From: Appendix G
NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Author, year | Consumer under study | CHI Application type | Location | Year data collected/duration of intervention | Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria | Control | Intervention | Jadad score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Diet/exercise/physical activity NOT obesity | |||||||||
Adachi, 20071 | Individuals interested in their own health care | Tailored advice based on answers to a Computerized questionnaire | Home/residence | 2002/January to September | 20–65 yr, BMI greater ≥24, BMI greater ≥ 23 with mild Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, or DM | BMI ≥30, history of major medical or psychiatric problems or orthopedic problems that prohibited exercise, received a diet and/or exercise program within 6 months, currently/previously/planned to be pregnant within 6 months | Untailored self-help booklet with 7-month self
monitoring of weight and walking; Self-help booklet only | Computerized behavioral weight control program with 6-month weight and targeted behavior’s self-monitoring; computerized behavioral weight control program only | 0 |
Anderson, 20012 | Consumers interested in their own health | Interactive computer based program | Kiosk based computers located in supermarkets | NS | NS | NS | No intervention- control condition | Computerized nutrition intervention | |
Brug, 19983 | General public interested in their own health | Computer-generated feedback letters | Home based | NS | NS | NS | General Information | Tailored Feedback; Tailored + Iterative Feedback | |
Brug, 19994 | Individuals interested in their own health | Computer-tailored nutrition education | Computer based; otherwise non-specified | NS | NS | NS | First intervention (comparison group) provided subjects with personal letters with tailored dietary feedback about fat, fruit and vegetables only | The second intervention (experimental group), tailored letters with dietary feedback was supplemented by feedback about personal outcome expectancies, perceived social influences and self-efficacy expectations | |
Campbell 19945 | Adult patients from four North Carolina family practices | individually computer-tailored nutrition messages | Home based | Between September and November 1991 | Office staff recruited participants as they checked in for any type of medical appointment. | patients who were too ill or mentally unable to complete the baseline survey | Messages were mailed to participants | An intervention group, which received tailored nutrition messages; a comparison intervention group, which received nontailored nutrition messages; The tailored intervention consisted of a one-time, mailed nutrition information packet tailored to the participant's stage of change, dietary intake, and psychosocial information. | |
Campbell, 19996 | Low income women enrolled in the Food Stamp program | Interactive computer based program | Facility based (food stamp office) | January through April, 1995 | 18 years of age or older, spoke English and either had children under 18 living at home or were pregnant | NS | No Intervention | Computer-based intervention consisted of a tailored soap opera and interactive ‘info-mercials’ that provided individualized feedback about dietary fat intake, knowledge and strategies for lowering fat based on stage of change | |
Campbell, 20047 | Participants in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) | CDROM program | Clinic-based | NS | Being at least 18 years of age, receiving WIC benefits for self or child(ren), and speaking and understanding English. For those women who were pregnant or breast-feeding, it was required that they have at least one prior nutrition session with a WIC nutritionist before being referred to the computer program | Women deemed as high risk by the nutritionist (eg, owing to pregnancy complications) were excluded from the study because of the probable need for more intensive counseling and follow-up. | Control group completed the surveys but did not receive the intervention until after follow-up | Interactive tailored nutrition education | |
Haerens, 20058 | Middle school adolescents) | Computer-tailored feedback | School based | Measures were assessed at the beginning (September 2003) and repeated at the end of the school year (June 2004). | NS | NS | No intervention | Intervention with parental support and intervention alone | |
Haerens, 20079 | Individuals interested in their own health care (students in randomly selected 7th grade class) | Interactive computer-tailored intervention | Remote location: school | Year, 2005 (November)/50 minute intervention with 3 month follow up | 7th grade students, parental consent | No intervention | 50-min class (in 7th grade) using the computer tailored dietary fat intake intervention | 0 | |
Haerens, 200910 | Adolescent population | Web-based computer tailored intervention | Home Based | February–March 2007 | NS | NS | Generic feedback letter | Tailored Feedback letter | |
Hurling, 200611 | Individuals interested in their own health | Internet-based exercise motivation and action support system (Test system) | Computer based; otherwise non-specified | NS | NS | taking of prescription medication, known heart conditions or related symptoms and receipt of advice from a health professional not to engage in physical activity or exercise | Non-interactive Internet-based physical activity system) | Interactive Internet-based physical activity system) | |
Hurling, 200712 | Individuals interested in their own health care | Internet and mobile phone for self reported physical activity | Home/residence | Duration, 3 month, September to December, 2005. | 30–55 yr, Body mass index 19–30, Not vigorously active, Not taking regular prescription medication, Internet and e-mail access, Mobile phone user | Employee of Unilever, 1 or more items on the PAR-Q, 1 or more items on the Rose Angina Questionnaire | No intervention | Internet and mobile phone based intervention | 2 |
King, 200613 | people with type 2 diabetes | Interactive CDROM | Facility based | NS | At least 25 years old; diagnosed with type 2 diabetes for 6 months or more; able to read and write in English; and able to perform moderate level PA | NS | generic health risk appraisal CD-ROM | Interactive CD-ROM | |
Kristal, 200014 | Enrollees of a large health maintenance organization | Computer-generated personalized letter and computer generated behavioral feedback | Home-based | NS | GHC enrollment, age (18–69) and an ability to complete the baseline survey in English. | Living outside of area or no longer enrolled in GHC | Usual Care Group (no intervention) | Tailored, Self-Help Dietary Intervention | |
Lewis, 200815 | Sedentary adults interested in their own health | Web-based computer-tailored Feedback | Computer/Home based | January 2003 through May 2006 | NS | NS | Standard Internet | Motivationally-Tailored Internet | |
Low, 200616 | Individuals interested in their own health care | Interactive consumer website (Student Bodies, | NS | 2001 | (F) first or second year college, northeast private, liberal arts college | Women with previous diagnosis of eating disorders or who were currently purging, | Control | Student Bodies with moderated discussion, Student Bodies with un-moderated discussion, Student Bodies with no discussion | 2 |
Mangunkusumo, 200717 | Individuals interested in their own health care: student--with parental consent | Internet site | Remote location (e.g. library internet cafe); at a secondary school | NS | Secondary school students of the same grade | Preprinted generic advice on fruit consumption and a mailed referral where applicable after baseline assessment | Tailored feedback on fruit consumption and an online referral where applicable after baseline assessment | 1 | |
Marcus, 200718 | Individuals interested in their own health care | Interactive consumer website | Home/residence | 15 Jan 2003 through 6 June 2006 | ≥18 yr, sedentary (<90 minutes of physical activity each week) | History of coronary or valvular heart disease, Hypertension, Diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, stroke, osteoarthritis, orthopedic problems that would limit treadmill testing, or any other serious medical condition that would make physical activity unsafe or unwise, consuming 3 or more alcoholic drinks per day on 5 or more days of the week, Current or planned pregnancy, planning to move from the area within the next year, current suicidal ideation or psychosis, current clinical depression and/or hospitalization because of a psychiatric disorder in the past 6 months, current clinical depression and/or hospitalization because of a psychiatric disorder in the past 6 months, taking medication that may impair physical activity tolerance or performance , and/or previous participation in exercise trials of authors | Tailored print, Tailored internet, Standard internet | 3 | |
Napolitano, 200319 | Individuals interested in their own health care | Interactive consumer website | Home/residence, Remote location: work place | 12 weeks | 18–65 years old, 120 minutes or less of moderate intensity physical activity per week, 60 minutes or less of vigorous intensity physical activity per week | Coronary artery disease, Stroke, Alcoholism or substance abuse, Hospitalization for a psychiatric disorder in the last 3 years, Currently suicidal or psychotic, Orthopedic problems that could limit exercise, and current or planned pregnancy | Wait list control group | Internet web site plus weekly email tip sheets | 0 |
Oenema, 200120 | Individuals interested in their own health care | Interactive consumer website, | Classroom or office of adult education institutes (sites of recruitment) | NS | Insufficient understanding of Dutch | Non-tailored nutrition information letter | Received we-based tailored nutrition education program | 0 | |
Richardson, 2007 21 | Sedentary adults with type II Diabetes | Enhanced pedometers with embedded USB ports, uploaded detailed, time-stamped step-count data to a website called Stepping Up to Health; and received automated step-count feedback, automatically calculated goals, and tailored motivational messages | Home/residence | NS | At least 18 years of age and had type 2 diabetes.
Eligible participants also reported regular e-mail use, and had access to an
Internet-connected computer with a Windows 2000 or XP operating system and
an available USB. Participants also had to be able to communicate in English, provide written consent, and obtain medical clearance to start a walking program from a primary care physician, endocrinologist, or cardiologist. | If they had used a pedometer in the past 30 days or were pregnant. | Participants randomized to receive LG were instructed to focus on total accumulated steps. | Participants randomized to receive SG were instructed to focus on bout steps. They were encouraged to set their pedometer to display bout steps (labeled aerobic steps on the Omron pedometers), and they were assigned weekly automatically calculated bout steps goals based only on bout-step data uploaded from the previous week. | |
Smeets, 200722 | Individuals interested in their own health care | Tailored newsletter computer generated based on information about the Individuals | Home/residence | 15 months | 18–65 yr, | Control group receiving one general information letter | Intervention group, receiving one tailored letter | -1 | |
Spittaels, 200723 | Healthy adults interested in their own health | Web based | Home based | NS | 20 and 55 years of age, had no history of cardiovascular diseases, and had access to the Internet | NS | No intervention | website-delivered physical activity intervention –with or without computer tailored feedback | |
Spittaels, 200724 | Individuals interested in their own health care | Interactive consumer website | Work | NS | 25–55 yr, internet access at home or work | History of cardiovascular disease | Online non-tailored standard physical activity advice | Online tailored physical activity advice +
email, Online tailored physical activity advice only | 1 |
Tan, 200525 | Individuals interested in their own health care | Interactive consumer website | Home/residence, Remote location: work place, | NS | 18–65 yr, Command of Dutch language, Access to computer with a CD-ROM | No information | Tailored information, Generic information | 1 | |
Vandelanotte, 200526 | Individuals interested in their own health care | Interactive computer-tailored intervention | University computer lab | NS | 20–60 yr | Complaints related to physical activity, Complaints related to fat intake (cardiovascular disease, diabetes, anorexia, problems with stomach, liver, gallbladder or intestine) | Tailored physical activity and fat intake Interventions after 6 month FU | Tailored physical activity and fat intake
intervention at baseline, Tailored physical activity intervention at baseline and tailored fat intake intervention at 3 months, Tailored fat intake at baseline, and tailored physical activity at 3 months | 1 |
Verheijden, 200427 | Individuals interested in their own health care | Interactive consumer website | Home/residence | Duration, Baseline collected between September 2002 to December 2002 with 8 month follow up | Greater than or equal to 40 years old, Diabetes mellitus type 2, Hypertension, Dyslipidemia | No internet access | Usual care | Usual care plus web-based nutrition counseling and social support program | 0 |
Wylie-Rosett, 200128 | Individuals (BMI > 25 kg/m2) in a freestanding health maintenance organization | Computerized tailoring | Kiosk based | NS | BMI > 25 kg/m2+ one cardiovascular risk factor | Intention to move beyond commuting distance | Work book only | Computer tailored feedback; computer tailored feedback plus staff consultation | |
Eating disorder | |||||||||
Winzelberg, 200029 | Individuals interested in their own health care | Interactive consumer website | Home/residence | NS | (F), West coast public university
students Desire to improve body image satisfaction | History of Bulimia or anorexia, currently engaged in purging activities, BMI below 18 | No intervention | Interactive consumer web site | 0 |
Nutrition intervention | |||||||||
Bruge, 199630 | Individuals interested in their own health care | Interactive consumer website | NS | NS | Employees of Royal Shell laboratory in Amsterdam, Netherlands | Non-tailored group; general nutrition information | Tailored group; computer generated feedback letters | 2 | |
Silk, 200831 | Individuals interested in their own health
care Mothers or pregnant | Interactive consumer website | Home/residence, Remote location: community agency or extension service office | 2 weeks | 18–50 years, (F), one or more children or pregnant, poverty (yearly income less than or equal to 185% of the federal poverty index | Pamphlet | Website Video Game | 0 | |
Overweight and binge eating | |||||||||
Jones, 200832 | Individuals interested in their own health care | Interactive consumer website | NS | 2005; 16 weeks | ≥85th percentile for age-adjusted BMI, binge eating or overeating behaviors at a frequency of ≥1 times per week in the previous 3 months, access to a computer and the Internet, not currently enrolled in a formal binge eating or weight loss program (eg, Weight Watchers), absence of any medical condition in which the actual condition or treatment affects weight and/or appetite, absence of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa | Wait list control group | SB2-BED | 1 |
NS = not specified, yr = year
Reference List
Adachi Y, Sato C, Yamatsu K, Ito S, Adachi K, Yamagami T. A randomized controlled trial on the long-term effects of a 1-month behavioral weight control program assisted by computer tailored advice. Behav Res Ther 2007; 45(3):459–70.
Anderson ES, Winett RA, Wojcik JR, Winett SG, Bowden T. A computerized social cognitive intervention for nutrition behavior: Direct and mediated effects on fat, fiber, fruits, and vegetables, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations among food shoppers. 2001; 23(2):88–100.
Brug J, Glanz K, Van Assema P, Kok G, Van Breukelen GJP. The Impact of Computer-Tailored Feedback and Iterative Feedback on Fat, Fruit, and Vegetable Intake. 1998; 25(4):517–31.
Brug J, Steenhuis I, Van Assema P, Glanz K, De Vries H. Computer-tailored nutrition education: Differences between two interventions. 1999; 14(2):249–56.
Campbell MK, DeVellis BM, Strecher VJ, Ammerman AS, DeVellis RF, Sandler RS. Improving dietary behavior: The effectiveness of tailored messages in primary care settings. 1994; 84(5):783–7.
Campbell MK, Honess-Morreale L, Farrell D, Carbone E, Brasure M. A tailored multimedia nutrition education pilot program for low-income women receiving food assistance. 1999; 14(2):257–67.
Campbell MK, Carbone E, Honess-Morreale L, Heisler-MacKinnon J, Demissie S, Farrell D. Randomized trial of a tailored nutrition education CD-ROM program for women receiving food assistance. 2004; 36(2):58–66.
Haerens L, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Maes L, Vereecken C, Brug J, Deforche B. The effects of a middle-school healthy eating intervention on adolescents' fat and fruit intake and soft drinks consumption. 2007; 10(5):443–9.
Haerens L, Deforche B, Maes L, Brug J, Vandelanotte C, De Bourdeaudhuij I. A computer-tailored dietary fat intake intervention for adolescents: results of a randomized controlled trial. Ann Behav Med 2007; 34(3):253–62.
Haerens L, Maes L, Vereecken C, De Henauw S, Moreno L, De Bourdeaudhuij I. Effectiveness of a computer tailored physical activity intervention in adolescents compared to a generic advice. Patient Educ Couns 2009.
Hurling R, Fairley BW, Dias MB. Internet-based exercise intervention systems: Are more interactive designs better? 2006; 21(6):757–72.
Hurling R, Catt M, Boni MD et al. Using internet and mobile phone technology to deliver an automated physical activity program: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2007; 9(2):e7.
King DK, Estabrooks PA, Strycker LA, Toobert DJ, Bull SS, Glasgow RE. Outcomes of a multifaceted physical activity regimen as part of a diabetes self-management intervention. 2006; 31(2):128–37.
Kristal AR, Curry SJ, Shattuck AL, Feng Z, Li S. A randomized trial of a tailored, self-help dietary intervention: The puget sound eating patterns study. 2000; 31(4):380–9.
Lewis B, Williams D, Dunsiger S et al. User attitudes towards physical activity websites in a randomized controlled trial. Prev Med 2008; 47(5):508–13.
Low KG, Charanasomboon S, Lesser J et al. Effectiveness of a computer-based interactive eating disorders prevention program at long-term follow-up. Eat Disord 2006; 14(1):17–30.
Mangunkusumo R, Brug J, Duisterhout J, de Koning H, Raat H. Feasibility, acceptability, and quality of Internet-administered adolescent health promotion in a preventive-care setting. Health Educ Res 2007; 22(1):1–13.
Marcus BH, Lewis BA, Williams DM et al. A comparison of Internet and print-based physical activity interventions. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167(9):944–9.
Napolitano MA, Fotheringham M, Tate D et al. Evaluation of an internet-based physical activity intervention: a preliminary investigation. Ann Behav Med 2003; 25(2):92–9.
Oenema A, Brug J, Lechner L. Web-based tailored nutrition education: results of a randomized controlled trial. Health Educ Res 2001; 16(6):647–60.
Richardson CR, Mehari KS, McIntyre LG et al. A randomized trial comparing structured and lifestyle goals in an internet-mediated walking program for people with type 2 diabetes. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2007; 4:59.
Smeets T, Kremers SP, Brug J, de Vries H. Effects of tailored feedback on multiple health behaviors. Ann Behav Med 2007; 33(2):117–23.
Spittaels H, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Vandelanotte C. Evaluation of a website-delivered computer-tailored intervention for increasing physical activity in the general population. 2007; 44(3):209–17.
Spittaels H, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Brug J, Vandelanotte C. Effectiveness of an online computer-tailored physical activity intervention in a real-life setting. Health Educ Res 2007; 22(3):385–96.
Oenema A, Tan F, Brug J. Short-term efficacy of a web-based computer-tailored nutrition intervention: main effects and mediators. Ann Behav Med 2005; 29(1):54–63.
Vandelanotte C, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Sallis JF, Spittaels H, Brug J. Efficacy of sequential or simultaneous interactive computer-tailored interventions for increasing physical activity and decreasing fat intake. Ann Behav Med 2005; 29(2):138–46.
Verheijden M, Bakx JC, Akkermans R et al. Web-based targeted nutrition counselling and social support for patients at increased cardiovascular risk in general practice: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2004; 6(4):e44.
Wylie-Rosett J, Swencionis C, Ginsberg M et al. Computerized weight loss intervention optimizes staff time: The clinical and cost results of a controlled clinical trial conducted in a managed care setting. 2001; 101(10):1155–62.
Winzelberg AJ, Eppstein D, Eldredge KL et al. Effectiveness of an Internet-based program for reducing risk factors for eating disorders. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000; 68(2):346–50.
Brug J, Steenhuis I, Van Assema P, De Vries H. The impact of a computer-tailored nutrition intervention. 1996; 25(3):236–42.
Silk KJ, Sherry J, Winn B, Keesecker N, Horodynski MA, Sayir A. Increasing nutrition literacy: testing the effectiveness of print, web site, and game modalities. J Nutr Educ Behav 2008; 40(1):3–10.
Jones M, Luce KH, Osborne MI et al. Randomized, controlled trial of an internet-facilitated intervention for reducing binge eating and overweight in adolescents. Pediatrics 2008; 121(3):453–62.
From: Appendix G
NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.