Copyright Notice: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/about/copyright/
NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Excerpt
We undertook this systematic review to assist the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) in updating its 2003 recommendation on cervical cancer screening. During the planning phase of this evidence review on cervical cancer screening, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) decided to fund a separate modeling study to be conducted simultaneously. The USPSTF determined that the scope for both the systematic review and the modeling study would focus on important clinical questions that could inform effective use of screening in practice. This systematic review focuses on when to begin screening and on updating test accuracy and harms data on liquid-based cytology (LBC) and human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, either alone or in combination with cytology. The modeling study focuses on the effectiveness of strategies that use different ages at which to begin screening and different screening intervals.1 These two reports are intended to provide the USPSTF with complementary information to update its recommendation on cervical cancer screening.
Contents
Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services1, Contract No. HHS-290-2007-10057-I, Task Order No. 3, Prepared by: Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center, Portland, Oregon
Suggested citation:
Vesco KK, Whitlock EP, Eder M, Lin J, Burda BU, Senger CA, Holmes RS, Fu R, Zuber S. Screening for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Evidence Synthesis No. 86. AHRQ Publication No. 11-05156-EF-1. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; May 2011.
This report is based on research conducted by the Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Rockville, MD (Contract No. HHS-290-2007-10057-I). The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the author(s), who are responsible for its content, and do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. No statement in this report should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
The information in this report is intended to help clinicians, employers, policymakers, and others make informed decisions about the provision of health care services. This report is intended as a reference and not as a substitute for clinical judgment.
This report may be used, in whole or in part, as the basis for the development of clinical practice guidelines and other quality enhancement tools, or as a basis for reimbursement and coverage policies. AHRQ or U.S. Department of Health and Human Services endorsement of such derivative products may not be stated or implied.
None of the investigators has any affiliation or financial involvement that conflicts with the material presented in this report.
- 1
540 Gaither Road, Rockville, MD 20850; www.ahrq.gov
- PDF version of this title (2.5M)
-
Liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus testing to screen for cervical cancer: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
[Ann Intern Med. 2011]
Liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus testing to screen for cervical cancer: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.Whitlock EP, Vesco KK, Eder M, Lin JS, Senger CA, Burda BU. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Nov 15; 155(10):687-97, W214-5. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
-
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review
[ 2008]
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: An Updated Systematic ReviewWhitlock EP, Lin J, Liles E, Beil T, Fu R, O'Connor E, Thompson RN, Cardenas T. 2008 Oct
-
Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.
[Ann Intern Med. 2009]
Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 17; 151(10):716-26, W-236.
-
Review Liquid-based cytology in cervical screening: an updated rapid and systematic review and economic analysis.
[Health Technol Assess. 2004]
Review Liquid-based cytology in cervical screening: an updated rapid and systematic review and economic analysis.Karnon J, Peters J, Platt J, Chilcott J, McGoogan E, Brewer N. Health Technol Assess. 2004 May; 8(20):iii, 1-78.
-
Review Screening for chlamydial infection: an evidence update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
[Ann Intern Med. 2007]
Review Screening for chlamydial infection: an evidence update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.Meyers DS, Halvorson H, Luckhaupt S, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Jul 17; 147(2):135-42. Epub 2007 Jun 18.
-
Screening for Cervical Cancer
Screening for Cervical CancerBookshelf
-
Artificial sweetener sucralose in U.S. drinking water systems.
Artificial sweetener sucralose in U.S. drinking water systems.Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Oct 15 ;45(20):8716-22. Epub 2011 Sep 26 .PubMed
-
Development of a genetic tool for activating chromosomal expression of cryptic o...
Development of a genetic tool for activating chromosomal expression of cryptic or tightly regulated loci in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Plasmid. 2011 Dec 26. [Epub ahead of print]PubMed
-
Structural and mechanistic insights into unusual thiol disulfide oxidoreductase.
Structural and mechanistic insights into unusual thiol disulfide oxidoreductase.J Biol Chem. 2012 Jan 13 ;287(3):1688-97. Epub 2011 Nov 28 .PubMed
-
Bacterial interactomes: from interactions to networks.
Bacterial interactomes: from interactions to networks.Methods Mol Biol. 2012 ;804:15-33.PubMed
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...