Background Cochlear implants aim to regain or improve hearing for people who are deaf or who have so poor hearing that hearing aids have little or no effect. Cochlear implants are small electronic devices. They transmit sound directly to the hearing nerve via electrodes that are placed in the cochlea by a surgical procedure. This technique relies on the hearing nerve still functioning.
This part of the report, Part A, has evaluated the clinical usefulness of cochlear implants in adults who are deaf or severely hard of hearing. Part B of this report has evaluated the cost effectiveness from a Norwegian perspective.
Methods We searched for systematic reviews, randomised controlled studies and prospective controlled studies in international databases in April and June 2006. We assessed and summarised studies that fulfilled our predetermined inclusion criteria.
Results No randomised controlled trials were identified comparing cochlear implants in adults with waiting lists or hearing aids. We included three prospectively controlled studies. One of the included studies compared cochlear implants (46 participants) with waiting list (16 participants) and two of the included studies compared cochlear implants (32 participants) with hearing aid (24 participants). The group given cochlear implants reported better speech recognition and improved quality of life, but had more complications.
All results should be interpreted cautiously because there was only information from nonrandomised studies, few people included in the studies, large variation in reported effect, and serious challenges with selection of participants to the groups.
No studies fulfilling our predetermined inclusion criteria were identified that compared unilateral and bilateral use of cochlear implants.
Conclusion Cochlear implants in adults may help improve speech recognition and quality of life compared to waiting lists and hearing aids. This information is of very low quality, and there is not enough information available regarding type and frequency of complications and side effects.
Preliminary version: HTML in process
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- Review [Cochlear implant in children: rational, indications and cost/efficacy].[Minerva Pediatr. 2013]Review [Cochlear implant in children: rational, indications and cost/efficacy].Martini A, Bovo R, Trevisi P, Forli F, Berrettini S. Minerva Pediatr. 2013 Jun; 65(3):325-39.
- Comparison of Bilateral and Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.[JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Sur...]Comparison of Bilateral and Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Smulders YE, van Zon A, Stegeman I, Rinia AB, Van Zanten GA, Stokroos RJ, Hendrice N, Free RH, Maat B, Frijns JH, et al. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Mar; 142(3):249-56.
- [Bilateral cochlea implantation in varying duration of deafness].[Laryngorhinootologie. 2004][Bilateral cochlea implantation in varying duration of deafness].Stark T, Engel A, Borkowski G. Laryngorhinootologie. 2004 Jan; 83(1):20-2.
- [Effect of rehabilitation for prelingual deaf children who use cochlear implants in conjunction with hearing aids in the opposite ears].[Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou J...][Effect of rehabilitation for prelingual deaf children who use cochlear implants in conjunction with hearing aids in the opposite ears].Tian Y, Zhou H, Zhang J, Yang D, Xu Y, Guo Y. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Oct; 26(19):868-70, 873.
- Review Systematic reviews of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multi-channel unilateral cochlear implants for adults.[Clin Otolaryngol. 2010]Review Systematic reviews of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multi-channel unilateral cochlear implants for adults.Bond M, Elston J, Mealing S, Anderson R, Weiner G, Taylor R, Stein K. Clin Otolaryngol. 2010 Apr; 35(2):87-96.
- Cochlear Implants in AdultsCochlear Implants in Adults
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...