Table 10Characteristics of studies evaluating assertive methods

StudyStudy designComparisonsOutcomesBaseline severityTreatment characteristicsResults
PASSETTI2008
(UK)
Non-randomised parallel cohort pilot studyFlexible access clinic (ACT methods)

Usual care clinic
Percentage completed assessment

Percentage completed aftercare

Percentage completed medically assisted withdrawal
Alcohol units per week (mean [SD]):

Flexible access: 143(111)

Usual care: 177 (120)
Flexible access clinic (n = 188): two walk-in weekly slots, each of 3 hours; two full-time CPNs, social workers, clinical psychologists and medical cover provided by staff of community alcohol team. Offered community-based assessments whenever patients had failed to attend. Modelled on ACT in the sense that it targeted patients with a history of disengagement; maintained a small case load; operated proactively and engaged assertively; it offered flexible access including assessment and treatment in the community where required; run by a CPN care coordinator working within a multidisciplinary team that met frequently, typically after each assessment or review.

Usual care clinic (n = 223): two full-time specialist CPNs and two social workers. Full time medical staff; large caseload (25 to 30), multidisciplinary case discussion took place once weekly or less, community-based assessments were not offered and limited integration of health and social care staff work.
No significant differences between the two groups on percentage completing assessment.

Significant differences found between two groups on percentage completed withdrawal programmes, p <0.05 (in favour of flexible access clinic) and percentage entered aftercare, p <0.02

From: 5, ORGANISATION AND DELIVERY OF CARE

Cover of Alcohol-Use Disorders
Alcohol-Use Disorders: Diagnosis, Assessment and Management of Harmful Drinking and Alcohol Dependence.
NICE Clinical Guidelines, No. 115.
National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (UK).
Leicester (UK): British Psychological Society; 2011.
Copyright © 2011, The British Psychological Society & The Royal College of Psychiatrists.

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Enquiries in this regard should be directed to the British Psychological Society.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.