For more information, see the GeneReviews Copyright Notice and Usage Disclaimer.
For questions regarding permissions: admasst/at/uw.edu.
NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Pagon RA, Adam MP, Bird TD, et al., editors. GeneReviews™ [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2013.
Disease characteristics. Prader-Willi (PWS) syndrome is characterized by severe hypotonia and feeding difficulties in early infancy, followed in later infancy or early childhood by excessive eating and gradual development of morbid obesity (unless eating is externally controlled). Motor milestones and language development are delayed. All individuals have some degree of cognitive impairment. A distinctive behavioral phenotype (with temper tantrums, stubbornness, manipulative behavior, and obsessive-compulsive characteristics) is common. Hypogonadism is present in both males and females and manifests as genital hypoplasia, incomplete pubertal development, and, in most, infertility. Short stature is common; characteristic facial features, strabismus, and scoliosis are often present, and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus often occurs in obese individuals.
Diagnosis/testing. Consensus clinical diagnostic criteria are accurate, but the mainstay of diagnosis is DNA methylation testing to detect abnormal parent-specific imprinting within the Prader-Willi critical region (PWCR) on chromosome 15; this testing determines whether the region is maternally inherited only (i.e., the paternally contributed region is absent) and detects more than 99% of affected individuals. DNA methylation-specific testing is important to confirm the diagnosis of PWS in all individuals, but especially in those who have atypical findings or are too young to manifest sufficient features to make the diagnosis on clinical grounds.
Management. Treatment of manifestations: In infancy, special nipples or enteral tube feeding to assure adequate nutrition; physical therapy may improve muscle strength; hormonal and surgical treatments can be considered for cryptorchidism. In childhood, strict supervision of daily food intake based on height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) to provide energy requirements while limiting weight gain (keeping BMI <30). Growth hormone replacement therapy to normalize height, increase lean body mass and mobility, and decrease fat mass. Evaluation and treatment of sleep disturbance per the general population. Educational planning should be instigated and speech therapy provided if needed. Firm limit-setting to treat behavioral problems; serotonin reuptake inhibitors are helpful for most teenagers and adults. Replacement of sex hormones at puberty produces adequate secondary sexual characteristics. Topiramate may help reduce skin picking in some. Modafinil has been successful in treating daytime sleepiness in children. In adulthood, a group home for individuals with PWS that regulates behavior and weight management may prevent morbid obesity, and growth hormone may help to maintain muscle bulk.
Prevention of secondary complications: Weight control to avoid development of diabetes mellitus; calcium and vitamin D supplementation to avoid osteoporosis; if osteoporosis develops, consider treatment with a bisphosphonate.
Surveillance: Infants should be screened for strabismus; routine monitoring of height, weight, and BMI to assure appropriateness of exercise program and diet; annual testing for hypothyroidism.
Other: No medications are known to aid in controlling hyperphagia.
Genetic counseling. PWS is caused by an absence of expression of imprinted genes in the paternally derived PWS/Angelman syndrome (AS) region (i.e., 15q11.2-q13) of chromosome 15 by one of several genetic mechanisms (paternal deletion, maternal uniparental disomy 15 and rarely an imprinting defect). The risk to the sibs of an affected child of having PWS depends on the genetic mechanism that resulted in the absence of expression of the paternally contributed 15q11.2-q13 region. The risk to sibs is typically less than 1% if the affected child has a deletion or uniparental disomy, up to 50% if the affected child has an imprinting defect, and up to 25% if a parental chromosomal translocation is present. Prenatal testing is possible for pregnancies at increased risk if the underlying genetic mechanism is known.
Consensus diagnostic criteria for Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) developed in 1993 [Holm et al 1993] have proven to be accurate [Gunay-Aygun et al 2001] and continue to be useful for the clinician. However, confirmation of the diagnosis requires molecular genetic testing, which was not widely available when the criteria were developed.
Findings that should prompt diagnostic testing have been proposed based on analysis of satisfied diagnostic criteria in individuals in whom the diagnosis of PWS has been molecularly confirmed [Gunay-Aygun et al 2001]. These differ by age group. The presence of all of the following findings at the age indicated is sufficient to justify DNA methylation analysis for PWS (see Molecular Genetic Testing):
Birth to age two years. Hypotonia with poor suck (neonatal period)
Age two to six years
Age six to 12 years
Age 13 years to adulthood
Cytogenetic/FISH analysis. Approximately 70% of individuals with PWS have a deletion on one number 15 chromosome involving bands 15q11.2-q13, which can be detected using high-resolution chromosome studies and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing.
Note: The typical deletion is one of two sizes: extending from the distal breakpoint (BP3) to one of two proximal breakpoints (BP1 or BP2). Clinical FISH testing detects both of these deletions and typically will not distinguish between them. In addition, there are other atypical and unique deletions that occur in approximately 8% of deletion cases [Kim et al 2012].
Approximately 1% of affected individuals have a detectable chromosomal rearrangement resulting in a deletion of bands 15q11.2-q13.
Fewer than 1% of individuals have a balanced chromosomal rearrangement breaking within 15q11.2-q13 and detectable by chromosome analysis and FISH.
Gene. More than 99% of individuals with PWS have a diagnostic abnormality in the parent-specific DNA methylation imprint within the Prader-Willi critical region (PWCR).
Clinical testing
Table 1. Summary of Testing Used in Prader-Willi Syndrome
| Test Method | Molecular Classes Detected | Proportion of PWS Detected by Test Method | Test Availability |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNA methylation 1 | Deletions, UPD & ID | >99% | Clinical |
| MS-MLPA2 | Deletions, UPD & ID | >99% | |
| FISH 3 | Deletions | 65%-75% | |
| DNA polymorphisms 4 | UPD and ID | 20%-30% | |
| CMA 5 | Deletions | 65%-75% | |
| DNA sequence 6 | ID with IC deletions | <1% |
UPD = uniparental disomy
ID = imprinting defect
IC = imprinting center
1. Will not distinguish molecular class; can be done by Southern blot or methylation-specific PCR.
2. Methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA):
• Will distinguish deletion from disomy (UPD and ID).
• Detects five parent-specific methylation sites.
• Will not distinguish UPD from ID.
• Can give approximate size of deletion and identify type 1 and 2 deletions (see Figure 2).
• Can also detect most IC and SNORD116 microdeletions (see Figure 2; Molecular Genetic Pathogenesis).
3. FISH is typically done in conjunction with a karyotype. Information is limited to AS/PWS region and the specific probes used (e.g., SNRPN). Does not query the whole AS/PWS region and it will miss small deletions. Does not give information about the rest of the chromosomes, and does not distinguish normal, UPD, and ID.
4. Not a first line test. Performed after DNA methylation analysis diagnoses PWS, but FISH or CMA analysis indicates disomy.
5. Chromosomal microarray (CMA) has a slightly higher detection frequency than FISH and will provide detailed information regarding size of the deletion. Also, it gives information regarding deletions and duplication in the remainder of the genome. Much more precise than karyotype and FISH. CMA will detect SNORD116 microdeletions (see Figure 2 and Molecular Genetic Pathogenesis) and some cases of UPD.
6. DNA sequencing has very specific role in IDs to distinguish IC deletions from epimutations. It is limited to a region of <4.3 kb in the PWS IC smallest region of deletion overlap (SRO) [Ohta et al 1999]. The map location is approximately 25,196,494 to 25,200,794 bp [UCSC Genome Browser, hg19].
Interpretation of test results. For issues to consider in interpretation of sequence analysis results, click here.
Information on specific allelic variants may be available in Molecular Genetics (see Table A. Genes and Databases and/or Pathologic allelic variants).
To confirm/establish the diagnosis in a proband. DNA methylation analysis will diagnose PWS in all three molecular classes as well as differentiate PWS from AS in deletion cases identified by CMA and FISH 15q11.2 analysis.
DNA methylation analysis consistent with PWS is sufficient for clinical diagnosis (though not for genetic counseling purposes). See Figure 1 for a comprehensive testing strategy.
For recurrence risk assessment. If the DNA methylation pattern is characteristic of maternal inheritance only, the underlying molecular class (deletion, UPD, or ID) should be determined for genetic counseling purposes (Figure 1).
It is typically most efficient to begin with FISH for the 15q11.2-q13 deletion. Simultaneous cytogenetic studies allow detection of a translocation or other anomaly involving proximal 15q. With the increasing use of chromosomal microarray (CMA) in clinical genetics, arrays may replace FISH analysis for the identification of deletions in PWS (and AS). However, each technique has its advantages. CMA will precisely identify the deletion size, which is anticipated to become increasingly important for genotype-phenotype correlations in the future [Kim et al 2012]. However, CMA will not detect the rare chromosomal rearrangements (translocations and inversions) involving proximal 15q which are detectable by simultaneous karyotype and FISH analysis and are important in recurrence risk determination. For genetic counseling purposes, a chromosomal analysis is advised in the proband to discern an interstitial de novo deletion from a balanced or unbalanced chromosomal rearrangement involving the 15q11.2 region. A CMA would also be indicated if an individual with PWS had a more severe phenotype than is typical in order to discern if there was a larger deletion present or an additional chromosomal abnormality elsewhere in the genome.
If no deletion or other chromosomal abnormality is detected, DNA polymorphism studies (requiring blood from both parents and the proband) are conducted.
If UPD is not detected, referral to a specialized laboratory for microdeletion analysis of the imprinting center (IC) should be done.
For prenatal diagnosis and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). Prenatal diagnosis for at-risk pregnancies requires prior identification of the disease-causing abnormality (deletion, UPD, or ID) in the family.
Angelman syndrome (AS) is caused by loss of the maternally contributed PWS/AS region. It is clinically distinct from PWS.
Maternally inherited duplication of the PWS/AS region causes intellectual disability, seizures, and autism.
Fetal size is generally normal. Prenatal hypotonia usually results in decreased fetal movement, abnormal fetal position at delivery, and increased incidence of assisted delivery or cesarean section.
Infantile hypotonia is a nearly universal finding, causing decreased movement and lethargy with decreased spontaneous arousal, weak cry, and poor reflexes, including poor suck. The hypotonia is central in origin, and neuromuscular studies including muscle biopsy, when done for diagnostic purposes, are generally normal or show nonspecific signs of disuse.
The poor suck and lethargy result in failure to thrive in early infancy, and enteral tube feeding or the use of special nipples is generally required for a variable period of time, usually weeks to months. By the time that the child is drinking from a cup or eating solids, a period of approximately normal eating behavior occurs.
The hypotonia improves over time. Adults remain mildly hypotonic with decreased muscle bulk and tone.
Delayed motor development is present in 90%-100% of children with PWS, with average early milestones achieved at about double the normal age (e.g., sitting at 12 months, walking at 24 months). Language milestones are also typically delayed. Intellectual disabilities are generally evident by the time the child reaches school age. Testing indicates that most persons with PWS fall in the mildly intellectually disabled range (mean IQ: 60s to 70s), with approximately 40% having borderline disability or low-normal intelligence and approximately 20% having moderate disability. Regardless of measured IQ, most children with PWS have multiple severe learning disabilities and poor academic performance for their intellectual abilities [Whittington et al 2004a]. Although a small proportion of affected individuals have extremely impaired language development, verbal ability is a relative strength for most.
In both sexes, hypogonadism is present and manifests as genital hypoplasia, incomplete pubertal development, and infertility in the vast majority. Genital hypoplasia is evident at birth and throughout life.
The hypogonadism is usually associated with low serum concentration of gonadotropins and causes incomplete, delayed, and sometimes disordered pubertal development. Precocious adrenarche occurs in approximately 15%-20%. Infertility is the rule, although a few instances of reproduction in females have been reported [Akefeldt et al 1999; Schulze et al 2001; Vats & Cassidy, unpublished data]. Although the hypogonadism in PWS has long been believed to be entirely hypothalamic in origin, recent studies have suggested a combination of hypothalamic and primary gonadal deficiencies [Eldar-Geva et al 2009, Hirsch et al 2009, Eldar-Geva et al 2010], a conclusion largely based on the absence of hypogonadotropism and abnormally low inhibin B levels in some affected individuals of both sexes.
In one study of 84 individuals with PWS (half males, half females) ages 2-35 years [Crino et al 2003], the following were identified:
In contrast to the long-held view that there are only two distinct nutritional phases in PWS (i.e., failure to thrive followed by hyperphagia leading to obesity) a recent collaborative study [Miller et al 2011] found that the transition between nutritional phases is much more complex, with seven different nutritional phases through which individuals with PWS typically progress (Table 2).
Table 2. Nutritional Phases in PWS
| Phase | Median Ages | Clinical Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Prenatal - birth | Decreased fetal movements & lower birth weight than sibs |
| 1a | 0-9 months | Hypotonia with difficulty feeding & decreased appetite |
| 1b | 9-25 months | Improved feeding & appetite; growing appropriately |
| 2a | 2.1-4.5 years | Weight increasing without appetite increase or excess calories |
| 2b | 4.5-8 years | Increased appetite & calories, but can feel full |
| 3 | 8 years - adulthood | Hyperphagic, rarely feels full |
| 4 | Adulthood | Appetite is no longer insatiable for some |
The hyperphagia that occurs in PWS is believed to be caused by a hypothalamic abnormality resulting in lack of satiety. Food-seeking behavior, with hoarding or foraging for food, eating of inedibles, and stealing of food or money to buy food, are common. In most, gastric emptying is delayed, and vomiting is rare. Obesity results from these behaviors and from decreased total caloric requirement. The latter is due to decreased resting energy expenditure resulting from decreased activity and decreased lean body mass (primarily muscle) compared with unaffected individuals. The obesity in PWS is primarily central (abdomen, buttocks and thighs) in both sexes, and interestingly, there is less visceral fat in obese individuals than would be expected for the degree of obesity. Obesity and its complications are the major causes of morbidity and mortality (see Morbidity and mortality).
Several independent groups have shown that ghrelin levels are significantly elevated in hyperphagic older children and adults with PWS before and after meals [Cummings et al 2002, Delparigi et al 2002, Haqq et al 2003b]. Ghrelin is a potent circulating orexigenic hormone that is produced mainly in the stomach. Circulating ghrelin levels rise after fasting and are suppressed by food intake. The appetite-inducing effect acts through the appetite regulating pathway in the hypothalamus. Ghrelin levels are lower in non-PWS obese individuals than in lean controls, and they decrease with age [Scerif et al 2011].
A small study of nine non-hyperphagic children with PWS (age 17-60 months) found similar levels of circulating ghrelin as in the eight control children matched for BMI, age, and sex [Erdie-Lalena et al 2006]. By contrast, in a larger and younger study cohort of 40 children and adolescents with PWS (range: 0.2-17.2 years; median age: 3.6 years), ghrelin levels were significantly elevated in the PWS group at any age compared to 84 age- and BMI-matched controls [Feigerlová et al 2008]. In fact, the highest ghrelin levels in PWS were found in the youngest children. Thus, in their study the hyperghrelinemia occurred at an age long before the development of obesity and increased appetite in PWS. Furthermore, several groups have now shown that pharmacologic reduction of ghrelin to normal levels in PWS, using either short- or long-acting agents, did not affect the weight, appetite, or eating behavior in hyperphagic individuals [Haqq et al 2003a, Tan et al 2004, DeWaele et al 2008]. At this time there are no consistently identified hormonal abnormalities to explain the hyperphagia, and the metabolic correlates of hyperphagia in PWS are still uncertain.
Up to 25% of adults with PWS (particularly those with significant obesity) have type 2 diabetes [Butler et al 2002] with a mean age of onset of 20 years.
Central hypothyroidism, with a normal thyroid-stimulating hormone value and low free thyroxine level, has been documented in up to 25% of individuals with PWS, with a mean age of diagnosis and treatment of two years [Miller et al 2008, Diene et al 2010].
Central adrenal insufficiency (CAI) following overnight single-dose metyrapone tests was noted in 60% of children with PWS in one study, suggesting that this may be the cause of the high incidence of sudden death in this population [de Lind van Wijngaarden et al 2008]. It is known that introducing GH therapy can precipitate adrenal crisis in individuals with incipient adrenal insufficiency by accelerating the peripheral metabolism of cortisol, which may explain the correlation between the incidence of sudden death at the beginning of GH treatment and CAI in individuals with PWS [Scaroni et al 2008]. However, subsequent studies have found normal cortisol responses to low- and high-dose synacthen testing, as well as to insulin tolerance testing [Nyunt et al 2010, Farholt et al 2011], so whether CAI is a true issue for individuals with PWS remains uncertain at this time and there is no consensus among endocrinologists as to whether evaluation for CAI should be performed on every individual with PWS or only those with symptoms consistent with adrenal insufficiency.
Sleep abnormalities are well documented and include reduced REM (rapid eye movement) latency, altered sleep architecture, oxygen desaturation, and both central and obstructive apnea [Festen et al 2006, Priano et al 2006]. Primary hypothalamic dysfunction is thought to be the cause of the alterations in sleep microstructure and abnormalities in ventilation during sleep, with studies showing low levels of orexin and hypocretin in the cerebrospinal fluid and decreased levels of acetyl-cholinergic neurons in the pedunculo-pontine tegmental nucleus [Dauvilliers et al 2003, Nevsimalova et al 2005, Bruni et al 2010, Hayashi et al 2011]. Some individuals with PWS have excessive daytime sleepiness, which resembles narcolepsy, with rapid onset of REM sleep and decrease in non-REM sleep instability [Bruni et al 2010].
A characteristic behavior profile with temper tantrums, stubbornness, controlling and manipulative behavior, compulsivity, and difficulty with change in routine becomes evident in early childhood in 70%-90% of individuals with PWS.
Behavioral and psychiatric problems interfere most with the quality of life in adolescence and adulthood.
Short stature, if not apparent in childhood, is almost always present during the second decade in the absence of growth hormone (GH) replacement, and lack of a pubertal growth spurt results in an average untreated height of 155 cm for males and 148 cm for females. The hands and feet grow slowly and are generally below the fifth centile by age ten years, with an average adult female foot size of 20.3 cm and average adult male foot size of 22.3 cm.
Data from at least 15 studies involving more than 300 affected children [Burman et al 2001] document reduced GH secretion in PWS. GH deficiency is also seen in adults with PWS [Grugni et al 2006, Hoybye 2007]
Characteristic facial features (narrow bifrontal diameter, almond-shaped palpebral fissures, narrow nasal bridge, thin upper lip with down-turned mouth) may or may not be apparent at birth and slowly evolve over time.
Hypopigmentation of hair, eyes, and skin resulting from a tyrosinase-positive albinoidism occurs in about one third of affected individuals.
Strabismus is seen in 60%-70%.
Hip dysplasia occurs in approximately 10%-20% [West & Ballock 2004, Shim et al 2010].
Scoliosis, present in 40%-80%, varies in age of onset and severity.
Up to 50% of affected individuals may have recurrent respiratory infections.
Rates of the following are increased:
Morbidity and mortality. Mortality rate in PWS is higher than in controls with intellectual disability, with obesity and its complications being factors [Einfeld et al 2006]. Based on a population study, the death rate has been estimated at 3% per year [Butler et al 2002]. Two multicenter series of individuals who died of PWS have been reported [Schrander-Stumpel et al 2004, Stevenson et al 2004], and an extensive case and literature review of 64 cases of death in PWS was performed [Tauber et al 2008]. Respiratory and other febrile illnesses were the most frequent causes of death in children, and obesity-related cardiovascular problems and gastric causes or sleep apnea were most frequent in adults. Other causes of morbidity include diabetes mellitus, thrombophlebitis, and skin problems (e.g., chronic edema, infection from skin picking).
A few individuals have been reported to have respiratory or gastrointestinal infections resulting in unexpected death; of these, three who died as a result were noted to have small adrenal glands [Stevenson et al 2004], although this is not a common finding. The recent report of central adrenal insufficiency in 60% of tested individuals [de Lind van Wijngaarden et al 2008] suggests a possible explanation for some of these unexpected and sudden deaths.
Acute gastric distention and necrosis have been reported in a number of individuals with PWS [Stevenson et al 2007a], particularly following an eating binge among those who are thin but were previously obese. It may be unrecognized because of high pain threshold and can be fatal.
Choking, especially on hot dogs, has been reported as cause of death in approximately 8% of deaths in individuals with PWS [Stevenson et al 2007b].
Concern about the possible contribution of growth hormone (GH) administration to unexpected death has been raised by reported deaths of individuals within a few months of starting GH therapy [Eiholzer 2005, Sacco & Di Giorgio 2005]. The few reported deaths were mostly in obese individuals who had pre-existing respiratory or cardiac disorders with evidence of upper airway obstruction and uncorrected tonsillar and adenoidal hypertrophy. In the database of one pharmaceutical company, five of 675 children treated with GH died suddenly of respiratory problems [Craig et al 2006]. In another study, the rate of death in affected individuals on and off GH did not differ [Nagai et al 2005]. A study of the natural history of PWS in one region of the UK found the overall death rate of individuals with PWS to be as high as 3% per year without GH therapy [Whittington et al 2001]. Thus, the relationship of GH administration to unexpected death remains unclear. However, a recent long-term study of 48 treated children suggests that the benefits of treatment exceed the risks [Carrel et al 2010].
Neuroimaging. In a recent study, all 20 individuals with PWS who were evaluated had brain abnormalities that were not found in 21 sibs or 16 individuals with early-onset morbid obesity who did not have PWS [Miller et al 2007]. All had ventriculomegaly; 50% had decreased volume of brain tissue in the parietal-occipital lobe; 60% had Sylvan fissure polymicrogyria; and 65% had incomplete insular closure. In another study, these authors reported white matter lesions in some people with PWS [Miller et al 2006]. A study of brain MRIs from 91 individuals with PWS from another group showed reduced pituitary height in 49% and some neuroradiologic abnormality in 67% [Iughetti et al 2007]. The implications of these findings are unknown.
No phenotypic feature is known to correlate exclusively with any one of the molecular classes of mutation that result in PWS. However, there are some statistical differences in the frequency or severity of some features between the two largest molecular classes (deletion and UPD).
UPD
Deletion
Penetrance is complete.
The term HHHO (hypogonadism, hypotonia, hypomentia, obesity) is no longer used.
The condition is sometimes called Willi-Prader syndrome or Prader-Labhart-Willi syndrome.
The estimated prevalence of PWS is 1:10,000 to 1:30,000 in a number of populations.
Many disorders can mimic parts of the PWS phenotype.
Craniopharyngioma and the results of its treatment show the greatest overlap with PWS. Damage to the hypothalamus causes most of the same findings that characterize PWS, particularly when craniopharygioma occurs at an early age. History and, if uncertain, methylation analysis will distinguish craniopharyngioma from PWS.
Hyperphagic short stature is an acquired condition related to psychosocial stress that includes growth hormone insufficiency, hyperphagia, and mild learning disabilities [Gilmour et al 2001]. History and, if uncertain, methylation analysis should distinguish this disorder from PWS.
Hypotonia in infancy is also seen in the following conditions:
Developmental delay/intellectual disability and obesity with or without hypogonadism can be seen in the following disorders:
Cytogenetic abnormalities including the following:
Features similar to those of PWS in the presence of joint contractures suggest Urban-Roger, Camera, or Vasquez syndromes, all of which are rare.
Careful clinical evaluation by a medical geneticist or other trained diagnostician is useful to direct testing appropriately and may avoid the unnecessary expense of molecular testing for diagnoses that are less likely based on clinical findings.
Note to clinicians: For a patient-specific ‘simultaneous consult’ related to this disorder, go to
, an interactive diagnostic decision support software tool that provides differential diagnoses based on patient findings (registration or institutional access required).
Management of the manifestations of PWS is age-dependent and should include both addressing the consequences of the syndrome and anticipatory guidance. It is recommended that a team approach be used, if possible. Several approaches to management have been published recently [McCandless 2011, Cassidy & McCandless 2010, Eiholzer & Whitman 2004, Butler et al 2006, Goldstone et al 2008, Cassidy & Driscoll 2009, Cassidy et al 2012].
To establish the extent of disease in an individual diagnosed with Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS), the following evaluations are recommended:
A team approach to management is recommended [Eiholzer & Whitman 2004, Cassidy 2005].
Special feeding techniques, including special nipples or gavage feeding, may be necessary for the first weeks to months of life to assure adequate nutrition and avoid failure to thrive.
Early intervention in children under age three years, particularly physical therapy, may improve muscle strength and encourage achievement of developmental milestones. In older individuals, daily muscle training increases physical activity and lean body mass [Schlumpf et al 2006].
Cryptorchidism may resolve spontaneously, even up to adolescence, but usually requires hormonal and surgical approaches; however, preservation of fertility is not an issue. Standard treatment is appropriate. Human chorionic gonadotropin treatment for infants with undescended testes should be considered as it can improve the size of the scrotal sac and improve surgical outcome [McCandless 2011; Angulo & Miller, unpublished data].
Management of strabismus is as for any infant.
When hyperphagia begins or weight centiles are increasing (often age 2-4 years), a program of a well-balanced, low-calorie diet, regular exercise, and close supervision to minimize food stealing should be instituted to prevent obesity and its consequences. The same program is appropriate if obesity is present at any time. Consultation with a dietician and close follow-up are usually necessary, and locking the kitchen, refrigerator, and/or cupboards is often needed once the child is able to open the refrigerator and cupboards. The energy requirement of people with PWS, which rarely exceeds 1000 to 1200 Kcal/day, should be considered in planning daily food intake. Assessment of adequacy of vitamin and mineral intake by a dietician, and prescription of appropriate supplementation, is indicated, especially for calcium and vitamin D.
Growth hormone treatment normalizes height, increases lean body mass, decreases fat mass, and increases mobility, which are beneficial to weight management. Dose recommendations in young children are generally similar to those for individuals with isolated growth hormone deficiency, i.e., about 1 mg/m2, but dose must be individualized as the child grows. It can be started in infancy or at the time of diagnosis. The adult dose of growth hormone is 20%-25% of the dose recommended in children.
Controlled trials of growth hormone therapies have demonstrated significant benefit from infancy through adulthood [Lindgren et al 1997, Carrel et al 1999, Ritzén et al 1999, Eiholzer et al 2000, Mogul et al 2000, Carrel et al 2002, Carrel et al 2004, Eiholzer & Whitman 2004, Hoybye 2004, Whitman et al 2004, Hoybye et al 2005, Hoybye 2007, Myers et al 2007, Mogul et al 2008, Sode-Carlsen et al 2010].
Initiate appropriate educational programming in children.
Behavioral disturbance should be addressed with behavioral management programs, including firm limit setting. While no medication is beneficial in managing behavior in all individuals with PWS, serotonin reuptake inhibitors have helped the largest proportion of affected teenagers and adults, particularly those with obsessive-compulsive symptoms [Brice 2000, Dykens & Shah 2003].
Psychosis is reported to respond well to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, but not to mood stabilizers [Soni et al 2007]. There are no well-designed studies of the effectiveness of treatment for psychosis in PWS [Ho & Dimitropoulos, 2010].
Replacement of sex hormones produces adequate secondary sexual characteristics but is somewhat controversial because of the possible role of testosterone replacement in behavior problems in males and the role of estrogen replacement in the risk of stroke as well as hygiene concerns related to menstruation in females. Daily use of the testosterone patch or gel, or use of slow-release testosterone injection every three months, may avert exacerbation of behavioral problems by providing a more even blood level. Concern about osteoporosis should be considered in deciding about hormone replacement. Recent reports of fertility in four women with PWS raise the issue of need for birth control [Akefeldt et al 1999; Schulze et al 2001; Vats & Cassidy, unpublished data].
Management of scoliosis, hip dysplasia, and complications of obesity is as in the general population.
Decreased saliva production can be addressed with products developed for the treatment of dry mouth, including special toothpastes, gels, mouthwash, and gum.
Disturbed sleep in children and adults should prompt a sleep study, as treatment may be available. Treatment depends on the cause and may include tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy and/or CPAP, as in the general population.
There is a high prevalence of excessive daytime sleepiness, unrelated to the degree of sleep apnea, in individuals with PWS. Modafinil has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment for this condition [De Cock et al 2011].
For adults with PWS, one successful living situation for behavior and weight management is a group home specially designated for individuals with PWS. Affected individuals generally require a sheltered employment environment.
Issues of guardianship, wills, trusts, and advocacy should be investigated no later than adolescence.
Obesity may be prevented if the diet, exercise, and supervision program described in Treatment of Manifestations is instituted.
If started at a young age, growth hormone treatment, along with good dietary control, may prevent or retard obesity and the high proportion of fat mass. It may also prevent development of the typical facial appearance.
Diabetes mellitus rarely occurs in the absence of obesity.
Calcium and vitamin D supplementation may be beneficial, as low-calorie diets are often low in dairy products and osteoporosis has been documented in the majority of older children and adults with PWS.
If osteoporosis develops, consider treatment with a bisphosphonate.
Although no formal study exists, individuals with PWS tend to be very sensitive to medications of all kinds. Starting with lower doses is recommended.
Recently health supervision guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) were published [McCandless 2011; click
for full text].
To assure appropriateness of exercise program and diet, including adequacy of vitamin and mineral intake, monitor height, weight, and BMI (weight in kg/height in m2):
Cryptorchidism can recur after orchidopexy; therefore, testicular position should be monitored.
Evaluate for the presence of diabetes mellitus by standard methods (e.g., obtaining glycosylated hemoglobin concentration and/or glucose tolerance test) in anyone with significant obesity or rapid significant weight gain.
Test annually for hypothyroidism, including free T4 and TSH levels.
Obtain history of any sleep disturbance and obtain a sleep study if present.
Monitor for development of scoliosis clinically or, in the presence of obesity, radiographically at least annually.
Perform bone densitometry by DEXA to evaluate for possible osteoporosis every two years in adulthood.
Obtain history for behavioral and psychiatric disturbance at least annually.
See Genetic Counseling for issues related to testing of at-risk relatives for genetic counseling purposes.
Treatment of individuals with PWS with octreotide, a somatostatin agonist, decreased ghrelin concentrations but did not change eating behavior in several studies [Haqq et al 2003b, Tan et al 2004, De Waele et al 2008].
One study demonstrated decreased skin picking with topiramate treatment in some individuals [Shapira et al 2004] and other clinicians have anecdotally found similar results whereby about half of individuals with PWS who skin pick benefit from low-dose (25-50 mg daily) topiramate.
Search ClinicalTrials.gov for access to information on clinical studies for a wide range of diseases and conditions.
No medications are known to aid in controlling hyperphagia.
Gastric bypass is contraindicated in PWS since it does not seem to correct the lack of satiety and will not prevent overeating. In addition, complication rates are high [Scheimann et al 2012].
The only study of the use of coenzyme Q10 for one year in children younger than age two years did not show improvement in body composition [Eiholzer 2004].
Genetic counseling is the process of providing individuals and families with information on the nature, inheritance, and implications of genetic disorders to help them make informed medical and personal decisions. The following section deals with genetic risk assessment and the use of family history and genetic testing to clarify genetic status for family members. This section is not meant to address all personal, cultural, or ethical issues that individuals may face or to substitute for consultation with a genetics professional. —ED.
Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) is caused by lack of expression of the paternally derived PWS/AS region of chromosome 15q11.2-q13 by one of several genetic mechanisms.
Parents of a proband
Table 3. Risks to Sibs of a Proband with PWS by Genetic Mechanism
| Molecular Class | Proportion of PWS by Molecular Class | Genetic Mechanism | Risk to Sibs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ia | 65%-75% | 5-6 Mb deletion | <1% |
| Ib | <1% | Chromosomal rearrangement | Possibly as high as 50% |
| IIa | 20%-30% | Maternal UPD | <1% |
| IIb | <1% | Maternal UPD with predisposing parental translocation or marker chromosome | Increased. Can vary from <1% to 100% |
| IIIa | <0.5% | ID with deletion in the IC | As high as 50% if father also has IC deletion |
| IIIb | 2% | Epimutation - ID without deletion in the IC | <1% |
UPD = uniparental disomy
ID = imprinting defect
IC = imprinting center
Ia. Fathers of individuals with deletions should have chromosomal and FISH analyses to determine if they have a chromosomal rearrangement. For probands with a de novo large deletion, the risk to sibs is less than 1%. Germline mosaicism for these large deletions has been reported on rare occasion [Kokkonen & Leisti 2000].
Ib. If a chromosome rearrangement or small gene region deletion has been identified in a proband, the risks to sibs and other family members depends on whether the rearrangement is paternally inherited or de novo [Cassidy et al 2012].
IIa. Maternal UPD 15 is typically de novo with a recurrence risk to sibs of less than 1% except if a Robertsonian translocation is present in either parent. Therefore chromosome analysis is indicated in the proband. If this does not identify a chromosome abnormality, the father of the child should be offered a chromosome analysis to ensure that he does not have a Robertsonian translocation. It is presumed that the mother does not have a Robertsonian translocation since the two maternal chromosomes 15 are normal in the proband. However, it is theoretically possible that the father has a Robertsonian translocation involving chromosome 15 which led to aberrant segregation at meiosis I and resulted in a sperm that was nullisomic for 15. This, combined with monosomy rescue to disomy, would result in an embryo with maternal UPD 15.
IIb. Individuals with UPD should have chromosomal analysis to ensure that they do not have a maternally inherited Robertsonian translocation that would theoretically increase the family's recurrence risk. In rare cases, UPD has resulted from malsegregation of a Robertsonian translocation and subsequent trisomy rescue. Empiric data suggest that the risk for recurrence in most of these cases would also be less than 1%, although the theoretic risk would be much higher.
If the mother has a 15/15 Robertsonian translocation, trisomy rescue will lead to PWS. If the father has a 15/15 Robertsonian translocation, monosomy rescue will lead to PWS. While most parents with a 15/15 Robertsonian translocation will probably have spontaneous abortions rather than PWS, but some may have a live-born child with PWS by the mechanisms described above.
Rarely, a small marker chromosome is also present in a proband with maternal UPD 15 [Liehr et al 2005]. In these instances it is important to examine both parents’ karyotype since it appears that these small marker chromosomes may increase the risk for non-disjunction and UPD [Kotzot 2002].
IIIa. People with PWS caused by an imprinting defect (ID) should be tested for an IC deletion by a lab experienced in detecting them. About 15% of those with an ID have it on the basis of a microdeletion in the IC. In about half of these individuals the IC deletion is familial and the familial recurrence risk is 50%. Therefore, fathers of children with an IC deletion should have DNA methylation and dosage analysis (or sequence analysis) in the PWS SRO to determine if they carry the IC deletion.
IIIb. The majority (about 85%) of those with an ID have a de novo epigenetic mutation and the recurrence risk to sibs is less than 1% for this group.
Offspring of a proband
Other family members. If a chromosome rearrangement (e.g., translocation or inversion) is identified in the proband and a parent, the sibs of the carrier parent should be offered genetic counseling and the option of genetic testing.
Family planning
DNA banking is the storage of DNA (typically extracted from white blood cells) for possible future use. Because it is likely that testing methodology and our understanding of genes, mutations, and diseases will improve in the future, consideration should be given to banking DNA of affected individuals.
High risk. Families who have a child with PWS should be aware that prenatal testing for PWS is possible, although most molecular mechanisms leading to PWS will not be detected by standard prenatal chromosome analysis. FISH, CMA, DNA methylation analysis, MS-MLPA, and DNA polymorphism studies for UPD have been validated in prenatal diagnosis, but only DNA methylation analysis (including MS-MLPA) at the 5’ SNRPN locus will identify the imprinting defects [Kubota et al 1996, Glenn et al 2000, Ramsden et al 2010]. While prenatal detection of all three molecular classes of PWS is possible through analysis of DNA extracted from cells obtained by chorionic villus sampling (usually performed at ~10-12 weeks' gestation) or amniocentesis (usually performed at ~15-18 weeks' gestation), it should be noted that only a few clinical labs have the experience to use DNA methylation analysis in prenatal diagnosis and these labs typically prefer to use amniocytes (versus chorionic villi) for analysis because of the known hypomethylation of tissue derived from the placenta [Driscoll & Migeon 1990, Glenn et al 2000].
Note: (1). Prenatal testing should only be undertaken after molecular confirmation of PWS has been established in the individual and the couple has been counseled regarding the risk to the unborn child.
Note: Gestational age is expressed as menstrual weeks calculated either from the first day of the last normal menstrual period or by ultrasound measurements.
Low risk. For low-risk pregnancies in which no family history of PWS exists, PWS may be a possibility:
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) may be an option for some families in which an IC deletion has been identified. PGD can also be used in cases of familial translocation to rule out UPD.
GeneReviews staff has selected the following disease-specific and/or umbrella support organizations and/or registries for the benefit of individuals with this disorder and their families. GeneReviews is not responsible for the information provided by other organizations. For information on selection criteria, click here.
Information in the Molecular Genetics and OMIM tables may differ from that elsewhere in the GeneReview: tables may contain more recent information. —ED.
Table A. Prader-Willi Syndrome: Genes and Databases
| Critical Region | Gene Symbol | Chromosomal Locus | Protein Name |
|---|---|---|---|
| PWCR | Unknown | 15q11 | Unknown |
Table B. OMIM Entries for Prader-Willi Syndrome (View All in OMIM)
| 137142 | GAMMA-AMINOBUTYRIC ACID RECEPTOR, ALPHA-5; GABRA5 |
| 137192 | GAMMA-AMINOBUTYRIC ACID RECEPTOR, BETA-3; GABRB3 |
| 176270 | PRADER-WILLI SYNDROME; PWS |
| 182279 | SMALL NUCLEAR RIBONUCLEOPROTEIN POLYPEPTIDE N; SNRPN |
| 600161 | PRADER-WILLI/ANGELMAN REGION TRANSCRIPT 1 |
| 600233 | GAMMA-AMINOBUTYRIC ACID RECEPTOR, GAMMA-3; GABRG3 |
| 601491 | IMPRINTED IN PRADER-WILLI SYNDROME; IPW |
| 601623 | UBIQUITIN-PROTEIN LIGASE E3A; UBE3A |
| 602117 | NECDIN; NDN |
| 603856 | MAKORIN 3; MKRN3 |
| 603857 | MKRN3 ANTISENSE RNA; MKRN3AS |
| 605283 | MAGE-LIKE 2; MAGEL2 |
| 605436 | SMALL NUCLEOLAR RNA, C/D BOX, 116-1; SNORD116-1 |
| 605837 | HECT DOMAIN AND RCC1-LIKE DOMAIN 2; HERC2 |
| 605855 | ATPase, CLASS V, TYPE 10A; ATP10A |
| 609837 | SMALL NUCLEOLAR RNA, C/D BOX, 115-1; SNORD115-1 |
| 610922 | NUCLEAR PORE ASSOCIATED PROTEIN 1; NPAP1 |
| 611215 | PRADER-WILLI REGION NONCODING RNA 1; PWRN1 |
| 611409 | OCA2 GENE |
The PWS region is localized to a 5-6 Mb genomic region on the proximal long arm of chromosome 15 (15q11.2-q13) (Figure 2). It lies within a smaller 2.5-Mb differentially imprinted region. PWS is a contiguous gene disorder, since studies thus far indicate that the complete phenotype is due to the loss of expression of several genes. It is also an example of an imprinted condition, since the expression of relevant genes in the 15q11.2-q13 region is dependent on parental origin [Glenn et al 1997, Bittel et al 2006].
The genomic and epigenetic changes causing PWS all lead to a loss of expression of the normally paternally expressed genes on chromosome 15q11.2-q13. Absence of the paternally inherited copy of these genes, or failure to express them, causes total absence of expression for those genes in the affected individual because the maternal contribution for these genes has been programmed by epigenetic factors to be silenced [Glenn et al 1997, Cassidy & Driscoll 2009]. Conversely, a loss of expression of preferentially maternally expressed UBE3A in this region by several different possible mechanisms leads to Angelman syndrome [Lossie et al 2001, Williams et al 2010].
The 15q11.2-q13 region can be roughly divided into four distinct regions which are delineated by three common deletion breakpoints [Christian et al 1999] lying within segmental duplications [Amos-Landgraf et al 1999] (see Figure 2):
Central to the PWS region is SNURF-SNRPN. It is a bicistronic gene encoding two different proteins. At the 5’ end of SNURF-SNRPN is a CpG island encompassing the promoter, exon 1 and intron 1. This is a differentially methylated region which is unmethylated on the paternally inherited expressed allele and methylated on the maternally inherited repressed allele [Glenn et al 1996]. The CpG island and exon 1 are within the 4.3 kb smallest region of deletion overlap (SRO) for the paternal PWS imprinting center (IC) [Ohta et al 1999]. SNURF-SNRPN also serves as the host for the six snoRNA genes located telomerically which are regulated by the expression of SNURF-SNRPN. The UBE3A antisense transcript also arises from transcription of SNURF-SNRPN and is thought to lead to repression of the paternally inherited UBE3A in humans and mice [Cavaillé et al 2000, Chamberlain & Brannan 2001, Runte et al 2001].
The snoRNAs are present in single copy except for SNORD116 (previously named HBII-85) and SNORD115 (previously named HBII-52), which are present in 29 and 42 copies, respectively. It is thought that the snoRNAs are probably involved in the modification of mRNA by alternative splicing and that each snoRNA gene may have multiple targets. However, at the present time only one target for a snoRNA gene (i.e., SNORD115) has been found and that is the serotonin 2C receptor [Kishore & Stamm 2006]. No targets have yet been found for SNORD116.
The exact function of each of the genes in determining the PWS phenotype remains to be elucidated, although possible insight has been gained by work with mouse models by multiple investigators. No single gene mutation that will explain all the features of PWS has been found in humans, unlike the situation in AS where single gene mutations of UBE3A fulfill all the major clinical criteria for AS [Lossie et al 2001, Williams et al 2010]. However, a “key” region to explain much of the PWS phenotype has been narrowed to the SNORD116 snoRNA gene cluster by several unique deletion and translocation families [reviewed by Buiting 2010]. A crucial role for the SNORD115 locus was eliminated by an AS family with a familial microdeletion that included the entire SNORD115 cluster and the UBE3A locus [Runte et al 2005]. There was no obvious phenotype when this microdeletion was passed paternally, but it resulted in AS when inherited maternally.
Critical region. PWS/AS critical region
Normal allelic variants. The following genes have been mapped within the PWS/AS region:
Pathologic allelic variants. Most cases of PWS result from an interstitial microdeletion of the paternally inherited 15q11.2-q13 region [Ledbetter et al 1981, Butler & Palmer 1983, Glenn et al 1997]. Deletions account for 65%-75% of individuals with PWS. The vast majority of individuals with deletions have one of two common proximal breakpoints (BP1 or BP2) and a common distal breakpoint (BP3) (see Figure 2) [Christian et al 1995, Amos-Landgraf et al 1999]. These recurrent common interstitial deletions measure about 5-6 Mb in size and are caused by the presence of multiple copies of tandemly repeated sequences at the common breakpoints (BP1, BP2 and BP3) flanking the deleted region. These low copy repeat sequences stretch for about 250-400 kb and can cause non-homologous pairing and aberrant recombination of the 15q11.2-q13 region during meiosis, leading to deletions (causing PWS or AS depending on parental origin), duplications (both maternal and paternal), triplications, and inverted dup (15) [Robinson et al 1998, Amos-Landgraf et al 1999, Boyar et al 2001, Maggouta et al 2003, Depienne et al 2009]. In addition, about 8% of those had unique or atypical-sized deletions (i.e., not type 1 or 2) from a variety of etiologies, including an unbalanced translocation [Kim et al 2012]. A deletion that is smaller or larger than typically seen in PWS may affect the phenotype.
Small deletions of the promoter region and the proximal upstream region of SNRPN (including the putative imprinting control element) have been identified in individuals with PWS who have maternal-specific DNA methylation patterns, but who have neither the usual large paternally derived deletion of the PWS/AS region nor maternal UPD. This pattern is considered an ID via an IC microdeletion.
Other individuals have biparental inheritance, but maternal-only DNA methylation patterns in this region without detectable abnormalities in the SRO for the IC. These individuals are considered to have an ID by an epimutation.
Recently there have been three separate reports of three different individuals with overlapping microdeletions (175 to 236 kb) that all encompass the SNORD116 gene cluster [Sahoo et al 2008, de Smith et al 2009, Duker et al 2010]. All three have multiple clinical features typical of PWS including neonatal hypotonia, infantile feeding problems, rapid weight gain by two years of age, hyperphagia, hypogonadism, developmental delay/intellectual disability, and speech and behavioral problems. However, these three individuals also have features not typical of classical PWS, including tall stature as a child, large head circumference, lack of a “PWS facial gestalt”, and hand features not typical of PWS. Furthermore, rigorous neurobehavioral studies have not been performed to determine if these individuals have the typical PWS behavioral phenotype. Nonetheless, it is clear from these studies that absence of the paternally derived SNORD116 cluster plays a major role in the PWS phenotype.
Normal gene product. The only identified protein products are those for SNRPN and MKRN3. SNRPN is a small nuclear ribonucleoprotein involved in alternative mRNA splicing.
Abnormal gene product. Unknown
Imprinting. Several of the genes in the PWS region (SNURF-SNRPN, MKRN3, NDN, MAGEL2, C15orf2, PWRN1) are subject to genomic imprinting, thus accounting for the fact that the PWS phenotype results only when the paternally contributed PWS region is absent. DNA methylation, which is involved in the process of genomic imprinting, has been demonstrated for several of the genes identified within the PWS region [Glenn et al 1996, Glenn et al 1997, MacDonald & Wevrick 1997]. Upstream of SNRPN, very small deletions of the putative imprinting control element for the region have been identified in a few individuals with PWS who have maternal-specific DNA methylation patterns but have neither the usual large paternally derived deletion of the PWS/AS region nor maternal UPD [Saitoh et al 1997, Ohta et al 1999]. Other individuals demonstrate sporadic imprinting defects that are epimutations [Buiting et al 1998, Buiting et al 2003].
Medical Genetic Searches: A specialized PubMed search designed for clinicians that is located on the PubMed Clinical Queries page 
For more information, see the GeneReviews Copyright Notice and Usage Disclaimer.
For questions regarding permissions: admasst/at/uw.edu.
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...