NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Cover of Current Validity of AHRQ Clinical Practice Guidelines

Current Validity of AHRQ Clinical Practice Guidelines

Technical Reviews, No. 6

Investigators: , MD, MPH, , MD, , MD, and , MD, MPH.

Southern California Evidence-based Practice Center based at RAND, Santa Monica, CA
Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); .
Report No.: 02-0035

Structured Abstract

Objectives:

To assess the current validity of 17 clinical practice guidelines developed under the auspices of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR), now renamed the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

Search strategy:

For each of the guideline topics, we conducted literature searches of MEDLINE® and Embase, limited to articles designated as guidelines, editorials, or reviews, and further restricted for some topics to particular key general medical and specialty journals. Additionally, we conducted a survey of members of the original AHCPR guideline expert panel to identify new evidence relevant to the validity of the existing guideline statements.

Data Collection and Analysis:

Identified evidence was used to assess the current validity of individual practice guideline statements. These results were used to classify each guideline into one of the following categories:

Withdraw. New evidence called into question one or more key diagnostic or therapeutic recommendations, or new evidence suggested the need for new key diagnostic or therapeutic guideline recommendations.

Retain, append new evidence. All key diagnostic or therapeutic recommendations were still valid, but new evidence supported changes to other recommendations, or supported greater refinement of existing recommendations.

Retain. The guideline continued to represent good clinical care.

Main Results:

One hundred twenty-one of 170 (71%) surveys sent to experts were returned. Limited literature searches identified 6,994 titles, of which 181 potentially relevant articles were retrieved and reviewed. With the addition of evidence suggested by the experts, we reviewed 208 articles. Based on these data, seven guidelines were judged to be sufficiently obsolete as to warrant withdrawal (Depression in Primary Care vols. 1 & 2, Cataract in Adults, Sickle Cell Disease, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Unstable Angina, Heart Failure, and Otitis Media with Effusion), three guidelines were judged to be still valid and retained (Pressure Ulcers in Adults, Treatment of Pressure Ulcers, and Cardiac Rehabilitation), and six guidelines were judged to be worth retaining but relevant new information for clinicians needed to be appended (Acute Pain Management, Urinary Incontinence in Adults, Management of Cancer Pain, Acute Low Back Problems in Adults, Post-Stroke Rehabilitation, and Reco! gnition and Initial Assessment of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias).

Conclusions:

Almost half of the existing AHRQ practice guidelines should be withdrawn, and an additional six guidelines should have additional information appended. Three guidelines are judged sufficiently valid to remain in circulation.

2101 East Jefferson Street, Rockville, MD 20852. www​.ahrq.gov

Southern California Evidence-based Practice Center Director/Project Director: Paul Shekelle, MD, PhD. Center Co-Director: Sally Morton, PhD.

Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.1 Contract No. 290-97-0001, Task Order No. 5. Prepared by: Southern California Evidence-based Practice Center based at RAND, Santa Monica, CA.

Suggested citation:

Ortiz O, Eccles, M, Grimshaw J, et al. Current validity of clinical practice guidelines. Technical Review 6 (Contract No. 290-97-0001 to the Southern California Evidence-based Practice Center at RAND). AHRQ Publication No. 02-0035. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. September 2002.

1

2101 East Jefferson Street, Rockville, MD 20852. www​.ahrq.gov

Bookshelf ID: NBK43864PMID: 20734522
PubReader format: click here to try

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page

Related information

Related citations in PubMed

  • Chiropractic clinical practice guideline: evidence-based treatment of adult neck pain not due to whiplash.[J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2005]
    Chiropractic clinical practice guideline: evidence-based treatment of adult neck pain not due to whiplash.
    Canadian Chiropractic Association, Canadian Federation of Chiropractic Regulatory Boards, Clinical Practice Guidelines Development Initiative, Guidelines Development Committee (GDC), Anderson-Peacock E, Blouin JS, Bryans R, Danis N, Furlan A, Marcoux H, et al. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2005 Sep; 49(3):158-209.
  • Review Clinical guidelines and payer policies on fusion for the treatment of chronic low back pain.[Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011]
    Review Clinical guidelines and payer policies on fusion for the treatment of chronic low back pain.
    Cheng JS, Lee MJ, Massicotte E, Ashman B, Gruenberg M, Pilcher LE, Skelly AC. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1; 36(21 Suppl):S144-63.
  • Review Otitis media with effusion.[Pediatrics. 2004]
    Review Otitis media with effusion.
    American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Otitis Media With Effusion. Pediatrics. 2004 May; 113(5):1412-29.
  • Clinical practice guideline: Otitis media with effusion.[Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004]
    Clinical practice guideline: Otitis media with effusion.
    Rosenfeld RM, Culpepper L, Doyle KJ, Grundfast KM, Hoberman A, Kenna MA, Lieberthal AS, Mahoney M, Wahl RA, Woods CR Jr, et al. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 May; 130(5 Suppl):S95-118.
  • Refinement of the HCUP Quality Indicators[ 2001]
    Refinement of the HCUP Quality Indicators
    Davies SM, Geppert J, McClellan M, McDonald KM, Romano PS, Shojania KG. 2001 May
See reviews...See all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...