≥2 ARMS/GROUPS: DICHOTOMOUS OUTCOMES (e.g. OR, RR, %death)

UI Author Year Outcome Exposure Categories(e.g., Tertiles)/Intervention Groups Mean Vit D level/dose Mean Ca level/dose No. of Cases * No. of Non- cases/Total N ** Crude or Adjusted analysis? Outcome Metric (e.g. OR, RR, HR, %) Outcome effect size CI/SE/SD ** P between groups *** P for trend ****
14618623 Tuohimaa 2004 prostate cancer ≤19 19 nd conditional logistic OR 1.5 0.8–2.7
20–39 169 nd 1.3 0.98–1.6
40–49 (ref) 229 nd 1
60–79 138 nd 1.2 0.9–1.5
≥80 67 nd 1.7 1.1–2.4

Duplicate one row per exposure category or intervention group.

*

Number of subjects with outcome

**

Please choose one and delete the others

***

Specify the comparison. For example group 1 vs. 3 = −6; group 1 vs. 2 = −8

****

P value for testing the linear trend of the OR/RR across different categories or doses

Number of subjects with outcome

Please choose one and delete the others

Specify the comparison. For example group 1 vs. 3 = −6; group 1 vs. 2 = −8

P value for testing the linear trend of the OR/RR across different categories or doses

From: Appendix C, Evidence Tables: R-Z

Cover of Vitamin D and Calcium
Vitamin D and Calcium: A Systematic Review of Health Outcomes.
Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, No. 183.
Chung M, Balk EM, Brendel M, et al.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.