17315319
|
Rohrmann
|
a) Eligibility criteria clear? (y/n)
|
Y
|
a) Exposure assessor blinded to outcome info? (y/n)
|
N
|
a) Method reported? (y/n)
|
Y
|
a) One of the prespecified methods
***
was used? (y/n)
|
NA
|
a) Level of the exposure in comparative categories(eg quartiles) is given(ranges)? (y/n) applicable for categorical analyses only
|
Y
|
a) Adjusted or matched for ANY confounders(other than age and sex)?
**
(y/n)
|
Y
|
a) Clear definition of outcome, including time of ascertainment? (y/n)
|
Y
|
a) Prospective collection of data? (y/n)
|
N
|
b) Sampling of population random or consecutive? (y/n)
|
nd
|
b) Outcome assessor blinded to exposure measurement? (y/n)
|
N
|
b) Food composition database or suppl composition reported? (y/n)
|
N
|
Time from sample collection to sample analysis reported? (y/n)
|
NA
|
b) Loss to follow-up<20%? (y/n)
|
Y
|
b) Analysis was planned when cohort was formed? (y/n)
|
N
|
| | | |
c) Internal calibration of method perform (if FFQ)? (y/n/NA)
|
N
| | | | |
b) Justification of final adjusted model selection? (y/n)
|
Y
|
c) Do the authors specify a primary outcome? (y/n)
|
Y
|
c) Justification of sample size (includes sample size calculations)? (y/n)
|
N
|
OVERALL Grade (A/B/C):
|
B
|
Explanation for Overall Quality Grade (if not Grade A):
|
Calcium intake is from combined diet and supplement; only 25% of participants used supplement; not all relevant confounders adjusted
|