, Maxwell JW, Rose CA. 2004 Annual Survey of the Mathematical Sciences. Notices of the American Mathematical Society. 2005. http://www.ams.org/employment/2004Survey-Third-Report.pdf .
  269. Klein A. Affirmative-action opponents suffer setbacks in Colorado and Michigan. Chronicle of Higher Education. 2004;50(31):A23.
  270. Konrad AM, Linnehan F. Formalized HRM structures: Coordinating Equal Employment Opportunity or concealing organizational practices? Academy of Management Journal. 1995;38:787–829.
  271. Konrad AM, Winter S, Gutek BA. Diversity in work group sex composition: Implications for minority or minority members. In: Tolbert PS, Bacharach SB, editors. Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1992.
  272. Kray LJ, Thompson L, Galinsky A. Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2001;80(6):942–958. [PubMed: 11414376]
  273. Krefting LA. Intertwined discourses of merit and gender: Evidence from academic employment in the USA. Gender, Work, and Organization. 2003;10(2):260–278.
  274. Kuck VJ, Marzabadi CH, Nolan SA, Buckner J. Analysis by gender of the doctoral and postdoctoral institutions of faculty members at the top-fifty ranked chemistry departments. Journal of Chemical Education. 2004. pp. 356–363. http://www.chem.indiana.edu/academics/ugrad/Courses/G307/documents/Genderanalysis.pdf .
  275. Kulis S, Chong Y, Shaw H. Discriminatory organizational contexts and black scientists on postsecondary faculties. Research in Higher Education. 1999;40(2):115–148.
  276. Laband DN, Piette MJ. A citation analysis of the impact of blinded peer review. JAMA. 1994;272(2):147–149. [PubMed: 8015128]
  277. Lach J. Minority women hit a “concrete ceiling” American Demographics. 1999;21(9):18–19.
  278. Lagendijk A. Pushing for power. Nature. 2005;438:429. [PubMed: 16306972]
  279. Larkey LK. Toward a theory of communicative interactions in culturally diverse workgroups. Academy of Management Review. 1996;21:463–491.
  280. Laurich-McIntyre S, Brainard SG. Retaining women freshmen in engineering and science: A success sory. Women in Engineering Conference Proceedings: Is Systemic Change Happening?; Washington, DC. 1995.
  281. LaVaque-Manty D, Steiger J, Stewart A. Transforming Science and Engineering: Advancing Women in Science and Engineering. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; Interactive theater: Raising issues about the climate with science faculty. (forthcoming)
  282. Leaper C, Anderson KJ, Sanders P. Moderators of gender effects on parents’ talk to their children: A meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology. 1998;34(11):3–27. [PubMed: 9471001]
  283. Leggon CB. Women in science: Racial and ethnic differences and the differences they make. Journal of Technology Transfer. 2006;31:325–333.
  284. Leggon CB, Pearson W. The baccalaureate origins of African American female PhD scientists. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. 1997;3:213–224.
  285. Lehrer E, Nerlove M. Female labor force behavior and fertility in the United States. Annual Review of Sociology. 1986;12:181–204. [PubMed: 12314445]
  286. Leslie MW. Women learn how to pierce the ‘polycarbonate ceiling’ in chemistry careers. 2005. http://www.Eurekalert.org/pub_release/2005-09/uoo-wlh092105.php .
  287. Levy LJ, Astur RS, Frick KM. Men and women differ in object memory but not performance of a virtual radial maze. Behavioral Neuroscience. 2005;119:853–862. [PubMed: 16187814]
  288. Linn MC, Petersen AC. Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development. 1985;56:1479–1498. [PubMed: 4075870]
  289. Lintner T. The Forgotten Scholars: American Indian Doctorate Receipt, 1980-1990. 1996. http://eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2/content_storage_01/0000000b/80/25/be/36.pdf .
  290. Linville PW. The heterogeneity of homogeneity. In: Darley JM, Cooper J, editors. Attribution and Social Interaction: The Legacy of Edward E. Jones. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1988.
  291. Linville PW, Fischer GW. Exemplar and abstraction models of perceived group variability and stereotypicality. Social Cognition. 1993;11:92–125.
  292. Loden M. Implementing Diversity. Burr Ridge, IL: McGraw-Hill; 1995.
  293. Long J, Allison P, McGinnis R. Rank advancement in academic careers: Sex differences and the effects of productivity. American Sociological Review. 1993;58(8):703–722.
  294. Long JS. Measures of sex differences in scientific productivity. Social Forces. 1992;71:159–178.
  295. Lovitts BE. Leaving the Ivory Tower: The Causes and Consequences of Departure from Doctoral Study. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield; 2001.
  296. Luchtmaya S, Baron-Cohen S, Raggatt P. Foetal testosterone and eye contact in 12-month-old human infants. Infant Behavior and Development. 2002;25:327–335.
  297. Lummis M, Stevenson HW. Gender differences in beliefs and achievement: A cross-cultural study. Developmental Psychology. 1990;26(2):254–263.
  298. Lynch L, Duan C, Glass B. Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1992;62:207–218.
  299. Lytton H, Romney DM. Parents’ differential socialization of boys and girls: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin. 1991;109(2):267–296.
  300. Maccoby EE, Jacklin CN. Psychology of Sex Differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1974.
  301. Malcom SM, Hall PQ, Brown JW. The Double Bind: The Price of Being A Minority Woman in Science. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science; 1976. (AAAS Publication 76-R-3)
  302. Mark S, Link H, Morahan PS, Pololi L, Reznik V, Tropez-Sims S. Innovative mentoring programs to promote gender equity in academic medicine. Academic Medicine. 2001;76:39–42. [PubMed: 11154192]
  303. Martell RF, DeSmet AL. A diagnostic-ratio approach to measuring beliefs about the leadership abilities of male and female managers. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2001;86(6):1223–1231. [PubMed: 11768063]
  304. Martell RF, Lane DM, Emrich C. Male-female differences: A computer simulation. American Psychologist. 1996;51:157–158.
  305. Martin J. Biological, Social, and Organizational Components of Success for Women in Academic Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006. Gendered organizations.
  306. Martin J, Myerson D. Women and power: Conformity, resistance, and disorganized coaction. In: Kramer RM, Neale MA, editors. Power and Influence in Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Sage Publications; 1998.
  307. Marwell G, Rosenfeld RA, Spilerman S. Geographic constraints on women’s careers in academia. Science. 1979;205:1225–1231. [PubMed: 472739]
  308. Mason MA, Stacy A, Goulden M, Hoffman C, Frasch K.University of California Faculty Family Friendly Edge. An Initiative for Tenure-Track Faculty at the University of California. 2005. http://ucfamilyedge.berkeley.edu/
  309. Mason MA, Goulden M. Do babies matter? The effect of family formation on the lifelong careers of academic men and women. Academe. 2002. pp. 21–27. http://www.aaup.org/publications/Academe/2002/02nd/02ndmas.htm .
  310. Mason MA, Goulden M. Marriage and baby blues: Redefining gender equity in the academy. Annals AAPSS. 2004;596:86–103.
  311. Mason MA, Stacy A, Goulden M. University of California Faculty Work and Family Survey. 2003. http://ucfamilyedge.berkeley.edu/workfamily.htm .
  312. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. A study on the status of women faculty in science at MIT. MIT Faculty Newsletter. 1999. http://web.mit.edu/fnl/women/women.html .
  313. Masters MS, Sanders B. Is the gender difference in mental rotation disappearing? Behavior Genetics. 1993;23:337–341. [PubMed: 8240213]
  314. Mathot J. Duke expands child care options. Duke News. September 9, 2005. http://www.dukenews.duke.edu/2005/09/childcare.html .
  315. Maznevski ML. Understanding our differences: Performance in decision-making groups with diverse members. Human Relations. 1994;47:531–552.
  316. McCain BE, O'Reilly C, Pfeffer J. The effects of departmental demography on turnover: The case of a university. Academy of Management Journal. 1983;26:626–641.
  317. McCracken DM. Winning the talent war for women. Harvard Business Review. 2000 Nov/ Dec (Reprint R00611) [PubMed: 11184970]
  318. McDowell JM, Singell LD, Stater M. Two to tango? Gender differences in the decisions to publish and coauthor. Economic Inquiry. 2006;44(1):153–168.
  319. McGlone MS, Aronson J. Stereotype threat, identity salience, and spatial reasoning. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 2006 (in press)
  320. McGrath JE, Berdahl JL, Arrow H. Traits, expectations, culture and clout: The dynamics of diversity in workgroups. In: Jackson SE, Ruderman MD, editors. Diversity in Work Teams. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1995.
  321. McLeod PL, Lobel SA, Cox TH. Ethnic diversity and creativity in small groups. Small Group Research. 1996;27:248–265.
  322. McNutt RA, Evans AT, Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW. The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review: A randomized trial. JAMA. 1990;263(10):1371–1376. [PubMed: 2304216]
  323. Mednick MT. On the politics of psychological constructs: Stop the bandwagon, I want to get off. American Psychologist. 1989;44:1118–1123.
  324. Merton RK. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1973.
  325. Merton RK. The Matthew effect in Science. Science. 1968;158:56–63.
  326. Meyerson DE, Fletcher JK. Harvard Business Review on Women in Business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School; 2005. A modest manifesto for shattering the glass ceiling.
  327. Milem JF. The educational benefits of diversity: Evidence from multiple sectors. In: Chang M, et al., editors. Compelling Interest: Examining the Evidence on Racial Dynamics in Higher Education. Stanford, CA: Stanford Education; 2003.
  328. Miller F. Leadership Diversity Conference: Beyond Awareness into Action. Center for Creative Leadership; Greensboro, NC: 1992. Discussant commentary.
  329. Mincer J. Family migration decisions. Journal of Political Economy. 1978;86:749–773.
  330. Moguerou P. Job Satisfaction among US PhDs: The Effects of Gender and Employment Sectors. 2002. (Working Paper), http://www.rennes.inra.fr/jma2002/pdf/moguerou.pdf .
  331. Monks J. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Higher Education Research Institute; 2005. Title IX Compliance and Preference for Men in College Admission. (Working Paper 80) http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/cheri/wp/cheri_wp80.pdf .
  332. Morgan C, Isaac JD, Sansone C. The role of interest in understanding the career choices of female and male college students. Sex Roles. 2001;44(5-6):295–320.
  333. Morrison A. The New Leaders: Leadership Diversity in America. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1996.
  334. Morrison AM. New solutions to the same old glass ceiling. Women in Management Review. 1992;7(4):15–19.
  335. Moses Y. Black Women in Academe: Issues and Strategies. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges; 1989.
  336. Myers SL, Turner CS. The effects of PhD supply on minority faculty representation. The American Economic Review. 2004;94(2):296–301.
  337. Naff KC, Kellough JE. Ensuring employment equity: Are federal diversity programs making a difference? International Journal of Public Administration. 2003;26(12):1307–1336.
  338. NAS/NAE/IOM. Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2007.
  339. NAS/NAE/IOM. Policy Implications of International Graduate Students and Postdoctoral Scholars in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2005.
  340. NAS/NAE/IOM. Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2004.
  341. NAS/NAE/IOM. Adviser, Teacher, Role Model, Friend: On Being a Mentor to Students in Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1997.
  342. National Center for Education Statistics. Trends in Educational Equity of Girls and Women: 2004. Washington, DC: US Department of Education; 2004. (NCES 2005-016)
  343. National Center for Education Statistics. Digest of Education Statistics, 2002. Washington, DC: US Department of Education Statistics; 2002. (NCES 2003060)
  344. National Center for Education Statistics. Trends in Educational Equity of Girls and Women: 2000. Washington, DC: US Department of Education; 2000. (NCES 2000-030)
  345. National Center for Education Statistics. The Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Washington, DC: US Department of Education; 1997. http://www.ed.gov/nces .
  346. National Institutes of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health. Primary Caregiver Technical Assistance Supplements. http://www.niaid.nih.gov/ncn/training/pctas.htm .
  347. National Research Council. Measuring Racial Discrimination. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2004.
  348. National Research Council. From Scarcity to Visibility: Gender Differences in the Careers of Doctoral Scientists and Engineers. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
  349. National Research Council. The National Scholars Program: Excellence with Diversity for the Future. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1996.
  350. National Research Council. The Path to the PhD. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1996.
  351. National Research Council. Research Doctorate Programs in the United States: Continuity and Change. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1995.
  352. National Research Council. Science and Engineering Programs: On Target for Women? Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1992.
  353. National Research Council. Women in Science and Engineering: Increasing Their Numbers the 1990s: A Statement on Policy and Strategy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1991.
  354. National Research Council. Everybody Counts: A Report to the Nation on the Future of Mathematics Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1989.
  355. National Science Board. Science and Engineering Indicators, 2006. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation; 2006. (NSB 06-02) Appendix Table 1-17.
  356. National Science Board. Science and Engineering Indicators, 2004. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation; 2004. (NSB 04-01)
  357. National Science Foundation. Survey of Doctoral Recipients, 2003. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation; 2006.
  358. National Science Foundation. Gender Differences in the Careers of Academic Scientists and Engineers. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation; 2004. (NSF 04-323)
  359. National Science Foundation. Graduate Students and Postdoctorates in Science and Engineering. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation; 2004.
  360. National Science Foundation. Women, Minorities and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering, 2004. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation; 2004.
  361. National Science Foundation. Survey of Earned Doctorates, 2003. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation; 2003.
  362. National Science Foundation. Survey of Doctoral Recipients. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation; 1999.
  363. Nelson DJ. A National Analysis of Diversity in Science and Engineering Faculties at Research Universities. 2005. http://cheminfo.chem.ou.edu/~djn/diversity/briefings/Diversity%20Report%20Final.pdf .
  364. Nelson S, Pellet G. Shattering the Silences [videorecording] San Francisco: Gail Pellet Productions; 1997.
  365. Nemeth CJ. Dissent as driving cognition, attitudes, and judgments. Social Cognition. 1995;13:273–291.
  366. Nemeth CJ. Dissent, group process, and creativity: The contribution of minority influence. Advances in Group Processes. 1985;2:57–75.
  367. Nettles MT, Millett CM. Three Magic Letters: Getting to PhD. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2006.
  368. Newcombe NS, Huttenlocher J. Development of spatial cognition. In: Kuhn D, Siegler RS, editors. Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol. 2. Cognition, Perception, and Language. 6. New York: Wiley; 2006.
  369. Newkirk MM, Richie E, Lunney JK. Advancing women scientists: The immunology experience. Nature Immunology. 2005;6(9):855. [PubMed: 16116459]
  370. Niemann YF, Dovidio JF. Relationship of solo status, academic rank, and perceived distinctiveness to job satisfaction of racial/ethic minorities. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1998;83(1):55–71. [PubMed: 9494440]
  371. Nieva V, Gutek B. Sex effects on evaluation. Academy of Management Review. 1980; 5 :267–276.
  372. Nieves-Squires S. Hispanic Women: Making their Presence on Campus Less Tenuous. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges; 1991.
  373. Nordenström A, Servin A, Bohlin G, Larsson A, Wedell A. Sex-typed toy play behavior correlates with the degree of prenatal androgen exposure assessed by CYP 21 genotype in girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2002;87(11):5119–5124. [PubMed: 12414881]
  374. Nosek BA, Banaji MR, Greenwald AG. Math = Male, Me = Female, Therefore Math ≠ Me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2002;83:44–59. [PubMed: 12088131]
  375. Nowell A, Hedges LV. Trends in gender differences in academic achievement from 1960 to 1994: An analysis of differences in mean, variance and extreme scores. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research. 1998:21–43.
  376. Oakes J. Opportunities, achievement, and choice: Women and minority students in science and mathematics. Review of Research in Education. 1990;16:153–222.
  377. O'Boyle MW, Hoff EJ, Gill HS. The influence of mirror reversals on male and female performance in spatial tasks: A componential look. Personality and Individual Differences. 1995;18:693–699.
  378. Office of Extramural Research. Sex/Gender in the Biomedical Science Workforce. National Institutes of Health; 2005. http://grants2.nih.gov/grants/policy/sex_gender/q_a.htm#q5 .
  379. Oldenziel R. Multiple entry visas: Gender and engineering in the US, 1870-1945. In: Canal A, Oldenziel R, Zachmann K, editors. Crossing Boundaries, Building Bridges: Comparing the History of Women Engineers 1870s-1990s. Amsterdam: Overseas Publishers Association; 2000.
  380. Olsen D, Maple SA, Stage FK. Women and minority faculty job satisfaction: Professional role interests, professional satisfactions, and institutional fit. The Journal of Higher Education. 1995;66(3):267–293.
  381. Opinion of the court. Grutter v. Bollinger 539 US 306. 2003. http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/pdf/02-241P.ZO .
  382. O'Reilly C, Caldwell DF, Barnett WP. Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1989;34:21–37.
  383. Orfield G. Dropouts in America: Confronting the Graduation Rate Crisis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press; 2005.
  384. Ostrom TM, Carpenter SL, Sedikeides C, Li F. Differential processing of in-group and out-group information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1993;64:21–34.
  385. Ostrow E. The backlash against academic parents. Chronicle of Higher Education. February 22, 2002. http://chronicle.com/jobs/2002/02/2002022202c.htm .
  386. Packard Foundation. Packard Fellowships for Science and Engineering 2006 Guidelines. http://www.packard.org/assets/files/conservation%20and%20science/2006_fellows__guidelines.pdf .
  387. Paglin M, Rufolo AM. Heterogeneous human capital, occupational choice, and male-female earnings differences. Journal of Labor Economics. 1990;8(1):123–144.
  388. Palepu A, Carr PL, Friedman RH, Amos H, Ash AS, Moskowitz MA. Minority faculty in academic medicine. JAMA. 1998;280(9):767–771. [PubMed: 9729986]
  389. Palfrey TR, Rosenthal H. Repeated play, cooperation and coordination: An experimental study. Review of Economic Studies. 1994;61:545–565.
  390. Park B, Judd CM. Measures and models of perceived group variability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1990;59:173–191.
  391. Park SM. Research, teaching and service: Why shouldn’t women’s work count? Journal of Higher Education. 1996;67:46–84.
  392. Pasterski VL, Geffner ME, Brain C, Hindmarsh P, Charles B, Hines M. Prenatal hormones and postnatal socialization by parents as determinants of male-typical toyplay in girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Child Development. 2005;76:264–278. [PubMed: 15693771]
  393. Pearson W. Black Scientists, White Society, and Colorless Science: A Study of Universalism in American Science. Millwood, NY: Associated Faculty; 1985.
  394. Pelled LH. Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science. 1996;7:615–631.
  395. Peña M. New childbirth policy for female graduate students. 2006. Stanford Report, http://news-service.stanford.edu/news/2006/february1/mom-020106.html .
  396. Pettigrew TF, Martin J. Shaping the organizational context for Black American inclusion. Journal of Social Issues. 1987;43(1):41–78.
  397. Pinker S. The science of gender and science. Pinker and Spelke: Edge: The Third Culture. 2005. http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/debate05/debate05_index.html .
  398. Pinker S. The science of difference: Sex ed. The New Republic. 2005 February 14
  399. Pinker S. The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature. New York: Viking; 2002.
  400. Pion G, Ionescu-Pioggia M. Bridging postdoctoral training and a faculty position: Initial outcomes of the Burroughs Wellcome Fund Career Awards in the Biomedical Sciences. Academic Medicine. 2003;78(2):177–186. [PubMed: 12584096]
  401. Plater WM. Future work: Faculty time in the 21st century. Change. 1995;27(3):22–33.
  402. Plous S. The psychology of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination: An overview. In: Plous S, editor. Understanding Prejudice and Discrimination. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2003.
  403. Polyani M. The Republic of Science: Its political and economic theory. Minerva. 1962;1:54–74.
  404. Pratto F, Bargh JA. Stereotyping based on apparently individuating information: Trait and global components of sex stereotypes under attention overload. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1991;27:26–47.
  405. Preston AE. Leaving Science: Occupational Exit from Scientific Careers. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2004.
  406. Pribbenow C, Maidl C, Winchell J. WISELI’s Workshops for Search Chairs: Evaluation Report. Madison: University of Wisconsin; 2005.
  407. Quinn DM, Spencer SJ. The interference of stereotype threat with women’s generation of mathematical problem-solving strategies. Journal of Social Issues. 2001;57(1):55–71.
  408. Rapoport R, Bailyn L, Fletcher JK, Pruitt BH. Beyond Work-Family Balance: Advancing Gender Equity and Workplace Performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2002.
  409. Rennie DJ. Peer review in Prague. JAMA. 1998;280(3):214–215. [PubMed: 9676657]
  410. Reskin B. The proximate causes of employment discrimination. Contemporary Sociology. 2000;29(2):319–328.
  411. Reskin B, Roos P. Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women’s Inroads into Male Occupations. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press; 1990.
  412. Resnick SM, Berenbaum SA, Gottesman II, Bouchard TJ. Early hormonal influences on cognitive functioning in congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Developmental Psychology. 1986;22(2):191–198.
  413. Rice ER, Austin AE. Faculty morale: What exemplary colleges do right. Change. 1988;20(3):51–58.
  414. Roach R. Ford diversity fellows urged to defend affirmative action. Diverse Issues in Higher Education. 2005. http://www.diverseeducation.com/artman/publish/article_4898.shtml .
  415. Rolison DR. Can title IX do for women in science and engineering what it has done for women in sports? American Physical Society News Online. 2003;12(5):8.
  416. Rosenfeld RA, Jones JA. Patterns and effects of geographic mobility for academic women and men. Journal of Higher Education. 1987;58(5):493–515.
  417. Rosenthal R, Rosnow RL, Rubin DB. Contrasts and Effect Sizes in Behavioral Research: A Correlational Approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
  418. Ross JS, Gross CP, Desai MM, Hong Y, Grant AO, Daniels SR, Hachinski VC, Gibbons RJ, Gardner TJ, Krumholz HM. Effect of blinded peer review on abstract acceptance. JAMA. 2006;295:1675–1680. [PubMed: 16609089]
  419. Rosser S, Chameau JL. Institutionalization, sustainability, and repeatability of ADVANCE for institutional transformation. Journal of Technology Transfer. 2006;31:335–344.
  420. Rosser SV. Biological, Social, and Organizational Components of Success for Women in Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006. Creating an inclusive work environment.
  421. Rosser SV. The Science Glass Ceiling. New York: Routledge; 2004.
  422. Rosser VJ. Faculty members’ intentions to leave: A national study on their worklife and satisfaction. Research in Higher Education. 2004;45(3):285–309.
  423. Roth S. The Steering Committee’s Report on the Women’s Initiative. Durham, NC: Duke University; 2003. http://www.duke.edu/womens_initiative/exec.htm .
  424. Rouse C, Glick P. Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of “blind” auditions on female musicians. American Economics Review. 2000;90:715–741.
  425. Rudman LA, Glick P. Gender effects on social influence and hireability: Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash towards agentic women. Journal of Social Issues. 2001;57(4):743–762.
  426. Rudman LA, Kilianski SE. Implicit and explicit attitudes toward female authority. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2000;26(11):315–1328.
  427. Rutgers University. A Study of Gender Equity in the Faculty of Arts and Sciences. 2001. http://fas.rutgers.edu/onlineforms/gender_report.pdf .
  428. Sandler BR. The Campus Climate Revisited: Chilly Climate for Women Faculty, Administrators, and Graduate Students. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges; 1991.
  429. Saults SJ, Liu F, Hoard MK. Sex differences in spatial cognition, computational fluency, and arithmetical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2000;77:337–353. [PubMed: 11063633]
  430. Sax LJ, Hagedorn S, Arredondo M, Dicrisi FA. Faculty research productivity: Exploring the role of gender and family-related factors. Research in Higher Education. 2002;43(4):423–446.
  431. Schmader T. Gender identification moderates stereotype threat effects on women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2002;38:194–201.
  432. Schmader T, Johns M, Barquissau M. The costs of accepting gender differences: The role of stereotype endorsement in women’s experience in the math domain. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research. 2004;50:835–850.
  433. Schmidt P. From “Minority” to “Diversity”. The transformation of formerly raceexclusive programs may be leaving some students out in the cold. Chronicle of Higher Education. 2006;52(22):A24.
  434. Schmidt P. Southern Illinois U. and Justice Dept. near accord on minority fellowships. Chronicle of Higher Education. 2006;52(22):A26.
  435. Schneider A. Support for a rare breed: Tenured women scientists. Chronicle of Higher Education. 2000 November 10
  436. Schneider B. The people make the place. Personnel Psychology. 1987;40:437–453.
  437. ALW Sears. Image problems deplete the number of women in academic applicant pools. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. 2003;9:169–181.
  438. Serbin LA, Poulin-Dubois D, Colburne KA, Sen MG, Eichstedt JAY. Gender stereotyping in infancy: Visual preferences for and knowledge of gender stereotyped toys in the second year. International Journal of Behavioral Development. 2001;25:7–15.
  439. Seymour E, Hewitt NM. Talking About Leaving. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1997.
  440. Sharpe NR, Fuller CH. Baccalaureate origins of women physical science doctorates: Relationship to institutional gender and science discipline. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. 1995;2(1):1–15.
  441. Shauman KA, Xie Y. Geographic mobility of scientists: Sex differences and family constraints. Demography. 1996;33(4):455–468. [PubMed: 8939418]
  442. Shaywitz BA, Shaywitz SE, Pugh KR, Constable RT, Skudlarski P, Fulbright RK, Bronen RA, Fletcher JM, Shankweler DP, Katz L, Gore JC. Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language. Nature. 1995;373:607–609. [PubMed: 7854416]
  443. Shepard RN, Metzler J. Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science. 1971;171(972):701–703. [PubMed: 5540314]
  444. Sheridan J, Brennan PF, Carnes M, Handelsman J. Discovering directions for change in higher education through the experiences of senior women faculty. Journal of Technology Transfer. 2006;31:387–396.
  445. Shih M, Pittinsky TL, Ambady N. Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science. 1999;10(1):80–83.
  446. Simpson R, Cohen C. Dangerous work: The gendered nature of bullying in the context of higher education. Gender, Work and Organization. 2004;11(2):163–186.
  447. Sinclair L, Kunda Z. Motivated stereotyping of women: She’s fine if she praised me but incompetent if she criticized me. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2000;26(11):1329–1342.
  448. Singer JM, Stake JE. Mathematics and self-esteem: Implications for women’s career choice. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 1986;10:339–352.
  449. Skolnik M. Does counting publications provide any useful information about academic performance? Teacher Education Quarterly. 2000;27(2):15–25.
  450. Smith DG, Parker S, Clayton-Pedersen AR, Moreno JF, Teraguchi DH. Building Capacity: The Study of Impact of The James Irvine Foundation Campus Diversity Initiative. Irvine, CA: The James Irvine Foundation; 2006.
  451. Solomon BM. In the Company of Educated Women: A History of Women and Higher Education in America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1985.
  452. Solorzano DG. The baccalaureate origins of Chicana and Chicano doctorates in the physical, life, and engineering sciences: 1980-1990. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. 1994;1(4):253–272.
  453. Aleman A, Bouma A, Kahn RS. Do women really have more bilateral language representation than men? A meta-analysis of functional imaging studies. Brain. 2004;127(8):1845–1852. [PubMed: 15240433]
  454. Sonnert G, Holton G. Career patterns of women and men in the sciences. American Scientist. 1996;84:63–71.
  455. South SJ, Bonjean CM, Markham WT, Corder J. Social structure and intergroup interaction: Men and women of the federal bureaucracy. American Sociological Review. 1982;47:587–599.
  456. Spelke ES. Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science? A critical review. American Psychologist. 2005;60(9):950–958. [PubMed: 16366817]
  457. Spencer SJ, Steele CM, Quinn DM. Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology. 1999;35:4–28.
  458. Stacy A. Biological, Social, and Organizational Components of Success for Women in Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006. Recruitment practices.
  459. Stanford University Chemistry Department. Letter to Graduate Students. http://pubs.acs.org/cen/news/pdf/Stanford_Policy.pdf?sessid=1602 .
  460. Stanford University. Stanford Graduate Student Handbook. “Childbirth Policy for Women Graduate Students at Stanford University”. http://www.stanford.edu/dept/DoR/GSH/childbirth.html .
  461. Steele CM. A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist. 1997;52:613–629. [PubMed: 9174398]
  462. Steele CM, Aronson J. Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1995;69:797–811. [PubMed: 7473032]
  463. Steinpreis R, Sanders K, Ritzke D. The impact of gender on the review of the curriculum vitae of job applicants and tenure candidates: A national empirical study. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research. 1999;41:509–528.
  464. Stewart AJ, LaVaque-Manty D, Malley JE. Recruiting women faculty in science and engineering: Preliminary evaluation of one intervention model. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. 2004;10(4):361–375.
  465. Strangor C, Lynch L, Duan C, Glass B. Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1992;62:207–218.
  466. Strum S. Second generation employment discrimination: A structural approach. Columbia Law Review. 2001;101(3):458–568.
  467. Sullivan B, Hollenshead C, Smith G. Developing and implementing work-family policies for faculty. Academe. 2004. http://www.aaup.org/publications/Academe/2004/04nd/04ndsull.htm .
  468. Taylor SE, Fiske ST. The token in the small group: Research findings and research implications. In: Sweeney J, editor. Psychology and Politics: Collected Papers. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1976.
  469. Tetlock PE. Accountability: A social check on the fundamental attribution error. Social Psychology Quarterly. 1985;48:227–236.
  470. Tenenbaum HR, Leaper C. Are parents’ gender schemas related to their children’s gender-related cognitions? A meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology. 2003a;38(4):615–630. [PubMed: 12090490]
  471. Tenenbaum HR, Leaper C. Parent-child conversations about science: The socialization of gender inequities. Developmental Psychology. 2003b;39(1):34–47. [PubMed: 12518807]
  472. Teodorescu D. Faculty Gender Equity at Emory: PCSW Study Finds Both Fairness and Imbalances. 2002. http://www.emory.edu/ACAD_EXCHANGE/2002/octnov/pcsw.html .
  473. Thomas DA. Diversity as strategy. Harvard Business Review. 2004;82(9):98–108. [PubMed: 15449859]
  474. Thornton S. Maternity and childrearing leave policies for faculty: The legal and practical challenges of complying with Title VII. University of Southern California Review of Law and Women’s Studies. 2003;12(2):161–190.
  475. Tomasello M, Call J. Primate Cognition. New York: Oxford University Press; 1997.
  476. Tomaskoviv-Devey D, Thomas M, Johnson K. Race and the accumulation of human capital across the career: A theoretical model of fixed-effects application. American Journal of Sociology. 2005;111:58–89.
  477. Toren N, Kraus V. The effects of minority size on women’s position in academia. Social Forces. 1987;65:1090–1100.
  478. Tregenza T. Gender bias in the refereeing process? TRENDS in Ecology and Evolution. 2002;17(8):349–350.
  479. Trix F, Psenka C. Exploring the color of glass: Letters of recommendation for female and male medical faculty. Discourse and Society. 2003;14(2):191–220.
  480. Trower C, Chait R. Faculty diversity: Too little for too long. Harvard Magazine. 2002;March-April
  481. Trower CA, Bleak JL. Gender: Statistical Report [Universities] Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education; 2004. Study of New Scholars. http://www.gse.harvard.edu/~newscholars/newscholars/downloads/genderreport.pdf .
  482. Turner CSV. Women of color in academe: Living with multiple marginality. The Journal of Higher Education. 2002;73(1):74–93.
  483. Turner CSV. New faces, new knowledge. Academe. 2000;86:34–37.
  484. Turner CSV, Myers SL. Faculty of Color in Academe: Bittersweet Success. New York: Allyn and Bacon; 2000.
  485. Tyre P. The trouble with boys. Newsweek. 2006 Jan 30;147(5):44–52.
  486. Umbach PD. Gender Equity in the Academic Labor Market: An Analysis of Academic Disciplines; Paper presented at the 2006 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association; San Francisco, CA. April 7-11; 2006. http://myweb.uiowa.edu/pumbach/AERA2006_equitypaper.pdf .
  487. University of California-Davis Lab Management Institute Web page. http://www.research.ucdavis.edu/home.cfm?id=OVC,14,1488 .
  488. University of California-Santa Cruz Chancellor’s Inaugural Symposium; November 3, 2006; http://celebration2005.ucsc.edu/symposium.asp .
  489. University of Colorado at Boulder. Faculty Recruitment and Retention Task Force Report. 2001. http://www.colorado.edu/AcademicAffairs/fac_recruit/fac_recruit.doc .
  490. University of Michigan STRIDE Web Page. http://sitemaker.umich.edu/advance/stride .
  491. University of Washington. ADVANCE Web Page. http://www.engr.washington.edu/advance/workshops/index.html .
  492. University of Washington. ADVANCE Center for Institutional Change Faculty Retention Toolkit. 2003. http://www.engr.washington.edu/advance/resources/Retention/index.html .
  493. University of Washington. Childcare Voucher Program. http://depts.washington.edu/ovpsa/childcare/voucher.html .
  494. US Department of Education. International Outcomes of Learning in Mathematics Literacy and Problem Solving: PISA 2003 Results From the US Perspective: Highlights. Washington, DC: US Department of Education; 2004. (NCES 2005−003)
  495. Valian V. Why So Slow? The Advancement of Women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1998.
  496. van Marle K. Infants’ Understanding of Number: The Relationship Between Discrete and Continuous Quantity. Doctoral dissertation, Yale University; 2004.
  497. van Rooyen S, Godlee F, Evans S, Smith R, Black N. Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: A randomized trial. JAMA. 1998;280(3:234–237. [PubMed: 9676666]
  498. Vistnes JP. Gender differences in days lost from work due to illness. Industrial and Labor Relations Review. 1997;50(2):304–323.
  499. Vogt C, Eccles J, Watt H. Explaining Gendered Occupational Outcomes. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2006. Women’s participation in ICT careers in industrialized nations.
  500. Voyer D, Voyer S, Bryden MP. Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin. 1995;117(2):250–270. [PubMed: 7724690]
  501. Waldfogel J, Higuchi Y, Abe M. Family leave policies and women’s retention after childbirth: Evidence from the United States, Britain, and Japan. Journal of Population Economics. 1999;12:523–545.
  502. Ward K, Wolf-Wendel L. Fear factor: How safe is it to make time for family? Academe. 2004. http://www.aaup.org/publications/Academe/2004/04nd/04ndward.htm .
  503. Weinberger CJ. Is the Science and Engineering Workforce Drawn from the Far Upper Tail of the Math Ability Distribution? Institute for Social, Behavioral and Economic Research and Department of Economics, University of California; Santa Barbara: 2005. (Working Paper)
  504. Weiss EM, Kemmler G, Deisenhammer EA, Fleischhacker W, Delazer M. Sex differences in cognitive functions. Personality and Individual Differences. 2003;35(4):863–875.
  505. Wennerås C, Wold A. Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature. 1997;387:341–343. [PubMed: 9163412]
  506. Wenzel SA, Hollenshead C. Former Women Faculty: Reasons for Leaving One Research University. Washington, DC: ERIC Document Service; 1998. (ED 465 327)
  507. Williams J. Are your parental leave policies legal? The Chronicle of Higher Education. 2005. http://chronicle.com/jobs/2005/02/2005020701c.htm .
  508. Williams JC. Biological, Social, and Organizational Components of Success for Women in Academic Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006. Long time no see: Why are there still so few women in academic science and engineering.
  509. Williams JC. Biological, Social, and Organizational Components of Success for Women in Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006. Moving beyond the “Chilly Climate” to a new model for spurring organizational change.
  510. Williams JC. Hitting the maternal wall. Academe. 2004. http://www.aaup.org/publications/Academe/2004/04nd/04ndwill.htm .
  511. Williams JC, Cooper HC. The public policy of motherhood. Journal of Social Issues. 2004;60(4):849–865.
  512. Williams JC. Unbending Gender: Why Work and Family Conflict and What to Do About It. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2000.
  513. Wilson G, Sakura-Lemessy I, West JP. Reaching for the top: Racial differences in mobility paths to upper-tier occupations. Work and Occupations. 1999;26:165–186.
  514. Wilson R. Dartmouth to provide paid leave to graduate students with new children. The Chronicle of Higher Education. May 16, 2006. http://chronicle.com/cgi-bin/printable.cgi?article=http://chronicle.com/daily/2006/05/2006051904n.htm .
  515. Wilson R. Duke and Princeton will spend more to make female professors happy. The Chronicle of Higher Education. 2003 October 10
  516. Witelson SF. Neural sexual mosaicism: Sexual differentiation of the human temporoparietal region for function asymmetry. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1991;16(1-3):131–153. [PubMed: 1961836]
  517. Witelson SF, Glezer II, Kigaar DL. Women have greater density of neurons in the posterior temporal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience. 1995;15(5):3418–3428. [PubMed: 7751921]
  518. Wolf-Wendel LE, Twombly SB, Rice S. The Two-body Problem: Dual-Career Couple Hiring Practices in Higher Education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2003.
  519. Wolf-Wendel LE, Twombly SB, Rice S. Dual-career couples: Keeping them together. Journal of Higher Education. 2000;71(3):291–321.
  520. Women in Science and Engineering Leadership Institute. Advice to the Top: Top 10 Tips for Academic Leaders to Accelerate the Advancement of Women in Science and Engineering. University of Wisconsin: WISELI; http://wiseli.engr.wisc.edu/Products/Sex_and_Science.pdf .
  521. Women in Science and Engineering Leadership Institute. Training for hiring committees. University of Wisconsin: WISELI; http://wiseli.engr.wisc.edu/initiatives/hiring/training_hiring.html#Workshops .
  522. Xie Y. Careers in Science and Technology: An International Perspective. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1996. A demographic approach to studying the process of becoming a scientist/ engineer.
  523. Xie Y, Shaumann KA. Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2003.
  524. Xie Y, Shauman KA. Sex differences in research productivity: New evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review. 1998;63(6):847–870.
  525. Yoder J. Rethinking tokenism: Looking beyond numbers. Gender and Society. 1991;5(2):178–192.
  526. Young R, Sweeting H. Adolescent bullying, relationships, psychological wellbeing, and gender-atypical behavior: A gender diagnosticity approach. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research. 2004;50(7/8):525–537.
  527. Zare R. Sex, lies, and Title IX. Chemical and Engineering News. 2006. pp. 46–49. http://pubs.acs.org/cen/education/84/8420education.html .
  528. Zhang L. Crowd Out or Opt Out: The Changing Landscape of Doctorate Production in American Universities. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Higher Education Research Institute; 2004. (Working Paper 63) http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/cheri/wp/cheri_wp63.pdf .
  529. Zhou Y, Volkwein JF. Examining the influences on faculty departure intentions: A comparison of tenured versus nontenured faculty at research universities using NSOPF-99. Research in Higher Education. 2004;45(2):139–176.
  530. Zimmer L. Tokenism and women in the workplace: The limits of gender-neutral theory. Social Problems. 1998;35(1):64–77.
Copyright © 2007, National Academy of Sciences.
Bookshelf ID: NBK9809
PubReader format: click here to try

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (10M)

Related information

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...