NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Schein OD, Friedman DS, Fleisher LA, et al. Anesthesia Management During Cataract Surgery. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2001 Dec. (Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, No. 16.)

  • This publication is provided for historical reference only and the information may be out of date.

This publication is provided for historical reference only and the information may be out of date.

Cover of Anesthesia Management During Cataract Surgery

Anesthesia Management During Cataract Surgery.

Show details

Appendix J. Peer Review Response Form for Draft Report

Evidence Report on Anesthesia Management During Cataract Surgery Review of Draft Evidence Report

Methods

  1. Are the inclusion/exclusion criteria for both the search strategy and the literature abstraction clinically reasonable and clearly stated? Image f3705_SQU.jpg Yes Image f3705_SQU.jpg No, if no, please comment.
  2. Are the questions addressed by the review clearly articulated? Image f3705_SQU.jpgYes Image f3705_SQU.jpg No, if no, please comment.
  3. Is it clear what patient populations are being discussed? Image f3705_SQU.jpg Yes Image f3705_SQU.jpg No, if no, please comment.
  4. Is it clear what interventions are being discussed? Image f3705_SQU.jpg Yes Image f3705_SQU.jpg No, if no, please comment.
  5. Is it clear what outcomes are being discussed? Image f3705_SQU.jpg Yes Image f3705_SQU.jpg No, if no, please comment.

Quality Assessment Methodology

6.

Have we captured the important aspect of quality of studies in our assessment? Image f3705_SQU.jpg Yes Image f3705_SQU.jpg No, if no, please comment.

Clinical Abstraction Methodology

7.

Were important areas overlooked? Image f3705_SQU.jpg Yes Image f3705_SQU.jpg No, if yes, please comment.

Evidence

  1. Given the ways the data were presented in the articles, was the evidence synthesized in a reasonably understandable way? Image f3705_SQU.jpg Yes Image f3705_SQU.jpg No, if no, please comment.
  2. Was the literature content clearly summarized? Image f3705_SQU.jpg Yes Image f3705_SQU.jpg No, if no, please comment.

Interpretation of Results

  1. Is the report clear enough about the strength of the evidence available for clinical decisionmaking on the most common strategies used for anesthesia management during cataract surgery? Image f3705_SQU.jpg Yes Image f3705_SQU.jpg No, if no, please comment.
  2. Do the conclusions flow from the evidence (strength or weakness) that is reviewed? Image f3705_SQU.jpg Yes Image f3705_SQU.jpg No, if no, please comment.
  3. Are there any assumptions or gaps that need to be more clearly described? Image f3705_SQU.jpg Yes Image f3705_SQU.jpg No, if yes, please comment.

Usefulness of Report

  1. Are the results of this report presented in a manner that will be useful for organizations making guidelines or policy? Image f3705_SQU.jpg Yes Image f3705_SQU.jpg No, if no, please comment.
  2. Can you think of additional research implications beyond those raised? Image f3705_SQU.jpg Yes Image f3705_SQU.jpg No, if yes, please comment.

Signature:_________________________________________ Date:_______________________

PubReader format: click here to try

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...