NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Structured Abstract
Background:
Advance care planning (ACP) honors patients' goals and preferences for future care by creating a plan for when illness or injury prevents adequate communication. ACP can also help patients assess their care options. Less than 50 percent of severely or terminally ill patients have an advance directive in their medical record, and physicians are only about 65 percent accurate in predicting patient preferences. Decision aids can provide a structured approach to informing patients about options and prompting them to document and communicate their preferences.
Purpose:
We developed a technical brief on the state of practice and current research for decision aids for adult ACP and to provide a framework for future research and effort.
Methods:
We interviewed Key Informants representing clinicians, attorneys, consumer advocates, experts in medical law and ethics, and decision aid researchers and developers. We searched online sources for information about available decision aids and conducted a literature search to identify available research on decision aids for adult ACP as an intervention.
Findings:
Numerous decision aids are widely available but not represented in the empirical literature. Of the 16 published studies testing decision aids as interventions for adult ACP, most were proprietary or not openly available to the public. Decision aids tend to be constructed for the general population or for disease-specific conditions for narrower decision choices. Designing decision aids that are responsive to diverse philosophical perspectives and flexible to change as people gain experience with their personal illness courses remains an important concern. Future directions for effort include further research, training of ACP facilitators, dissemination and access, and the potential opportunities that lie in social media or other technologies.
Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Key Informants
- Peer Reviewers
- Background
- Guiding Questions
- Methods
- Findings
- Summary and Implications
- Next Steps
- References
- Appendix A Interview Guides for Key Informants
- Appendix B Published Literature Search Strategy
- Appendix C Organization Web sites Searched for Gray Literature
- Appendix D Evidence Tables
- Appendix E Examples of Advanced Care Planning Tools That Did Not Meet Definition of Decision Aid
Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services1, Contract No. 290-2012-00016-I. Prepared by: Minnesota Evidence-based Practice Center, Minneapolis, MN
Suggested citation:
Butler M, Ratner E, McCreedy E, Shippee N, Kane RL. Decision Aids for Advance Care Planning. Technical Brief No. 16. (Prepared by the Minnesota Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2012-00016-I.) AHRQ Publication No. 14-EHC039-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. July 2014. www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/reports/final.cfm.
This report is based on research conducted by the Minnesota Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Rockville, MD (Contract No. 290-2012-00016-I). The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the authors, who are responsible for its contents; the findings and conclusions do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. Therefore, no statement in this report should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
The information in this report is intended to help health care decisionmakers—patients and clinicians, health system leaders, and policymakers, among others—make well informed decisions and thereby improve the quality of health care services. This report is not intended to be a substitute for the application of clinical judgment. Anyone who makes decisions concerning the provision of clinical care should consider this report in the same way as any medical reference and in conjunction with all other pertinent information, i.e., in the context of available resources and circumstances presented by individual patients.
This report may be used, in whole or in part, as the basis for development of clinical practice guidelines and other quality enhancement tools, or as a basis for reimbursement and coverage policies. AHRQ or U.S. Department of Health and Human Services endorsement of such derivative products may not be stated or implied.
This report may periodically be assessed for the urgency to update. If an assessment is done, the resulting surveillance report describing the methodology and findings will be found on the Effective Health Care Program Web site at: www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov. Search on the title of the report.
None of the investigators have any affiliation or financial involvement that conflicts with the material presented in this report.
- 1
540 Gaither Road, Rockville, MD 20850; www
.ahrq.gov.
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- Review Decision aids for advance care planning: an overview of the state of the science.[Ann Intern Med. 2014]Review Decision aids for advance care planning: an overview of the state of the science.Butler M, Ratner E, McCreedy E, Shippee N, Kane RL. Ann Intern Med. 2014 Sep 16; 161(6):408-18.
- The advance care planning PREPARE study among older Veterans with serious and chronic illness: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.[Trials. 2015]The advance care planning PREPARE study among older Veterans with serious and chronic illness: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Sudore R, Le GM, McMahan R, Feuz M, Katen M, Barnes DE. Trials. 2015 Dec 12; 16:570. Epub 2015 Dec 12.
- 'Not yet' and 'Just ask': barriers and facilitators to advance care planning--a qualitative descriptive study of the perspectives of seriously ill, older patients and their families.[BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2015]'Not yet' and 'Just ask': barriers and facilitators to advance care planning--a qualitative descriptive study of the perspectives of seriously ill, older patients and their families.Simon J, Porterfield P, Bouchal SR, Heyland D. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2015 Mar; 5(1):54-62. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
- Review Core Functionality in Pediatric Electronic Health Records[ 2015]Review Core Functionality in Pediatric Electronic Health RecordsDufendach KR, Eichenberger JA, McPheeters ML, Temple MW, Bhatia HL, Alrifai MW, Potter SA, Weinberg ST, Johnson KB, Lehmann CU. 2015 Apr
- Advance care planning--a multi-centre cluster randomised clinical trial: the research protocol of the ACTION study.[BMC Cancer. 2016]Advance care planning--a multi-centre cluster randomised clinical trial: the research protocol of the ACTION study.Rietjens JA, Korfage IJ, Dunleavy L, Preston NJ, Jabbarian LJ, Christensen CA, de Brito M, Bulli F, Caswell G, Červ B, et al. BMC Cancer. 2016 Apr 8; 16:264. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
- Decision Aids for Advance Care PlanningDecision Aids for Advance Care Planning
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...