NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Institute of Medicine (US) Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice. Sex-Specific Reporting of Scientific Research: A Workshop Summary. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2012.

Cover of Sex-Specific Reporting of Scientific Research

Sex-Specific Reporting of Scientific Research: A Workshop Summary.

Show details


  • Bairey Merz CN, Shaw LJ, Reis SE, Bittner V, Kelsey SF, Olson M, Johnson BD, Pepine CJ, Mankad S, Sharaf BL, Rogers WJ, Pohost GM, Lerman A, Quyyumi AA, Sopko G. Insights from the NHLBI-sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study: Part II: Gender differences in presentation, diagnosis, and outcome with regard to gender-based pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and macrovascular and microvascular coronary disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(3 Suppl):S21–29. [PubMed: 16458167]
  • Becker JB, Arnold AP, Berkley KJ, Blaustein JD, Eckel LA, Hampson E, Herman JP, Marts S, Sadee W, Steiner M, Taylor J, Young E. Strategies and methods for research on sex differences in brain and behavior. Endocrinology. 2005;146(4):1650–1673. [PubMed: 15618360]
  • Becker JB, Berkley KJ, Geary N, Hampson E, Herman JP, Young E, editors. Sex Differences in the Brain: From Genes to Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press Inc; 2008.
  • Beery AK, Zucker I. Sex bias in neuroscience and biomedical research. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011;35(3):565–572. [PMC free article: PMC3008499] [PubMed: 20620164]
  • Berry DA. Introduction to Bayesian methods III: Use and interpretation of Bayesian tools in design and analysis. Clin Trials. 2005;2(4):295–300. 364–378. discussion 301–304. [PubMed: 16281428]
  • Canto JG, Goldberg RJ, Hand MM, Bonow RO, Sopko G, Pepine CJ, Long T. Symptom presentation of women with acute coronary syndromes: Myth vs reality. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(22):2405–2413. [PubMed: 18071161]
  • Clayton J. Presentation at Sex-Specific Reporting of Scientific Research: A Workshop; Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine;
  • FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) Guidance for the Use of Bayesian Statistics in Medical Device Clinical Trials. 2010. [accessed November 14, 2011]. http://www​​/MedicalDevices​/DeviceRegulationandGuidance​/GuidanceDocuments/UCM071121​.pdf.
  • Freedman LS, Simon R, Foulkes MA, Friedman L, Geller NL, Gordon DJ, Mowery R. Inclusion of women and minorities in clinical trials and the NIH Revitalization Act of 1993—The perspective of NIH clinical trialists. Control Clin Trials. 1995;16(5):277–285. 293–309. discussion 286–289. [PubMed: 8582146]
  • Gandhi M, Ameli N, Bacchetti P, Sharp GB, French AL, Young M, Gange SJ, Anastos K, Holman S, Levine A, Greenblatt RM. Eligibility criteria for HIV clinical trials and generalizability of results: the gap between published reports and study protocols. AIDS. 2005;19(16):1885–1896. [PubMed: 16227797]
  • GAO (U.S. General Accounting Office) Women’s Health: FDA Needs to Ensure More Study of Gender Differences in Prescription Drug Testing. 1992. [accessed November 2, 2011]. GAO/HRD-93-17. http://archive​
  • Gigerenzer G. Calculated Risks: How to Know When Numbers Deceive You. New York: Simon & Schuster; 2002.
  • Goldkind SF, Sahin L, Gallauresi B. Enrolling pregnant women in research—lessons from the H1N1 influenza pandemic. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(24):2241–2243. [PubMed: 20554981]
  • Goodman SN. Toward evidence-based medical statistics. 2: The Bayes factor. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130(12):1005–1013. [PubMed: 10383350]
  • Gurwitz JH, Col NF, Avorn J. The exclusion of the elderly and women from clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1992;268(11):1417–1422. [PubMed: 1512909]
  • IOM (Institute of Medicine) Women’s Health Research: Progress, Pitfalls, and Promise. Washington DC: The National Academies Press; 2010.
  • IOM. Sex Differences and Implications for Translational Neuroscience Research: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011.
  • ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. Lancet. 1988;2(8607):349–360. [PubMed: 2899772]
  • Jagsi R, Motomura AR, Amarnath S, Jankovic A, Sheets N, Ubel PA. Under-representation of women in high-impact published clinical cancer research. Cancer. 2009;115(14):3293–3301. [PubMed: 19507175]
  • Kahn SE, Zinman B, Lachin JM, Haffner SM, Herman WH, Holman RR, Kravitz BG, Yu D, Heise MA, Aftring RP, Viberti G. Rosiglitazone-associated fractures in type 2 diabetes: An analysis from A Diabetes Outcome Progression Trial (ADOPT) Diabetes Care. 2008;31(5):845–851. [PubMed: 18223031]
  • Kent D, Hayward R. When averages hide individual differences in clinical trials. American Scientist. 2007;95(1):60–68.
  • Kent DM, Hayward RA. Limitations of applying summary results of clinical trials to individual patients: The need for risk stratification. JAMA. 2007;298(10):1209–1212. [PubMed: 17848656]
  • Kim ES, Menon V. Status of women in cardiovascular clinical trials. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29(3):279–283. [PubMed: 19221204]
  • Mittelstrass K, Ried JS, Yu Z, Krumsiek J, Gieger C, Prehn C, Roemisch-Margl W, Polonikov A, Peters A, Theis FJ, Meitinger T, Kronenberg F, Weidinger S, Wichmann HE, Suhre K, Wang-Sattler R, Adamski J, Illig T. Discovery of sexual dimorphisms in metabolic and genetic biomarkers. PLoS Genet. 2011;7(8):e1002215. [PMC free article: PMC3154959] [PubMed: 21852955]
  • NIH (National Institutes of Health) Monitoring Adherence to the NIH Policy on the Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research: Comprehensive Report: Tracking of Human Subjects Research As Reported in Fiscal Year 2009 and Fiscal Year 2010. Washington, DC: HHS and NIH; 2011.
  • Putting gender on the agenda. Nature. 2010;465(7299):665. [PubMed: 20535156]
  • Sleight P. Debate: Subgroup analyses in clinical trials: Fun to look at—but don’t believe them! Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med. 2000;1(1):25–27. [PMC free article: PMC59592] [PubMed: 11714402]
  • Wald C, Wu C. Biomedical research. Of mice and women: The bias in animal models. Science. 2010;327(5973):1571–1572. [PubMed: 20339045]
  • Wong JB. What are my chances?; Presentation at Sex-Specific Reporting of Scientific Research: A Workshop; Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2011.
  • Zucker I, Beery AK. Males still dominate animal studies. Nature. 2010;465(7299):690. [PubMed: 20535186]
Copyright © 2012, National Academy of Sciences.
Bookshelf ID: NBK84194
PubReader format: click here to try


Related information

  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to pubmed

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...