NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Cover of Assessing Research-Doctorate Programs

Assessing Research-Doctorate Programs

A Methodology Study

Editors: Jeremiah P Ostriker and Charlotte V Kuh. .

Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); .
ISBN-10: 0-309-09058-X

Excerpt

The Committee to Examine the Methodology to Assess Research-Doctorate Programs was presented with the task of looking at the methodology used in the 1995 National Research Council (NRC) Study, Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States: Continuity and Change (referred to hereafter as the “1995 Study”). The Committee was asked to identify and comment on both its strengths and its weaknesses. Where weaknesses were found, it was asked to suggest methods to remedy them.

The Committee recommends that the NRC conduct a new assessment of research-doctorate programs.

Contents

Assisted by James A. Voytuk

This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health Award# N01-OD-4–2139, Task Order No. 107, received support from the evaluation set-aside Section 513, Public Health Act; the National Science Foundation Award# DGE-0125255; the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Grant No. 2001– 6–10, and the United States Department of Agriculture Award# 43–3AEM-1–80054 (USDA-4454).

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the organizations or agencies that provided support for the project.

NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance.

Copyright © 2003, National Academy of Sciences.
Bookshelf ID: NBK43475PMID: 20669476DOI: 10.17226/10859

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (7.5M)

Related information

Similar articles in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...