NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Since the first edition of On Being a Scientist was published in 1988, more than 200,000 copies have been distributed to graduate and undergraduate science students. Now this well-received booklet has been updated to incorporate the important developments in science ethics of the past 6 years and includes updated examples and material from the landmark volume Responsible Science (National Academy Press, 1992).
The revision reflects feedback from readers of the original version. In response to graduate students' requests, it offers several case studies in science ethics that pose provocative and realistic scenarios of ethical dilemmas and issues.
On Being a Scientist presents penetrating discussions of the social and historical context of science, the allocation of credit for discovery, the scientist's role in society, the issues revolving around publication, and many other aspects of scientific work. The booklet explores the inevitable conflicts that arise when the black and white areas of science meet the gray areas of human values and biases.
Written in a conversational style, this booklet will be of great interest to students entering scientific research, their instructors and mentors, and anyone interested in the role of scientific discovery in society.
Contents
- COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, ENGINEERING, AND PUBLIC POLICY
- [The National Academies]
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- A Note on Using This Booklet
- Introduction
- The Social Foundations of Science
- Experimental Techniques and the Treatment of Data
- Values in Science
- Conflicts of Interest
- Publication and Openness
- The Allocation of Credit
- Authorship Practices
- Error and Negligence in Science
- Misconduct in Science
- Responding to Violations of Ethical Standards
- The Scientist in Society
- Bibliography
- Appendix: Discussion of Case Studies
FINANCIAL SUPPORT: The development of this document was supported by grants from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. Support for dissemination of this document was provided by the following corporations and disciplinary societies: Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Glaxo Research Institute, SmithKline Beecham Corp., Sigma Xi, the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, the American Society for Microbiology, the American Chemical Society, the American Institute for Biological Sciences, the American Sociological Association, the American Statistical Association , the Association of American Medical Colleges, the American Institute of Physics, and the American Physical Society. Additional support was provided by the Basic Science Fund of the National Academy of Sciences, whose contributors include the AT&T Foundation, Atlantic Richfield Foundation, BP America, Dow Chemical Company, E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., IBM Corporation, Merck and Company, Inc., Monsanto Company, and Shell Oil Companies Foundation.
NOTICE: This volume was produced as part of a project approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. It is a result of work done by the Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP) which has authorized its release to the public. This report has been reviewed by a group other than the authors according to procedures approved by COSEPUP and the Report Review Committee.
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- Review On Being a Scientist: A Guide to Responsible Conduct in Research: Third Edition[ 2009]Review On Being a Scientist: A Guide to Responsible Conduct in Research: Third EditionNational Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering (US) and Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. 2009
- Medical ethics educational improvement, is it needed or not?! Survey for the assessment of the needed form, methods and topics of medical ethics teaching course amongst the final years medical students Faculty of Medicine Ain Shams University (ASU), Cairo, Egypt 2010.[J Forensic Leg Med. 2011]Medical ethics educational improvement, is it needed or not?! Survey for the assessment of the needed form, methods and topics of medical ethics teaching course amongst the final years medical students Faculty of Medicine Ain Shams University (ASU), Cairo, Egypt 2010.Fawzi MM. J Forensic Leg Med. 2011 Jul; 18(5):204-7. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
- Should the History of Science Be Rated X?: The way scientists behave (according to historians) might not be a good model for students.[Science. 1974]Should the History of Science Be Rated X?: The way scientists behave (according to historians) might not be a good model for students.Brush SG. Science. 1974 Mar 22; 183(4130):1164-72.
- Review The Ethical Interest of Frankenstein; Or, the Modern Prometheus: A Literature Review 200 Years After Its Publication.[Sci Eng Ethics. 2020]Review The Ethical Interest of Frankenstein; Or, the Modern Prometheus: A Literature Review 200 Years After Its Publication.Cambra-Badii I, Guardiola E, BaƱos JE. Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Oct; 26(5):2791-2808. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
- Materials and the Development of Civilization and Science: Empiricism and esthetic selection led to discovery of many properties on which material science is based.[Science. 1965]Materials and the Development of Civilization and Science: Empiricism and esthetic selection led to discovery of many properties on which material science is based.Smith CS. Science. 1965 May 14; 148(3672):908-17.
- On Being a ScientistOn Being a Scientist
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...